Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





What's your reason for buying a Hybrid?

191012141527

Comments

  • falcononefalconone Posts: 1,726
    I have posed the question so many times it's getting ridiculous. No one has come up with an equivalent gas only vehicle for 27k that has all the content of the Prius along with 45mpg. If that car exists, I'll buy it today. As a matter of fact, I will post a JPG of the sales invoice as PROOF that I purchased such a vehicle.

    BTW... FOX=FAUX
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Posts: 7,160
    This is shallow at best or outright false on the part of Fox ( which typically has an agenda ) without comparing it to something.

    If the comparison is New vs New such as a Corolla/Civic ( ~34 mpg ) @ $17500 SP vs Pkg 2 Prius (~45 mpg ) @ $22500 then the Prius saves $500 a year in gas based on 15000 mi/yr but you then you have to give up the size and comfort of the Prius plus the present typical $500 Tax Incentive. The next Prius' sold will be delivered in 2006 so the Tax Incentive a Corolla/Civic buyer will give up will be ~$2800. Even though the vehicles are not equal in size or comfort the 'recovery period' for the Prius delivered in 2006 will be only 5 yrs vs a Corolla/Civic - but during that time the Prius owner will have a much nicer vehicle.

    More importantly though the Hybrid buyer is rarely concerned with recouping a price differential. It's an added benefit but well down the list of reasons to buy. I see it every day. These buyers will take a Prius over other midsize cars like the Camry or Accord for the same reason that a Lexus/Acura buyer will opt for an ES 330 or TL over a Camry or Accord. Does the Lexus/Acura buyer calculate how long to recoup these differentials? Not likely.

    BTW in 2006 a typical Prius ( after the Tax Credit ), without Navi, will likely be less than a similarly equipped Camry or Accord. Plus one still gets the gas savings. Thats where FOX is misleading the public. Agenda??

    But believe what you wish. It was said on TV.

    kdhspyder
  • Hi misterme -- I get 17.5 mpg in the city on my V8, and 24 mpg on the highway. Not too bad considering the performance level.

    Hi kdhspyder! Gee, I don't know what it is, but my six friends who do own Priuses have all sworn on Bibles (well not exactly, but I did grille them pretty hard) that their mileage OVERALL (city/hwy/whatever) is around 41-44 mpg. Sure the clock has registered some fantastic mileages at any given point but when they do the math over months and months it comes out to about this range.

    hi falcon! -- I think the VW TDI would meet your criteria for a non-hybrid that matches the Prius features except for certain types of emissions. The VW would have some plusses and minuses against the Prius. On the plus side, it would handle and brake MUCH better and be much more fun to drive. It would be about as fuel efficient in highway driving almost certainly, but overall perhaps 4-6 mpg less so, or in total city driving perhaps 10 mpg less so.

    RE: Road & Track -- that's EXACTLY why I like their rating of 41 mpg. They aren't "milking" out the best possible mileage or having fun or playing games trying to achieve top mileage. They are just driving it like they would any other car. So while I also enjoy playing with my car I don't think that all kinds of coasting or "egg under the gas pedal" or driving barefoot techniques are really a fair indication of true MPG.

    Also, your friends reports are only anecdotal, whereas R&T kept some 50,000 miles of log books. That's more appealing data to my somewhat scientific mind.

    Reliability: Jury is still out. Honestly only one of my friends has had serious problems with a total meltdown of the hybrid drive system. Also I have seen two Priuses on the hook in the past month, but keep in mind that I live in Hybrid Heaven and there are a LOT of Priuses on the road where I live.

    Personally I never judge a car's reliability until it has been out about three years. Then all the facts are usually in on the car. VW's record after three years hasn't been very good I must admit.
  • gagricegagrice San DiegoPosts: 28,681
    I want vehicle stability control
    I want HIDs
    I want bluetooth
    I want NAV
    I want 45 mpg
    I want a hatch
    I want keyless entry/start
    I want AT-PZEV

    ...waiting..............................


    I would trade all the above for good handling, performance & superior braking with a Jetta TDI Wagon. And get an honest 45-50 MPG at 75-80 MPH on the highway. None of the above atttributes are available in the Prius II. If you are a gadget freak and don't care about highway handling, the Prius may be a good choice.
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Posts: 7,160
    Hi Shifty..

