Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I have had a Ford dealer here treat me that when when considering an Expedition. My Lincoln store never treats me that way.
Here is my issue with the LS at the risk of offending certain people. Here in LA, where I live, 3 out five people driving the LS seem to be 80+ in age and alot of females at that. I am 38 and male. Am I not the demographic for this car? I know it sounds silly, but I have to consider this.
First, how loaded is that 525i compared to the loaded LS-V8? I'd imaging that a LS V6 competes more with the 525i.
Second, if you are concerned about performance and image, you should be comparing 530i's or 540i's to the LS-V8?
I heard some LS demographics a while back. IIRC the median age is 51 (that is half of the LS customers are under 51 years old and half are over 51). IIRC sales were around 65% to males with male customers heavily weighted to LS V8's and sport package models.
Around here the it looks like mostly people over 60 years old drive 525i's (pretty even between male I female). The younger (40 - 50 years old) more status concious and free spending drivers are the ones with 530i's and 540i's. While the under 40 crowd is in 3 series. Then again, I suppose the average person couldn't tell a 2000 525i from a 2003 M5 from a 540i. I guess what I'm saying is IMHO you are being a little silly about this.
There are many people your age driving the LS. I an 43. I have personally met people in their early 20s with LSes. As the earlier vehicles get older (and less expensive) they are becoming popular with the younger generation.
The real problem is V6 models (base & premium) are disappearing much faster than the V8s, due to the heavy discount. You can/should check Lincoln's web site to see the inventories of your local dealer(s).
Hope this helps, beaconcar93, and good luck.
You know I never thought of maybe going down to a new-improved 6 to get into a new LS.
Anyone have perf times on:
2001 V8
2003 V8
2003 V6
thx!
Ace
2000 V8 7.2 / 15.2 sec - early build with 3.58 rear end
2000 V8 7.5 /15.7 sec - later build with 3.31 rear end
2000 V6 9.0 / 16.8 sec - auto trannie
2003 V8 6.5 / 14.9 sec - C&D review
2003 V6 8.3 / 16.4 sec - Consumers Reports.
Note CR's times are usually slow vs. other rags, I'd guess if C&D tested it they's probably get 8.0 & 16.1 for times.
I test drove a 2003 V6 and thought that from a stop lower speeds, say 20 - 60 mph it felt almost as fast as my 2000 V8 with 3.31 rear end. Where the V8 still has it over the V8 is higher speed acceleration, say 60-80, 60 - 90 etc.
The dealers up here (New England) are claiming that there is only $4,500 in rebates available on a LS purchase. $3,500 factory rebate and $1,000 Ford Credit if you finance through Ford Credit. They are advertising V6 bases for $25,999.
On the RCO (lease) program they are telling me that up to $5,500 in rebates are available.
The Lincoln web site says that 0% APR PLUS $2,000 in rebates are availble, but the dealers here say that is not so.
First off - you folks are great - thanks for all the useful info on a free site!!!
I have a 2001 V8 sport, so it is probably on the slower axle. The 6 sounds good, but boy teh 8 seems like the way to go, all be it about 10K more. I dunno. Something tells me the incentives come sept 3 should be real good.
Ace
slunar, at the time (one month ago), the incentive was 3500(ford/lincoln cash) + 1000(f/l cash) + 1000(ford credit cash) + 1000(drive back to L/M bonus - 1k for lincoln, 500 for mercury). I was told they are all national incentives, but this could be wrong, maybe some was just regional.
$1,000 customer cash ($3,500 if no 0.0%)
$1,000 bonus cash for financing w/ FMCC
$1,000 rebate for buying V8. This is a manufacturer to dealer incentive but they agreed to give it to me. I was told rebates vary by region and they had to verify the last two but finally agreed. Is there another $1,00 out there? Not sure where the $6,500 comes from.
What helped me decide was 1) I loved the car, 2) incentives helped a lot 3) dealer gave better trade on my car than any other. I said, I like the CTS but they aren't dealing much on them now.
By the way, re demographics, I'm 37 and I've seen a variety of ages driving these cars. I don't feel like I'm driving an older persons car. (is that politically correct enough?)
Re dealers, I went to two with two very different experiences. One was more like a stereotypical used car salesman but this one is closest so this is where I would have it serviced. He said very plainly that the level of service is different if you don't buy from them. I didn't care for that at all and I bet his manager would disagree. The other is the one where I got it from. They were courteous, professional, helpful and most of all, not pushy.
