Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Bob
Bill: who says they won't? Build a minivan spin-off from that platform? Only Sienna offers AWD, Dodge can't package AWD with Sto-n-Go so it doesn't come on those models.
It is truly a 5+2. +2 is big enough for my needs, I don't want a school bus!
Reviews will be good or bad, but honestly, my advice is this - go drive it yourself! Form your own opinion, and feel free to disagree with one opinion from an auto writer, because that's all it is.
We can all agree about one thing the Tribeca is not - BORING. It's not boring outside, it's not boring inside, it's not boring to drive. That is how it stands out to me.
-juice
Can someone with more Tribeca experience than me verify this?
That's my point exactly...Subaru doesn't have a minivan. Honda, Nissan, and Toyota have minivans and can afford a slot in their vehicle lineup bewtween their midsize vehicles and minivans. This is it for Subaru. I don't see how a Tribeca is a big step up from an Outback. Bob himself stated that he thought that the Tribeca is likely to take sales away from high-end Outbacks. The success of the Tribeca will be to a great extent determined by how many NEW Subaru customers it brings into the fold. There is a lot of competition in this market segment.
Part of this is frankly sour grapes...I really like Subaru products, but I think that they do a lousy job of responding to the U.S. market. They are very slow to adapt, partly because I think they are undercapitalized. I had an interesting chat with a person at one of the local dealerships and he expressed a similar frustration, only his gripe was that Subaru was coming to the hybrid game very late. Subaru has been most successful when they added something that the other manufacturers lacked...the Outback, the WRX, and to a lesser extent the Forester. I think that they would have had a big success if they managed to provide a true alternative to the minivan (i.e., a useable third row) with exceptional handling.
Bill
Bob
Adding a minivan would have been nice, but not necessarily a home run for Subaru.
The biggest successes for Subaru have been vehicles that the competitors did not have an answer to (at least initially), e.g., the Outback and WRX. The Tribeca is not revolutionary, not by a stretch. However, if they made the Tribeca a bit more Pilot/MDX sized and actually had a functional thrid row, I think people would have been very interested in the car...a fun to drive minivanesque vehicle.
"...It is truly a 5+2. +2 is big enough for my needs, I don't want a school bus!"
I don't want a school bus either; however, the Tribeca is a 5+2 in name only. You cannot seat five adults comfortably. Heck, you can't even seat three adults plus two fifth grade + kids comfortably. The third row is extremely tight and claustrophobic, and there is relatively little cargo room. I will say one thing though for Subaru: they priced the Tribeca very aggressively. My only worry though would be it taking sales away from LL Bean Outbacks and VDCs.
Bill
Not true. Five adults can fit very comfortably in a Tribeca.
Bob
Popa_sez
Bill: Subaru is not a full-line manufacturer, may not ever be.
Will it steal Outback sales? So far noone here has traded one in. In fact most sales seem to be conquests from other brands, primarily Toyota/Lexus. We'll see, but not so far.
For me, I'd have 2 adults, 2 child seats on the outer middle row, and the nanny in the middle at times. At other times there would be a 3rd or 4th kid in the 3rd row, but then the nanny would not be with us. So 2+3 or 2+2+2 for us would work, 4 kids in the back with a few book bags.
Pilot, Expedition, Suburban, and LR3 are roomier but they're not fun to drive.
-juice
We like only the gray interior in either, Mahoghany (1st choice), blue or seacreast green, spected out as 7 passenger with nav (which requires lmtd). By the way..a salesperson told me today that the nav talks giving you directions while you are driving...that doesn't sound right :surprise: , is it so :confuse:
Really wondering if travelling an hour for a savings of some bucks was an option depending on the hassle with tags....??
thanks y'all
amy
-Karen in AZ-
They are bad reviewers and worse writers.
In addition this guy from the auto site is apparently on drugs. I do not know what he thought he was reviewing but it wasn't the B9. If he actually drove one he could not had so many errors.
