Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Land Rover LR4 vs Toyota Sequoia vs Audi Q7
I am looking for a 7 passenger vehicle in the 50K range or below. I have a Volvo XC90 that has been no problem, but is also no fun. My kids are getting bigger, and the knees hitting me in the back while I drive is becoming a problem.
Looking for something that is larger for the middle row passengers, and handles better in the rain/snow.
Is the Sequoia too big? Seems pretty reliable. My last Toyota was an '83 Tercel, so I can't really speak to the current lineup.
I have an A6 which handles great in the snow, so that is what I like about the Q7, but the MMI is the dealbreaker. I have had 2 A6's where the MMI is broken and not covered under warranty. I use only the right side of the MMI now that works, and LOVE the QUATTRO!
I really like the cargo and smart interior design of the LR4, but am worried about reliability.
I am sure most would agree Volvo's are boring, but mine has been very low maintenance at 80K miles, so I keep it around.
Thoughts?
Looking for something that is larger for the middle row passengers, and handles better in the rain/snow.
Is the Sequoia too big? Seems pretty reliable. My last Toyota was an '83 Tercel, so I can't really speak to the current lineup.
I have an A6 which handles great in the snow, so that is what I like about the Q7, but the MMI is the dealbreaker. I have had 2 A6's where the MMI is broken and not covered under warranty. I use only the right side of the MMI now that works, and LOVE the QUATTRO!
I really like the cargo and smart interior design of the LR4, but am worried about reliability.
I am sure most would agree Volvo's are boring, but mine has been very low maintenance at 80K miles, so I keep it around.
Thoughts?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
For the Audi Q7, personally, I think it's a waste of steel... uglier than a troll. That being said, it's still an Audi, so you can expect the usual with your experience with it - if you can get past the looks!
For the LR4, it's the most luxurious of the three. It is also the most capable in terms of traction - quattro is fine if you're power sliding around corners in the snow - like you can do in the A6, but don't expect to be doing that in an SUV... mostly you will need traction in straight line acceleration and braking - and you don't need Quattro for that... the LR4 has a great powertrain setup compared to the previous model... but it is a bit thirstier than the previous model.
It all depends on what you really want to use it for most of the time.... I wouldn't want to put someone in the third row of the LR4 for long trips or on a regular basis - it has the best headroom and legroom, but it's somewhat uncomfortable compared to the Sequioa.. the Q7 is also uncomfortable.
WRT reliability on the LR - I have had an LR3 and an LR4 - The LR4 has worked out all the kins from a new design (much the same way the Disco 2 was much more reliable than the Disco 1).
In four months with my LR4, I have not had to go back to the dealer a single time - when I had the LR3, I had been back to the dealer six times in four months.
wrt comparison with a Volvo - there is none... Volvo's are very soft drives - the three vehicles you posted for comparison drive very differently than a Volvo. The storage space on a Volvo is a joke - the rear loadspace has a huge amout of wasted space under the rear deck... very low headroom in the storage space, and average performance.
The Sequioa will drive the most truck-like out of the three you posted, the Audi the most car-like.
Obviously you can tell because I have owner an LR3 and LR4 that I am a bit biased - but you did post in the LR forum.
Do yourself a favour and schedule a test drive with all three on the same day.. it's the only way to keep each vehicle fresh in your mind when comparing.
a.m.