Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Low End Sedans (under $16k)

1138139141143144187

Comments

  • csandstecsandste Posts: 1,866
    When I bought my '01, everything was pretty muted and dull. Car looks good in red. The lens shapes (which I don't particularly like) seem to merge into the body with that color.

    Followed a GT hatch today and still wish they had sedan lights. If I was a Hyundai product planner I would have put on some Ricer-Nissan Altima type clear lenses to differentiate the GT's.
  • So, let me guess.....you saw this red GT, fell in love, made a deal on the spot, and then spent the rest of the auto show guarding it. ;-)
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,624
    Not quite. I did fall in love with it, but I didn't know the GT I bought was actually the one from the Auto Show until AFTER I bought it. But that is a long story, one that I documented ad nauseum in the Hyundai Elantra 5-door discussion.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Central CTPosts: 9,448
    "Subtle? It's not supposed to be subtle! It's called a GT"

    that's why i thought it was funny that you thought a rear spoiler was too 'showy'!
  • Not quite within an hour, yes, I had to rest up a bit after a grueling schoolweek. Nice to catch up on my 'Low End Sedans' reading.

    After looking at everyone's pictures(I already knew how those rigs looked like anyway but it's fun to re-browse through them for freshen-ups, eh?)I gotta tell ya somethin'. Kia body designers are tops in the business. No kiddin'. For all of rroyce's constant putdowns of any type of HyunKia vehicle I still like Kia the best. I've been Kia-sizing since May of '99 and whenever a car comes along to make me want to stray(be thinking Scion tC here, I really like that new rig)Kia produces a new vehicle that I latch back onto for futures lists(here's where all of your minds ought to be thinking '05 Kia Sportage 2.0L 4cyl. w/5-speed tranny!!)

    Oh, I still like the Kia Spectra body wrap better than Elantra. The rear of either rig is kinda plain, though I prefer Kia's pushed-up treatment better than the Elantra's look. As for the front end, well, it's all Kia Spectra up there IMO. Kia body designers have done it right, ever since the lowly '88 Ford Festiva hit U.S.shores with that cute little styling body, eh? Keep it up Kia!

    Y'all know that Ford engineers assisted Kia with original Sportage undercarriage design, right? It was that "real truck-like" ladder frame Ford helped them produce. Nice little relationship those two companies had in the 80's. Of course y'all know that Kia designed and built the Ford Festiva, right? That car still holds a pretty decent reliability reputation even to this day.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    I think you mean Ford Aspire. I'm pretty sure the Festiva of the late 80s wasnt a Kia.

    ~alpha
  • what was it's introduction year to the U.S., 1988? Anyhoo-it was built by Kia Motors of South Korea. Yes, that Kia. It's true.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Central CTPosts: 9,448
    i agree with you. i rented an 'aspire' one time.
    i did not enjoy it at all, but that's old news.
  • csandstecsandste Posts: 1,866
    At that time Kia was the best of the three Korean automakers. They had the goods when the Lemans (Daewoo) and Hyundais were sucking.

    The Festiva was engineered by Mazda and was essentially a Mazda 121. The Mazda 323 of the same era had a very similar dash layout to the Festiva.
  • The Aspire was also largely designed by Mazda, again the 121 rebadged. The Aspire was really just an example of a new model getting bloated and ruined by changing regulations, kind of like MGBs with big rubber bumpers.

    I owned a 1994 Kia Avella (the Korean name for the Aspire) in South Korea and it was a terrific little car. It didn't have the fun and tossable handling of the Festiva (Kia Pride in Korea), but it was just as quick, far more stable at speed and generally went about its business as well as any small Mazda would, only a bit smaller.

    The Korean model lacked airbags and doubtless other heavy safety gear, and in Korean trim, did 0-60 in I'm guessing about 10 seconds with the 5-speed. It also had power windows and a tachometer in the dash, options I don't think were offered on American Aspires.
  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    The late 80s Festiva was a Kia, then I stand corrected. But I was under the impression it was more Mazda.

    ~alpha
  • largely a Mazda design(per posts #2935 and #2936-great to get input from those that owned those rigs!). I was going on my own feeble memory. The 1988 Ford Festiva was the first car I seriously considered buying for my first new car. I didn't end up buying one but almost pulled the trigger. I ended up buying a used 1986 Mercury Lynx station wagon in 1989 from Budget Rental Car for $4995 with only 10,000 miles on it. Decent car but nothing standout-ish about it at all. It actually caught fire in the steering column on me. Insurance largely picked up the tab of rebuilding my Lynx.

    My first new car purchase ended up being a 1994 Ford Escort wagon(the only problem ever with it was a cracked manifold gasket at around 50,000 miles-fixed for free under Ford's warranty). Decent rig it was, really.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • The Aspire "SE" hatchback could be had with a tachometer. You occasionally see the clusters for sale on eBay. The 1995 base Aspire I had was terrific, but alas, a rebuilt wreck, and the dealer could not produce a title after nearly 3 months, so he had to buy it back. Gave me a nice 1997 Accent GS for the same price, also rebuilt, with a title, but alas, I wrecked IT 6 days later. Ended up with a 1988 Colt Vista wagon after all was said and done, go figure.

    I like the new Rio. Local dealer is offering the stripper (5-speed, no PS, no AC, no radio) for $5888. They have several. The other dealers have the same cars, same MSRP, but want $7995 or similar. So I bit, and lo and behold, my credit SUCKS, so I still need $3000 down. But the buyer's order shows $5888 as the sale price and the only questionable fees were the $43 for the title (title fee is $33 in this state), $50 for a documentary fee, and $289 for a "consumer services" fee. The $289 one is supposed to include some oil changes and tire rotations and offers bird-dogs if I refer someone who buys a car, $50, $100, $150, stuff like that. All in all, $6751.31. Wish I had it in cash, I'd be driving a Blueberry Rio right now.

