Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
there needs to be a "one way" law, if you put the same model name on an OEM tire that you do at retail, build 'em the same. if that means we are offered a base choice of YoDude tires on a car order and the upgrades are to Firestones, BFGs, and Michelins, we need to be able to know what each of the four tires is all about.
aka bait and switch. in some endeavors, it's illegal. why it wasn't here, I don't know.
CAVEAT EMPTOR!
we don't until a thousand blow out and roll the customers over.
that's what's gotta change. if the OEM tire is a paperweight, it should be labelled as a Gasleaker Gutless-Wonder brand tire. and I would really like to see the construction details on the window sticker myself. they have the room.
am I too picky, perhaps so. but when I have the car sent to the dealer for warranty work like such, I think it's only fair if I would get it back with new parts in condition just like when I first purchased the vehicle. If other Explorers show the same thing on the back panel, then I have no claim. But case in matter, others don't.
hmmmm... come to think about it, you must be a proud employee of Ford Motor?
Don't get me wrong... I think the Explorer is fine so far (knock on wood), it's just that if anything like that goes wrong, fix it right. Order me the right part that's flawless.
Orignal post was just to share with others on here so to see if this is a common problem. Second post on this issue was an update, and I praised how greatly that bodyshop manager handled the issue. Third post was to share the result after I had the car fixed, along with my opinion about Ford's "quality is #1"...
my 2000 exploder limited has had a couple minor issues, nothing to get worked up over, and has been the best vehicle I ever had, for what it's worth.
No, I'm not a proud employee of Ford. I'm a motor vehicle enthusiast with an eye for bodywork surfaces that leads ME to be overly critical of factory sheetmetal and yes, plastic, imperfections. I thought maybe you were overreacting to the "standard" all-to-common surface imperfections. Windshields and suits aside, it sounds like you've got a real problem.
swschrad... don't get me wrong, although I only have 1600 young miles on my Explorer thus far, I am happy with the car except for this issue and a few other minor ones that are not worth mentioning. And I will have to say this, this Explorer of mine is definitely not the best vehicle I have ever owned, but I still like it.
Is there enough width between the wheels inside?
Thanks. And if not, what is the maximum width that will fit in the back of an 03 Explorer? Thanks, Paul
Thanks,
Steve
I have some doubts considering that a part-time system in which the switchable-drive yokes might not spin all the time would never be in phase to start with by the law of averages. but if you're AWD fulltime, and supposedly that's the base mode in the 2002 and later explorer/mountaineer, it might be interesting to check.
but you can see if the OD makes a difference by just locking it out around town when the predominant speed you drive is around the shift point. if the issue disappears, and you are of course maintaining the same speeds, it's a tranny issue concerning the OD. if not, it's a chassis/suspension/drive issue of some sort, and it's based on the RPMs. at that point, having had bad yoke bearings replaced on a drive shaft before, I would definitely consider a driveline excitement.
so far no service issues.
This truck has exceeded my expectations. I at the time was looking at the MDX and ML but the discounts on the Mountaineer were too good to pass up.
This is my first american vehicle in 15 years and I have been impressed.
Good luck with your purchase.
and if parking brakes do freeze, what can i do next time besides not using them? (i always use my parking brakes)
thanks
it is also possible for the drum/disk actuator to freeze where the cable connects.
one solution is to let it sit a few days if you can... the ice will eventually sublimate away. another is a heated garage. you could use alcohol-type brake cleaner on the linkage and that should dissolve out the ice.
one thing I have done for years after going through weather of excitement to help prevent freeze-up is to set and release the brakes a couple times when I park. this should flip out the mush before it sets hard.
good thing is i don't think anything is broken after hearing that pop. tested the brakes and parking brake and all working fine
I have a
mercedes 300ce (still have it and like it)
bmw 750il (gave to my dad, and like it until i got the mercedes)
honda CRV (for a very short time, and trouble free, and gave it up due to personal issue)
toyota mr2 turbo (loved it... and missed it, very much trouble free)
toyota 4runner (really missed this one, true trouble free)
mercury topaz (no comment... lol, it was ok)
dodge colt (ok car, no trouble really)
pontiac sunbird (piece of crap)
datsun 280z (was ok... toy car? lol)
fiat 131 (my very first car, also one that lasted me 2 months... lol)
oh, I'm only 31, so you can do the math... many of those cars I bought used.
and the reason why I picked the Explorer this time around...
