Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Luxury Performance Sedans

1354355357359360502

Comments

  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    I guess you could ask why anyone would need that, but why would anyone need a 911 in a country where the speed limit is 55 in most places. Or even the 550 or A6 4.2. Cars that go 155 mph don't make much more sense than SUV that will never leave the pavement in terms of practicality.

    Actually, there's one thing that these cars can do that's actually quite useful in modern NA traffic, certainly much more so than a "go directly to jail" speeding ticket for 155. Single lane roads with passing zones. They are all over PA, and PennDOT seems to think that maybe 200ft of passing space (half of which is on a blind corner or hill) is "plenty". When you put your foot to the floor and want to go from 40mph to 90mph to get ahead of the three 18-wheelers in front of you RIGHT NOW only a V8 can do that.
  • sfcharliesfcharlie Posts: 402
    I and a couple of friends, who over the last year have been test driving and reading about luxury sport sedans, have narrowed down the choices to M35x versus Audi A6 Quattro. When you read comparisons in magazines, online, or in such big comparison tests as the one run annually by the Canadian Automotive journalists, unless the editors default to the usual suspect (BMW 5 series, here it would be the 530xi), the two leading contenders recommended to buyers who l love to drive are the M35 and the Audi A6.

    In my own test drives, I found the A6 more nimble ... very subjective, that word, I know, but maybe a better way to put it is that I have been driving a BMW 3 series and, in the Audi I felt as if I was closer to driving a car that size, while in the M35 I had a sense that I was driving a larger car. Actual size comparisons: Audi A6 is longer (bumper to bumper) at 194.2" versus the M35 at 192.6"; but Audi has shorter wheelbase at and 111.9", versus 114.2" for the M35.

    On the other hand, the M35 was quicker off-the-line, when accelerating from dead stop. Audi had a just-noticeable slight delay in responding that has been noted by at least a couple of car magazines.

    Inside the car, I felt more at home in the Audi A6 -- taut, clean feel -- versus my wife and son, who, as passengers, continue to comment on the comfortable and luxurious feel of the Infiniti. Similarly, the control-center screen in the Audi presents radio stations and CD tracks against a black background, while the Infiniti presents everything in full technicolor. I liked the visually simpler black background. But the M35 offers regular push buttons as well, which I'd probably defer to when driving anyway.

    Anyone been comparing these two cars?
  • rich545rich545 Posts: 386
    I didn't say that you were criticizing anyone; I was just trying to give you a perspective on why someone would want a Cayenne or Toureg over a station wagon. Just for the hell of it, I decided to look at the size difference between the A6 Avant and Cayenne because I already knew my wife's Avant is a good deal longer than my Cayenne. Here's how they stack up:
    A6 Avant-193.5" long; 79.2" wide; 57.4" tall; 111.9" wheelbase; 4,167 lbs; 4.6" ground clearance; 33.9 cubic feet cargo space with seats up; 59 cubic feet with seats down.
    Cayenne-188.3" long; 75.9" wide (not sure if that includes mirrors; the Avant's measurement does); 66.9" tall; 112.4" wheelbase; 4,949 lbs; 8.5" ground clearance; 19.1 cubic feet cargo space with seats up; 62.5 cubic feet seats down; 1800 lb payload capacity (couldn't find this figure for the Avant).

    So really, the only way that the Cayenne is bigger is height by 9.5". It weighs a good deal more, but that weight is for the Cay S with the V8 and the Avant's is with the V6.
  • rich545rich545 Posts: 386
    A LOT of money to spend with that benefit don't you think? Don't get me wrong, I love all of the cars I mentioned. It's just if your talking practicality between them and SUV's both make sense in some ways, and not too much sense in others (overkill performance vs. needless off-road capabilities). Hell, my dream garage would be something like a Cayenne Turbo S, 911 Carrera 4S Cabriolet and the Audi A8. Currently, the garage and wallet are somewhat lacking!
  • anthonypanthonyp Posts: 1,857
    There are two articles in Architecural Digest explaining design and style....Both interesting Tony
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    Well, other than that, and perhaps the ability to rocket up an entrance ramp when there's a gap in traffic on a busy highway, what other reason is there to have 300+hp?
  • rich545rich545 Posts: 386
    Hey, I'm right there with you. That's why I bought the 325 hp 545i two years ago rather than the 530i, and why I bought the 340 hp Cayenne S rather than the base V6 Cayenne. If I had an extra $120,000 sitting around I would have gotten the 520 hp Cayenne Turbo S! All I'm saying is that in everyday driving in the US the extra horses aren't really utilized anymore than the off-road capabilities most SUVs have. I don't know about you, but I've done some pretty good off-roading (not in the Cayenne of course), and I enjoy it almost as much as I do throwing a car into a turn at scary high speeds. It's a completely different experience without a doubt, but fun none the less. Again, I bought my Cayenne because of it's ridiculous performance for an SUV as well as its utility. If we're talking about the practicality of SUVs I'd have to admit a lot of what I own is overkill. Do I need a 65" TV? Nope, but I sure do enjoy it. Do I need an SUV with 340 hp? Hell no, but I do really like how it gives me a lot of what you're talking about while at the same time being a much more flexible vehicle than my 545i was.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    I am struggling to get by with a 62" Widescreen -- at least it is Hi-Def.

