Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





2010 Ford Taurus

1246725

Comments

  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    The E350 only has 268 hp - why are you comparing it to a 365 hp Taurus SHO? The 263 HP Taurus starts at $27K and is still at least $10K cheaper than the E350 nicely equipped.

    For a true comparison you need to select the E550 4matic (AWD) and 382 hp. It STARTS at $60K.

    And I wouldn't be surprised if the Taurus was bigger than the E class to boot.

    Try comparing apples to apples next time.
  • podpod Posts: 176
    This is an enthusiasts magazine and the audience may be quite different than the standard car buyer. The nonSHO tauruses are pretty much a known item, carrying over most of the 2009 basics. The SHO is a totally new breed. I wonder how many people will hold back the first year to see the track record (resale value wise and repair wise) especially given the economy. The old saw about not buying a car in its first year of existence might see a slow start and then a gradual acceptance as the performance and reliability data come in. Granted it will take more than a year to set resale values. Hopefully there will be a significant change in the way tauruses have depreciated in the past. On the other hand, enthusiasts are willing to take the gamble given the very newness of this new powerful machine.
  • NASCAR Mike was making light of the fact that $40K is a lot of money for most American sedan buyers. The comparison was not a direct one.

    Ford has a winner with the new Taurus but it is priced too high. Most nicely equipped offerings are $32K-$33K or about 10% above where they should be.

    We all know that someone who plunks down $32K today for a well equipped SEL will have a $22K car 6 months from now. The Asian and European makes will depreciate half that much in the same timeframe.

    I may be interested in a $19K 2010 Taurus with 10,000 miles on it next fall though.
    ;) They'll be plenty around for under $20K soon.
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    The new Taurus is a desirable car that's not being overproduced and isn't being dumped into rental fleets. You can't predict depreciation based on past vehicles.

    People who say the new Taurus is overpriced simply have no idea how much a new car costs or what the competition offers. The new Taurus isn't a bargain, but go compare it to imports of similar SIZE and features - it's priced competitively.
  • I agree on price. I spec'd out an Avalon XL with cloth and little 16" wheels. It was more expensive sticker wise a paddle-shift Taurus SEL with leather, Sync, and a popular option package. Wasn't rolling on funny looking tiny wheels either.
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    Exactly. I think some people just like to complain or simply haven't priced the competition lately.

    Or they want to buy one and can't.
  • Right akirby - we have no idea how much a car costs.

    A used 2010 Toyota Avalon will be worth $27K next year and the comparable Ford Taurus will be worth $19K.

    Facts are facts. Your opinion that past depreciation doesn't predict future depreciation is what Detroit has been praying for for 25 years. It hasn't helped yet.
  • A used 2010 Toyota Avalon will be worth $27K next year and the comparable Ford Taurus will be worth $19K
    May be true, but not many of us buy a car one year and get rid of it the next. For those of us who keep a car for eight or ten years the depreciation is of little concern.
    In fact I pay a property tax annually on the value of my vehicles. So, in this case, faster depreciation may be a plus.
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    The point you're totally missing (on purpose?) is that Ford has changed the things that caused poor resale value in the past. Reliability is no longer an issue. They're no longer overproducing and putting huge rebates on the hood of new cars or dumping cars into rental fleets.

    I don't know what the resale value will be on a 2010 Taurus - and neither do you. We'll just have to wait and see.
  • I won't argue with you on re-sale value. Of course for people who keep their cars 10 years, re-sale value is no concern.

    Ford put a decent body on and interior in the 2010 Taurus. Everything "under the skin" is the same as 2009. Used 2009 Ford Taurus' with 15,000 miles on the clock are available for half of sticker price today. I'm glad I didn't buy one for $34K last year when I can get one today for $17K. ;)

