Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I forgot to add, I am the original owener and the car has less than 62,000 miles on it.
Thanks ljordan4
I can tell you from personal experience as a former Ford Taurus driver, that Impala has very few problems compared to the Taurus. Probably the two most serious problems with the Impala are with a defective engine cradle in some early 2000 models, and water leaking into the passenger area from a faulty A/C unit. I can't think of any serious problems like the Taurus had.
Do yourself a favour, dump that Taurus now and get something else! You'd be most pleased with an Impala. In fact, just about ANYTHING is better than a Taurus! Rent an Impala or take one for a test drive.
I know it's not a major thing, but it bothers me. I wonder if anyone who has experience with the buy back procedure can offer some advice.
We had not bought a new or near new vehicle in 18 years. Years ago dealer service complaints seem to be quite high.
Even with the on going trouble of our engine cradle which lead to the replacement of the cradle, Chapman's service dept has been great.
Our engine cradle was replaced at 43k miles after the Chapman service rep worked to get GM to cover the costs. GM did cover all costs given the history of complaints on our engine cradle.
Hunter39..... sounds like you had a good trip. I do not travel well, I am one of those ppl that want to be there NOW. I could very easily ask the pilot of a airplane traveling at 450mph to "step on it!"
Tony
LJordan, I have a 2k Impala with 25k miles on it, haven't yet experienced any of the common problems that have been on the 2k's (cradle, steering shaft and engine hesitation) But even given that I haven't heard too many complaints from anyone who owns a 2001 concerning those things either. I've had minor things, all taken care of through warranty and handled quickly and fixed the first time. If you want the size and feel of a big car without the price, Impala is your strongest bet. You get more for your money for sure.
Tony, I just didn't tell you how ticked off I got at the lack of service provided (letters have been written, I doubt I'll hear anything)I'll put up with a lot , to a point and then I start telling people! Fortunately the problems came on the return trip home and it didn't stress out my vacation.
there are 7 small pages of production pics
http://www.theherd.com/factory/factory1.html
Cool Assembley pics. Don
Also, had those mouldings ever been waxed? I think it would be difficult to get the wax off completely.
It is definitely an option to taking them off.
http://www.jcwhitney.com/item.jhtml?ITEMID=65354
Sure they lack the Bowtie in the center and do not attatch to the lugnuts but they are a very close knock-off. Don
I just got back from the mountains in the impala and it handles and corners great.
2001 LS
Build Date 01/01
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to dis the Impala, it's a nice large sedan for a reasonable price. But it's not a sport sedan and it wasn't designed to be one. I guess it comes down to what you compare it to. I'd hope any 2001 vehicle would be would be a better performer than a 1980 Datsun 200SX, I'm sure it was a good car then but I doubt it had over a 80hp. By today's standards everything sucked in 1980. Hell a 1980 Corvette only had like 180hp and I bet a new Impala would probably outperform that in everyway as well.
However, wanted to say that I bought regular unleaded last night here in central AR for $1.159; that's about as cheap as I've seen gasoline in some time.
I have driven the Jetta. Nice car. Many times I taught about buying one, specially the VR6 model. The V6 is a bit mushy in the corners for a German tuned car, plus it is pretty heavy upfront. The 1.8T does seem to solve this complaint.
The Jetta is a nice car, good quality of materials all around, nice build fit and finish but very below average reliability. Upon reading hundreds and hundreds of posts of VW Jetta owners here in Edmunds, VW Vortex, et al, these cars do seem to have a fair share of irritants beginning with the often poor dealership service,Poor quality mechanical components, short warranty (Which was finally upgraded to 4 years), high prices and smallish dimensions. Call me insane, but I think that if I buy a four door car, I want my rear passengers to have reasonable comfort. The Jetta has an alarming lack of rear seat leg room and head room. The back is suited for small toddlers and pets. $24K for a car that has the interior room of a 2+2 sports coupe....ridicoulous.
But hey the car has its attributes but until the day Dr.Piech gets its act together to seriously improve the reliability of its products and stop the bickering and non-sense at VW dealership service dept, then I might consider one. The 4 year warranty is a step in the right direction, but there is much room for improvement.
The Impala LS handles beautifully for a 3400 pound sedan. But large heavy FWD sedans are not your beef; therefore in your mind, nothing will ever drive closely as your Jetta. I have owned Hondas and Acuras and let me tell you that each car has it set of attributes. This Impala really impressed me enough to change my Honda only and Japanese only mind sets. 6000 miles and not a single problem not even a rattle or noise, just a solid car built like a tank. Ask your VW Jetta fellow owners of their experiences at 6K miles...at least 10 unscheduled trips back to the VW dealer to get 20 items fixed not only once but 2 and 3 times.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and certainly yours is more than welcome. And in that tone I encourage you to take a test drive of a new Impala LS. Take it down your favorite twisty road or mountain pass (If you happen to live near the mountains) and then come back with a full report.
The Impala base sedan and LS are two different cars wearing same clothes.
GM does make a very competitive car, vastly underrated by the import loving automotive press and owners that will never accept the fact that the US can make a good handling sedan, not only Asia or Germany.
