Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I've been getting 26-27 in the city and 36 or higher on the freeway.
Nowdays, I do probably 85-90% city driving, so my combined average is just over 27.
I live in Tennessee and temperatures have been in the 70s-high 80s.
Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the sport model is supposed to get the same gas mileage as any of the other trim levels.
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.ef2c24d/25596#MSG25596
But I'll share thoughts here as well.
A lot of people compare these, and so did I. Funny thing is I wanted to drive a SkyActiv, to compare 2.0l vs. 2.0l, but the salesman brought the wrong car, and I ran out of time.
The Mazda3s was a little bit quicker, but not much. The design is more dated, with too many buttons and a tiny info screen a mile away from you. The seats were hard, though the SkyActiv's are a little better. It has much less room in the back seat.
The Impreza (CVT) felt peppy and responsive. I was really impressed. Never felt slow at all. It does get a bit loud if you floor it and keep it there, but it's quick enough that you never need to do that for very long. In normal use the CVT is simply smooth and unobtrusive.
Interior materials - close, but I'd give the nod to Subaru. Seats were much better, and you had more room front and back.
Steering tied, both good. Both seemed to have good brakes, no complaints.
Impreza wins in visibility by a mile. Love the mirrors on the doors. You see the curb much better. This sedan had a spoiler, which I would not get. They did not have any 5 doors to test drive. Again! 2nd time I went there.
I didn't get to push the handling much, but the ride in the Subaru was better, plus it was more quiet as well.
Manual mode in both seemed pointless to me. Mazda let me go up to 5, but not 6. Where's the manual control? I don't get it. I thought I'd love the paddles on the Subie but they seem totally un-necessary. Maybe in the hills?
It's funny. I have a Miata, and I really expected to like the Mazda3 better. Even with the handicap (S model instead of the I model), I would pick ... Impreza.
Perhaps what sealed the deal was an off-camber entrace ramp to a highway. It was uphill, sharp curve. I floored it and the Impreza was in its element, AWD gripping and keeping it neutral as it gained speed.
In the same spot the Mazda3s felt more twitchy, making you want to ease off the gas so you don't end up in the ditch.
Funny how you have a certain expectation from reading other reviews and such, but then drive them and surprise yourself. :shades:
I would like to hear from other new Impreza CVT owners on this.
Sounds like you were at Fitz Gathersburg. Was the BRZ Limited still there?
Should head out to the dealer in Frederick, as there are hills nearby. I've driven several new Subarus from that dealer on those mountain roads. Hook up with your brother Jose, and do it together.
Bob
BRZ was long gone. They said right up front "no test drives". I'm sure they sell them before they even arrive in dealers, anyway. Subaru should give one tester to each dealer but then the supply problem would only get worse.
i've had my impreza for 2.5 months now and used them on occasion. coming from a manual transmission before this, the paddle shifters just aren't the same thing. but i have used them on occasion on a hilly road and also when trying to break in the car and vary RPMs.
i personally would have preferred a more traditional triptronic manual transmission on the shift lever toward the side like a lot of cars have. i'm used to having my hand down there, but i'm sure some people like the paddles better. i've heard one complaint about the paddles is not being able to shift mid turn because one's hands aren't in the right position relative to the shifters.
Question ... when you remove the drain plug, does oil hit the plastic undercover or does it drain without obstruction?
The messiest part of past oil changes was cleaning up the oil that hit the undercover.
I did notice that there was some oil on the plastic surrounding the drain plug, but I think it may have been the splash from the plug falling into the pan (rookie move, lol). It seemed to drain pretty clean once the plug was off. I'm definitely going to consider the Fumoto valve at 7500 miles... Good luck!
I understand the appeal of Fumoto valves, but I'm personally not a fan. I prefer as few potential leak paths as possible, so I'll deal with a little splash and a new crush washer every 7,500 miles. That's just me.
Oh, I noticed the Subaru crush washers are a little different than the standard soft alloy washer. There's actually a little design to this one with a raise face designed to yield. The factory-installed washer was painted to the plug, making removal difficult and requiring a razor knife to separate the two.
going to change my oil in a couple of weeks so this is all great info you guys have shared. did you jack up the car? i've decided i'm going to try to do it without my jack and jackstands.
how tight was the drain plug and filter? in my past few new cars, i found that they can sometimes be incredibly tight coming from the factory? (not sure what my leverage will be if i don't jack up the car and i'm not as strong as i used to be )
I had the chance to pass cars in the same stretch of road recently, once with the Impreza/CVT and once with a 2012 Focus manual. I found that hitting the gas with the CVT, I accelerated quickly from 40 to 60 and rocketed past the annoying slowpoke. In the Focus, I had to downshift two gears to take off, and it still didn't feel as fast or powerful as the CVT.
