Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Acura RL



  • varmintvarmint Posts: 6,326
    I went looking through the pics for the Ody and they have a torque curve there. None for the RL, though.

    Yeah, cars are getting heavy. I suspect that making them safe in a crash, silent on the road, and filled with goodies is simply one too many goals for a featherweight. But I was hoping that the use of aluminum subframes would have kept the weight under 3,800.
  • ksomanksoman Posts: 590
    add another 1/4th pound... lol

    Robertsmx, dude, you rule.

  • 1) Weight
    2) Mileage
    3) Turning circle

    Accord Hybrid anyone?
  • It appears based on the descriptions I've been able to find that the RL doesn't have split fold rear seats - just a pass through.

    I was watching the RL with interest, but now it just dropped off my list for consideration. I don't understand why Honda isn't putting them in... The TL also became a non-starter for the same reason.
  • Messages 2019 and 2020, posted in the early morning hours of Sept. 1st, reference new content regarding the 2005 RL on the Acura web site. As of 9:00 pm EDT, same day, that content has been pulled, or the web site is malfunctioning. Although the RL prototype button is now gone, the new 2005 RL button only takes you to info on the NSX, MDX, and RSX, and the regular 2004 RL data remains. Were some erroneous specs published, I wonder, and subsequently taken down?

    New poster - "GnaRLy" - happy owner of a '96 RL and prospective purchaser of an '05.
  • dc661dc661 Posts: 71
    I had the same problem trying to use Firefox browser. Tried the site with Internet Explorer and it worked fine. (Make sure pop ups are NOT blocked.) Its basically a mini-site for the new RL.

    Sidenote - the interior is stunning. I want this car!
  • shotgunshotgun Posts: 184
    Robertsmx -Based on your various calculations on torque, gearing, drive ratios and your propensity, for the most part, for being "right on the money" - Given the RL's drag coefficient of .29, and weight of 3,900+ lbs - what do you estimate is the RL's top speed?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Posts: 5,525
    Thanks shotgun/ksoman.

    Thats hard to figure out. But I assume it may be around 150 mph. I believe someone tested TL at 152 mph, not sure who. RL may match that.
  • Carmakers consider folding rear seats too utilitarian for their top-line luxo class cruisers and unbecoming of their image. They offer the ski opening as a concession.

    BTW, while it's interesting to read all the technical prose about the weight, turning-circle, gearing, etc. about the new RL, I'll base my judgment on an extended test drive putting the car through its paces.

    I expected a weight increase with the addition of the SH-AWD system, so the "porkiness" of the '05 is a non-factor for mr.
  • I just went to Canadiandriver website and they had a news post saying Acura Canada has just announced the MSRP for the new 2005 RL. It apparently has jumped from C$55,000 for the old 2004 to C$69,500 for the brand new 2005. That seems a very large jump even taking into consideration the significant amount of improvements in the 2005 version. We are talking about Lexus territory here. In fact, for C$70,000, you can alomost get an Audi S4. I thought I would get one of these new RLs but if the price is indeed correct, I am leaning more towards an Infiniti M45 or FX45 now. What do you guys think? I don't think Acura US has announced their pricing yet.
  • cericceric Posts: 1,093
    I have fold-down rear seat in my BMW 540iA (for extra few hundreds buck as an option). For one thing, I have never have an occasion to use it yet (my Odyssey took care of things). For second, I believes it compromises structure integrity (specifically, torsional/bending rigidity) by roughly 5-10% (due to lack of cross members that could be placed there).

    I guess I can do without one. Just MHO. That turning circle does bother me. In California, there are many tight U-turns. My friend's RX300 with 44ft proves hard to negotiate tight U-turns and parking spaces.

    robertsmx, great posts on the gear ratios.
  • rayainswrayainsw Posts: 2,476
    I see that on their web site they now show EPA highway as 25 - vs. 26 on the press releases dated 1 Sept.

    Still "based on internal testing".


    - Ray
    Wondering why . . .
  • rayainswrayainsw Posts: 2,476
    Looking at a couple of roughly comparable (nothing will line up exactly regarding size, HP, equipment, etc.) AWD sedans, I see the (2004) A6 4.2 300 HP listed at approx. 4000# and the Passat W8 (I happen to have owned one) at just under 4000#.

    I do not think that the published RL weight is disappointing.

    And I do not think that the EPA highway numbers (26 or 25) are disappointing.

    If one requires (or desires) AWD, there are trade offs. One is the additional weight and parasitic drag of the additional drivetrain components.

    - Ray
    No longer looking at AWD as a requirement . . .
  • varmintvarmint Posts: 6,326
    I guess "porkiness" was too strong a word. Still when compared with cars like the BMW 530 and G300, the RL comes out roughly 400 lbs heavier. Adding AWD will account for 200 lbs, making the difference much smaller. That's very true. However, given that Acura wants to stay with a V6 only, I would think that weight would be a larger concern for them than other manufacturers.

    Robertsmx - I've been thinking about your formula. At it's core, it's simply power multiplied by mechanical advantage, then divided by factors of resistance. But I've got a question about the tires. In your equation, you use the circumference of the tires as an indicator for their resistance to the power of the engine. What about the mass of the tires?

    I would think tire mass would also be a factor, though I cannot for the life of me guess at how significant. Have you got any links on the subject?

    Thanks in advance
  • l943973l943973 Posts: 197
    Dear Acura,

    If your reading this, and I know you do since you've posted Edmunds comments on your site in the past.

    Please add the ability to ask for the time using the voice command.

    In our 04 MDX 189, the clock is so far down the dash that you have to look away from the road for 2 seconds just to see the time.

    Having the clock adjust for daylight saving time would also be a plus.

    thank you.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Posts: 5,525
    New pictures of the "JDM RL", the Honda Legend...

    Aggressive... lean muscle
    Exterior: Front
    Classy... sleek
    Exterior: Side
    Clean, yet muscular...
    Exterior: Rear
    Huge foot rest to go with "piano-style" gas pedal...
    Interior - I
    The front seat headrests have an interesting look to it...
    Interior - II

    Link to the News Item (Japanese)

    Varmint, mass of wheel will not play a role in affecting the overall gearing (hence thrust or the max speed in each gear). It will, however, contribute towards drag/rolling resistance and weight of the vehicle, besides handling.

    I have had the set of formulas I quoted for several years now, and have been playing with them. But I’m sure a web search could lead us back to the source.
  • l943973l943973 Posts: 197
    I can't believe the 05 RL still has a 4-way power passenger seat! That was one of my grips with the current RL. Hopefully they will have a touring package like the MDX to fix this problem.

    How come the rear headrests can be powered down but must be manually raised? Most folks that sit in the back NEVER raise the headrest.
  • ksomanksoman Posts: 590
    Oh the RL looks good in the darker colors.... Now if only the US side of the Acura company becomes brave enough to move away from the 100s of shade of silver, champaigne & white & black that they offer and actually offer some nice deep dark colors...

    but i bet their entire line up for the next 10000 years will always be these ridiculous boring silvers, golds & shades of gray...

  • ksomanksoman Posts: 590
    the edmunds review of the 2005 honda ody is out. how far behind is the RL...

Sign In or Register to comment.