Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
1. Goodyear Integrity at about $94 per tire is the cheapest, and is still a decent tire (103T, UTQG 460 A .
2. Goodyear Assurance TripleTred at about $129 per tire is a very long lasting tire (104H, UTQG 740 A .
3. Continental ContiCrossContact LX should be long lasting at about $127 per tire (108H, UTQG 680 A .
4. Goodyear Fortera Silent Armor at $153 per tire is long lasting and has good traction and heat resistance (104H, UTQG 620 A A).
5. OE tires on my relative's SUV were Michelin LTX A/S (not sure whether it was 103 or 104 load rating). The Michelin LTX A/S at $151 per tire (103S, UTQG 400AB) is not nearly as much tire for the money based on the load rating and UTQG rating. The tread will not last as long as any of the others, even as long as the cheapest one on this list, the Goodyear Integrity which costs $57 less per tire.
I went Plus Zero, as they are not available in the same width as Michelin for 18" rims. And they look much nicer, with more "mascular" thread pattern.
Just recently began to have a problem with the DVD player (factory installed) in my 2006 XC90. This is what happens... I insert a disc into the player, the screen says reading disc, then after a few seconds it ejects it. :mad: I have tried different DVDs to rule a problem with the actual disc, but the problem has continued. I plan to take the vehicle in next week to have the problem rectified, but I'm curious to know if anyone else has had this problem.
TIA
If this is a requirement - look at full size SUV - GM, Ford, big Toyotas and Nissans. BMW, MB, Acura, ets. - are going to be equally uncomfortable.
The trunk space is very good with 5 seats and just adequate or marginal for the long trip with 7. Again - if you plan long road trips with more than 5 and a lot of stuff - the best bet is a full size SUV. Even minivans have somewhat restricted cargo space with all seats up.
I am 6'0" 175 and unless the 2nd row is all the way forward, there is no room for my toes or legs in the third row. We have done it twice with 7 people - its not possible.
Another gripe - car seats. I cant put a carseat behind the drivers seat is im driving. It must go in the middle and to top it off, putting it in is a total hassle.
I have 15K miles on my XC in 19 months and Im on the verge of selling it because of the space issues (6 month old, 80lb growing dog and at some point future 2nd child).
Great car for short people/ people without big families.
The XC90 (I6-cyl) gets 13-16 mpg around town and 21-22 mpg hwy under the best of conditions. The V70 (base 5-cyl 168 hp non-turbo) about 21-23 mpg around town and 30+ mpg hwy (34 mpg on IHs driven carefully).
Did I make a mistake? I'm hearing a lot about transmission failures... I can't even imagine this!!!!
I went to look at an XC70 (which I had already researched) and ended deciding I liked the 7 passenger idea and ended up putting money down for this car. I hadn't read a thing about it! I feel like an idiot.
Please help!
~Susan
It sounds like you are doing your homework so you're way ahead of the average buyer too.
This may help (may make your anxiety level worse too though if you nitpik through every item .):
Used Car Buying Checklist
If it's not, either buy a warranty or find a CPO car at your local Volvo dealer.
The T6 had a poorly matched transmission but if it was driven conservatively and maintained well there is no great cause for alarm. Just make sure all the recalls have been performed and that the mechanic verifies there are no leaks or creaks, and that every system is to spec and works as intended. Test every door, seat and switch personally. If it pans out, enjoy!
My lease will end in 10 months. A month ago, I was told by the dealer that I need new tires. It only has 28K miles. I've had it since summer of '05. As far as I can tell, the tires appear to be okay. I did the "penny" test and it passed it. Question: When I return at lease end, am I obligated to replace the tires? I would rather not spend the money on tires if I don't have to since I'm not keeping it. I can't find anything on the contract that say I have to. Of course I didn't go through the contract with a fine tooth comb. You know how "exciting" reading those legalese are.
Do not panic, and definitely, do not feel like an idiot
We also have 2004 2.5T AWD w/7seats and have absolutely no problem @65K miles.
Just do not treat your XC90 as a sport coupe, and your are going to be fine.
But do buy an extended warranty.
Enjoy your ride.
Measuring Tire Tread Depth with a Coin
But it would be easier (and likely more accurate) just to swing by a tire shop and ask a tech there to measure the tread for you with their depth gauge.
Most lease agreements require that tires be returned with at least 4/32″ of tread depth and that they be evenly worn, even though most US state laws say tires aren't worn out until the depth gets to 2/32."
I'd ask the dealer for a price quote on new tires and shop around, get a quote from Tire Rack, etc. The dealer may surprise you with a good quote.
I think most leases require replacements with original equipment spec'd tires too, so the size and speed ratings, etc. should match.
Nothing more.
You do not have to have the same brand of tires as when the car was new.
