Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!




  • div2div2 Posts: 2,580
    Well, like I said, they really aren't that tough to install. If you want to tackle it I can walk you through it. On the other hand, if you ever take a road trip to the Ohio Valley region let me know and I'll slap a front set on in under an hour. I'm a pro now... :P
  • driver100driver100 Burlington, ON 7 mo/Tampa FL 5 moPosts: 11,683
    I am going to keep that in mind.

    A trip to the Ohio Valley region that is. :)

    Not attempt it myself.

    2012 535ix 2013 Audi A4 2013 Passat

  • Karen_CMKaren_CM Posts: 5,021
    A reporter aims to speak with anyone who has owned a vehicle and found its controls to be complicated. Please respond to by Monday, July 17, 2006, and be sure to include your daytime contact info and a few words about your experience.

    Jeannine Fallon
    Corporate Communications

    Community Manager If you have any questions or concerns about the Forums, send me an email,, or click on my screen name to send a personal message.

  • nyccarguynyccarguy Stamford, CTPosts: 7,401
    I definitely dig the '07 X3 3.0 si. What's with the "s" now? They've got it on the Z4 and now the X3.

    2001 Honda Prelude Type SH/ 2011 BMW 328xi / 2011 Honda Pilot EX-L w/ Navigation

  • juanchyprjuanchypr Posts: 17
    :) Well one week with this post and nobody answers.
    This forum is so quite :cry:

    Information copile directly from BMW of North America

    Explanation of the Name Change
    The X3 3.0si will replace the X3 3.0i. The "s' is meant to differentiate the new more powerful engine from the X3 3.0i model it replaces. It also differentiates it from the X3 3.0i that will replace the X3 2.5i in markets outside the US. The US will continue with a single model startegy that was implemented for MY2006, by only offereing the X3 3.0si. ( The naming strategy is also consistent with the Z4.)

    Start of Production August 2006 SOP ;)
  • 462462 Posts: 5
    I have the opportunity to buy an 2005 X3 3.0 with all the goodies except Nav. It has about 13,000 miles and they are asking 29,800. Whatcha think??
  • clpurnellclpurnell Posts: 1,087
    Nope, I am not a lawyer. My field is information technology; ERP systems selection, implementation and support.


    Had no idea we had career's in common. I work for the bully of the industry right now but may be going back on my own soon. I like the X3 thinking about replacing my dearly departed FX35 with one.
  • div2div2 Posts: 2,580
    $30K seems to be the current sweet spot for the 2004-2005 X3. If it's a CPO car it sounds like it would be an excellent choice.
  • wmdavis1wmdavis1 Posts: 14
    I looking at buying one of these vehicles. I previously owned a 1998 RAV4 and liked it size, ride, steering and reliability alot. Negatives for me were underpowered and cheap stereo/speakers. I would like something similiar, but with more power and a better sound system. The new X3 and RAV4 V6 seem like similar vehicles to me, but with the RAV4 being a more practical choice and the X3 a more upscale choice. I've never owned a Bimmer before and was wondering if a if anyone has familiarity with these vehicles and a knowledgeable opinion on whether the X3 is worth the approx. 50% price difference ($30K v. $45K)? Also, has the gas mileage figures for the new X3 been released yet? Thanks.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Posts: 27,652
    If you really liked your previous RAV4, then the X3 is probably not worth 50% more than the new RAV4 (at least to you..maybe not to me, either)..

    But, if you lease, you may find that price difference is more like 20%, and I would certainly consider it..

    (not the host here)

    Prices Paid, Lease Questions, SUVs

  • bargamonbargamon Posts: 302
    Your asking the wrong crowd.

    These guys and gals are the owners of X3's and most seem pretty happy.

    The RAV4 looks like a very nice vehicle and toyota products are exellent.

    How long will you keep the vehicle? Leases can work out great on BMW's!

    4 years included maintenence on the BMW.

    In the long run, the X will cost you more but its percieved value. If you like it, and can afford it and WANT to spend for it, then your answer is it.

