Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Acura TSX Prices Paid and Buying Experience

tturedraidertturedraider Posts: 159
Please tell us about your Acura TSX deal.


  • jthokiejthokie Posts: 2
    I paid 26,250 for a 6-speed manual TSX sans navigation system. That included wheel locks, splash guards, and delivering the car with the color preference I wanted from another dealership 5 hours away. They financed at 3.9%.
  • nicdmxnicdmx Posts: 35
    jthokie...was that with our without the destination charge? Also..."sans navigation" means w/out naviagtion correct??

  • caminacamina Posts: 31
    After test driving a TSX the dealer was telling me they are not discounting the least not right now. Is this the case everywhere ?
  • CarMan@EdmundsCarMan@Edmunds Posts: 38,515
    Hi camina. I spoke with the manager of an Acura dealership whom I am friends with last week and asked him about the market for the TSX. According to what my friend told me, dealers in my area are not really discounting the new TSX at all. If they really have to they may throw in a couple of minor freebees, but they are sticking really close to full MSRP at this time. I am sure that this will eventually change as supply catches up with demand and the TSX is not the hot new product on the block. At one time dealers weren't discounting the Acura TL at all and now they are blowing them out at invoice. If you want what's hot and new you will have to pay a little more for this car, but if you can wait discounts are inevitable.

    Smart Shoppers / FWI Message Boards
  • gearhead10gearhead10 Posts: 84
    When I test drove the TSX the salesguy also said they were going for MSRP except for a red MT they had on the lot for 2 weeks. He said he might be able to sell it for less. Evidently it was one of the first batch the dealership had gotten in the first weekend the car was out and the ONLY MT they had gotten. They had since gotten only AT's and had no trouble selling them at MSRP. So if you're in the market for a manual that's not one of the most popular colors (silver, gray or black) you might be able to get a discount.
    Also seems that the AT's are way more in demand than the MT's.
  • aqphamaqpham Posts: 11
    The dealer I went to is also aiming for MSRP. The salesperson even added that they are taking orders right now for July delivery. I guess they are selling them like hot cakes. Hopefully I will be able to get invoice price later on this year or early next year.

  • Especially relative to the Audi 1.8 Quattro.... I wonder what kind of deal you could do there, especially a lease comparison.

    Also, how much more the is the TL if the TSX is at MSRP.

    P.S. I rather liked the look of it. Clear rip off of BMW/Audi styling as in the new accord interior (have these Honda people had an original idea in their lives - thank God they make great cars), but I am fan of the 3-series so it seemed rather nice to me.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Posts: 1,978
    Actually you can buy a TL for less. A TL without NAV is now going for $24,500 and a simlar TSX is $26,990 (with $500) shipping.
  • matt00matt00 Posts: 32
    Can you tell me how I can purchase a TL for $24,500? The best deal I got was $26,500?
  • gearhead10gearhead10 Posts: 84
    One could probably get a comparably equipped A4 1.8T frontrack for around $27500. Would be a very close comparison. Both very nice cars with good handling that could use more power IMO.

    A TL? It's larger but slower and doesn't handle as well as a TSX with MT. Bland styling too.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Posts: 1,978
    A friend who is a wheeler dealer, went to Don Carlton Acura Tulsa toward the end of the month and paid $24,500 for a TL on the lot and the Tulsa Acura dealership is not that large, but their are only two in the state of Oklahoma.

    I have not checked the prices in Houston, but I would expect similar saving. Especially since the current TL will be replaced in September.
  • I am not arguing that TL is a better car. My point is that it is supposed to be a move up within the brand.

    Personally I like a BMW 3-series over a 5-Series. But if 3-series was more expensive than a similarly powered, comparably equipped 5-series, it would seem strange.

    So I question the value proposition, not which is a better car. Clearly the TSX is overpriced or the TL is underpriced. Or both... Doesn't matter, just intriguing...

    Your comparison of a TSX manual and a TL automatic and prefering the styling, handling and power of the TSX points to why you would have this kind of inverse pricing.

    Personally, I'd go TSX automatic myself...

    Just'd feel bad the TL was cheaper....
  • gearhead10gearhead10 Posts: 84
    Yeah, I guess Acura didn't have to think too hard to justify raising the price of the forthcoming generation of the TL.

    I think the TSX may be considered overpriced only because dealers aren't moving off of MSRP to sell. And if one really needs the room, the current TL is a bargain (if you don't mind having an "old" car in a few months).

    If TSX's start being discounted, Acura could sell way more than 15,000 of them. I seriously considered going for one, until I drove an A4 quattro. The 3-series is very nice as well with unbeatable driving dynamics but then one has to justify the extra $5-6K+ over a comparably equipped TSX.

    And if one just HAD to have more power, the TSX is a Honda and we'll soon be tripping over tuner upgrades to get more power out of the K24.
  • uncledaviduncledavid Posts: 548
    I doubt dealers will be discounting the TSX much, until Honda starts bring more of them over here. Its not going to be hard for them to move 15,000, so there is going to be little incentive to discount.
  • himilerhimiler Posts: 1,209
    In Syracuse, the Acura dealer has 3 ATs (none sold so far), and just received the first MT that wasn't spoken for already (after selling 3 MTs off pre-release deposits). Honestly, it's a bit of a dog with the AT, but the tranny is very smooth.
  • a manual transmission would be insanity...
  • dudkadudka Posts: 451
    I used to live in NYC and drove manual for years. no biggie, of course you can not talk on the cell phone, drink coffee, and do other inappropriate things behind the wheel. But having manual in traffic is not as bad as people make it to be. I used to keep it in 1st or second and just play with the trottle, rather than switching between brake and gas.
    as far as street parking, after my car was broken in once, i started garaging, it is well worth the peace of mind to know your car will be there the way you left it last night.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Posts: 1,978
    San Francisco
  • mazda6smazda6s Posts: 1,901
    A manual is OK in SF, you just have to get a Subie with the hill-holder feature. Of course, Subies are popular in SF for other reasons (not that there's anything wrong with that). :)
  • gearhead10gearhead10 Posts: 84
    Hill-holder feature would be absolutely necessary.

    I would agree with himiler also. Alright, what are the other reasons Subies are popular in SF? Guess I'm a little thick 'cause I can't figure it out. :D
Sign In or Register to comment.