Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Lexus ES 300/ES 330



  • Hello. Can someone please clear something up for me. I have a 96 es300. When do I turn the O/D off? on the Highway or City? Also, I have an ECT Power button, what is that for? Is it bad for your transmission to drive with the O/D on while in the city "stop and go" traffic?
  • rickc5rickc5 Posts: 378
    The ES has only one horn. It is located on the right side of the front end (don't forget, the sides {right and left} of a vehicle are determined from the seated driver's perspective. If you're standing in front of the car, facing it, the horn's on the left.), just under the large black plastic panel that fits between the grille and the radiator. You must remove the panel to get at the horn. You can see the horn by looking through the grille.

    Since your accident was to the front end of the car, it's quite possible the horn was damaged too.
  • rickc5rickc5 Posts: 378
    Its totally safe and advisable to leave your transmission in Overdrive all the time. It can increase your gas mileage and does no harm. About the only time I can think of for turning it off would be if you were climbing a hill that was just steep enough for the transmission to "seek" back and forth between third and fourth (O/D). Turning it off would keep the transmission in third gear.

    The ECT button changes the shifting points in the transmission if you are using full-throttle accelleration, keeping it in each gear for a few hundred more RPM so you get the maximum power benefit. You will notice no difference when driving normally.

    Both of these features should be explained in your owner's manual.
  • s852s852 Posts: 1,051
    You said you paid $523 per month for 39 months and 15K miles per year, but your deal was complicated by having a trade-in.

    No one can compare it to what they have or have seen.

    The dealer may have factored in what he was giving you for the trade-in and what he could do with your old car (either good or bad) when he offered you that deal.
  • ugmd20ugmd20 Posts: 11

    Actually, we went over all of the numbers before he knew that I was going to give him a trade in.
  • sddlwsddlw Posts: 361
    I like turning the O/D off when driving around town, when speeds are less than 50 mph. I think the car is much more responsive without the O/D engaged. I used to do the same thing with my previous cars by setting the shift lever to 3rd. rather than drive. Most people do not do this though, and just drive around in the "D" position.
  • I have a '92 ES300 that I bought in December '98 with 45000 original miles. The dealer would not certify it ('mileage is OK but it's too old'). I opted not to buy the $1K extended warranty; now I'm kicking myself because I just paid AAMCO over $3K to rebuild the transmission (still has less than 70K miles). The car now seems to at least shift normally once again, including overdrive.

    QUESTION THE FIRST: the O/D OFF light, which didn't blink before, now does. According to the manual, this indicates a transmission problem. AAMCO connected it to a 'diagnostic machine' (yeah...right) and couldn't clear the error from the computer; they claim the O/D sensor needs replacement. Should I make a stink if they try to charge me for this part, or should I suck it up and pay? I feel like this should be included in their service; I'm also skeptical that replacing the sensor will even solve the problem.

    QUESTION THE SECOND: Now that the transmission has been rebuilt, should I have the front end re-aligned? I recently bought 4 new Yokohama AVID touring tires for it and don't want premature tire failure.

    QUESTION THE FINAL: I've never changed either the struts or shocks on this car and I'm pretty sure the original owner didn't, either. At 70K miles and 8+ years, should I just do it anyway? What could I expect to pay for this? The ride could use improvement.

