Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
If so, the brakes and/or the park brake cable or levers might have physically frozen in place. Water might have gotten into the calipers and frozen the pads/shoes compressed onto the rotor/drum.
This is only a slight possibility, but I have seen it happen.
I am not necessarily recomending you trying that as your problems sounds more unique being that you were only parked an hour and not four weeks...
I would try and jack up each wheel indvidual and see exactly which one is frozen and which isn't.
If it is just one wheel then possibly jacking up that wheel, putting chocks under the other wheels and gently tapping the rim with a plastic/rubber mallet might free the pad from the rotor.
If it has been really cold then maybe there is ice so spraying warm water on the pads/rotors might be good.
So I guess one wheel jammed because the caliper, being loose, "cocked" into a weird position?
I dunno---the explanation sounds a bit odd, but they were there and I wasn't.
Call them and ask if other bolts were checked.
Did you have any brake work done recently?
I thought I knew how to drive a stick shift.
Now, I'm not so sure.
There are many tutorials online, but they are for reading, and I find them hard to follow.
Does anyone know where I can get a videotape that clearly shows how to drive a manual transmission??
I don't want to have to go through that expense ($1,500!)
for a long time.
thanks
I think VW may be blaming the victim here, but I don't know...I can't see you drive....
and I DO shift with the pedal in. Like I said, I really thought I knew how to drive a stick.
I'm not sure if it's the "gear box" as you call it.
What they replaced looks like a plate. It is a round metal plate made of steel, I guess. And they did show me the one that they took out, and compared it to a new one. The old one was scratched, whereas the new one had a rough black surface.
I don't think this VW dealer is dishonest. They are good people, and they DID show me the old one compared to the new one.
Anyway, I still want to know if there is a video out there that shows how to drive a manual correctly.
Does anyone know?
te
Well okay, maybe you could have better driving habits.
Here are some good ways to kill a clutch. See if you have any of these bad habits.
1. Holding a car on a hill, say at a light, by working the clutch pedal in and out.
2. Resting your foot on the clutch pedal while the car is moving but you are no longer shifting....so your foot is resting while you are waiting to shift....your foot keeps constant light pressure on the clutch pedal.
3. "Lugging" the engine by a combination of too high a gear (like 4th or 5th) and too low a speed. The engine starts to chug and THEN you downshift after this warning.
4. Downshifting to brake the car at traffic lights on level ground.
5. Slipping the clutch to get out of snow or icey parking spaces.
So what's your score?
Still, there are times when it just can't be avoided, like when you're making a turn, or slowing down ....
and also guilty of #3. But again, it's not like I do it EVERY day.
The others I don't do at all.
But I'll work on #2 and #3 from now on.
Still, I wish I could observe someone who really knows how to drive a manual transmission.
2)A 5 year old car with 36,000 miles. If the majority of these miles where driven in city traffic, with a lot of stop-and-go, then 36,000 miles is about the expected, and accepted milage for a clutch/pressure plate. Therefore, nothing is wrong with your driving techniques.
Next to last manual car I had needed a clutch at about 36 or 40,000 miles. And it was almost all in-town driving.
A manual transmission car CAN be started in gear, but it's hard...usually it doesn't start, it just "hops" and stalls itself---so it has a kind of built in safety feature. But an automatic transmission, if started in drive, would just...GO, and quickly too. It would be very dangerous.
Shiftwrong... you seem to know about stuff like this?
It's hard to describe a CVT without diagrams.
Here, let this website do the work for me!
CVT: How it Works
At least for the CVT's that use the VDP set up. (I'm starting to get confused myself here!)
Shifty, Yikes... that CVT stuff in your link is really confusing. I don't blame you guys at all for wanting to bail on that question.
But, better fuel economy and improved engine performance between a narrow range of something or other will work for now.
In both cases, you get "ratios"
Now take the first pulley and squeeze the sides together. It would force the belt outward to the outside circumference edge of the first pulley, thereby increasing the diameter of what that belt surface is riding on. The second pulley, at the same time, would decrease in size. Now when the engine turns, it is a large pulley driving a small pulley, lots of speed, but low torque...ie 5th gear.
So instead of 5 (or X) specific gears, it is infinite. The belt can ride at any spot in this pulley set. The constant velocity terminology, comes from the fact that the engine could (almost) theoretically run at say 1K RPM. When you start out the pulley set up gives you more power. As your vehicle speed increases, the drive pulley compresses more and more, thereby continuing to increase vehicle speed up to your desired MPH.
Oh, one last question(s) then I'll leave you guys alone. Is this CVT the transmission of the future? And any idea on if the CVT will be more or less expensive to repair/replace than a standard 4/5 speed automatic trans.? By the way it is described, it sounds to be less expensive to repair.
I'm thinking of getting a Nissan Altima in the next year or two, and I understand all models have the CVT transmission. Thanks.
