Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Honda Odyssey vs Dodge/Chrysler minivans

1171172174176177335

Comments

  • marine2marine2 Posts: 1,155
    The ortega is a very curvy moutain road in the dodge I was a little nerous too much body lean and the transmission isn't set up to slow you down no 2nd gear setting availiable so on the way down you have to brake(some people will say NEVER use you tranny to slow down a car,

    I have driven from Phoenix to Prescott a couple of time this year in my 2005 Dodge minivan and didn't encounter that kind of body leaning in my van and there is one big mountain to cross with lots of turns in it By contrast, I found this on the internet of a test drive of the Ody. on mountain roads.

    "As on its passenger cars, Honda tuned that suspension tightly. The vocal engine, decent tire grip, and busy ride quality make it feel connected to the road, and the turning radius is nearly as tight as a sedan's. Like the Accord it's based on, the Odyssey gives the feeling that it can be tossed around corners a bit. Taking it up on the offer ruins the illusion, however, mostly because the capsizing feeling that comes with any aggressive turn reminds you of how high you're perched. That, plus too-slow steering, plus the Odyssey's not-so-mini measurements, make mountain runs a nervous affair. It's probably best to be content with the Odyssey's feel in the city, and best to keep it there."
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    the transmission isn't set up to slow you down no 2nd gear setting...

    Every Dodge or Chrysler mini-van I've been in has had a second gear selection.

    Dusty

    My 2001 caravan Van had D 3 L R they were the only selections. Which one is 2nd???
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    have driven from Phoenix to Prescott a couple of time this year in my 2005 Dodge minivan and didn't encounter that kind of body leaning in my van and there is one big mountain to cross with lots of turns in it By contrast, I found this on the internet of a test drive of the Ody. on mountain roads.

    Wow do you believe everything you read, the guy asked my opinion. I rode the roads and thats how I felt. Is that so big a deal to try and make my opinion trivial. Of coarse it is :P
  • marine2marine2 Posts: 1,155
    Wow do you believe everything you read, the guy asked my opinion. I rode the roads and thats how I felt. Is that so big a deal to try and make my opinion trivial. Of coarse it is

    I don't know what year Dodge you drove, but my 2005 didn't feel that way. It's wasn't said to make your opinion trivial and I didn't mean it to sound that way. Just to let that person know the new Dodges aren't that way .But as you know, there have been much blasting of the Dodge by Honda owners and I wanted to set the record strait as to how the 2005 handles mountain roads and also show what a professional tester said of the Ody, on mountain roads.
  • dennisctcdennisctc Posts: 1,168
    I had my baby up in the mountains of West Virginia over the holiday. The last 15 miles to the campground takes an hour due to hairpin curves, very steep grades and roads wide enough for only one car (due to wash outs). My DCX SXT handled it great!!!
  • dlovull1dlovull1 Posts: 8
    It is great that I am getting feedback on both sides on both cars to help my selection but remember I have driven my dodge for 9 years and I have had pretty good luck with it except for annoyance problems. It does drive and up hills and has taken me where I wanted to go. In test driving and looking at the interior apperance I felt the honda had a different ride than the dodge but not radically different and only time would tell if I would dare to say better which would mean I already own the car. The same holds true for the interior. If the honda was better I have made a guess out of the blue that it is 10% better. That still does not come close to the 25% price difference. I am retired and I could use any money I can get. Dodge becomes the choice.
    Dave
  • macakavamacakava Posts: 775
    " I am retired and I could use any money I can get. Dodge becomes the choice."

    With your above description and the driving preference spectrum I have decscribed many times in the past, the DGC would fit you like a glove. Go for it!
  • badgerfanbadgerfan Posts: 1,564
    Your "phantom wipers" were a common problem in that era Caravans and dealer should have been able to fix if it failed under warranty I believe it was a problem in the steering column wiring or the multifunction switch..

    The glove box door retainers on our 1996 Caravan also failed after warranty and were so simple to replace I did it myself, and the parts were so inexpensive the dealer gave them to me. The replacements did not fail now at 8 years of ownership for us. Both of these were really minor issues.
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    The same holds true for the interior. If the honda was better I have made a guess out of the blue that it is 10% better. That still does not come close to the 25% price difference. I am retired and I could use any money I can get. Dodge becomes the choice.
    Dave

    At the price your getting the Dodge is a good value. Me and my wife liked the Honda better and got a pretty good deal on the EX-L with dvd only about 3000.00 more than a dodge with the same equipment, and less than the sienna. Getting a new car is always nice. Enjoy your new vehicle and have a good time. Hey if your retired you should be putting more miles on your van. If you can save $8000.00 dollars thats alot of money for taking vacations/recreation. I just like to keep people informed on why I bought the Honda. I liked the ride better(results may vary) comfort, safety features, and packaging. Even as I write this someone is ready to tell me I didn't!!! Dodges reliabilty is getting much better and after 20 years maybe the 41TE issues are a thing of the past CR says they have improved from below average to above average since the late 1990's.
  • hansiennahansienna Posts: 2,312
    Why is the opinion the DC minivans have THE MOST ATTRACTIVE exterior styling a subjective opinion :blush: while "The Honda was the only minivan my Wife thought was even a bit good to look at !!" a responsible reply? :lemon:
    Sales numbers indicate that DC minivans are THE MOST PREFERRED .
  • macakavamacakava Posts: 775
    To some men, the Quest has a sexy, seductive exterior look/appeal to it, especially from her rear BUTT!