Especially the rollie pollie handling crack - this about the B9 that out handled the BMW X5 in a recent test.
He apparently attended the Dan Rather school of reporting
Driver 8way
Pass 4way
No power driver's seat? Yeah, I wonder if he drove it, too!
Mahogany != Maroon
More than a few people here know a heck of a lot more about the Tribeca than these reviewers do. In fairness they probably write on review a week, and who knows how long they wait after driving it until they write it.
I take notes, and have to refer to them when I write a review.
-juice
The Outback VDC has an LSD, but the Tribeca doesn't. Instead the Tribeca has incorporated a 4-Wheel Traction Control with the VDC.
Interesting. I wonder if this change will also be made on the '06 Outback VDC? I do remember that the SOA guy giving the Tribeca chassis demo at Valley Forge mentioned that the Tribeca did not have an LSD. I think he said it was because of noise, that the LSD was noisy, or something like that. Juice do you remember him discussing that?
Bob
to you. You can choose male or female voice. spanish, english or french. Really
cool.
I have a the 7 pass. Seacrest Green metallic/beige interior with navigation system.
Love it!!!!
I pulled the lever on the seatback but it's not budging.
...and now from Healy review in USA Today "maroon," and "ghastly."
This made me very curious, and found several Tribecas today so I could actually see and compare colors for the first time...
Saw it late evening under low, dark clouds. The first word that came to mind describing this color was "plum." More brown and even purple than I had anticipated. Never before seen a car that color. Do not dislike it, but not at all what I had thought it would look like; very different from the images I'd seen prior to ordering. I was thinking "spicier, brighter, more RED!" Original choice was Black, then thought I'd put some color in the driveway for a change, after owning black for years. The silver was also very sharp, though I did not really consider it when ordering. Anyone have this "red" color currently and do you like it? Is it what you anticipated? Will probably stop by Sunday in sunlight for a 2nd look.
BTW, of the 8 or so I saw today, every one was a fully loaded 7 passenger limited.
-Karen in AZ-
It might be similar, but I think the B9's version has a little more brown in it:
if those links don't work, you can get to the pics in my albums:
goto pic 158 and 159 in this one and goto pic 2 and 4 in this one
-Brian
Bob
-Brian
Bob
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
http://www.chicagotribune.com/services/newspaper/premium/printedition/Sunday/transportatio- n/chi-0506050173jun05,1,814192.column
amy
This B9 seems a lot roomier than the identical one I saw the first time. The first one, which I only got to sit in, was inside the showroom, which was not too well lit. Today, the one I drove was sitting outside in bright daylight, and seemed much larger and more impressive. Inside the vehicle, I had much the same feeling as well, and I am certain it was due to the change in lighting.
From what generic measurements I took, the knee room and foot room on the B9’s front pass side is about an inch or so wider than my OB, even though the huge console seemed to take up more room. And, although the leg room in the OB is supposed to be an inch more, I felt it was just the opposite.
The ride was GREAT -- very smooth, although too brief, and on fairly well-paved streets. It was very quiet, even though I was driving on the frontage road right next to a busy and noisy freeway. Handling seemed very pleasant and car-like.
The AT does seem to search a bit for the right gear (both in speeding up and decelerating) but it did so subtly and smoothly, and wasn’t a distraction to me. It does have plenty of get-the-heck-into-oncoming-traffic power. I didn’t get a chance to romp on the gas or tear around a corner (next time, maybe). Besides, I didn’t want to scare the salesman, who rode along with me :-)
I didn’t think I would like the dark gray leather interior (too hot in the AZ desert), but with its perforations, it was pleasantly comfortable. There were some beige/taupe accents on parts of the dash that looked really classy with the gray, I thought. BTW, the brochure shows the leather in beige as well; however, it’s not perforated but rather a more traditional solid leather texture. From looking at the brochure, the beige cloth looks a lot like my OB’s (pretty, but hard to keep clean) and the gray cloth looks like a black-on-charcoal tweed. Not my tastes, but I’m sure some folks will like them.
