Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Chrysler Allies With Fiat

12021222325

Comments

  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,594
    Heck, if it's big enough to suit my needs, and I like the way it looks in person, I'd consider one. My real lust right now is a Charger, though, although if I do make the spring for a new car, it would probably be something a bit more frugal/economical.
  • fezofezo Posts: 9,195
    Really?? Unless you're a Mopar fanatic,

    You DO remember who you are talking to, right? :D

    Andre - you are the first one I thought of when I hear this.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Oh I know who I'm talking to.

    I use "you're" in the euphamistic manner as in "the collective world".
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Posts: 4,120
    edited December 2011
    For those who remember the old generation Darts, I think "Dart" has a positive connotation, overall. Some associate it with stodgy and boring, but Valiants and Darts were arguably the best compacts available in their day.

    I think it's a smart move to revive the old name for Dodge's '13 compact. Of course, how the car leverages the name will depend on the product, as comparisons will surely be made between the new and old Darts.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    I think it's a smart move to revive the old name for Dodge's '13 compact.

    I think it's a smart move but not for the reason you list. The target market will have zero recollection of the old Dart that went away close to 40 years ago. That's why it's smart to re-use it. The last boring Dart won't act as baggage for this modern vehicle. The Dart name today will be marketed as an agile, swift vehicle as the name implies.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,594
    The Dart name today will be marketed as an agile, swift vehicle as the name implies.

    I wonder if mischievous youngsters will try to pry the "D" off, and fit it with the "F" off of a Ford product, like they would occasionally do back in the day? :P
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Probably not as I think few automakers actully use individual letters for the badges anymore.

    I saw a Passat wagon the other day (not mine) that the owner removed the "A" and replaced it with the "T" with it's arms removed. "PISSA" to us Bostonians means something that is too cool ie Tom Brady is a wicked pissa quarterback.
  • Stever@EdmundsStever@Edmunds YooperlandPosts: 38,985
    The H you say. :D
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Does Honda use individual letters still?
  • berriberri Posts: 4,007
    The target market will have zero recollection of the old Dart that went away close to 40 years ago.

    Probably true. But those that do will be a positive because the Dart always had a reputation as a good, reliable decent looking vehicle back then.
  • Stever@EdmundsStever@Edmunds YooperlandPosts: 38,985
    At least on the front, as does Hyundai.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Probably true. But those that do will be a positive because the Dart always had a reputation as a good, reliable decent looking vehicle back then.

    But will those 70-90 year olds be out there buying Darts?

    I'm under 50 and remember the last Darts. Good looking is not an attribute I'd use to describe them. IMHO they were neutered refreshes of the late 60's Dart.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Posts: 16,897
    But those '60s Darts weren't exactly all recycling fodder by the time some of us young'ins started driving. I'm under 40 but have some good memories of a '64 and, I believe, a '68 Dart growing up.

    '13 Stang GT; '86 Benz 300E; '98 Volvo S70; '12 Leaf; '08 Town&Country

  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,594
    I'm under 50 and remember the last Darts. Good looking is not an attribute I'd use to describe them. IMHO they were neutered refreshes of the late 60's Dart.

    You really have to consider the whole Dart history though, and not just focus on those few sad final years. Using the final Dart to sum up the whole lineup is like picking 1974 to represent the Mustang or GTO!

    I'd imagine most people under 50, when they think of a Dart, are going to think of the hot '67-69 models, which sported engines on up to the 440 Wedge and 426 Hemi, or the 340 and 360 powered Swingers, Demons, and Dart sports of the 70's. They're not going to be thinking about Grandpa's baby-poop brown '76 Dart Custom sedan with the slant six and the AM-only radio!

    Also, the Dart seemed to hang around for a long, long time after 1976. Used examples were plying the streets and a common sight long after most equivalent cars had been disposed of. So, it might still be fairly fresh in the memory of lot more younger people than something like an old Nova, Falcon, or Granada might be.
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Your opinion doesn't count - you'd fight to the death to protect the image of a Volare!! Admit it - you would.