    I will agree that the differential in 'reported' mpg ratings may very well be due to semi-fanatical mileage junkies doing the most to milk the Prius for all its benefits; you mentioned coasting as much as possible, driving with 'an egg under the pedal', etc. This seems to a game that many owners play when driving. On Priuschat these are summarized for new owners to use as a potential reference.

    But these 'strategies' are also useful if one is concerned about keeping fuel usage to a minimum and emissions as low as possible.

    I'd suggest that a reasonable mpg estimate balancing the daily rushing around we all do vs the special strategies one might do if so inclined would be 45 mpg ( 41-44 vs 51-55 ). YMMV. ;)

    regards,

    kdhspyder
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Posts: 7,160
    Both good points and that's why there are a wide variety of vehicles for a wide variety of drivers. One size certainly doesnt fit all so your preference for the performance of the TDI is just as valid as mine for the gadgetry/environmental benefit of the Prius. The Prius is certainly not a high performance vehicle and was never intended to be one.

    Comparing the 2 is not really valid. They are just too different.

    kdhspyder
  • My calculations confirm that....so in 3 years at $3 per gallon my additional investment for a hybrid will be paid back....and the next 10 years will save me a $1000 a year....My Prius gets a legit 52 MPG in Mixed driving....the car it replaced a Suburu got a Legit 23 MPG in Mixed driving (28-30 on the freeway) Those are apples to apples compairsons based on our families driving habits (both cars belong to my wife who drives it almost exclusively)
  • falcononefalconone Posts: 1,726
    TDI doesn't have many of the features.

    Can't buy it where I live.

    VW dealers suck....

    VWs are unreliable..

    Way too many other reasons... anyone else?

    Don't forget.. it has to have ALL the features in the list above....thanks!
  • What price would you be paying for that Jetta TDI win no features????

    My Prius easily drives on he freeway at 75-80 mph....and still gets good milage in the city..actually even better milage in the stop and go traffic.

    *Not to mention it is unlikely to have the poor repair record of a Jetta.

    *Can be fueled at ANY gas station. No searching for that special station.

    *Is and will continue to legal to buy fuel for, in ALL STATES.

    * Is Much better for the environment.

    * Is more comfortable to ride in.
  • bottgersbottgers Posts: 2,028
    It seems you and I are looking for two totally different packages when talking about hybrids. You want something with an endless number of creature features while I am looking for a vehicle that gets me from point A to point B, with the reliability typically found in most Toyotas, offers a reasonable amount of comfort and is as inexpensive as possible to both purchase and operate. I believe most people who are interested in hybrids would fit more into my catagory than yours. For myself and probably most others as well, hybrids aren't the best choice.....not yet anyway.
  • Does any Prius OWNER with an 04 or newer Prius get only GET 41-44 MPG...

    As I have said my wife drives our Prius and makes no effort to milk it for milage..and we have always gotten 48-52 Mpg. in mixed driving.
  • It may be that the hybrids will have a similar appeal that Volvos had in the 1980s...the joke then was "Volvos....cars for people who hate cars".

    Just kidding but you get the point about the possible difference between a VW TDI owner and a Prius owner. I kid my friends and call their cars "Transportation Modules".

    You know, "features" don't all have equal weight to all people. For me, fun to drive (good handling, braking and acceleration) is worth about 10X more than subjective ideas about comfort. I can't trade that away for gas mileage either, as I lose one my my biggest pleasures in day to day driving--fun and "oneness" with the machine, for $500 bucks a year tops in savings. Not worth it to me.