I am not aware of the details of current transmission technology. I looked at a Nissan Murano a year ago (wifes request) which had a CVT and drove it, ended up not buying it because of other family criteria. I've driven a CVT vehicle as a rental vehicle on a business trip couple months ago, it was a SUV of some sort and I thought a Ford. Unfortunately I flew in at about 2am, drove it to the hotel and then business meeting, then back out. I didn't have time to really investigate further or even remember the model.
The thing you notice when driving CVT is you don't feel it shifting, but the Nissan I test drove was sluggish when trying to quickly accelerate, or when a regular automatic would be 'downshifting'. When think about what is happening, you actually have to get a number of rotations on both pulleys before the belt is able to crawl it's way up to a different position on the pulley. You have to remember that both pulleys have to change the circumference at the same time. When one pulley diameter is getting smaller, the other has to be squeezed to get larger the equivalent amount....to keep the belt tension the same. If one pulley gets smaller and the other doesn't get bigger, the belt would just completely slip.
I don't know the belt technology that is in use in current CVT's. The pulley's I was involved with before is pulley and fiber belt technology, and I can't imagine what we think of as 'fan belts', holding up under 100K miles of transmission service. I'd imagine they'd have to have some metal or kevlar reinforcement, or may even be metal for all I know. Hard to wear gears of an normal automatic or manual transmission out. Current manual shift clutches aren't wearing or slipping when fully engaged. CVT's to me, would always have the potential of slippage/wear of the belt.
I personally figured I'd be a laggard in adopting this technology, same reason I haven't bought a hybrid, because I keep cars 10+ years and 6 digit mileage. Not sure of the resale values either couple years from now.
If you lease vehicles, and it's always under warranty....I'd look into it.
For instance in brakes, the new brake pads need to wear down to completely contact the rotors. The rotors actually need to go thru some warming and cooling cycles. You don't want to brake to hot and heavy during the break in period, as rotors can warp.
The piston rings need to wear slightly to align with the cylinder walls. Each bearing in each moving part will begin to wear.
You'll find everyone has an opinion on this, and can be totally different. I personally like to drive a little like 'a granny' in light city traffic, going thru a lot of heat up and cool down cycles, avoiding long highspeed interstate driving. Get the vehicle up to operating temperature, and then let it cool down. I keep the revs under 2K, and very easy on the braking. You'll find references to avoiding constant speed, during the break in period.
Usually by a thousand miles, things are pretty well initially broken in and all the parts wear points are mated. I suspect even up to 3-5K things are still slightly wearing to align.
There are a few limited production cars that have fussier engines, like the Viper. You get too heavy a foot on those engines from zero miles and you'll be putting in a crate engine soon enough. Some other exotics are broken in before you take delivery, because the horsepower needs to be verified.
Whenever I bought a new car, I always changed the oil and filter at 1000 miles, to clean out any metal shavings, filings, rocks, boulders, chainsaws, and any other material left in the engine, that stays in suspension and is drained with the removal of the hot oil...
They say that is no longer necessary, because engines are assembled in a cleaner environment, yada, yada, yada...
Considering all the criticisms of car quality today, I feel that it is worth the $50 (I use synthetic, so it costs a little more), since it will only pass the 1000 mile mark once, and after that I am in total control of the oil change schedule...so just like I wash new jeans to get the "newness" out of them, since they are only new once, I still change the oil in a new car at 1000 miles, just for my peace of mind...
Thinking about it, I would do it within 1000 miles of a used car, since I may not know when it was last performed unless I have maint records...
I just feel that if the oil is clean, even if "overchanged" it can never hurt the engine, as anything that keeps the inside clean can only help it last longer...
I'm new to this forum, have a Hyundai Elantra 01, 4dr sedan.
I'll be grateful if anyone could help me with this, the windshield washer doesnt work anymore, I had a look at it, its not the water being empty, or the pipes being clogged, so I think its the windshield-washer motor, cause I dont hear the motor sound anymore, any idea where the motor is located or how do I access it? short on money so i'll have to fix it myself.
Thanx
So pull the tank out of its slide and the motor should come out with it.
since they are truly experts in engine design, manufacture and racing, i tend to think they know what's best for their engines.
me personally? I'd let a break in oil get about 4500-5000 in a new engine. by that time, it's likely to have done it's thing, and the engine has probably reached the point achieving most of it's fuel economy potential.
after that, if it's a honda and i'm using regular oil, not much past the same mileage. i have no history with synthetics. they seem very expensive to me.
The thing is , how do I pull it out? I cant do it from above, looks like i might have to take it to the garage so that they can lift the car and try to pull it out from below. Also is there anyway to know if its the motor thats not working.
Thanx
You can hear the motor when you activate the stalk switch on the dash. Once the motor is out, it is easily bench-tested.
There might even be braces, wiring, etc about the tank that need to be taken off also.
ya the motor is at the bottom, and the worst part is, i cant pull it or slide off from the top,found a high pavement and pulled it out from below. the worst part is that the replacement i found has a different power socket so now to friggin go down and try to a re wire it.
Was the dealer part very expensive? Maybe, if it's not too costly, it would be easier to just buy the "right" motor and return the other one.