    What a world, what a world.

    I have screen envy!
  • rich545rich545 Posts: 386
    Not trying to stir the pot, but I'd say what a country, what a country! Screen envy is a tough thing, but hey, it's only 3 inches!
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    And then after 65" you'll just have to go to a 70" er, when will it stop?

    I tried to buy the HD DVD player today -- one demo, none in stock. Incredible picture on Serenity the movie.
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    What's nice is that the new '06 HDTVs finally have actual 1080p HDMI inputs to go along with their 1920x1080 resolutions. More interesting is Samsung's first DLP RPTV with an LED light engine, the HL-S5679W. The LEDs have 4-5x the lifespan of the old Arc lamps, near instant start-up time, and since there's no more color wheel, there's no more "rainbow effect".

    Unfortunately, the LED set costs $1K more than its Arc lamp powered counterpart, and only comes in the 56" size.

    I really hope you were kidding about actually buying a HD-DVD player. Not only are the first gen players incredibly slow and buggy, but the HDMI 1.3 ports required to actually use the new super DD and DTS 96\24 lossless surround formats probably wont exist for another 2 years! HDMI 1.2 doesn't even exist yet! Not to even mention the whole, "HD-DVD could be the next Beta" thing.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    Currently all 1080p (what little there is) is down res'd to 1080i anyway -- and some of the sources, HD Tivo, for one, allow you to specify 720P which happens to be the native resolution of my EOY 2005 set. I use the component run since I have that built into my house which provides an HD signal from the HD Tivo (programming from DirecTV) in eye popping quality.

    The HD DVD unit (there is ONLY one for sale) is $449, slow slow slow but produces a great picture. My favorite BRICKS retailer here in River City claims there will be a combo HD DVD, BluRay, DVD and CD player this fall from LG (Korean, as I recall.)

    What this has to do with LPS cars beats me -- so I think we'd better cease and desist. My email address is non private should you care to chat further.

    This all started sorta because we were talking about needs vs wants and how LPS cars generally fit into the latter category.

    I just received my copy of the BMW magazine and the next big technology (coming soon one would imagine to the LPS Bimmers) seems to be ACC (automatic cruise control) and lane departure warning and rear camera's DNA spliced together to darn near assemble what one would assume is the pre-requisite to a car that can come close to driving itself.

    We truly are at the point of "anything is possible" in these cars in terms of technology.

    What once were vices are now virtues, kind of thing, methinks.

    :shades:
  • hpowdershpowders Posts: 4,269
    I would think and certainly hope that folks who drive BMW's would not need lane departure warning systems.
    Sounds like a direct shot at the Infiniti M.
    Too bad.
  • markcincinnatimarkcincinnati Posts: 5,047
    There is a diagram of a new BMW in the new BMW Magazine that shows several "cones" of radar, sonar, video, etc as if they were force fields on the Starship Enterprise.

    Automatic cruise control, lane departure warning, proximity warnings and avoidance mechanisms are "comming soon" to BMW's. The cars appear to be heading towards offering more and more information, warning, avoidance and "control taking" technologies.

    The GPS system will, apparently, know the degrees of the upcoming left hand corner and will know the ability of your car to take the corner at a given speed. If you ignore the warnings the car will (be capable of) both apply the brakes and even steer to help you avoid an accident.

    One imagines that these systems will have off switches.

    However, it bears noting that the ESP systems (regardless of their TLA's) cannot TODAY be fully disengaged by pressing the DSC or ESP or anti-yaw, bla bla bla button.

    ABS on my first two or three Audis that had this techcnolty actually had ABS off buttons on the dash board.

    No more, it is, apparentely now known that I am not capable of knowing when I might want ABS on or off.

    Now, my opinion on all of this stuff is "mixed" -- I do want more gizmos, literally I want them. But I do not want them to be 100% outside my control.

    Auto drive is within our capabilities, we currently don't have the infrastructure to support it. One would imagine it will be deployed in the not too Star Wars future, though.

    I-Robot indeed.
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    Auto drive is within our capabilities, we currently don't have the infrastructure to support it. One would imagine it will be deployed in the not too Star Wars future, though.


    Unfortunately, I have to assume that in order to turn "auto drive" off, one will have to scroll through a 27 page lawyer screen warning of all of the dangers of being a human in control of moving vehicle, that crashing is not the responsibility of the automaker, and are you sure you wouldn't rather have the car do the driving while you enjoy a nice cup of tea?
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    Some interesting choices, and a very different perspective than you'd get from say C&D.

    http://driving.timesonline.co.uk/section/0,,27909,00.html
  • jshattnerjshattner Posts: 32
    ...but the Infiniti M is not sold in UK.
  • merc1merc1 Posts: 6,081
    Well there are some Benzes there so I'm :D

    M
  • lexusguylexusguy Posts: 6,419
    ...but the Infiniti M is not sold in UK.

    Not really a surprise, Nissan has no real presence in the UK automarket. Their most expensive sedan, the Primera, starts at around 12K pounds. The Fuga 2.5 would probably cost at least 35K pounds.

    It was a surprise to see the GS300 make the list, as Clarkson usually hates Lexus vehicles.
  • hpowdershpowders Posts: 4,269
    Well the M5 and M6 made the grade so I am very :) :) !

    Well, time to load the family in the ol' estate car and be on my way. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.