Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





«13456710

Comments

  • wsag26wsag26 Posts: 124
    I hate the vehicle, totally (except for the interior). Good job Nissan. You've made an ugly SUV again. I think Nissan should just stick to the Armada. They don't need another Pathfinder.
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    I agree, the exterior is fricken WEIRD. Too bad Chevy can't build an interior like that though. :)
  • regfootballregfootball Posts: 2,166
    i think its totally fine.

    eye of the beholder i guess.

    at least its not an ION freakshow.
  • cericceric Posts: 1,093
    I almost bought an Armada. Everything is great except for the fact that I actually do not need 9100lb towing and some minor exterior and interior dislikes. i.e. Armada is beyond what I need. The new Pathfinder looks mighty fine to me. Even though I wish they had put the 5.6L V8 in it (instead of 4.0 V6 in pictures), I am one potential buyer for it as of now.
  • Kudos to Nissan for actually sticking almost entirely to having the new Pathfinder look like the DuneHawk concept! I loved the DuneHawk, and I love the new Pathfinder. It's MUCH better looking than the Armada.

    You guys are too conservative if you don't like this design. It's aggressive and progressive. It's sculptured design isn't watered down at all, like many SUVs that move from concept to production guise. It has a real muscular stance to it, that really sets it apart from other vehicles on the road.

    If the H3 SUV looks as cool as the H3T, it'll be a no-brainer next fall when I trade my truck in, but I'm going to give the new Pathfinder some serious consideration, along with the redesigned '05 Grand Cherokee.
  • wheelz4wheelz4 Posts: 569
    I think the new Pathy looks pretty good....certainly a lot better than the new 4Runner (and with 7 passenger seating to boot!)
    2 things: I know it's kind of a signature, but those rear door handles suck...it you have kids, it's almost impossible for them to reach, let alone operate. And, are they going to drop the Pathfinder part of "Pathfinder Armada"? What's wrong with just Armada?
    Speaking of names, even the new Pathfinder is getting a little big for it's name, although it is somewhat more svelte than the Armada. I mean, how many paths could your find your way down in that boat!
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    Is it really a 4.0L V6 powering this new SUV?? Wow, Nissan finally stopped using the VQ 3.5 in all their cars!! :)
  • wsag26wsag26 Posts: 124
    That interior looks so ugly, I'll puke. The Nissan Maxima's interior is just like the Cadillac CTS (almost) and its bad. Personally, everythings bad.
  • jchan2jchan2 Posts: 4,956
    is nice, but the exterior to me works better on the larger Armada than the smaller Pathfinder.
  • probably grow on me, but I have to agree with previous post about the rear door handles. At least they have started to make them body colored. When I bought my 01 LE I was surprised it did not come with body colored door handles. The new Pathfinder looks like an Armada clone, just a little smaller. The look is a little too boxy for my taste.
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    "That interior looks so ugly, I'll puke."

    You're just saying that because Nissan has something to compete with the gawdawful TrailBlazer. Typical GM fanatics..can't respect another car, er SUV. It looks very well built inside with so much luxury! Please, I'll take this over a TrailBlazer anyday....you make me laugh. :)
  • Any word on whether the 2005 Pathfinder will still have the option of a manual transmission?
  • rctennis3811rctennis3811 Posts: 1,031
    I was surprised that the automatic doesn't have a manual shift mode! Heck, the Murano has a manual shift on it's "transmission". It would've worked better on a real automatic, not a CVT which hogs all the HP up. :)
  • I really don't like the gold one, but for some reason the last few pics in silver look better to me. Maybe I'm biased, owning a silver '02 :)

    I dunno, the interior doesn't do much for me, maybe I'll have a different opinion seeing it in person. And I'm not so sure about the front-end treatment, it just doesn't seem like the "Pathfinder style". It suits the Armada better, IMHO.

    Maybe I'm just stuck on the current Pathfinder generation...
  • jchan2jchan2 Posts: 4,956
    I agree that the new Nissan SUV stying works best on the larger Pathfinder Armada than it does on the smaller Pathfinder.
  • alpha01alpha01 Posts: 4,747
    For 2004, the 4Runner is available with a 3RD row seat, I'm pretty sure....

    Overall, I like the distinctive look of the new Pathfinder and Frontier, and I'm glad they've adapted the 3.5L VQ for real truck. I'll admit Im a little disappointed in the interior of the Maxima, but the Patherfinders looks better, IMO.

    ~alpha
  • cericceric Posts: 1,093
    I researched 4Runner, almost bought it until I found out that if you choose 3rd row seats, a lot of options becomes unavailable for no obvious reasons. GPS, for example. It make you wonder why? Probably Toyata want me to buy 50K+ Gx470 instead, which I won't. Too bad. Besides, 4Runners with 3rd seats are hard to find, according to my salesman if you can trust him, that is...
  • cericceric Posts: 1,093
    All seats fold flat (unlike Armada - base of 2nd row fold vertical). See official link from Nissan.

    http://www.nissanusa.com/content/0,,action-NStaticLoader_path-@ni- ssan@future@static@futureModels,00.html

    BTW, Nissan says (250+hp, and 270+ lb-ft) for the new VQ 4.0 V6. I wish they make the 5.6L V8 in Armada available in Pathfinder also..
  • jchan2jchan2 Posts: 4,956
    nobody would buy the Pathfinder Armada. Does the Pathfinder have optional third row seats?
  • ric29ric29 Posts: 1
    Here's my problems with the new pathfinder;
    It's got a 10 horsepower increse and a similar torque increase, but the weight is definitely going to go way up, which means it will be weaker. The Truck based frame means trucklike handling, which is not horrible, seeing that it probably wants to be distanced from the Murano. Things like the skyview roof, as seen in the concept, aren't on it, and neither is sonar parking or a rear camera, which is now essential in the class; I see zero innovations. Styling wise, it looks exactly like the new frontier with a bed shell, which is what the Xterra should have looked like. My biggest complaint is the engine. The V8 should be an option. The smaller 4Runner, GM, Ford, and Mercury all offer V8s as options. If the Xterra will be again fronteir based, with the same engine, it will end up being more powerful than the pathfinder, which makes no sense, b/c no one will buy the pathfinder The Armada will still sell, Ford's V8 explorer is as popular as the expedition.
«13456710
This discussion has been closed.