    I wish I could be one of those hybrid owners who give good reasons for buying one, but not yet....... :P
  • gagricegagrice San DiegoPosts: 28,681
    I would need a crew cab or club cab.
    PU bed at least 6 feet long
    Power enough to pull a 6000 lb trailer
    30 MPG highway
    ground clearance enough for most CA fire trails
    If it is AWD or 4X4 if would have to be good in sandy washes
    I like XM radio
    Does not need
    ABS
    ESP
    VDIM
    XYZ
    side air bags
    curtain bags
    NAV
    Bluetooth (cellphones in cars should be outlawed)
    I hate the blue HIDs (should be outlawed)
  • falcononefalconone Posts: 1,726
    Sounds like something they made in the early 60's. How about nixing the seatbelts and airbags.
  • bottgersbottgers Posts: 2,028
    ,,,,,agree with gagrice about bluetooth. Every car should have a jammer that disallows cell phone use when the vehicle is in any gear except park or neutral.
  • Consumer Reports (I know, some folks don't think they're THE source but they're certainly a valid source) in their review of the Highlander Hybrid found the same good reasons I have - they rated the HH as top in its class - and with the twin Lexus 400 the only "excellent" in the class - with the one point that if you're buying it just to save on gas $ you might be disappointed. While the HH is still an SUV - and to some folks a stodgy one at that - I truly enjoy driving it, my wife shudders when I play a little and punch it on our highways around Philly (and it goes, wish my friend's old Mustang was still around so we could have a little fun car to car - he now drives a van, by the way) and overall it is a good mix of power, space, comfort and performance, plus better mileage, high tech and environmentally friendlier, plus every mpg increase with the features we need in a vehicle is a real saving on the overall use of petroleum, which we should all be looking for -- there are MANY hidden costs to low MPG, check the cost to us or future taxpayers for the bill just passed by congress. Imagine if that was being paid for - dollar for dollar - by an increase in gas tax. So if it costs me some $$ in purchase price to reduce gas consumption, that's an investment in the future to me.

    I've had more fun driving a Miata convertable on Maui, VW and Mercedes wagons on the autobahn around Berlin (and the cobblestone excuses for highways on the east side after the wall was opened, passing smoke-spewing Trabants as they skittered down the road - that was an experience!), even a beat up old Suzuki of some type through the mountains of Queensland in Australia, but in my real world day to day the HH is a great vehicle, a kick to drive, very comfortable and gets mileage way above my old van and even the equivalent gas Highlander (we get around 27mpg that when we don't walk includes a commute of about a mile each way, not good for getting top hybrid mileage). I have no regrets with this choice, though it will be nicer once the payments are done! Variety is a great thing....
  • gagricegagrice San DiegoPosts: 28,681
    Sounds like something they made in the early 60's

    They may have. Not for sale in this country. XM is more recent than that. And a 30 MPG full size truck may be a push for that time period. I have never needed ABS, ESP or airbags in 48 years of driving. I imagine I have driven on more snow & ice than most people on this forum. Those fancy driving aids give people a false sense of security, leading them to drive too fast for the conditions.
  • gagricegagrice San DiegoPosts: 28,681
    Does any Prius OWNER with an 04 or newer Prius get only GET 41-44 MPG

    If you take a peak at greenhybrid you will see statistics for over 300 Prius II owners. About 63 owners are reporting mileage between 36-44 MPG. Only 21 are averaging EPA or better. Overall average is 48 MPG, which is very good.
  • blaneblane Posts: 2,017
    Gary,

    In your normal day-to-day driving;

    What percentage of your time is spent needing a cab that seats more than four people?

    How many hours per week do you need to use a PU bed of whatever length?

    How many hours per week do you usually pull a 6,000 pound trailer?

    How many hours per week do you drive on fire trails or in sandy washes?

    If your answers indicate that your needs are for minimal numbers of hours of the above per week, then you don't need to buy a full hybrid for those applications. However, if most of your time behind the wheel is spent like the rest of us plebians, you can do fine with a hybrid car 95% of the time. You can keep some gas-guzzling junker in the yard for the other 5% (perhaps a Sierra?).
  • "Gee I have never met a Prius owner that gets 52 mpg city/hwy average."

    Mr. ShiftRight, do we have the capability to post pictures of the vehicle's MPG as displayed on the monitor?

    When I drive my wife's Prius, i'd get better than 58mpg. The Prius is my wife's car so I don't get to drive it much, but when i filled it up, I would reset the mpg and drove about 50miles or so. When my wife takes over, it would drop down to around 52mpg. My 400h currently displays 30.5mpg for the last ~800miles.

    Are pictures convincing enough? or people's minds already made up? I can get you a couples of pictures when I get a chance.
This discussion has been closed.