Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


bm196bm196 Posts: 6
edited April 1 in General
Looking for a (not too major) project car:


  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    You should check out post # 96 in Topic 6.

    Topic 6, Classics Conference

    Your Host
  • C13C13 Posts: 390
    I think a separate AH topic would be great. I hope we don't get consolidated into one of the big generics like "Cars: What Do *You* Think?".

    So Shifty:
    how about that Sprite that had a body that resembled the MG Midget? And here I'd thought that Bugeye Sprites were the only kind. Is my face red?

    Is it better than the Midget in any way? Nicer badge for one.
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    First thing for a Healey conference is we'll have to watch the typos and spell it right...or lose credibility.

    It seems that buyers don't much differentiate between the Midget look-alike and the AH sprite...personally, I feel the AH version should be worth a tad more. They are fun little cars and a bargain right now. You can buy nearly perfect Midgets and Sprites from 1968-79 (the non-bugeye was made from '67-71, the Midget up to 1979) for dirt cheap...$3,000 is close to top dollar no matter how nice it is. Along with the RX-7 coupes, the absolute "steal" of the current market, and so much fun to drive if you can fit in one. And they're easy to tweak, parts can be had anywhere, and as simple as a wood stove to repair...just imagine 90-100hp in a 1500 pound car that did 0-60 in about 12 seconds with 65 hp! And all this with your knuckles dragging on the ground.
  • C13C13 Posts: 390
    Well, Anglische bein a [non-permissible content removed] stepchilde of teutonic and latin great grandparents (some of whose influence on currentspeak is direct while other strains come to England [let alone to the Yanks], after filtering through various Keltish tribes for centuries, thus producing several different versions of a given idiom), I figure there's a lot of flexibility.

    In other words, Healey's progenitors a few centuries back might have been Healy, Hielye or god knows what all.

    By the way, did you know that 'yankee' is an Americanization of a Dutch word for sailor and trader, and before that it, in Dutch it was an epithet, the equivalent of '[non-permissible content removed]' or 'sumbitch'? So the Dutch sailors were calling themselves bastards, and the working class people of New Amsterdam were calling themselves by the name the sailors had used. Eventually it came to mean 'Dutch colonials', and later 'Americans'.

    Ain't dat somethin?
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    I'm just waiting to see how you're going to bring all that back to Austin Healey Sprites...:)
  • C13C13 Posts: 390
    Haven't a clue. I was hopin you'd do it.
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647's some recent realized Healey prices, from the Barrett Jackson auction.

    56 AH 100M roadster (1 or 640 factory built) Condition 1 $48,000

    56 AH 100-4 (BN2) Cond. 2 $25,200

    60 aH 3000 MK I (BT7) Cond. 2 $33,328

    64 AH 3000 MK II (bj7) Cond.1 $29,138.

    No doubt about it, good Big Healeys from the 50s &60s are strong sellers right now.
  • C13C13 Posts: 390
    Wow. Those are high numbers.

    So I guess this is a good time to sell and a lousy time to buy.
  • carnut4carnut4 Posts: 574
    I think back to 1963-64, when I was looking for my first car. I wanted an Austin-Healey in the worst way, and looked at several used ones. At that time, you could find a good used 58 0r 59 for around $1200- which was just a little more than I could afford. Now, they are almost as out of reach as they were then. A friend of mine bought a nice "62 3000 Mark II-one of the few that came with three SU's. Also the last year before they went to rollup windows in '63. He and I traded cars for a day every so often. I'd pick up my girlfriend in that Healey and we'd drive to the beach. I loved it. I'd still like to have one.
  • vanmanvanman Posts: 2
    Being as it is a good time to sell, I have decided to part with my '67 mk III as I do not foresee the time, money, and necessary ambition to restore this car as it should be done. I drove this car when I was 16 and have many fond memories of it and would love to continue to own it and fix it up. But life, it be complicated. With three kids , a new house, a new job, consulting work on the side, and a new Sienna on the way, I can't fit the Healey into the picture. To be 16 again when it was just about looking cool and having fun. Maybe this is a plea for reasons not to sell.
    A lady in my business park drove a light teal Bug Eye daily to her office and I really thought that car was in such nice shape and condition what a great ride that must be!
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    It's one of the all-time fun cars to drive, Frederick...maybe not in hail storms, however. The restorers tell me the trick setup is the 1275 engine with the ribbed gearbox (much stronger than earlier gearboxes). Still priced well under 410,000, you can have all the fun of a Miata with none of that annoying reliability.
  • lwflwf Posts: 223
    From post 7 "60 aH 3000 MK I (BT7) Cond. 2 $33,328".