When it comes to passing on a two-lane road, I now have complete confidence in the CVT. I have just over 3000 miles on the car, so perhaps the CVT has learned my habits and preferences. It seems to know that when I hit the pedal, I really mean it.
John
With the filter on top, it would be even less!
Just realized that with reasonably steep downhills (e.g. the Sunol grade on 680N in CA) I've had no issues with this. Maybe Subaru optimized the software in time for cars delivered in late April?
Ramps. I think it's possible to do the job without, but you'll need a shallow pan and long arm. Worst case you can use the included jack to lighten the load on one wheel (and block it for safety) to create more space.
how tight was the drain plug and filter?
I found a spec that listed the torque as 31 ft/lbs, and I'd believe that figure given the break-out torque. Really, not bad. My wrench had a 2-foot handle and there was just a little resistance.
The filter, on the other hand, was fairly tight. My standard filter wrenches wouldn't fit the very small diameter of the filter housing, so I resorted to my strap wrench. The rubber strap had a hard time creating sufficient bite, but with a little muscle motivation the thing finally turned. The new filter says to turn one additional rotation after initial contact, and I made sure to lube the rubber seal well. If it's equally difficult to remove at 7,500 miles I'll find an appropriately sized cap so I can use a regular socket wrench.
- have a pretty long arm (enough to know that i can reach the drain plug by hand. i also think my drain plug is shallow enough. i figure if i can do my wife's prius which has a lot less clearance (although the plug is much further up front), i should be able to do this one.
- if i have problems, i'll resort to my floor jack and jackstands. again, the only problem i forsee is not having enough leverage with my standard socket wrench which isn't too long to break the initial factory seal.
- good to know what i might encounter with the filter. i'm assuming that after this first one, i'll have no problems. i've always found that by tightening by hand, i can get 7/8 a turn in and that can be tweaked with a standard strap wrench although by hand (as long as my hand is dry) is tight enough. i also lube the seal with some oil.
I don't know if it is or not. I've read that the CVT adapts to how the car is driven, but I don't believe everything I read.
What I do know is that the CVT seems well programmed for passing situations.
Finally we starting to see Subaru reviews that don't harp on ugly styling.
Bob
Funny, they hint that it's derived from the BRZ engine, but we know it's the other way around. The FB existed first.
we'll see how it goes for me with or without jackstands.
probably next weekend and then i'll report back. after i crack it the first time, i really don't see it being a hard job without a jack or ramps given my experiences/struggles changing my wife's prius.
Bottomed out where? Front, rear, center?
The front overhang is much longer on the Impreza vs. Civic due to the Impreza engine being in front of the axle.
The rear overhang is pretty short (on the hatchback) and the muffler is fairly well tucked up behind the rear fascia.
* Sport and Limited (and Premium w/ Moonroof) have the same tires.
* Front/Rear fascias are the same.
* Suspension is suppose to be the same.
* Sport has lower sill cladding.
Are the Sport roof rails helium filled? :P
Nav/Bluetooth/Infotainment - I do thing the Veloster's infotainment system provides better sound, presentation, and bluetooth integration (but it has no Nav). I don't really need a Nav as I have been called the human GPS - but the wife needs to find her way around town. Looks like I can play DIVX videos on it if in park and parking brake engaged - will try that this weekend.
Extended Warranty - I found a dealer in MA that is offering the extended warranty hundreds cheaper than anywhere else. I plan to purchase it later this month via credit card using 10 pay periods.
Accessories - I only have the remote starter. Subaru has it start the car. But as soon as you unlock / open the car door, it turns off. You have to restart it with a key - which I guess is a good theft deterrent. Accessories on the wish list include
- a hitch (not recommended by Subaru) - for a hitch mounted bike rack
- Cross bars (Is there a difference between aero vs. normal other than looks?) - Do I have to buy Subie version or should I just go for Yakima / Thule?
- kayak carriers
- ski/snowboard
- cargo basket
- seat back protector
- all weather floor mats
Did anyone go for the leather fabric protector? Isn't Scotch guard the same thing?
Here's the link again for anyone else who needs it: link title
I got my email about Subaru confirming my purchase, called the 800# to do the survey, got my email today stating my gift card is in the mail ... going to buy a few year's worth of toilet tissue with mine
Yup, it needs a cargo extension.
Shoulda had an XL version [same length as sedan] (i.e., a real sportwagon).
That's what Subaru wants you to think.
But ... there are at least 5 people that don't want a CUV/SUV.
A new gen Impreza wagon would be ideal for satisfying those that still mourn the loss of the last gen Legacy wagon.
Displayed 100F on my commute home in the "desert" North East.
anyone this past winter confirm i shows sub zero temps?