However, they have to be the same type of tire.
bigeddy: thanks for the info. what does a 'poorly matched transmission' mean? i'm no gearhead! Also, do you know a way to determine if all recalls were performed...i've learned there were a few for this model/yr but the carfax says 'no outstanding recalls'.
thanks again,
susan
As far as recalls go, the dealer should be able to tell which ones applied and when they were done by plugging the car's ID number into Volvo's computer database. Also, there are TSBs (Technical Service Bulletins) that correct design or manufacturing problems and are generally done only when the car owner complains of a problem (for example, the infamous rusty lug bolts). There are several websites that list recalls and TSBs.
Size: 235/60VR18; Load Index: 102 (1874 lbs/tire); Speed rating: V (149 mph); Treadwear: 300; Traction: A; Temperature: A
Possible replacement I found (Kumho Road Venture APT KL51) has the following specs:
Size: 235/60VR18; Load Index: 103 (1929 lbs/tire); Speed rating: V (149 mph); Treadwear: 600; Traction: A; Temperature: A
This is how both tires are listed in tirerack.com. Would this be an acceptable replacement? I know the specs are very similar. I just want to make sure because there's a couple of differences. Would this be considered the "same type of tire"?
The Michelins are $216 per tire while the Kumhos are $103 per tire. If the Kumho is an acceptable replacement, I think my decision is set.
What do you think, volvomax?
Is there a link or section where I could get information on when the XC90 is going to change its model?
Is that public information? I would hate to purchase a car to have the model change the year after.
The rumor is 2010, but nobody, least of all dealers or car rags, knows for sure.
I guess there is that incentive going on about the free DVD/etc. package.
If I don't have kids, do I really need this feature? I just can't see paying for something that I will probably not use more than once or so..
Em
For me a small, fuel efficient, and relatively clean diesel would be preferable to a hybrid. On the Volvo UK site gives the following data on the XC90 AWD "D5" 2.4L 5-cyl diesel (136kW = 182 hp, torque 400N-m):
6-spd Manual tranny-- City: 10.7 L/100km, or 22 mpgUS); Highway: 6.9 L/100km or 34 mpgUS, CO2 carbon emission is 219 g/km.
Geartronic Auto tranny-- City 20 mpgUS, highway 32 mpg, CO2 carbon 239 g/km
In contast the 3.2L 6-cyl gasoline engine emits CO2 carbon of 289 g/km and tested at mpg city/highway: 13.7 mpgUS/25.5 mpgUS.
The new XC90 will arrive in 2012.
The FIRST version of the new car was voted down, because it was too close to the current car.
The 2nd version is greenlighted.
Is there any prospect of Volvo selling diesels in the US? I gather that the 2.4L 5-cyl diesel engine is now available in Australia, whereas it used to be available only in Europe. Could it be that Volvo cannot produce enough diesel engines to satisfy the strong demand in Europe and the US? Or is it they Volvo doesn't want to spend the money to get the emissions to satisfy US requirements? Could it be that with US emissions controls the mpg would be significantly lowered and that this would make it less attractive?
I like our XC90 3.2, but the mpg is not as high as I would like. I wonder if Volvo will produce a software flash that would increase fuel efficiency? I am about to change the oil for the first time and am going to use Mobile1 0W-40 "European Car formula". I hope that will improve the mpg, especially on short trips intown.
Volvo will be offering the new uprated D5 diesel engine in the US in approx 1.5 yrs.
Maybe sooner,if they can.
DO NOT use the European mpg estimates though.
Case in point, the Mercedes E320 Diesel is rated at 42mpg in Europe, yet the US EPA says it does 32 mpg here,both figures are highway.
As for your mileage, no software is going to change that, nor will oil.
You have a 4500 lb car, powered by a 235hp gasoline engine
Simple physics limits how efficent that setup is going to be.
If you do alot of short town trips, the engine is constantly accelerating,braking and accelerating again. It never gets to run at a continual rpm, or at a continual speed where the engine isn't working as hard.
The diesel will be more efficent,plus the next XC90 will more than likely have some form of intergrated starter/generator which shuts the engine of when the car is stopped,much like a hybrid does.
But from the Mercedes UK website I see that the 42 mpg you refer to is actually 42 mpgUS = 50 mpgUK!
This is such a large difference that it makes me think that the test procedures are different and the engine controls must be different. The US diesels must have different engine controls.
Normally in Europe the fuel efficiency is given in L/100km. To convert between L/100km and mpgUS divide whichever one you have into 235. To convert between L/100km and mpgUK divide whichever one you have into 282.
So 42 mpgUK converts to 282/42 = 6.71 L/100km
And 6.71 L/100km converts to 235/6.71 = 35 mpgUS.
Also, the emmissions sytems probably are as well, and that can cause different results as well.
My wife (5'2") frequently ends up in the 3rd row with another family member of similar height. The only time we "couldn't" use the 3rd, was for installing a toddler car seat. My 2 year old would not have any space for his feet because the car seat hits the back of the second row.
Mind you, getting to the 3rd is tricky and sometimes is easier by hopping from the rear hatch.
link title