Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.com/showthread.php?47728-Open-air-Picnic-Cand- y
I like it much better than the same year Valiant, Falcon, or Chevy II wagon.
Well I guess you could bring the Christmas tree home in it. :P
Mainstream=successful, but oftentimes, boring.
Well you never know what might "catch on" until you build one, that's true---in this case, wrong guess.
I think the idea is very interesting, and fun to look at, but also totally whacko.
The Matchbox version was cool too, even had the retractable roof panel
Even as a kid, the Wagonaire was my favorite Matchbox. I was a closet Studebaker buff then!
The UPI did use Wagonaires as camera cars. I'll have to look for a link of a pic to post.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VjsDd--MJxs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOm5P1AkUi4
A friend gave me the two DVDs of Studebaker TV commercials for Christmas available from the Studebaker National Museum. It was fun to see Mike Wallace and Tom Bosley in Studebaker commercials. Other actors in Studebaker commercials or printed ads were James Mason, Art Linkletter, Red Skelton and Zsa-Zsa Gabor. Clint Eastwood and George Burns were on Mr. Ed too. It was a very popular show at the time.
Studebaker used Wagonaires as camera cars in some of their TV commercials where they were advertised as platforms for moving cameras.
Most of them were shot at the Studebaker proving grounds. Nice image here. http://www.pbase.com/redtop/image/81902560"
I believe that it is still the largest sign in the world.
While I was looking for the Wagonaire camera commercials, I found Tom Bosley (Mr. Howard Cunningham in Happy Days) in a 1956 Stude commercial here. He just died very recently.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVdKKne8_hk
The $99K selling price was before commissions/fees.
Someone posted on the SDC forum that he'd seen the car and it would not have garnered a first-place award at a Studebaker Drivers' Club national meet judging.
Actually if this was a spectacular frame-off restoration done to extreme standards, then the builder didn't make any money, even at that price. Scary thought, what superb restorations cost these days.
http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.com/showthread.php?16100-Photos-from-SASCO-(lots-of-big-pix)&highlight=sasco+sheetmetal
My brother-in-law bought NOS rear quarters for his '56 Hawk there about three years ago--about $600 for both if I remember correctly.
Generally, an over-the-top, unheard of, never to be seen again price like that is probably indicative of a professionally restored car to amazing standards.
You can't spend less than $75000 these days if you turn your car over to a restoration shop, and that would be for a relatively plentiful and well-known type of car.
The only Golden Hawk I expected to see selling for anythhing near that price would be the one now owned by Roger Ebert. Here is a great article about Roger and his Hawk. http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/12/ive_got_the_sweetest_set_of_wh.html
I really enjoyed the part where he says he enjoyed driving it with his left elbow hanging out the window. My Commander has the same body and with that big steering wheel, that is the most comfortable way to drive it.
http://www.mystarcollectorcar.com/2-features/editorials/1010-barrett-jackson-day- -3-lost-in-the-fifties-and-happy-about-it.html
"Since I saw the GH in person I will state that this is a crazy amount of money for that car. It would not be capable of garnering a first place at an SDC International meet."
At the bottom of the Ebert article is a video clip from the movie "Held Up." Lots of nice images there, but the 8-track tape player is definitely wrong. That movie used two Golden Hawks and my friend owns one of them here. He and his wife are directly behind the car.
I'm not sure, but back in the mid fifties I'm thinking the Hawk was a series of lines topped off by the Golden Hawk, then Silver Hawk and then plain old Hawks?
A bunch of boozed up bidders with egos and more money than they know what to do with coached on by the floor people.
I wonder how many of those "bidders" are shills?
If similar cars sell 20X at B-J for that same money, then I take notice that a new plateau might in fact be established---but a 1X fluke doesn't really relate to the real world.