    I guess my memories of muscle car Darts have been replaced by my uncle's poop brown 76 sedan. To think he replaced a GTO with that.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,594
    Your opinion doesn't count - you'd fight to the death to protect the image of a Volare!! Admit it - you would.

    Well, the Volare had its good points and bad. The '76-77 models were horrible rusters, but in '78-80 they were no worse than anything else out there.

    My grandmother's cousin had a '79 Volare wagon, two-tone black over silver with a red interior, that was actually pretty sharp looking. She wanted to sell it in 1996, and I would've bought it, but another family member beat me to it. It was still shiny and rust-free by that time, but IIRC, the passenger door wouldn't open, the a/c didn't work, and the headliner was sagging. But she only wanted $300 for it.

    So instead, I bought a 1979 Newport I found in the junkyard for $250. Still ran good, but the transmission was shot.

    I guess my memories of muscle car Darts have been replaced by my uncle's poop brown 76 sedan. To think he replaced a GTO with that.

    My grandparents on my Dad's side of the family had a '75 Dart Swinger, in a light creme/beige color. It used to stall out on them all the time, and the dealer never could fix it, so they traded it on a new Granada in '77, which promptly ate its transmission. But instead of dwelling on that '75 Dart, I try to block it from my memory! :P

    And, to be fair, it was 1975. I have a feeling just about anything you bought in '75 would've been crap. Although, my Mom bought a new LeMans that year, and other than needing a new distributor within a year or two, it wasn't bad. Until Dad hit a tree with it in '77. It got fixed, but never ran right after that. :sick:
  • robr2robr2 BostonPosts: 7,601
    Well, the Volare had its good points and bad. The '76-77 models were horrible rusters, but in '78-80 they were no worse than anything else out there.

    See I told you that you could defend the Volare. Now justify the Chrysler TC by Maserati!!

    :)
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,594
    See I told you that you could defend the Volare. Now justify the Chrysler TC by Maserati!!

    No. I have to draw the line somewhere! :shades:

    Oh, and back on the Volare tangent. In 1994 I looked at a '78 or '79 that someone was selling locally. It was a coupe, had the 360-4bbl, and was rust-free, although it had a big dent in one of the rear quarters, and the ignition was busted, so you could start it by sticking anything that would fit in there. Seller only wanted $500 for it.

    I drove it, and thought it was inferior in just about every way to the '68 Dart I was driving at the time.
  • Stever@EdmundsStever@Edmunds YooperlandPosts: 38,985
    "1989 Chrysler TC by Maserati: Stupid combination of front-drive K-Car bits, indifferent Maserati assembly in Italy and a two-seat roadster body that was indistinguishable from a LeBaron. It's both the worst Maserati and worst Chrysler ever."

    It made #15 on IL's 100 Worst Cars of All Time.
  • berriberri Posts: 4,007
    remember the last Darts. Good looking is not an attribute

    Well Robr, like many other models that hang around the later ones get long in the tooth. But during the 60's and early 70's I'd see a lot of these cars on college campuses and military basis. Not high income people, but a lot of younger people in those demographics. You've got to compare it to comparables of the time like Nova (another decent looker for its price back then), Falcon, Maverick, etc. It wasn't in the same price and market as say a Cutlass or Camaro. I think one advantage Dart had in its segment was the availability of a 2 dr HT model and it had a relatively decent interior for its class as well.

    But will those 70-90 year olds be out there buying Darts?

    Well, seriously they won't be buying a lot of cars, period. I agree its market demographics will likely be younger buyers, but some older buyers, particularly in urban markets, still buy a small car.

    Now I believe you are in the Boston area, so I don't see you as a perspective buyer. Driving in that town you need some metal around you because the lack of following the road laws means its like driving bumper cars there, right? But heck, you're airport can be a challenge too!
Sign In or Register to comment.