    Maybe your wife senses competition and is steering you the other way! :)
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    "The Honda was the only minivan my Wife thought was even a bit good to look at !!" a responsible reply?

    Well, it is my wife's opinion. And I din't say it was anyone elses like your trying to imply. Sales are not all about looks as our good friend Dave said he would rather keep some money in his wallet(nothing wrong with that Dave) And as far as I'm concerned that lady has great Taste!!! ;) Take it easy Hans your gonna blow a gasket. I still love ya man!!!
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    Sales numbers indicate that DC minivans are THE MOST PREFERRED .

    You know there is a difference between most prefered and most purchased. I prefered a Subaru WRX STI but with 3 kids I got a Honda Odyssey.

    Let's look at edmunds most consumer most wanted MiniVan-The Honda Odyssey!!! Here's what they have to say!!!!

    Minivan: Honda Odyssey

    The Honda Odyssey conquered this category thanks to a sympathetic restyling that allowed the car to become the hands-down winner by a clear majority of votes. None of the other vehicles, not even last year's winner, the Toyota Sienna, registered more than half of the enthusiasm that consumers seemed to have for the new 2005 Honda Odyssey. The addition of optional eight-passenger seating with a stowable middle seat, second-row chairs that convert into benches, and generally improved space and noise dynamics undoubtedly helped the Honda Odyssey to reclaim its rightful crown in the minivan hierarchy.
  • marine2marine2 Posts: 1,155
    Myself, I like the exterior of the Dodge better, but not a lot better than the Honda. Inside, it's all Honda by looks. It then boils down to what you like better and what features you feel you must have for the price you want to pay and how your going to use it. I think now, you'll find both vans pretty reliable. I think by now, everyone knows how I'm using mine. I couldn't have a van without stow-n-go. But that's me. I'm sure the way some of you use your van, stow-n- go means nothing to you.
  • hansiennahansienna Posts: 2,312
    The Grand Caravan, Odyssey, and Sienna each have some of them but not all of them in any one of the 3...at a price I consider reasonable. ;)
    The Sienna XLE has all the features but in Denver Region, all XLE's include XLE Package # 4 that is $2575 bringing the MSRP up to $ 32,365. The 2nd row seats of the Sienna are not comfortable for me. :cry:
    The Odyssey has the most comfortable seats, the easiest to use 3rd row folding seats, the most power, the nicest cloth interior (Grey with bluish tint) with the prettiest color (Ocean Mist Metallic) and has an MSRP of $ 28,710. The Odyssey lacks the overhead console with compass, temperature, and trip computer that I like in a minivan. :cry:
    The Grand Caravan SXT has all the features but the trip computer now lacks the current fuel economy reading that is included on my lesser 2002 T&C LX. (The Sienna has that feature.) :confuse:
    The higher price of the Sienna XLE with Pkg # 4 disqualifies it for me while the Odyssey would be my first choice if price were comparable to the GC SXT. Based on all the above factors, the much lower actual selling price of the GC SXT makes it my first choice. I can do alot with the approximately $ 5,400 lower actual selling price of the GC SXT vs Ody EX or almost $ 9,000 lower selling price vs Sienna XLE. ;)
  • mrblonde49mrblonde49 Posts: 626
    The DCX color Magnesium is the nicest color out there, IMO. Saw another on the road yesterday The color on their website (where it looks like a standard dark green) looks NOTHING like the real life color.
  • dennisctcdennisctc Posts: 1,168
    "The Honda was the only minivan my Wife thought was even a bit good to look at !!"

    Jeezzzz, what do women know about automobiles??????? :P

    Shame on you guys for letting them have ANY input!!!!!
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    The DCX color Magnesium is the nicest color out there, IMO.

    I haven't seen it in person, it is probably pretty nice. My vote is for Honda Odyssey Sage brush Pearl. It's like 3 colors in one, just change the lighting. It's a greenish, blueish, grayish color. I think it's the Boss! ;) I'll keep my eye open for the Magnesium!!
  • socalawdsocalawd Posts: 542
    Jeezzzz, what do women know about automobiles???????

    Shame on you guys for letting them have ANY input!!!!!


    Dennis I'm sure your wife dosen't read this forum or you'll be getting none. We all know who gets input into the family car!!! BTW my wife is smart she knows where the gas goes and to tell me if any lights go on, strange noises, wierd problems happen.(well sometimes she tells me) But I'm sure she can put gas in the car!!!
  • motown1motown1 Posts: 2
    Just my $.02

    I get to spend a considerable amount of time behind many of the mass market people haulers. Everything from around town to long highway trips.

    If changing loads (people and/or alternatively, stuff) is the intended usage, the DCX vans are nearly impossible to beat. A vehicle with power sliders and hatch and the SNG is, IMHO, leagues better than anything I've used.

    Granted, some of the imports have superior powertrains; however, those advantages pale in comparison to the game-changing superiority of the Stow N Go system. It's hard to describe until you've lived with one for some time.
This discussion has been closed.