I remember one year when some guy paid more for a reproduction Duesenberg than for the real thing. We buzzed about that for weeks. :surprise:
Brooks Stevens did fine work for Studebaker the last few years. Styling is subjective of course, but I think the '62 and '63 Larks seem more 'upscale' in general than everybody else's compacts at the time, and the '64 still looks good IMHO by even later standards. All done on a shoestring by Mr. Stevens.
http://photos.aaca.org/showimage.php?i=22806&c=505
This is what is meant by "classic styling". If it's "classic" it doesn't start to look dated and odd to the modern eye.
To be fair about it, the "new" Avantis are far worse---they are really hideous to me. The older ones are more "pure".
If the Avanti had a different nose on it, it might even be handsome.
I think the styling is what has held the car back in value for so long. Values have been stagnant for a long time and it's not an easy car to sell at a decent price. You can still buy very nice ones for the price of a KIA.
I think some of the Avanti pricing stagnation is, to me it really doesn't look like an old car. I mean, it has curved side glass and very minimal trim. Most didn't have any optional wheels and the colors were muted. People who like lots of glitz (like many who like old cars) won't find it in an Avanti. I've heard in Studebaker circles that the Avanti, compared to a lot of other cars of the period, is like the simple black dress with single strand of pearls. Personally, I agree, although like the GT Hawk more even though its age is more apparent.
Ironically, I got a card in the mail today from a woman in Leawood, KS. All I can think of is that she must have gotten my name from Feb's Hemmings Motor News which I had an article in. She asked me if I had any of the old "Studebaker News" dealer newsletter as she was pictured in one with the new Avanti she bought in college as a twenty-year-old. She named the dealership in Grand Forks, ND. For some reason it all sounded familiar to me. I own only three issues of that newsletter, and by God, her (small) photo, getting the keys from the dealer, is in one of the three and the article underneath notes that she was the first delivery of an Avanti in North Dakota! Small world. I plan on sending the magazine to her gratis.
http://carphotos.cardomain.com/ride_images/3/237/4784/25592391671_large.jpg
Both the Avanti and Hawk were utilizing "long hood, short deck" styling while GM was still doing the "short hood, long deck" thing.
Whenever a different or "radical" car design appears, people tend to love or hate it, with few neutral opinions. I posted this link before, but here is a list of rich and famous people who loved the Avanti http://wizbangpop.com/2009/07/09/cars-of-the-stars-the-great-studebaker-avanti.p- - - - - - - - hp
There were only two models of American cars that stayed in production long after their parent company died - the 1937 “coffin nose” Cord 810 and the Studebaker Avanti. Some might say, “What could be uglier than a car that looks like a rolling coffin?” Others would say, “Wow, I really like that!” These two cars were never intended for everyone.
This page has many nice images of Avantis and Hawks.
http://oldcarandtruckpictures.com/Studebaker/Hawk.html The final image is of a gold 2005 Avanti that is owed by my neighbor who encourages me to park my 1955 Commander hardtop in front of his house. (He likes them both too.)
The Avanti was first introduced in 1962, and forty-three years later, people were still trying to build and sell a car that looks like it. I would say that qualifies it as a “classic” design.
I have a Strato (dark) blue '64 Daytona Hardtop. I've posted this link before, but here are my two Studes:
http://forum.studebakerdriversclub.com/showthread.php?16626-Bill-Pressler-s-63-a- nd-64-Daytonas&daysprune=-1
Disc brakes, fastest production car at the time as verified by U.S.A.C., three-speed automatic which could be shifted manually through three forward gears, full instrumentation, and seats four. OK in my book!
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/studebaker-avanti-6.jpg
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=290517569797
I think what killed Avanti values was the regrettable attempts to reproduce the car on and on and on by independent people. They just made the car worse and worse, not better and better, unlike say the Cobra reproductions which keep the original's styling and often improve the mechanicals tremendously.
In the fake-Cobra case, these repros enchance the public's love of the original; in the fake-Avanti case, I feel it degraded it.