Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Jim
Can A3'ers tell me please how your cars fare with these? I've noted ground clearance of A3 is pretty low (4" for 2.0T, less for 3.2).
Remember, Audi brought the A3 to America for one (among others) big reason: stab Volkswagen. They brought us the Phaeton, so Audi had to strike back- and the A3 is doing surprisingly well here. It's already sold 4,000 units, so I'm sure that by the end of the year they'd have reached the 10,000 mark. It really is a nifty little car, and a better value than the A4 sedan.
'06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330
Going to the Chicago "Streets of Tomorrow" event next month... can't wait to drive the Q7 (and get driven in the RS4 :P)!!!
Seems doubtful... Doesn't VW own Audi?
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Various web interviews made with Audi execs and my experience at Audi Streets of Tomorrow suggest Audi uses excess VW capacity as well as their own factories to build product, and uses many VW parts in their cars.
The A3 3.2 is essentially a VW R32 with 5 doors, Audis' AWD/suspension calibration, and Audi interior trim. The A3 is a VW GTI with 5 doors and similar Audi additions.
Audi seems to stand for Luxo-Performance, and their reliability is improving. Remaining problems are high production cost, and a small, spotty dealer network.
VW? Not sure what their message is - it's been very confused lately. Sadly, their reliability and dealer attitude remain near rock bottom. But their new exec claims he will fix that.
Saying the GTI and A3 are essentially the same car is pretty ridiculous if you've driven the two vehicles. They're markedly different in how they feel when pressed hard. Tha A3 definitely has the more button-down feel - its lower center of gravity and decidely different sheetmetal makes the driving experience different from the GTI. Smaller windows, lower seating position, different dash/console layout makes the experience wholly different.
Drive them both. Just because cars have the same drivetrain/chassis that doesn't mean they feel the same. Would you say a Jetta 1.8T feels the same as the TT? Same engine/chassis underneath...decidely different feeling to how the cars drive.
At the LA CA Audi "Streets of Tomorrow", I saw a mixture of Boomers and Gen X'ers - not too many Gen Y's . The "gotta drive em" cars then were the RS4 and the A3.
I never said the A3 on a world basis is there to hurt VW- just in the U.S.
And yes, the A3 does drive better, has a slightly nicer interior, is better-looking to most (less chunky), and has optional AWD to the GTI and R32's FWD (does the R32 have AWD? I forgot).
And Audi has a family of its own. Here is VW AG:
Audi - Bentley - Bugatti - Skoda - Volkswagen
Audi AG:
Audi - Lamborghini - SEAT
The A3 has always been made from Golf/Jetta/TT underpinnings. Same basic chassis/engines, just the specific tuning of each car is aimed at its target market.
In 2005 Porsche bought a 18-20% stake in VW AG (and thus Audi too). VW AG owns VW, Seat, Skoda, Bugatti, Lambo, Audi, NSU and Bentley.
R32 or 36 when it gets to the USA will have 4motion.
2. I know the A3 is based on the Golf/TT/Jetta/Fabia/etc.
3. I know Porsche bought a large stake in VW- but that doesn't mean that they have anything to do with the business decisions (unless it involves them like the next Cayenne)
4. NSU isn't a company any more (it was one of Audi's precursors)
5. Okay- didn't no the Rabbolf R3-something had 4Motion
It's just a bit odd that within the same company, there are so many competitors:
Phaeton vs. A8L- and A8L usually wins
911 Turbo vs. Gallardo vs. upcoming R8
VW lightweight convertible vs. Porsche Boxster vs. Audi TT
VW affordable "four door luxury coupe" vs. Porsche Panamera (I know the Porsche will be more upscale)
Toureg vs. Cayenne vs. Q7
GTI/R32 vs. A3
Murcielago LP640 vs. Veyron
Wow... that is a LOT of competitors!
:P
Then again, if Audi is mondo backordered for the A3 3.2, all bets are off?
Porsche, Audi and VW have distinct buyers. Someone really enamored with Porsche wouldn't seriuously consider a Gallardo and that goes the other way too. The Boxster doesn't compete for the same buyers as the TT or the Eos.
Find nail: hit on head. Well done.
Still, the point is well taken that we have a very competent manufacturing group with a bit of an identity crisis and some internal conflicts because of that. Crux of the issue, IMO, was trying a little too hard to take the VW marque a little too far up the food chain.
Just MO, of course.
It is a great looking car, though.... When I see a slightly used one for half-price.... hmmmmmmm
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I wonder when Audi will make use of their talents. Perhaps they could work similar magic on the A3 ?
A good article in Business Week explains more.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
VW has been planning a Boxster-killer for the past two or three years, which debuted as the "Concept R" idea, and because the TT is also a Boxster competitor, I consider all three to be in the same class.
I know that people wouldn't cross-shop most of those cars, but that doesn't make them non-competitors.
I've heard people say that the opensky gives them a sense of a more spacious cabin, but I'd rather have a truly more spacious cabin, rather than the appearance of one (and for that matter, save over a grand in dollars).