    I still have the blue, hard-cover "DRIVER'S HANDBOOK" that came with my 3000. If that car is worth 33 grand today, I guess the handbook must be worth a thousand or two. Is anyone interested in buying it?
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    Best thing would be to contact an enthusiasts
    website...but I assure you, having been a British car collector, we are cheapskates by nature, so don't expect to make a fortune on's a good site to start:

    Oh, my last post on Sprites was supposed to read "under $10,000", not "under 410,000", which I'll save for the Bugatti posts.
  • lwflwf Posts: 223
    Hey, I was only joking. But I did drive a Healey 3000 for 11 years. It's pretty hard to believe anyone could be serious about it being worth 33 grand. Who knows, maybe in another 40 years it'll bring 33 million?
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    Well, it is really THE classic British sports car, a great heavyish cruiser with roll up windows (later models) and 100 mph capability, beautiful lines, speed and agility, a reasonable rarity, lots of chrome and leather and really has a lot going for it. It's very pleasant to look at and great fun to drive hour after hour, a combination many "classic" cars don't have.

    I mean if people are paying $60,000 for Dodge Cornonet Hemis, I don't see why a car like this isn't worth half that.
  • lwflwf Posts: 223
    If you didn't mention "beautiful", I'd think we
    were talking about two differernt vehicles. In my opinion it was the best looking car ever made. Your other comments have me puzzled, however. I've driven cars at 100 mph, but never that one. It wasn't much of a powerhouse, so I'm not sure it would even get there. As I remember, BMC boasted 0 to 60 in 12 seconds. That's not very impressive. Leather, yes, but what chrome and what wood? Some of the drawbacks I remember were an aluminum-steel interface where the body met the fenders that was a perfect galvanic cell on salty fenders were required every 4 or 5 years. The knock-off lugs on the wheels were soft brass and even though I tightened them once a month, I had wheels fly off while driving down the highway (never at 100 mph, though). The electric fuel pump was notorious for not working. I used to drive with the brass hammer for the knock-off wheels always ready so I could reach back and slam the panel every time the fuel pump stopped working. I can't count the number of times I stopped to help a stranded Healey 3000 and got it going by doing nothing more than hitting the fuel-pump panel (right behind the driver's seat) with my fist, heard the click, click, click and told the driver "turn the key, it'll start now. And, of course, the flexible-tubing exhaust system that broke every 6 or 7 thousand miles was a really clever British invention.

    It certainly was beautiful, but it was also the worst engineered car I've ever owned. I still can't believe anyone would pay $33k for one today.
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    Well, the problems you mentioned are easily solvable, and i would presume that by the time somewhen restored the darn thing, they would have installed the necessary $50 modern fuel pump...too bad you had to put up with that, someone should have helped you on's an easy fix. The knock offs was probabaly a worn spline problem of some sort, and again, a wire wheel specialist should be able to solve that without huge expense.

    The BJ8 Healeys had a wooden facia, but not normally trimmed in leather...the earlier cars were trimmed in leather on the wearing surfaces. A leather facia was also an option on some models.

    A Mark III had 150 hp and 173 ft lbs of torque and 3000 rpm (not bad for a six), and with the overdrive transmission topped out at 125 mph, with 0-60 in 9.5 seconds...the "weakest' of the 3000s had a top speed of 114 mph and did 0-60 in 11.4 seconds.

    These figures are from "Austin Healey--The story of the Big Healeys" by Geoffrey Healey.

    As for rust...well, in those days, mercedes and porsche and Rolls Royce were no better--most cars rusted like crazy in the 1960s.
  • lwflwf Posts: 223
    This and another posting here in Edmunds regarding the Healey are the only times I've talked about them in over 25 years. I could go on and on and on about the the dumb things that characterized the 3000 (a battery in the trunk, transmission with no syncromesh in low gear, legs & feet inside of a virtual oven, knee-action shocks in the front, etc.); however, I must admit that I really loved that car....more than any other I've ever owned and probably ever will own. Mine was one without roll-up windows, so I guess that means it must have been a Mark I with the 0-to-60-in-11.4-sec engine(excuse me for being off by 0.6 sec). I never thought of it as a Mark I. The "I" must be a designation that had been an afterthought once the IIs and IIIs came out.

    I don't have any of your reference books, but if they say the Mark I was fast, they must also say that every 6-cylinder Chevy and Plymouth manufactured in the 60s was faster, because every car like that could beat me when the light turned green. The 3000 looked like a racing car to all who were unfamiliar with it, so I always got a challenge. It didn't take me long to realize that if I took it I'd lose. I remember I outgunned a VW once, however. 115 mph top speed? You can't be serious. To me, the fun of it wasn't power and speed, it was being in the cockpit of something that felt like it was custom built around me, and driving without a top or windows...even in rain or snow (real driving with a clutch and floor shift). Everyone I knew in those days thought I was crazy, so I wouldn't be surprized if no one alive today can have any empathy for why I loved it, in spite of all of its engineering and manufacturing deficiencies.
  • MrShift@EdmundsMrShift@Edmunds Posts: 43,647
    Well, maybe yours was just a little tired? You know, by the time we got our hands on them back then they had already had a hard life and many miles...

    But they weren't a drag racer, that's for sure...they were a cruising car...true, maybe a Dodge Dart could beat you, but you'd certainly catch up the minute you hit a turn.

    Yes, without rollups you definitely had an early one.......battery in the trunk? Just like a new Miata...see, they were ahead of their time!
This discussion has been closed.