Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Pontiac Grand Prix - 2000-2005

1139140142144145218

Comments

  • dindakdindak Posts: 6,632
    I still like it on the GT models. It looks good and the plastics are nicely matted. It all feels good too, maybe not top shelf, but certainly not as cheap as some are making it out to be.
  • montanafanmontanafan Posts: 945
    The difference between a GT2 and GTP is only $1,505 ($1,375 if factor in the GTPs standard driver's lumbar support), the remaining difference is the GTP's standard OnStar which every car should have.

    If a 1997 GTP was $25K with no rebates, and a 2004 GTP Comp G with rebate is $29K, that is less the a 2% increase per year. And that excludes the value of the improved / new features on the 2004. Wish my cable, electric, heat, insurance, real estate tax went up less the 2% per year or had improved features.
  • regfootballregfootball Posts: 2,166
    "For the record, I always try to buy domestic, and still do feel a bit guilty for buying Japanese"

    not sure why,

    a) you should get the car that best suits your needs for the money REGARDLESS of the 'nameplate'

    b) domestic or import is all smoke and mirrors today anyways. Many domestics are made all over in Mexico and other places, the new chevy equinox will have chinese motah! Meanwhile, Toyota Camrys and Honda Accords build near a million in the US each year. There are just as many if not more jobs created for US citizens building and selling Camrys as their are selling Centurys. The profits go to shareholders, not countries. Shareholders are from many different countries.
  • tek3tek3 Posts: 20
    Final assembly is such a minor portion of what goes into producing a car. Don't forget the R&D, engineering, planning, administration, etc. that go into it. Not all profits go to the shareholders either, they also get plowed back into the company for R&D, etc.
  • montanafanmontanafan Posts: 945
    Shareholders only get dividends. GM pays $2.00 per share in dividends on their regular 1 2/3rds par value stock, regardless of profits. Profits go to companies. Where the company is headquartered has implications on where any profits are taxed, and invested.

    0.4% of the US population's health care costs were paid for by GM last year. The production of Camrys vs Centurys may equal, but with 2.5 retirees for each active worker at GM, the impact is much greater.

    Agree wholeheartedly, buy the car/deal/dealer that feels best to you.
  • carguy58carguy58 Posts: 2,303
    To me it doesn't matter. I mean American Fortune 500 companies move more jobs overseas each year. Gm has rebadged Toyota's in the past. Mazda and Ford do parts sharing and so do Chrysler and Mitsu. It might have mattered in the 80's but with Chrysler merging with Mercedes and American Jobs moving overseas the lines are blurred to me.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Posts: 1,203
    The first time I saw a 95 Aurora(way back in early 94) I thought it looked like space ship both inside and out. In fact, when my father had one I often referred to it as "the ship". To me that was not a bad thing as the cockpit-like interior made driving the car feel like you were piloting something much smaller.
  • garywgaryw Posts: 116
    I am in Portland, anyone in the Washington/Idaho area seeing killer clearance deals being advertised on the remaining 2003 GP's.

    If so please let me know who....
  • I love the cockpit theme in my car's interiors. That is why I can't buy a CamAccord. The interior is so bland and basic it makes me cringe.

    I want to drive a car, not an appliance.
  • ab348ab348 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CanadaPosts: 1,540
    Dindak, go sit in an '04 GP. Tap that black plastic console material with you knuckles. Look at the black plastic surrounding the dash center stack (if it's a bright day better wear your sunglasses to cut the shine). See if the example you sit in has a rainbow sheen on that center surround reminiscent of gasoline on water like the one I sat in did. Revel in the look of the Uglycloth (TM Regd.) seats.

    It's not as cheap as it's been made out to be... in reality, it's even cheaper.

    2011 Buick Regal Turbo, 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass S Holiday Coupe

  • "It's not as cheap as it's been made out to be... in reality, it's even cheaper."

    Oh my gosh - I better call my dealer and cancel my new GP order! Tonight I'll run down to buy a CamAccord because they have perfect interiors!
  • jmr001jmr001 Posts: 6
    "Dindak, go sit in an '04 GP. Tap that black plastic console material with you knuckles. Look at the black plastic surrounding the dash center stack (if it's a bright day better wear your sunglasses to cut the shine). See if the example you sit in has a rainbow sheen on that center surround reminiscent of gasoline on water like the one I sat in did. Revel in the look of the Uglycloth (TM Regd.) seats"

    I have a 2004 GTP with leather. I like the interior. Granted, it's not the best in the world, but to me it looks nice, and that's all that counts. No rattles, nothing is loose, everything fits good. I live in Florida and have never have a problem with the glare or seen the 'rainbow sheen' on the center stack. The front bucket seats are very comfortable. They have done a good job of making the cabin more quiet. The ride is good considering I have the 17 in tires.