    Whew... I think that's it. Thanks!
  • New pictures should start floating in April for Sept-Oct debut. This car will set the standard for entry level luxury. No offense intended but, Bye Bye Acura TL and Infinity I30!
  • dardsondardson Posts: 21
    I drove a Camry LE, 4 banger. It was a tiny bit slow but amazingly quiet, smooth, and well done. I am blown away by the quality of even a lowly Camry LE. We love the Solara but hate a two door. It's too low and hard as h___ to get out of in a parking lot with the wide doors. We will in the next few months move out of the the two door. Wondering if a move up to a Lexus ES300 is worth it over a Camry XLE V6. What exactly are you guys getting in a Lexus that we don't get in a Toyota? I could do the extra 4 or 5 thousand if I thought the thing was worth it. Any experience out there....between Toyota and Lexus. Toyota seems like exactly the same car to me with a few less bells and whistles. ????
  • Five months ago I ordered a Mercedes C320. Last week I drove to the dealer in my 2000 Solara V-6 that cost exactly HALF the price of the 320. The dealer tried to rape me on my flawless Solara with 3,000 miles on the odometer. The Solara is simply too good of a car to be giving away at some dealership. Now my wait begins for the new 2002 ES300. I'm confident that it will be a very nice car and will offer me years of trouble free service which is something that I can not say about the C320. Can't wait to see what the new ES will look like!
  • I drove a fully loaded Camry XLE V6 for three years on lease and racked up almost 70,000 miles. It is an excellent car and I had absolutely no problems with it. It was a great experience. Then I bought a used ES 300 with 34,000 miles on it. Both were 97's. As wonderful as the Camry XLE V6 was - the Lexus is definitely a step up. They redesigned both cars in 1997 and have kept them pretty much the same until they both get redesigned for 2002. They share only 25% of the same parts as the previous ES (1996 and back) edition was based off the Camry, but this one was based off of the Toyota Windom - a Japanese/European Toyota product.

    Both cars will get you to where you want to go in style.You will pay more for the Lexus name but will also get an even nicer vehicle with a better "cockpit" in look and feel. You will have much better leather - I noticed that immediately - a better stereo system- the insrtument panel is better, etc. Your resale value will also be similar by percentage to Toyota so you will get back the 4-5K margin if you sell later. I had great service with Toyota, but Lexus is even better. A limo to and from the dealer, a free wash with each visit, a leather lounge while you wait and most important a real sense of satisfaction that you were treated not only in style but professionaly and fairly.

    The real question is do you have the $4-5K to spend on a car. If not, feel great with the Camry, if so get the ES300 and you will see a world of difference.
    Those who say they are the same except for the name know little about both cars and do not have the experience that I have had driving both.

    I really liked my Camry, but love the fact that I drive a Lexus and that it is an even better car.
  • hunter001hunter001 Posts: 851

    The ES300 is known as the Toyota Windom in Japan. It is not "based off it", It is "it". Both currently and in the future. Also, the Camry, the Avalon and the Toyota ES300 are based on the SAME PLATFORM. They share the basic engine architecture (with variable valve timing heads in the ES version) and the exact same transmission. Also, MOST of the non-externally-visible mechanical parts (platform) are IDENTICAL. The Lexus RX300/Toyota Highlander is also based off the same platform.

    The ES300 is definitely a step-up from the Camry XLE V6. No question about it. It has got quite a few styling differences and also a lot more content - similar to the Infiniti I-30 vs the Nissan Maxima (who share the Engine/Transmission/mechanical components between them) and the Honda Accord EX V6/Acura 3.2 TL (even though the Engine in the Acura has got a larger displacement - 3.2L vs 3.0L, and the transmission in the Acura is a totally different 5-speed adaptive sportshift automatic vs the 4-speed transmission in the Accord V6).

    I sure think that the next ES3xx will definitely sport a 5-speed transmission like the Acura 3.2TL and maybe have an engine that is larger than the Camry V6 (similar to the Acura vs the Honda).

