Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Nissan Pathfinder Club Performance Mods

24

Comments

  • phil47phil47 Posts: 394
    Have always had problems with "induction" noise. One benefit of the Stillen kit I had on my 99.5 was that the filtercharger was in the fenderwell which pretty well eliminated the induction noise. It was also drawing colder air which is better for developing HP (as opposed to drawing warm air from the engine compartment which many pop chargers w/o air dams do). I'd think very carefully before putting on a pop charger duper. Hope this helps.
  • duperduper Posts: 127
    Thanks for the advice. I was only looking to it recently but still weighting the dis/advantages. I'm afraid that the louder noise will bother me but kinda tempted by the power increase, though it's minimal.
    Guess if I want more power, I have to trade in for the new engine :)
  • apb3apb3 Posts: 11
    I am looking at mods that will improve the economy more than performance, though I guess these usually go hand in hand. I am looking at Synth oil, K&N and maybe a cat-back. I have not seen any posts on cat-backs here, I was led to believe that this was the cheapest performance mod you can do for 10-15Hp - is this BS
  • For a NA engine, if there isn't a factory header, an aftermarket header will provide the best bang for the buck. The next bang is a CAI (well designed). Cat back is usually the weakest bang for the buck because the exhaust effiency is lowered once it gets to the restrictive cat.

    Going internal to the engine can unleash a fair amount of power but that is usually price prohibitive especially if you don't do the work yourself.

    Hope this helps.
  • socal_pfsocal_pf Posts: 3
    Which performance mod are allowed by the factory warranty?
  • smokey75smokey75 Posts: 434
    Hey, I know this is on the low end of the spectrum for performance mods, but has anyone with a 2001 PF changed their air filter to k&n? How does it feel as far as power? Thanks...
  • phil47phil47 Posts: 394
    I haven't noticed any significant HP increases, but I haven't done a direct comparison (you know, 0-60 runs immediately before and after). I only had 2000 miles on the truck when I switched, so it really hadn't even broken in yet and I wasn't very familiar with its power curve. To be honest, I switched mainly for the long-term savings in airfilters, and any improvement in HP or fuel economy is just gravy :-)
  • duperduper Posts: 127
    I found this link on a Toyota 4runner site that's really interesting.


    I was thinking of trying it on my Path, but found out the airbox doesn't have a flat surface as the one on the 4runner.


    Maybe someone have a better idea of how to do it right. It could a great alternative for an jwt intake if you worry about letting water in for offroading.


    http://www.toyotaoffroad.net/jnburtman/deckplate.html

  • pathy01pathy01 Posts: 2
    Weapon R has an intake available for the 2001 Pathfinder. I've been hoping for one to become available for some time now, figure some of you might be too. Check them out at www.weapon-r.com They also have a ram air kit which can be used in conjunction with the intake. I've got both ordered, should be arriving soon. I'll let you know what I think of them when I get and install them.
  • I recently installed a K&N filter in my 2001 LE. However, I was speaking to technician today who warned me that oil that may be given off by the filter may damage the mass air sensor and cause it to give false readings to the onboad processor. Has anyone heard of this potential problem?
  • jecklesjeckles Posts: 87
    I have tried K&N in several vehicles and am not impressed.

    I don't want to start any flame wars or anything, but K&N filters are for race cars that get rebuilt often. Oil analysis shows wear metals and silica (sand) increase substantially after switching to K&N. I could also actually see dust accumulating on my throttle plate.

    My brother uses one when he races (just in case he really gets an extra .5 hp) and then switches back to something more safe for normal driving. I recommend either use a high quality paper filter or reusable foam.

    Just my $0.02 on the subject....
  • byroniiibyroniii Posts: 5
    Hat off to everybody,
    Name's Jerry, now doing a boring survey on car brands. Just a few questions, what do you guys think of the above 5 brands? What would u associate with each of them? Do they mean something to you? For example, some people regard Buick as for elder citizens. I don't know. I just want to know what u folks think.
    Thanks.
  • exzaveexzave Posts: 16
    OK CAI is cold air induction got that - pretty self explanatory

    Cat-Back means putting exhaust system after factory catylitic converter. right..? New muffler and exhaust outlet right?

    What is a "header"? Is it just a specially designed exhaust manifold. Does it include new cat or work with stock one? Does one generally put in new muffler, exhaust outlet w/ new header?

    What about chips? These void warranties right? Are their any after market ECU's for pathfinders?

    Answers or links to general modding information appreciated.