    I've taken a bath on used Ford's I've traded in. Used Honda's were a much better story.
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    And the 2009 models were boring and had big discounts to move them. If you parked a 2009 and 2010 side by side only a handfull of automotive enthusiasts would know they used the same platform. They're totally different, inside and out. Even the front clip was modified to handle the SHO engine output.
  • Not everything under the skin is exactly the same. The suspension has been improved, the engine made more responsive, the transmission programming improved, much more sound insulation, stiffining and reinforcing of the body. This is called refinement. I hate road noise and Hondas have plenty of that. Besides, the new Taurus makes a visual impact which i like. Nobody even notices another boring Honda with good resale value.
  • gregg_vwgregg_vw Posts: 2,419
    Resale value is overblown. You have to compare what you actually paid when you bought the car (not "sticker") to what you get when you sell it. Yes, Hondas generally command higher resale, but also usually cost more when first bought (commanding prices closer to sticker). When you compare a five year old Ford to a five year old Toyota, the Ford buyer is still often money ahead because of the huge discounts on the front end. If Ford can command prices closer to list on the 2010 Taurus, then resale will be higher as well. If discounts and rebates grow, resale will drop. It is more or less supply and demand.
  • To each his own, but don't get me wrong. The '10 Taurus is a good car - no question there. I just wish they would price a well-equipped Limited under $30K and not $35K where Lexus lurks with their ES350.

    I understand Ford is trying to take the Taurus up-market but they went a bit too far. At the high end they are very close to Lincoln type pricing.

    Maybe that's their goal. Eliminate Merc.
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    The plan is to move Ford upmarket and then move Lincoln even further upmarket. But the Lincoln piece is still under development, so there's more overlap now between the Taurus and MKS than Ford intends long term. It's a temporary situation.

    The Taurus Limited is a MUCH bigger car than the ES350 and has more features. Why shouldn't it be priced the same? What does the Lexus have that makes it worth $5K more than a Taurus Limited?

    I'm so sick and tired of people saying that the Taurus is overpriced just because it's a Ford. Look at the car and not the badge.
  • The 3.5L EcoBoost V6 is a nice, and most highly likely, reliable engine. But, smooth it is not, compared to many of the Asian V6 counterparts. When one spends $30K to $40K on a car, you expect a refined and smooth engine. This is where the Honda and Toyota V6 engines shine, and even the Hyundai 3.8L V6 is a smooth one, albeit less refined than either the Honda or Toyota. The 3.5L EcoBoost has a certain harsh nature through the full RPM range that the others' do not, and yes, I've driven all of the aforementioned vehicle/engine combos. And, I won't even discuss the refined and smooth nature of the BMW I6 engine.

    I really wish Ford the best on this, as compared to Chrysler and GM, they're on a roll with good products in each market segment.
  • Look at the car and not the badge.

    //////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

    Bingo! That Blue Oval is a tough sell when you move up-market. For decades Ford has been an entry level brand. That image will take time to change.

    The new Fusion is a better buy than than the new Taurus. For $22K I can get an I4 Fusion with the options I want. Hard to justify a Taurus from my end but many others may have more means than myself. ;)
  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    Isn't Toyota also an "entry level" brand? Have you priced an Avalon lately? That is the Taurus' direct competition, not the ES350.

    The Avalon STARTS at $28,695. A fully loaded FWD model is $38,985.

    The Taurus starts at $25,995. A fully loaded FWD model is $38,580.

    Please explain to me how the Taurus is overpriced when it's cheaper and better than the Avalon?
  • The 2010 Taurus is too expensive, period.

    Looks like the Ford salespeople and PR people have taken notice of this thread.

    Instead of arguing, just pile on that incentive cash, nice and deep, like you know you're going to have to. ;)
  • berriberri Posts: 4,000
    People aren't likely to spend around $40K on any Ford or Chevy sedan, probably not an an Accord or Camry either. That's too close to Audi, Acura and Lexus pricing which carries a better prestige image and better depreciation. In fact, luxury sales are down so there are some great deals on them right now. Good timing Ford!

    Ford always messes up initial pricing (maybe too big of egos in Dearborn) and ends up having to incentivize heavily which screws over the initial buyers. Wait 6 months on this one and you'll probably save a bundle. Someday Ford may learn how to market. They should be aggresively pricing these new vehicles like the new GM is doing against the import brand competition. Get people into the dealerships and cars first, then down the road they can price more closely.

    I hope Detroit has improved on turbocharging. I remember Mopar getting into this in the 80's I believe. I had a few rentals with it and it sucked. Driving was like spooling up a jet engine but without the guts. Way too much lag time and too abrupt when it did kick in.
Sign In or Register to comment.