But in any A3 it's pretty cramped in back.
It's says it's a 20 spoke wheel, so it might look like the the A3 3.2 style wheel.
What size tire does the wheel have (a lower profile than 45)?
Any car I own (especially in this price range) needs to have a really nice roof, otherwise I just don't consider it, it's that important to me. I generally have the sunroof open nearly every day. My preference is for the type of moonroof that does not open into the headliner, but slides outside the car. I had a '95 Integra, and although there was not a lot of headroom to work with, the moonroof intrusion was minimal. When open, the the moonroof glass formed a "wing" that seemed to keep the car more stable than a just a hole in the roof.
The SkyRoof really helps create a nicer character for this car. Without it, many buyers would look for similar performance, but more bang-for-the-buck from lower-priced and more reliable competition.
The average price of most sunroofs is $600-700 for just a front sunroof in todays market. And a lot of them are package priced anyway. Considering it's a twin panel roof in the A3 and a stand alone option, I don't think $1000 or so is overpriced.
And call any reputable shop to put an aftermarket power tilt and slide sunroof in any car. You're easily looking at 700-1000 if you want it done professionaly.
-cos
It's interesting how well some of these (by what I'm used to in N.A.) underpowered cars work in this more rural area of Europe, with frequent roundabouts and often tractors on the roads. Compared to the Citroen C4 I had last time, this car had much less driveline lash if you were in too low or high a gear for the revs.
It's mostly two lane highway with a max speedlimit of 80km/h (50mph) but I did a short jaunt on their fourlane at the 130km/h (80mph) speed lmit and it cruised along nicely and had surprisingly little road noise. The engine noise was high pitched, which at 4000rpm in fifth is what you would expect, but tire and wind noise wasn't too bad at all. I was still instinctively trying to shift up though. Seems like needless wear and tear, and the engine is very responsive between 2000-3000rpm.
I'm curious, what kind of rpm @ what mph do the manual Audi A3's sold in N.A. have ?
Of course, not all that many people __drive__ at that speed.
80-90 is routine. The "drivers" cars (euros, tuners, etc.) usually run at 90 mph or over.
Median speed on Los Angeles freeways is 70-75 though limit is 65.
In Nevada they will close the I-15 one day a year to allow driving at virtually unlimited speed (not exactly sure how that works...)
The tollroads of France/Italy and the autobahn provided me with more time to cruise at 120+ (MPH, not KPH)---also it's less stressful as the cops don't come after you for running up to 140+ for miles on end.
I did post this in the Real World Trade In forum and heard in the $23-24000 range (Manheim), but since this is the actual A3 forum I was curious if anyone else had looked into them used and what the general thoughts were.
Thx!
My understanding is the A3's essentially a rebadged VW Golf MkV (Audi told me it uses VW chassis, engines and drivetrains for A3), with Audi interiors, trims, and suspension calibrations. The 3.2 is a VW R32 with 5 doors and similar focus on unique mods for Audi.
Having VW as the A3 foundation, and VW getting worse in reliability this year, what can we expect? :confuse:
If I could afford a second car and had good roads nearby, the A3'd be great to drive! The 3.2 corners flat as a pancake and keeps you in touch with the road you're driving on!
(update: Ah, upon further review, it looks like only the 2005 MY ratings are on the website. Maybe they are close... is the 2006 expected to be much different? I had just started looking at the A3, so I'm not sure.)
That part of Denmark (Jylland or Jutland) is more traditionally Danish -- the best single word is: orderly. I didn't see very many cars at all driving above 130km/h. As our 4-lane speed limit here is 100km/h, and the slowest speed you see people driving at is 110km/h with many vehicles travelling at 120-130km/h, I wonder if that would be the same response in this part of Canada too ?
It would be an interesting experiment. Oh well.
Uh, the A4 and A6 have shared chassis and engines with the Passat line for a long, long time. The TT used a golf platform too. So what?
For all those models, reliability isn't so hot either. But to Audi's credit, they're better than VWs' :shades: .
And does reliability really matter much wrt a performance luxury car?
Thus far, my A3 (knock on wood) has been bullet-proof. Absolutely no correlation to my previous Jetta or R32. About my only complaint on the car is that the handle-bars on the center console get in the way from time to time, the parking brake is in in a silly position relative to the arm rest and the brakes are a bit soft for my liking.
Otherwise, great!
However, those engines are not VW-developed. Audi usually develops the popular engines for the VW Group, and the high-end ones. VW covers the mid-range.
I have had my A3 for six months- not one problem.
The only problem I had with my 2000 A6 2.7T, which I traded in last year (for an S4 Cabriolet), was that the washer caps flew off if I tried to wash my headlights on the highway. I got them replaced- twice.
My S4 Cabriolet has been an angel. Not a single problem!
Hope this helps the original inquiry.
'06 Audi A3 2.0T DSG • '05 Audi S4 Cabriolet • '04 Lexus RX330