Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Cadillac STS/STS-V: What's New for 2007?



  • b4zb4z Posts: 3,372
    Since it hasn't been posted here yet I'll do the honors.
    Very positive article with excellent pics, in "redline" no less. - ek&cat_code=coverstory&content_code=00852343&Search_T- - ype=STD&Search_ID=2234475&record=17
  • cadman88cadman88 Posts: 64
    I believe that one reason June sales may have been low is because GM had "dealer auctions" with SRXs. These SRXs were GM executive vehicles/demos/etc. with relatively low miles (under 1000).

    My dealer is relatively small (normally they have about 5 CTSs on the lot, about 5 SRXs as well) and they went to this auction and brought back two FULLY LOADED SRX V8s. Both had ~500 miles on them, and both were about $48,000, or $10,000 less than a new SRX with the same options. There were dealers from Chicago there that took many of the ones that were for auction.

    I'm guessing that if my dealer took two of them the ones in Chicago probably took 15+, and I'm sure most buyers would buy the slightly used SRXs and save 10 grand.
  • sevenfeet0sevenfeet0 Posts: 486
    I'm not sure I buy the argument that the STS is too expensive. I might have until you start learning what it costs to get comparable 545i and E500 models. Those guys are way expensive and Cadillac seems to have a comparable story here. The STS is also $5000 cheaper as a base car compared to the older Seville, but that car didn't have a V6 as an starter.

    The key will be product mix. Cadillac learned the hard way that the car business is not like Apple building Macintosh computers where often at product launch, the most expensive models go quickly right out of the gate. I'm starting to see a lot more SRXs on the road now, most with V6 engines. The STS has 6(!) different major options groups, and I'm sure that a lot of attention has been paid to the modeling of what gets sent to the dealers early, with any needed changes at a moment's notice.

    Finally, Cadillac is still trying to find it's new street cred footing with the competition, but I think I'm starting to see a pattern: close but slightly more aggressive in styling, performance and handling than Mercedes. They will give up the raw performance figures to BMW (so does Mercedes) on the normal models and then compete with them squarely in the V-series. I thinkk the performance numbers may improve a bit with the 6 speed trany due in 2006, but GM needs a 7 speed slushbox to compete with Mercedes/BMW now.
  • volvodan1volvodan1 Posts: 196
    The SRX on the new side has certainly taken a hit because of the program cars that are out there. I just sold one for 38-39K w/2900 miles (V8, 3rd row, etc.). The customer was just strolling through and looked at the V8's on our lot for 50-51K. They had checked Rainiers for $40Kish and to buy the SRX w/ Certified 6yr/100K mile warranty was a no brainer. They were leaning towards the Caddy anyway, but that sealed the deal. I don't think there will be a ton more (obviously nothing like Seville/Deville program/rentals.)

    The STS will be interesting because it is a player according to the auto mags but will it catch on? I think it will. Like most cars, the "as tested" price is high, buy that is not what matters. They buy the $45K car but "it does everything the $65,000 car does, pretty much". A vast majority of these will be sold in the $50K dollar range. The high price is because there are more options (adaptive cruise,AWD, etc.) They will keep the 70/30 mix and it will be successful.

    BTW, Eaton seems pretty close on a lot of his observations.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    Audi consistently is ranked very highly from a "quality" perspective. Audi, too, often ranks very highly or "in the top class" of performance and safety.

    What I, and many others, lament is the low "reliability" of many of the German brands (Audi included). I agree that reliability is important, but some of the most reliable cars I have ever owned were of very poor quality. Recent Audis consistently are lauded with praise by most of the "Car" magazines.

    The Cadillac, fine as it may be, does not yet have the je ne sais quois that even Audi, BMW and Mercedes have despite their less than stellar reliability (but high quality) ratings.

    Hence, my comment something like, "in a world where I made the rules, the new STS would be priced much more aggressively (a la Lexus in the early days) -- in the same vein as Chryco priced the the 300C aggressively) perhaps unbundling some of the options, too."

    Please don't think I believe the STS should be priced THE SAME AS a Chrysler 300C, it is just that several of the reviews of the 300C (at about $36K) have suggested that the 300C "feels like" a $45K car. The $62,500 version of the STS if it were brought to an MSRP of $55K would (or should) roll off the showroom floor and put the fear in some of the German and Japanese high lux nameplates. Then, like Lexus, price could be brought up to "content" "equivalency."

    The STS, at this point, for ME, seems like too much money (but part of the reason is that I want the AWD version, and it just seems over the top to bundle the option groups so that the only way to get such an STS is to opt for the over $60,000 MSRP.)

    That is, uh, IMHO, "unfortunate."
  • mbukukanyaumbukukanyau Posts: 200
     The only flaw I have seen among magazines in the STS interior quality is the plastics around the radio. If one wants to pick at the little things in a car, there is plenty in any car…
    STS is praised for offering the same level of technology as the German cars, without having to retrain people how to drive and interface with the car… like the famous idrive and Audi… ease of use is key….to technological interface, that is what Microsoft windows is all about( Making it easy for Joe to work on a computer without attending MIT..), idrive has not done anything good for BMW in the NA market, I do not know about Europe.
    I do not know how one can speak of quality without including reliability as one aspect of quality…..The Deutschmobiles are no where near GM especially Buick and Cadillac…. In reliability
  • eaton53eaton53 Posts: 356
    "it is just that several of the reviews of the 300C (at about $36K) have suggested that the 300C "feels like" a $45K car."

    I've actually driven the 300C, SRX and CTS. The 300C is really fast in a straight line, but it suffers from a weight problem and can't touch the Caddys in their athleticism.