1) the look of it (very important to me)
2) moved from S.F., CA to Ohio and needed a car for the winter. Also, been wanting to get a SUV for a long long time since I traded in the 4runner for the mr2 turbo.
3) 0% down, 0% financing, basically, free money
and I guess I asked that question about frozen parking brake was because I haven't at all experienced this kind of weather (lived in the san francisco most of my life). Only time I saw this kind of coldness was back in Feb (not even this cold) and when I went to tahoe (I don't ski so I didn't stay in the mountain for overnight).
and so far, i still like my explorer a lot except that little thing i'm still having to deal with the dealer about the back panel and a few minor stuff.
In addition the folding third row seat was a great feature. I too have gotten use to the siler interior finish.
Best of luck with your new Mountaineer.
Later production vehicles were switched to 17 inch
tire.
got 0 down 0% financing on it, so I didn't drill on the price too much, plus these explorers have been selling like hot cakes, guess the dealer really didn't need to worry about not cutting below MSRP (or that I didn't try harder...)
Try to remember they're machines..and it's a miracle they even work at all. That helps me when little things happen... Good luck.
yep, I hope and want to keep the explorer for a while myself (more than 6 months?? hehehhehee, hey might go 5 years, who knows?!).
I too thought about an Expedition, but did not need the room and thought it would probably be slower and use more fuel.
In addition, I found the interior of even the EB version of the new Expy to be quite plain, and hardly luxurious. (And what's with those silly looking, brushed-metal collars around the front cabin's air vents? Did someone from the new Thunderbird's design team fill-in one day for someone else on the Expedition's design team? It almost looks as though these stupid looking metal collars were an afterthought attempt to jazz-up the Expy's otherwise uninspired and bland interior).
Similarly, I found the new EB Expy's leather captains seats and rear seats to be woefully uncomfortable from the first time I sat in them, and I could not find the sweet spot for the driver's seat no matter how much I diddled with the adjustments, because THERE IS NO SWEET SPOT!! In particular, I found that the seat cushion of the driver's chair did not adequately and comfortably support my lower thighs; in fact, even with the driver's seat tilted fully downward, it still felt like my lower thighs were being impinged upon (and hung over) by a padded "shelf edge", rather like the edge of an uncomfortable lawn chair. Furthermore, I found these leather seats to be too firm, as in "hard", and the back seats were simply terrible. Why is it that GM seems to be the only manufacturer that knows how to design and make seats for the typical American rump (as well as offering engines with more than enough power for such massive vehicles?) If I'm going to spend $40,000.00+ for a mid-size or full-size SUV, it must at least offer comfy seats and a luxurious, well-appointed cabin interior, as well as plenty of power and muscle. Unfortunately, with the new Expy, Ford has once again missed the boat, in my opinion. What a shame.
The Triton engine is long in the tooth, huh? This is the same coil-on-plug, overhead cam engine I have in my Navigator? The one that can pull a load up Baker grade in 124 degree heat with the a/c on in 3rd gear, at 70mph, and not even bump the heat guage? Personally, I've never needed more grunt than my triton delivers. I may be mistaken, but I believe the GM modular engines are still pushrod design (talk about long in the tooth!)and they may finally have coil on plug, but Ford brought that out in 98, and GM just got on board, as they do with everything.
Now on the seats, this is a butt subjective topic, but the biggest knock I have had on Chevy's forever is the hole you sit in, so that sweet spot you like is exactly what I can't tolerate. It's what you get used to I guess.
And finally, overpriced, underpowered dog sled? Look if you hate the Expedition, get off the board and go over the Chevy board belong, and enjoy their complaints about piston slap in their new "short in the tooth" pushrod old fashioned engines.
Brushed metallic eyesores? You guys are getting pretty tough to please. (:o]