    Here's the rub. This dealer says to add AC to the car is $2500. I figure it this way. Buy the $5888 car, take it to another dealer, have the AC put on for what I hope to be half that. I wonder if they'd even do it to a car sold by a competing dealer. I mean, the one dealer got screwed by having his bluff called on a non-AC equipped car, used for bait & switch tactics (no one in Texas buys cars without AC), but the other gets to make labor and parts profits on the AC install. Everybody wins, except the selling dealer, right?
  • It will debut next month at New York City's Auto Show. I just looked at a picture of it from the rear-side view and it looks great. It will offer a 1.6L 4 cyl. engine only but, thankfully, a 5-speed manual tranny or an automatic. It is a tad wider and a tad higher than previous Rio's. Check it out and see what I mean.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    I immediately thought of you when reading CR.org tonight!

    In an upcoming issue, the Hyundai Elantra GT will go head to head with a Chevy Cobalt LS, a Ford Focus ZX4 SES, the Honda Civic EX, and Saturn ION 3.

    The full reviews are not available yet, but members can view the overall scores of all compact sedan for rankings/ratings. The Elantra tested struck me as fairly pricey: $17,589. I'm guessing that was the only way that ABS found, with a high option pkg. Hyundai seems to be all about passive safety, but has been very reluctant with ABS- heck, the Accent just added it to the options list this year.

    Personally, I would have liked to have seen a Mazda 3 S and Suzuki Aerio in the mix, as the 3S has never been tested and the Aerio is a good deal different than when CR last visited it.
    ~alpha
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,624
    Well that's cool. I suppose it won't be before the May issue, since the Annual Auto Issue is next. And of course the Elantra is due for a redesign later this year, so it might be a long time before CR gets around to testing it again. But it will be interesting to see how the older designs (Civic, Focus, and Elantra) compete with the newer GM cars.

    It looks like they will be testing automatics, given the price of the Elantra. Too bad for us stick lovers, but I guess it's best for the majority of the marketplace. The GT is available with ABS/TCS sans moonroof, but for whatever reason they decided to go with the fully loaded models--maybe other cars besides the Civic EX had a moonroof. If they equip all cars equally (actually impossible given leather and TCS are not available on the Civic), the Elantra could still end up stickering lower than all the others. But that doesn't matter in CR's ratings.

    Since they are testing sedans here, it wouldn't make sense to include the Mazda3s. But I expect the Mazda3i will still rank at the top of CR's list after this review. It's already bested the Focus, Civic EX, Elantra GLS, and ION. I am very curious to see how they rank the Cobalt. They usually put a lot of store in rear-seat room, so it will get dinged for that. Here's how I predict they will rank the cars:

    Focus ZX4 SES
    Civic EX
    Cobalt LS
    Elantra GT
    ION 3

    The Focus beat the EX before and the Civic hasn't changed significantly since CR's last test. I think the Cobalt and Elantra will be very close in their rankings, but they will probably give the Cobalt the edge because of its exceptionally smooth and quiet ride. But who knows, the Elantra could offset that with better seating accomodations.
  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    A few points- my guess, and what I posited in my last post, is that to get an ABS equipped Elantra, they probably had to go with a fully loaded, top option pkg model. ABS is extremely rare on the Elantra in these parts.

    I'm not sure I understand your comment on the Mazda 3S. Its a sedan or hatch, and although I didnt state it, I meant sedan. I would just like to see how they view the sharper handling, stiffer ride, stronger acceleration of that model compared to the 3i they tested. Due to the bias toward practicality, the basic trim/engines of some models are preferred. And, I would have like to have known the overall MPG for the 2.3/auto.

    You were almost right about the ranking. The Elantra finished ahead of the Cobalt, which fared only midpack overall- the synopsis (which Im guessing will appear in the April Auto Issue) pointed to the Ecotec's raucous sound, somewhat disappointing fuel economy (but also very strong acceleration), as well as a cramped backseat. The highs for the Cobalt were listed as Ride and Acceleration, and the vehicle's score for Materials Quality/ Fit/Finish (whatever CR calls) was a big improvement over the Cavalier.

    ~alpha
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,624
    I have been told by Mazda salespeople that the 3s has the same suspension as the 3i. I suppose it's possible they didn't know their own cars, but if true I don't see how the ride and handling would differ signficantly between the 3i and 3s--unless you go for the 17" wheels option on the 3s sedan. I don't recall if the 3i that CR tested had 16" or 17" wheels.

    I've had no problems finding Elantra GTs with ABS in my area. In fact, I've seen more with it than without it, in both the ABS and ABS+moonroof packages. I've even seen several GLSes with ABS. It's a lot better than a few years ago, when CR first tested the Elantra. Back then, ABS was very rare on the Elantra GLS.

    I agree with CR's comments on the Cobalt. I'm not surprised the Elantra topped it--I did say I thought they'd be very close and maybe the Elantra would edge it based on factors like seating.

    P.S. Apparently the pages you are looking at are for members only, I can't find them on the CR site.
  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    Backy, indeed, I was under the impression that the s and i had different suspensions. Still, given the different engine, gearing, tires, equipment... for the same reason that you wanted to see the GT tested, I would still politely request CR to test the 3s. The 3i (both 5M and 4A)tested by CR actually had the 16 inch alloys.

    I guess ABS is still unpopular in the NJ/NY/CT area as compared to the Northern Middle US.

    Yes, the pages I am looking at are members only, which is why I wrote: "The full reviews are not available yet, but members can view the overall scores of all compact sedan for rankings/ratings"

    ~alpha
Sign In or Register to comment.