    Exzave
  • smokey75smokey75 Posts: 434
    Hey, I'm considering a K&N FIPK Intake & Borla cat-back (not sure if they make one) for my 2001 PF LE. What are your thoughts on these? Thanks...
  • xplorx4xplorx4 Posts: 621
    There are several people discussing different engine mods on the forums at 4x4parts.com


    Here's a sample photo of someone who custom-made his own intake:


    (Click here to view the thread)


    image

  • Recall Alert: NISSAN PATHFINDER
    Owner Notification Date: 9/11/2001
    Number of Units Potentially Affected: 31,000
    Component Description: STRUCTURE:HATCHBACK HINGE AND ATTACHMENTS
    NHTSA Campaign Number: 01V282000
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Description of Recall Campaign:
    Vehicle Description: Passenger vehicles. 2001 model year Nissan Pathfinder
    vehicles manufactured from December 20, 2000, through June 8, 2001, and 2001
    model year Infiniti QX4 vehicles manufacturer from January 8 to June 8, 2001.
    Some of the brackets used to attach the two gas struts to the rear door (hatch)
    may not have been made to specification. At high ambient temperature, the
    increase in gas pressure in the strut(s) may cause one or both brackets to bend,
    resulting in the struts detaching from the bracket(s) when opening or closing
    the rear door.

    If both struts detach from the brackets, the door will rapidly fall down and
    possibly strike someone, possibly causing serious injury.

    Dealers will replace the brackets for the struts free of charge.
    Owner notification is expected to begin during September 2001. Owners who
    take their vehicles to an authorized dealer on an agreed upon service date and
    do not receive the free remedy within a reasonable time should contact Nissan at
    1-800-647-7261. Hawaiian residents should call 1-808-836-0888. Also contact
    the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Auto Safety Hotline at
    1-888-DASH-2-DOT (1-888-327-4236).
  • brian60brian60 Posts: 76
    Just installed some 265/70R16 Michelin Cross-Terrains on my 99.5 PF and they only seem to rub on the driver's side at about 3/4 of the way to fully cranking the steering wheel to the right while backing up. There's a ridge on the plastic fender liner directly behind the foglights that connects with the tread where it meets the outer sidewall. There seems to be a 1/2" more clearance on the passenger side, which seems to be enough so that nothing rubs. I used some Velcro to pull the liner back about 1/2", but I still got it to rub once today. I might redrill the three mounting holes for the fender liner on the bottom of the bumper if I can't get the Velcro to work. Just thought some of you guys might like to know.

    BTW, 265/70s really fill up a Pathy's wheelwells - it's one of those things you have to see in person. Parked next to a Yukon and a Sequoia a few days ago, and I definately had the meatiest tires. Only downside is that my 3.3L feels even weaker as it tries to spin all that rubber.
  • How do you like your new cross terrains? These Michelins are the top rated all season in the Pathfinder size out on the Tire Rack web page. About 30 places up the food chain from the Bridgestone Dueler H/T that came on the Pathfinder. The noise is supposed to be way better (less) and the traction better. Would you agree?
  • I really like my Cross-Terrains, although I only really have the Dueler H/Ts to compare them to. I actually didn't notice much of a difference with respect to road noise. I used to run my H/Ts at 33-35 psi, while America's Tire Co. inflated the Cross-Terrains to 30 psi. At these pressures, I never thought the H/Ts were particularly noisey.

    In the handling department, the Cross-Terrains absolutely destroy the H/Ts - even with the much taller sidewall. I haven't been able to test their inclement weather handling too much, but they did handle the oily California streets much more assuredly than the H/Ts. I'll be testing their snow performance once Tahoe starts getting some pow-pow. The Cross-Terrains definately soak up bumps, potholes, expansion joints, etc. much better than the H/Ts without sacrificing any driver feedback - it's like I popped for the QX4 or something. Better handling and more comfortable - I don't know how Michelin does it.

    I knew I wanted Michelins because of their longevity and I chose the Cross-Terrains over the LTXs because of superior street handling, superior treadlife, and equal all-season traction. When I bought my tires, Michelin was giving away a pair of Motorola Talkabouts (T5300?) with each set of tires - don't know if they're still running that deal.

    Good luck.

    P.S. Keep in mind that the Tire Rack survey still has a limited number of responses for the Cross-Terrains, so it could still turn out that they're worse than Wilderness ATs or something. ;)
  • Has anybody investigated using an ECU from a Manual PF (w/ 250 hp) in an auto trans PF to boost the hp?

    It seems like a chip maker could pounce on this idea and tweak our 240hp engines to get an easily documented 10hp increase. Aside from the transmission, I don't think there are many mechanical differences.

    Just thinking out loud...
This discussion has been closed.