Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





High End Luxury Cars

1112911301132113411351156

Comments

  • drfilldrfill Posts: 2,484
    That BMW would hamstring their own car that way, Toyota-esque, if you will. I would think Toyota and BMW have different clientele, different objectives.

    If the BMW can't outperform, what good is it? At $90k, not much.

    Bad enough iDrive is standard. No joy for 5 fans. :cry:

    Wouldn't put it past BMW to stack the deck against the manual, to put over the controversial SMG. The SMG does have to pay for itself, at some point.

    BMW is not as prescient as other companies in knowing what it's customers want/expect. You get what they give you. :confuse:

    DrFill
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    Unfortunately "Computers on Wheels' is the future for all cars including performance ones.

    Not necessarily. The Z4M is what a Motorsport car should be, rude and crude. Lotus also hasn't become infatuated with computers and iDrive style control systems. Then you have cars like the Ariel Atom, which is an Elise without all the unnecessary extras, like a windshield and body.
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    That BMW would hamstring their own car that way, Toyota-esque, if you will. I would think Toyota and BMW have different clientele, different objectives.

    Even Volvo lets you shut down the stability control on the S60R.
  • patpat Posts: 10,421
    Please let's keep our comments focused on the high end cars and leave out the sniping at each other. Some more posts have been removed.

    I know you guys know how to keep to the subject without dragging personal comments into the debate. Let's get back there, okay?
  • tagmantagman Malibu, CaliforniaPosts: 8,441
    It's coming... in 2009.

    link title

    TagMan
  • brightness04brightness04 Posts: 3,151
    http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070306/UPDATE/703060451/1148- /AUTO01

    Wow! $11,345 support on 7 series! Wonders of financial engineering ;-)
  • tagmantagman Malibu, CaliforniaPosts: 8,441
    OMG, don't let this amazing opportunity pass you by.
    Now's your chance to trade in your Saab for a REAL driving machine. ;)

    TagMan
  • drfilldrfill Posts: 2,484
    Didn't know BMW was having this much trouble moving the metal!

    Regarding the 7 series, this information may be a referendum on the less than opulent or inviting interior, and hopefully an improvement, brand-wide, is in the works.

    DrFill
  • cyclone4cyclone4 Posts: 2,259
    I am surprised that you folks have not commented on the new information that ljflx revealed (LS460 forum) about R & T's admitting that testing of the post production models are much more accurate test results. Based on the fact that C & D tested a pre-production LS460, basically proves that those results were quite erroneous. I would paste his post here but I will not do so without his permission.
  • hpowdershpowders Posts: 4,269
    So when I read a positive review of a BMW pre-production vehicle in R&T or C&D, the car I may eventually lease should actually be even better? Great news!
  • houdini1houdini1 Kansas City areaPosts: 5,860
    Well, I think anyone with a brain and that knew how to read already knew that the report in question was completely bogus. Most people just dismissed it out of hand.

    2013 LX 570 2010 LS 460 2002 Tacoma 4x4

  • brightness04brightness04 Posts: 3,151
    7 series is not a REAL driving machine; it's a HELC. In any case, I'm looking to add a car, not trading the Saab, because the Saab is probably more valuable as a justification for writing down the entire lease payment on the new car as business expense.

    Since you brought up Saab, what really scares me is that BMW's turbo-charging gammit is smelling like what Saab did in the 80's: extracting short term profit on existing engine instead of ploughing more money into massive new R&D. It would be a damn shame if BMW becomes non-viable as an independent going concern . . . kinda scary on a day when Dr. Z talks about MB itself potentially becoming a take-over target.
  • brightness04brightness04 Posts: 3,151
    Didn't know BMW was having this much trouble moving the metal!

    There was definitely change in the wind, in the last couple years, first with the 7 and 5, then even the 3 starting last year. Cars that used to command nearly full MSRP became heavily discounted and subsidized. I have been repeatedly pointing out the unusual lease subsidies that have been happening, signifying underlying weakness. Glad to be vindicated by the late-as-usual professional analysts. Getting eggs in the face is the usual fate of being a prophet. I was talking about eminent homebuilder and lending industry collapse in Spring 2005; people thought I was an idiot at the Memorial Day luncheon that year. Same went with my predictions on the relative market potentials of Wagoner, Ford and Chrysler about a year ago, even as everyone piled on criticizing GM management.