    All in all, I like what I got, and look forward to driving it every day. It's almost a pleasure to come to work every day.
  • You better be careful - they'll throw you off the board for making nice comments about the 04GP! ;)

    I echo your evaluation of the cabin. Very good and comfy - but not perfect. And it is a pleasure to get to work - it just sucks once you actually get there!
  • bobbyz34bobbyz34 Posts: 10
    For the most part I like the cockpit design, the position of all of the controls and the seat comfort. I like the multi tone interiors, getting away from being awash in beige or charcoal, or worse, burgandy or blue.

    I just wish they would change the surface finish of those pieces of hard black stippled plastic on the dash and the small pieces on the doors as well as the airbag cover. The rest of the dash material is very nice.

    Maybe someone will make aftermarket replacements for those, heck maybe even GM will make those changes for 2005 that can be fit into a 2004.

    Even with my small gripes I still plan on buying one in the very near future.
  • oldsman01oldsman01 Posts: 1,203
    My only problem with the new GP interior is the cheap looking cloth seats and the lack of upscale features such as automatic climate control and auto dimming rearview mirror. I've sat in an 04 GP a couple of times and the quality of the dash materials is far superior to the previous models.
  • jauto98jauto98 Posts: 77
    Hi all, been reading this board for some time. Finally was able to drive the 04 grand prix during the 24-hr test drive. Was a GT2 in Fusion Orange (got a lot of talk when driving around and at the gas station). Overall, I was impressed with the GP in terms of driving dynamics. Acceleration was smooth and plentiful, brakes were adequate and was a very stable and controlled drive. At one point I had to do an evasive maneuver to avoid hitting a tire stripe ("alligator") and switched lanes going 70. As for the interior, I was thoroughly impressed with the quality and the gap thickness of the dash. Although there was some hard plastic inside with a design texture that reminds me of styrofoam.

    Some of the gripes I have with the GP was the seat comfort, or lack of. Front seat cushion seems a little long for my taste and the back seat was no better in terms of comfort. Your feet won't even go under the front seat and the cushions was very flat. Also, rear visibility was poor IMO as it was difficult to judge where the rear end was when backing up.

    All in all, it’s a car I will be considering in the near future. Probably consider a GT2 with the InfoTech Package and head curtain side airbags in either graystone or polo green. Sorry for being so long.
  • ab348ab348 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CanadaPosts: 1,540
    Nothing wrong with multitone interiors if done right. Unfortunately Uglycloth (TM Regd.) is not the way to do it.

    What's wrong with burgundy or especially blue interiors? I would kill for a blue interior in a new car these days. Gray just looks too much like a prison cell and doesn't go with many shades of blue paint very well.

    2011 Buick Regal Turbo, 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass S Holiday Coupe

  • bobbyz34bobbyz34 Posts: 10
    As far as multi-tone interiors, I was referring to how the dash can be the dark gray and the actual IP surround and center console, etc is black. And in the beige interior the dash is still black as well as the carpeting, beige flooring gets dirty easily.

    I had a burgandy 85 Pontiac 6000 and everything inside was burgandy. Then a blue 89 6000 and everything inside was blue. I just don't think when the outside matches the inside color, except black, it looks good. I just prefer the beige, gray, or black interiors. Those colors go with any exterior colors and the latter 2 are easiest to keep looking clean.
  • One thing I can't figure out is why I couldn't get the natural beige interior with the fusion orange exterior color....
  • ab348ab348 Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, CanadaPosts: 1,540
    Beige or gray doesn't go with any color though, that's the problem. There are certain shades of blue or green or teal that none of them go with. One of the reasons I dislike silver cars these days is that they all come with the same interior, usually gray, which I hate in an interior. In the past silver could be paired with black, white, blue, red, all sorts of interior shades. Not now. Same with the inexplicably popular champagne or sandstone color - beige only unless the manufacturer is really cheap and only offers a gray interior, in which case it doesn't go together at all. We need more interior color choices, not less.

    2011 Buick Regal Turbo, 1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass S Holiday Coupe

Sign In or Register to comment.