Speaking of the brochure, kudos to Subaru for the wonderful photos and samples. The layout is superb and quite impressive (I believe others have alluded to this, as well). The infamous Mahogany Red is definitely more brown than the wine-colored OB’s of the past, and not really red at all. They should have called it Mahogany “Brown”, or just simply “Sassafras”, IMHO.
One of the things I was most curious about was the ease of the entry-exit, especially from the 2nd row seats. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the seat heights were quite a bit lower (2-3 inches) than the Highlanders and Pilots I had driven a year ago, and only about three inches higher than the OB. This would make it easier for older folks or folks with physical limitations to climb in and out (namely, my parents and elderly grandma).
The Nav system has some really cool features (most of which have been mentioned in this forum)...I WANT it, but I don’t NEED it :-)
A couple of final thoughts:
1. Did anyone else notice how messy the fingerprints were on the outside chrome door handles? Shows every little mark...I noticed this on the first Tribeca I saw last week, too.
2. Both the brochure and the web site say the turning radius is 35.4, but that’s the same as the OB’s. Where did I get the stat of 37.4? Must have been a typo somewhere...I guess it makes sense ‘cuz it’s the same platform, etc.
3. I drove an ‘05 OB Beaner wagon, too, just for comparison and for fun. It wasn’t nearly as cool nor as fun to drive as I had thought it would be...guess I’m just spoiled now!
-Karen in AZ-
Urmez
">
Picked up the new B9 7limited Thurs night and have 275 miles on it. Had a 20 minute highway drive but the rest has been short jaunts around town. Checked the NAV and was SHOCKED to see the 16.2 mpg reading. What is up with that ?
Any other mileage reports (better) ?
Also, keep mind that that the gas mileage should improve a bit once it gets broken in, and the tranny "adapts" to your style of driving; but I wouldn't expect a dramatic gain.
Bob
Then, type in here: [img src=http://myurl.com/photo.jpg]. Instead of using the brackets, use the carats (greater than/less than) signs on your computer, and presto! Your photo should appear.
MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
Share your vehicle reviews
The thing about this color is the lighting as well as shades, gives it a different look all the time. Kind of a pearl for a dark color.
It's different and that's why we like it.
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/info.shtml
Here is a bit of the actual text:
"The test used to determine the city fuel economy estimate simulates an 11-mile, stop-and-go trip with an average speed of 20 miles per hour (mph). The trip takes 31 minutes and has 23 stops. About 18 percent of the time is spent idling, as in waiting at traffic lights or in rush hour traffic. The maximum speed is 56 mph. The engine is initially started after being parked overnight. Vehicles are tested at 68 F to 86 F ambient temperature.
The test to determine the highway fuel economy estimate represents a mixture of "non-city" driving. Segments corresponding to different kinds of rural roads and interstate highways are included. The test simulates a 10-mile trip and averages 48 mph. The maximum speed is 60 mph. The test is run with the engine warmed up and has little idling time and no stops (except at the end of the test).
NOTE: To make the numbers in the Fuel Economy Guide more useful for consumers, EPA adjusts these laboratory test results to account for the difference between controlled laboratory conditions and actual driving on the road. The laboratory fuel economy results are adjusted downward to arrive at the estimates in the Fuel Economy Guide and on the labels seen on new cars, light trucks, and vans. The city estimate is lowered by 10% and the highway estimate by 22% from the laboratory test results. Experience has proven that these adjustments make the mileage estimates in the Fuel Economy Guide correspond more closely to the actual fuel economy realized by the average driver."
There has been a movement underfoot to get EPA to revise its methodology. This push has come from folks who have bought hybrid cars whose mileage has been greatly over-estimated by the EPA methodology. These angry people have complained to their dealerships and Congressmen, and I expect that there will be a revision to the methodology for calculating mileage in the not too distant future. That said, I think that comparisons between vehicles are still relevant, provided of course, that hybrids are not included in the mix.
Bill