    In short, the 300C is a one dimensional modern day muscle car, whereas the Caddys are the complete package. I expect the STS to be the most complete package of all and well worth the premium over a 300C.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    In no way was I comparing the actual cars to each other (the Cadillac and the Chrysler) -- simply the pricing at the "market entry point."

    I do not think the cars are comparable, I meant only to suggest a pricing scheme that would allow me to opt for an STS V8, and click off MagnaRide and AWD and perhaps some sound system options without going for the full-on $13,000 option bundle. Moreover, I meant to suggest that although Cadillac has made great strides in its products in the past few years, that the cars still on the showroom floor with the badge STS, etc, are not likely to attract those who are driving enthusiasts -- the need, I was suggesting, was to price the cars "not based on where they are going or soon will be, but where they are likely perceived to be at this juncture."

    The Germans, crappy quality or reliability or whatever term we may settle on, are "perceived" by many to be of the highest quality (separate from reliability, I'm afraid to say) -- few American cars have achieved this -- although wait fifteen minutes and, well, the tide (the perception) is changing.

    I am rooting for Cadillac, indeed, I am rooting for American automobiles of all ilks. The fact that I even considered the new STS was something that even two years ago I would never have done.

    Now, however, I find a pricing and bundling scheme that seems a bit presumptuous -- and premature.

    Like most of what is written here, it is just an opinion.

    Finally, although I agree that "a" component of quality "ought" (normative) to be reliability, it seems -- to read Car, Car and Driver, and the rest, that it rarely is.

    I certainly hope that, at the very least, it will be possible to so configure a new STS so that one does not have to "order everything" just to get AWD.

    But that's just me, apparently.
  • eaton53eaton53 Posts: 356
    "I meant only to suggest a pricing scheme that would allow me to opt for an STS V8, and click off MagnaRide and AWD."

    I absolutely agree. AWD, Magnaride and a sunroof should be stand alone options, available no matter what else you get.
  • Kirstie@EdmundsKirstie@Edmunds Posts: 10,675
    Let's be careful about veering into arguments based on subjective comparisons, especially when no one on this board can provide first-hand ownership experience yet!

    Need help navigating? - or send a private message by clicking on my name.

  • buttstonebuttstone Posts: 1
    I've driven a Lincoln LS with the Heated/Cooled seats that work pretty well. This article makes mention of seats that "wick moisture away" rather than providing cool air. I can't see how it would work to cool me off. The only thing I see happening is the seat absorbing my perspiration. Does anybody have experience with the system?
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    It's more like Cadillac vs. the GS and not the LS...

    This class includes the:
    -E Class
    -5 Series
  • mbukukanyaumbukukanyau Posts: 200
    LS is in the STS price range and the STS is comparable in size its bigger than the GS

    When STS was unveiled just before the New York show, Cadillac general manager Mark LaNeve said the car would play against the BMW 5 Series and 7 Series (falling between those two models), not to mention competing squarely against the Mercedes-Benz E-Class, Audi A6 and the Lexus GS 300 and LS 430. That’s a pretty tough crowd, but STS belongs in the same discussion. It is that good.
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    Yea I remember reading somewhere that because the STS is so big, it could compete in the S-Class' category, but the intention is to have it compete in the midsize luxury category along with the M, RL, A6, E-Class, etc.
  • scottphillipscottphillip Posts: 249
    I picked up a 2005 STS brochure yesterday. Very slick!!! I cannot wait to see/drive one in person.
  • pearlpearl Posts: 336
    I agree that these are two of the key targets for the new STS (5 series notwithstanding). Right now, both of these foreign marques enjoy favorable worldwide reputations. No matter how good the new STS is, it will still have to battle a very negative upslope commentaty (i.e. "it's a piece of American junk"; MB/Lexus is the benchmark - show us that this new Caddy is even close to being as good, etc, yada, yada, yada). Pointing out some recent quality survey won't do it (anymore than Lexus "did it" in 1989). The new STS needs to come out of the gate with bullet proof reliability and favorable magazine commentary. If that holds up through the first year, then the STS has a chance to make it permanent. Launch and immediate follow through are ABSOLUTELY critical.....
  • bigdaddycoatsbigdaddycoats Posts: 1,058
    I had the chance to sit in one last night. It was a dark blue with neutral interior. Very comfortable and the leather smell was fantastic. The interior is really nice - all the materials seem to be of good quality and feel soft to the touch. The push button start is kind of cool. This car had the V6 and it was very quiet. Overall, I think Cadillac has a winner on its' hands. Did not have a chance to drive it - maybe next time.
  • rayainswrayainsw Posts: 2,476
    “favorable magazine commentary.” - pearl

    Scanning the reviews in MT and R&T (and a quick glance at C+D at a newsstand, since my copy has not yet arrived) suggests that the early reviews are very favorable, indeed.

    The reliability and durability will take a while in owners hands to establish.

    - Ray
    Looking forward to my own first impressions, once my local dealer has received a demo . . .
  • rayainswrayainsw Posts: 2,476
    Note added to order guide:

    (QAF) Performance Handling Package, revised footnote 1 to read:
    "Not available for 2005 Model Year start-up.”

    Thus – likely will not show up on the initial allotment of dealer Demos . . .

    Darn. Caddy seems to be working hard to make an evaluation difficult for me.

    - Ray
    Who, at this price level, would likely spend the additional $795 for this package - - IF assured via a test drive that the resulting ride / handling compromise suits my preferences . . .
Sign In or Register to comment.