    The consumer market itself really speaks loud and clear, long before the talking heads get the memo. The BMW dealer offered to do everything possible to make a deal on the last day of the month. . . too bad I injured my hand (in an unrelated accident) shortly after the test drive a couple days before. The guy may not even work there anymore this month.
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    Since you brought up Saab, what really scares me is that BMW's turbo-charging gammit is smelling like what Saab did in the 80's: extracting short term profit on existing engine instead of ploughing more money into massive new R&D. It would be a damn shame if BMW becomes non-viable as an independent going concern

    That really doesn't seem likely. The only engines Saab has ever built that've been world class have gone into the Draken and Gripen. BMW is one of the premier engine builders in the world. In the case of the 335i, rather than let Infiniti and Lexus beat them with the G and IS, they used a turbo. There's no way they could've engineered a new engine with 300+ naturally aspirated hp in time for the '07 MY. Look at how long Audi and Mercedes continued to use their 2.8L and 3.2L engines when the Japanese had far more horsepower from their 6s. BMW is the last one to get lazy when it comes to new engines.
  • blkhemiblkhemi Posts: 1,717
    You guys move fast from subject to subject!

    Well, I just blew back in from Maine. I've missed a lot to say the least.

    But the biggest blunder of all has to be Dewey. I never knew you disliked Audi's that much. You're a BMW driver and you want to call Audi's "unreliable"? Well, I just drove the snot out of the S8 without so much as a hiccup. Sorry Dewey that you feel this way, but all of my Audi's have been free of any problems.

    BTW: the XKR will be here on the 25th. Can't wait.
  • blkhemiblkhemi Posts: 1,717
    Excellent post, LG.

    Bimmer has been building the straight-6 motor for decades, yet they've never failed and with proper maintenance, have been known to exceed 200k miles with ease.

    Just because the Japanese-brand models are coming out with hot V6's doesn't make BMW obsolete, as we all know the 3-Series still holds it own.

    The 335 makes 300hp even, yet it's 4.75 0-60 makes it faster than the 306hp IS and GS. Only the new 300hp CTS is left to chance it.
  • tagmantagman Malibu, CaliforniaPosts: 8,441
    Didn't know BMW was having this much trouble moving the metal!

    Having trouble moving cars and getting overly-aggressive to generate volume sales are two entirely different things...

    TagMan
  • esfesf Posts: 1,020
    Wouldn't you say the RS4 and M5 are high-end? I mean, $70K and $90K. Not many low-end car buyers can afford them!

    IMO the RS4 is much better than the E60 M5. It's a bit of an E39 reincarnate. Supreme handling, gearbox, engine, style, interior... and even similar power from its (smaller) V8.

    The only difference? It has the wrong configuration. Like Porsche, Audi has learned how to deal with this the hard way. It's harder to make the RS4 great to drive than an M5 or M3.

    And this is coming from someone who desperately wants the new M3:

    http://www.autospies.com/news/GENEVA-MOTOR-SHOW-PHOTO-GALLERY-More-photos-of-the- -BMW-M3-Concept-13171/

    It's beautiful. I want an M3 convertible to replace the S4 and an S5 coupe as my next winter car. Ultimate performance fleet! And I'd be able to compare them.

    '06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330
  • brightness04brightness04 Posts: 3,151
    MB switched from Inline6 to V6 in the early 1990's in order to address the packaging issue.
  • brightness04brightness04 Posts: 3,151
    Does every discussion have to turn into some kind of phallus length comparision? Read the previous posts again, it's on a very specific topic about packaging, as in engine space vs. crumple zone space. MB switched from I6 to V6 in the early 90's to address this very issue. BMW has been the lone hold-out. It becomes an issue when cylinder bore size makes the engine unwieldily long for modern sedan packaging efficiency.

    BTW, the 200k boast is so ludicrous. If it's so easy, why isn't BMW offering 200k warranty? For what it's worth, both my 5 series developed engine oil jellying problem shortly after 100k miles.
Sign In or Register to comment.