  • s852s852 Posts: 1,051
    Oh please, that's an exaggeration especially since it is possible they could mess up the styling like they did with new new SC.
    The 2002 will probably be nice, but as usual, it will be priced significantly higher than a TL or I30 when similarly equipped.
    Some people will be willing to pay the premium price to get the most prestigigous names and most luxurious models, but many will want to save several grand and live with simiulated wood as opposed to real wood trim in a TL.
    I think most people would prefer an ES300 for about the same price, but they are not near the same price.
  • ved3ved3 Posts: 43
    the best way to be sure is to visit,
    order a test drive of the ES near you, and
    compare this experience to how you felt driving
    the camry. I think most honest people who have
    experienced both cars will tell you that they're
    not similar. but a lot of people have said
    they're similar. maybe this is a toyota strategy
    to boost camry sales I don't know. if it is, it's
    working big time. some people actually have
    started to say that they look alike. this can
    happen when they believe what others say more
    than they believe their own eyes.
    it's not to take anything away from the Camry
    which may be the best average family hauler but
    I think the ES is better in every possible way.
    so if you can afford the extra $5K, I'd do it.
    don't buy it yet. drive it for yourself, play
    around with all the amenities inside, and you'll
    see what I mean.
    take care everybody.
  • You can obviously tell that I am biased by my great history with Toyota. Remeber thought that the Tl redesigned in 1999 is still competing against the 97 redesign of the Lexus. The difference in price as you point out is also reflected in the resale price in which the ES wins out. If you love the Tl and plan on driving it for a long time that is great. The new S version is cool, but I prefer the Lexus in ways other than price including cockpit feel and overall luxury. When Acura redesigns the Tl in 2004 it will be competing against the 2002 design Lexus at a lower price. That is why I believe that the base for the new ES will be on par with the TL S version.
    Acura is a great brand but there are reasons why they are priced below Lexus.
  • s852s852 Posts: 1,051
    Some corners were cut to keep the TL prices lower. For instance, the TL wood is not real and the wood in an ES300 is real. The ES300 has more leather than a TL. Some people care alot about things like that and rule out the TL for those reasons and some people care more about getting cool toys like the navigation system in the TL.
    I suppose Aura could use the same leather and wood in a TL and only raise the price by a few hundred dollars to reflect their added cost, but they choose not to.
    I looked up the 2001 ES300 in today and you can order one for about $300 over invoice in my zip code. That price is tempting, but I really like navigation systems. I rented a Hertz Taurus with an add-on navigation system and even that was pretty cool.
    I wonder if the 2002 ES300 will have it?
    Of course when the 2002 first comes out, you will probably have to pay full MSRP so real world street pricing will be much higher than any MSRP change will reflect.
  • hunter001hunter001 Posts: 851
    Actually, it would not be correct to compare low-end Navigation systems like the Hertz "Neverlost" Navigation system to high-end Navigation systems like the one present in the Acura 3.2TL. The DVD based Navigation in the Acura (covering the entire continental US on one DVD), has 7 Gyro-sensors present within the frame of the car, that would pin-point the location of the car EVEN IN AN UNDERGROUND PARKING LOT. In low-end Navigation systems, even the presence of Large buildings, thick clumps of trees etc, can stop the Navigation from functioning, since they do not have Gyro-sensors that would predict the position of the vehicle, in the absence of signals from the Satellites. The Navigation guides you through thick fog and pitch darkness like a guardian angel - never misstating or faltering. 2 miles before your turn approaches, the NAV warns you to "Keep to the Right/Left", one mile before the turn, it warns you again, 0.5 mile before, it warns us again, and before the turn, there is a countdown of 1000ft...800ft....600ft...500ft....100ft.... etc. You just cannot miss your turn. Also, when the Navigator audio warns us, the BOSE speakers of the 3.2TL automatically dims, allowing us to hear the Navigator lady's voice clearly. This NAV helped us a lot during a trip from NJ to IL, through Ohio that we undertook a while back. Absolutely worth every penny. Navigation systems employed by Audi and BMW are not even worth being placed on the same planet as the Acura system, even though they charge a pretty packet for it.