    I think the X3 is a great value for the money!
  • wmdavis1wmdavis1 Posts: 14
    I will definitely look into BMW leasing options. I had my RAV4 for nearly 8 years, and I would plan to keep my new vehicle for a similar length of time. I was under the impression that leases were more beneficial if you only plan to keep the vehicle for a shorter duration (2-3 years). Also, I'm interested in how the gas mileage on the 2007 engine. I've heard it should be better, and I think the gas mileage on the current engine sucks. Surely BMW can do better than that! The RAV4 V6 gets 22/29 city/hwy I believe and BMW should be able to approach this, or am I missing something related to the performance? Thanks for your comments.
  • juanchyprjuanchypr Posts: 17
    :shades: Legendary BMW 6-cylinder power :shades:
    BMW 6-cylinder engines are of the inline variety. This layout is rare these days as most
    vehicle makers use V-6s, primarily because their compactness suits tightly packaged
    front-wheel-drive cars :sick: . An inline layout takes more space, but BMW favors it for its
    smoothness and sound. Indeed, the expert media consistently applaud the Bavarians
    for doing so. In an early drive of the X3, the German magazine Auto Bild alles allrad 1
    noted of an X3 3.0i with automatic transmission that “Even when one doesn’t select the
    Sport mode, the smooth inline engine revs handily to its redline before the transmission
    shifts smoothly to the next gear.”
    The X3 engine is of BMW’s acclaimed M54 engine architecture, whose salient points
    include –
    • Aluminum block and cylinder head
    • Dual overhead camshafts/24 valves
    • Double VANOS 2 steplessly variable intake- and exhaust-valve timing
    • Dual resonance intake system.
    Previously, 2.5- and 3.0-liter engine versions powered the two X3 models; for ‘06
    3.0-liter version continues in the X3 3.0i with 225 hp @ 5900 rpm and 214 lb-ft.
    3500. It delivers a decidedly lively 0-60 time of 7.6 sec. with manual transmission,
    sec. with automatic. Again we turn to for an objective assessment:
    “Even though the competition fields more powerful sixes, this engine, which BMW
    uses in its cars, continues to be a favorite of ours. It's smooth as silk, has a ripping
    exhaust note when you wind it out and performs like it's hiding 40 more horses under
    the hood.” ;)
  • driver100driver100 Burlington, ON 7 mo/Tampa FL 5 moPosts: 11,683
    The new X3 and RAV4 V6 seem like similar vehicles to me, but with the RAV4 being a more practical choice and the X3 a more upscale choice.

    If you are practical minded the RAV4 is probably your better choice. Some people believe price for what you perceive to get means the lower priced vehicle is really the better value.
    What price do you put on; amazing feel of the road, all the power any normal human being needs, perfect ergonomics, tremendous engineering (the battery is in the rear to give perfect weight balance), I don't know if the X3 has taken the crash tests but I am pretty sure it is as safe as any car in it's segment (this seems to be a priority to European makes). And, if you do keep your car for 8 years I will bet the X3 will be a classic and will be worth much more than the RAV4, we are talking classic European designing that lasts - in fact 10 year old BMW's and Mercedes look better than most manufacturers new cars.

    In my case I had 2 Jeeps and I thought, why does anyone pay 50% more for a vehicle, aren't they all pretty much the same, get you from point A to point B?
    When I took the test drive I didn't want to give it back. I tested a few SUV's (and various rental cars), but why look further. It is the perfect vehicle, and a tremendous value. There are few vehicles that can combine the practicality, safety, style, engineering and pure enjoyment of driving, like an X3.
    As for mileage I get about 25 hwy and 20 city (premium fuel don't forget). Not as good as a Toyota, but excellent considering the size of the engine and the weight of the vehicle. 4 year warranty with service counts for something.

    Once again if you are an extremely practical person you won't be happy.....but if you want to really appreciate driving and engineering, then you have to go for a test drive! :D
    The X3 showed me there is a whole different world out there.

    2012 535ix 2013 Audi A4 2013 Passat

  • kdshapirokdshapiro Posts: 5,751
    "If you are practical minded the RAV4 is probably your better choice"

    LOL. Let's be fair. If I *really* am practical minded, a RAV4 V6 is too expensive, there are other alterntatives for less money. /ot

    Let it be said this way. If money was no object I would rather have the BMW. The X3 handles like a sedan, the RAV4 handles like a truck compared to it.
  • driver100driver100 Burlington, ON 7 mo/Tampa FL 5 moPosts: 11,683
    If you are practical minded the RAV4 is probably your better choice"

    I mean between an X3 and RAV4 - IMO the RAV4 is being more practical.
    If you want to be even more practical, go with a Hyundai Tucson ;)
    If you want some enjoyment in your life, and won't feel guilty about it....go with the X3.

    2012 535ix 2013 Audi A4 2013 Passat

  • kdshapirokdshapiro Posts: 5,751
    I agree. The X3 is luxury item. Sort of like comparing Rolex to Timex and have the Timex win on value. :confuse.
  • driver100driver100 Burlington, ON 7 mo/Tampa FL 5 moPosts: 11,683
    I agree. The X3 is luxury item. Sort of like comparing Rolex to Timex and have the Timex win on value. : :confuse:

    Well put....perfect!

    2012 535ix 2013 Audi A4 2013 Passat

  • bodble2bodble2 Posts: 4,519
    Ahh...I'm not so sure that if the RAV4 is a Timex, the X3 is a Rolex. An Omega, or a Tag Heuer, perhaps. ;)

    Come to think of it, the RAV4 would be more like a Seiko. :shades: Save the Timex for the Tucson. :blush:
  • wmdavis1wmdavis1 Posts: 14
    To be fair, Consumer Reports recently rated the new RAV4 its top smaller SUV, although the X3 was not included in the comparison. For less money, I could get a lesser vehicle like a Hundai, but that doesn't mean I would get a better value. The real question in my mind is for more money would I get a better vehicle/value in the X3. The consensus here is a resounding yes! I'm looking for feedback on what makes the X3 a better value. It certainly looks sharper. A prior message suggest that the engine should be superior. Gas mileage seems to be a negative. So what else makes the X3 a Rolex compared to the plebeian RAV4?
Sign In or Register to comment.