As for VW, I sold my Jetta back in early July and now drive an 01 Pathfinder LE (Impala still has more seating room and takes up more space in our garage). I don't want to start a debate over suv's vs. sedans, but I needed the suv to tow my boat. But you can't compare a Jetta to an Impala. Their completely two different cars that happen to have a similar price range.
As for comparing quality among vehicles, that's tough to do on a forum. For example, the 2000 Jetta (diesel) that I had was absolutely trouble free for 35K and got 50mpg to boot. Like you, I've read and talked to people that had many problems with their VW's, thankfully I wasn't one of them. But it seems everyone knows someone thats had good or bad luck with different vehicles. I've owned GM, Chrysler, and Ford products in the past and my last 2 new vehicles have been foreign makes only because of the poor quality of my past 3 domestics (My wife's Impala not one of those). At the same time I don't have brand loyalty to any one car company. I buy what I like, as I imagine you do. I've never owned a BMW but have driven several and they have always put a smile on my face, but they should considering their price. I appreciate and agree with your suggestion of driving an LS, but if I'm going to waste my time and a sales persons time to go for joy ride thru some twisties, it won't be in an Impala LS(though I don't doubt it could provide some enjoyment), I'll take the 6 speed vette please.
You hit the nail on the head with mentioning I prefer "germanic" feel and the Impala doesn't fit my description of a sporting sedan. Maybe when I'm older and my kids are out of car seats my preferences/needs may change. Which is already the case since I am driving an SUV which a few years ago I would have never dreamed.
Ain't that right, Teo?
I can tell you first hand that the Impala LS drives 10x better than the top of the line Taurus.
I cornered noticeably flatter than he did too.
LRCobra
Silver Bullet
We had a history of complaints with the engine cradle from the original complaint at 9k miles.
We could have pushed the issue sooner. But now the car has the lastest design cradle under it. This cradle is fully welded and stress tested.
Under the stress test do they have a nagging boss, along with a wife and kids yelling at it??
LOLOL I am just kidding there, do not flame me!
Tony
http://home.hawaii.rr.com/impala/
BTW, they are only selling at MSRP, wouldn't even accept my offer of 195.00 under
Chris
http://members.home.net/chrbut
Question: Has anyone noticed a noise when turning their cruise control on/off at relatively low speeds (i.e. @ 45 mph). I happened to do so last night on the way home from church, and found when I set the cruise @ 45 mph, it made an audible click that seemed to come from the front drivers side of the engine area, and when I hit both buttons to turn off the cruise, it made a similar sound. It sounded very similar to the clicking/clunking coming from the ISS, but it was a singular sound, not a series like what I hear applying the brakes.
In fact I even read somewhere that a larger gas tank has been incorporated to compensate for the lousy mileage.
Ken
You see, I realized after the last reapir that they actually did fix the seat back recliner OK. It's just that the seat rails are also loose, causing a slight wobble.
They're familiar with the seat rail TSB, so I'm pretty confident at this point.
They replaced the recliner, which solved most of it. However, now that I don't have the big movement in the seat back, I'm noticing a rocking in the base.
Considering there is a specific "seat track" TSB, and other here have mentioned having the rails replaced, I guess there is a fair amount of this going on. It may be that some people don't care. It's not huge. But, I'm picky like that.
Thanks for keeping your eyes open.
Both have the radio/cassette/CD combo. Did they sort out the sound issues for 2002?
Anything else I should consider?
Rich
Did you say you're getting two 2002 LS? Dang!
and not visible until the cover came up or did the cover come loose and then the leather caught on something. Not sure- but I did notice the loose cover when it snagged on my leather coat- visible foam padding at the edge of the cover. Keep a sharp eye out
on the leather seats folks- it could be very pricey to replace them on your own.
Art
A dealer told me that it detects glass breakage in case of a robbery and triggers horn and lights. Anyone know more about this? Opinions?Could it possibly decrease insurance rates? What does a similar after-market alarm cost?
I suspect it's just the cruise control mechanism and nothing to worry about (at least I HOPE that's the case!).
Brad
Over the life of my car (18,058km since May 14/01), here are the stats (format is litres/100km - US MPG - CDN MPG):
Lifetime actual average: 10.21 - 23.34 - 28.03
DIC actual average: 9.09 - 26.13 - 31.38
Best actual: 7.44 - 31.62 - 37.97
Worst actual: 12.63 - 18.63 - 22.37
I agree that the DIC is more accurate over long highway distances. As soon as you do lots of city driving or stop-and-go driving, the DIC completely loses it.
One interesting thing I have noticed is that the low-fuel warning DOES seem to be accurate. I've tested it a few times, and regardless of what it thinks your "range" should be, it seems to come on when I've got about 10 litres left in the tank (or about 100km range left).
Brad
than an add-on car alarm system- this per my insurance carrier. I believe the extra money was
worth it- I also absolutely love the control for the radio on the steering wheel. I believe this adds
to my safety- not fumbling for the radio controls. Think it all through and make your choices.