    Also, in addition to "cool toys" like the Navigation system, the Acura also has a 5-speed Sportshift Adaptive Automatic transmission that is a class-exclusive. All other vehicles in its class including the ES300, the Infiniti I-30 etc., soldier on with 4-speed transmissions borrowed from their pedestrian siblings (Toyota Camry, Nissan Maxima). Also, the Acura has triple-sealed full-frame windows, window-glass that go all the way down (unlike competitors like I30, ES300 where the rear glass sticks up a few inches over the window). It also has a turbine smooth and powerful 3.2L V6 engine (0-60 of the Acura is 6.4Secs vs 7.9 Secs for the ES300 & I30 - as per Motortrend), rear-vents for the AC controls (similar to the one present in the LS430, GS430), expensive Double Wishbone suspension on the front and Multi-link double-wishbone suspension in the back (the exact same suspension present in the LS430, GS300, GS430, SC430 unlike the ES300 that employs the cheaper and less-dynamic Macpherson Strut suspension on all 4-ends), standard HID lighting and a variety of other subtle and not-so-subtle differences. Incidentally, with the double-wishbone suspension, you can actually feel the "planted-ness" of the car, particularly noticeable at higher speeds, when other cars with less dynamic suspensions develop a certain floaty-feel.

    Acura has cut costs by employing "simulated wood" as opposed to "real wood" and you can find more vinyl on the interiors than the ES300, as you pointed out. Whether that merits a higher/lower price is upto the buyer. To each his own...whatever floats your boat...

  • Sure, you pointed out the better points about the TL. But you are forgetting that not only is the wood trim but the ES has much better not to mention much more leather, HID headlights that has auto-leveling, better stereo system, better nameplate, better dealer service, etc...

    I am still puzzled about the 0-60 in 6.4 secs. Is this the regular or the TL-S you are talking about?
  • remus26remus26 Posts: 34
    "I think most people would prefer an ES300 for about the same price, but they are not near the same price."

    If most people would prefer a ES300 for about the same price, that basically justifies why it would cost more money!
  • hunter001hunter001 Posts: 851 mistake.... The 0-60 acceleration of the Acura 3.2TL is 6.7secs not 6.4secs...the 6.4secs figure was for the 3.2CL-s....

    No question about the dealer service. Acura has got miles to go before they can even touch Lexus. Acura dealers are also greedy - as seen by the no-discount policy adopted while selling the MDX (for basically 30 minutes of paperwork).

    Anyway, here are the acceleration figures of the comparison test done on the 2000 3.2TL, 2000 Lexus ES300, 2000 Infiniti I-30 and 2001 Oldsmobile Aurora V6 (Motortrend - June, 2000 issue)....

    ---------Acura 3.2TL-----Lexus ES300-----Infiniti I30--
    0-30------- 2.5 ------------ 2.8 -------------------- 2.9
    0-40------- 3.7------------ 4.0 -------------------- 4.1
    0-50------- 5.1------------ 5.9--------------------- 5.9
    0-60------- 6.7------------ 7.9--------------------- 7.9
    0-70------- 9.0------------ 10.1-------------------- 10.0
    0-80------ 11.5------------ 13.3-------------------- 13.0
    0-90------ 14.3------------ 17.0-------------------- 16.6
    Qtrmile--- 15.2@93.1 ----- 16.0@87.5 --------- 16.0@88.5

    As you notice, the other cars did not stand a chance from right off idle to much higher speeds....the Acura always held the upper-hand....incidentally, the 1999 3.2TL (with the 4-speed transmission and a non-free flowing intake-manifold) was slower than the 2000 and beyond 3.2TL. Engine modifications in the 2000 TL improved low-end torque and mid-range power, even though peak hp/torque numbers remained the same. Of course, with the advent of the 3.2TL-s, all these figures have been bettered......

    Also, the Acura (EPA classification - midsize) is heavier than both the Lexus ES300 (EPA Classification - Compact) and the Infiniti I-30 (EPA Classification - mid-size) yet has better mileage figures (better hwy figure than the I-30).

    Mileage of Acura 3.2TL: 19city/29hwy (3483lbs)
    Mileage of Lexus ES300: 19city/26hwy (3351lbs)
    Mileage of Infiniti I30: 20city/28hwy (3194lbs)

    (The Acura weighs 3494lbs with the Navigation)

Sign In or Register to comment.