I'll continue to follow this board and will report with comments good or bad.
Rich
I refer to my '03 LS V8 as a mood-elevating mile-eater. I've had it for six weeks, 3,000 miles, yet when I go the the garage, the attraction to drive the LS exceeds that of my '01 Mustang GT 5-speed convertible.
-Paul
Congratulations on your new LS. You made the right choice. The rear windows should not be a problem. The cable retainer was changed from plastic to metal in Jan 02. It looks like that change solved the problem. Also the window problem mostly affected cars that are in hotter areas than the northeast. Best I can tell there are very few LS's that are affected by the overheating issue. I've heard similar horror stories about both Caddy & Lincoln dealers. I just saw an article somewhere that Caddy wants to cut down significantly on the # of dealers they have so it sounds like Caddy knows they have problem dealers.
No big suprise -- the new LS 6 is slower off the dime than the LS 8. I see absolutely no difference in car response to the 03's drive by wire vs the 00's direct cable link. The tranny is definitely smoother in the 03 than the 00 -- no question -- and it has nothing to do with age. The brakes are lighter touch on the 03, the steering a bit lighter. The ride is identical. (both are non-sport). I am sure the 03 LS 6 is faster than the 00 LS 6 -- but 8 cylinders is eight cylinders -- and you can really feel the difference going up freeway on-ramps, or passing cars going up hill at 60 mph or higher.
Personally, I like the hydraulic (00) cooling system that is very responsive to engine temps over the newer (03) (and cheaper) electric motor fan. And I hate the new plastic nickel interior -- but like the sculpted, Mercedes inspired, door panels.
Personally, I would complement grandma on her purchase of an LS8. The demographic for Evos and WRXs may be more to your liking but do you really want to join that cohort?
Different subject. My car has the Michelin Pilots on it and they look like they could cost a few bucks when replacement time comes. Anyone know what the expected tread wear is on these?
"Then the comment about "engine noise at high RPM's" It's an American car...we like our engines to sound that way, dammit!"
Dead on, man. I mean, if you're going to have a 280hp V-8, I want to hear it. It gets me going more than anything else.
Thanks for any help.
On the hydraulic cooling system on the 00, ANT may correct me on this, but I think it was trouble prone, so the retrenchment back to the electric cooling fan was probably a good idea. I don't think it was just about being cheaper....I think the hydraulic system was a nice idea, but a failure.
Ace
Assuming the list on the LS you looked at is $48,045, Dealer invoice + LDMA comes to $44,258. Plus if what rfdevil1 says is right the dealer gets another $1,000 in dealer cash. So forgetting any trade and adding in the dealer's holdback, the dealer is trying to make $6K in profit off you, not including your trade in.
Now getting to your trade in, $17K sounds low. I'd guess that the dealer would try to resell your LS for about $22K, that is a $5K profit on your trade in.
So it seems to me this dealer is trying to make $11K in total profit on you.
I'd look for another dealer.
In all honesty, I couldn't justify $20K to trade up 3 model years. My 2000 runs and looks great, and has only 25,000 miles. Sure, I'd like to upgrade, but it's just too little bang for too big a buck, IMHO.
Thanks for the advice. I thought 17K was low, and was actually thinking if I got 19-20K I'd be happy. Lets say I got $ 44K deal on the new one (I plan on using hte 0%), 19K for the used one, that's still 25K for 2 model years diff. The numbers just don't add up. He has a used 03 w/ 7K miles on it for 37K (loaded prem sport w/ Navi). That would bring the delta down to 18K. I'm thinking I'll sit for a while and pick up a clean used one in 6-12 months. I could justify 12-13K delta but anything over that IMO is pushing it. Considering most 2002's right now are in teh high 20's, that means the 03's should be in the low 30's (with Navi), just a guess, sometime this spring.
Anyway, what do you guys think?
Ace
Yep. Voted with my money, & have no regrets.
gschwartz can tell you a story about someone who sold his 2 year old GS-430 and lost around $17K in 2 years.
Plain and simple, the more expensive a car is, the more depreciation will see in real $$. Luxury cars are a very poor investment. Many auto writers have pointed this out many times.
Thanks for the response. I know it seems like an annoyance but since I've started paying attention I think I've only been able to get the brake to work correctly once or twice. Seems like my problem is a little more frequent.
Mine's going back in later this week. I'll post if they figure anything out.
$20k will buy a really nice used LS, with plenty of the factory warranty left. Happy shopping.