Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I never said traction control and ESC were the same thing. My point is that I don't feel like it will be a make or break option for MOST people. When I bought my Accord I was glad it has the SCAB but I could not have cared less if it had ESC or traction control. IMO, I've been driving for 10 years without it and don't feel as if it would make a difference in my particular case. If you go so far as to say that ALL cars need ESC and are unsafe without it then you might as well go one step further and say that all cars should be AWD/4WD.
I've been in the market for a new car since March, and went through weeks of comparison shopping and test drives. The final two choices were the Accord LX and the Camry LE, and the Camry won based upon a number of criteria for my family. But, just for grins, I inspected and test drove both the Hyundai GLS Inline 4-cylinder and the V6 last week, and there is no doubt Hyundai is moving up the ladder. The build quality appears excellent and the V6 is an impressive engine. It appears that with the introduction of the 2006 Sonata, Hyundai may be mirroring the transformation that occured with Honda and Toyota products over the years. If so, the Japanese manufacturers may have some valid competition.
Thats your perception, which may be right or wrong (just because you've never had an occasion where ESC saved your bum, doesnt mean that you wont). Also, why did you ignore my question about ABS? How often does it activate in your Accord, and given that number (high or low), are you glad its standard? I imagine you probably have no problem with ABS.
"If you go so far as to say that ALL cars need ESC and are unsafe without it then you might as well go one step further and say that all cars should be AWD/4WD."
Yea, didnt say that, not even close, so lets not jump off the deep end (and again, ESC does not correlate in anyway to AWD/4WD).
~alpha
Now there is a way to disable your abs for testing reason but your car will re-enable it on start up once you turn the ignition off. But due to safety precautions the information on how to disable your ABS is not readily available.
You're just taking a small sample size and your assuming it happens to all Honda and Toyota owners. I agree it does happen to people, but i know a few people who own old Honda's and Toyota's that have gone trouble free.
My point is that there are cars out there that are just as good as Honda or Toyota and just as reliable.
Can you show proof that there are car manufacteurs that are as reliable as Honda and Toyota. If american car companies do start making reliable cars (which they are starting to), it will be very hard to convince consumers. During the 80's-90's Honda and Toyota continued to make better cars while American car companies continued to make unreliable cars. People will always remember that.
This is a little off topic but last night i was talking to my friend about the GM discounts, and he pointed out a problem. As you know GM right now has employee discounts their plan is to sell more cars (which is working) but are actually making less of each car. Their plan of selling more cars could backfire when they take it off. People right now know how much am employee discount is, and when GM takes off this offer people will think "oh, i could get the car at that price, why should i buy it now" So basically what i'm trying to say is when they take the employee discount offer off, a lot of people will not buy their cars.
gmctruck answered quite well the question you posed to me. Additionally, there are a FEW cars (though not many) which have "ABS Active" warning lights on the dash. I drove some miles in the winter in a friends 96 Geo Prizm, and her vehicle had this light.
~alpha
It also depends on the car the type of feel back you get... Some high end luxury cars don't give you the pulsating feel but you can hear the tires when they lock and are instantly released.
I was only aware of the ABS malfunction light, but not of the Active warning light.
Some people when they buy a car good deal or not, really that great or not, become attached to them. Also GM does have superb trucks, and some cars like the CTS , Saab 9-3 maybe even the cobalt can do the trick if you don't care that much about what kind of car you own.
So even if they get off this employee discount it could work for them in the long run somehow.
I also don't understand why people here are talking about the civic when this a mid size comparison thread.
Something interesting for you Honda fans, it is believed the next new accord won't be out at least till early 2009. I don't know if thats true or not, but i certainly think that will not be good for honda at all.
Yes.... look around and notice how many older Volvo's are still on the road. Many of them have well over 200k miles on the clock and are still going strong. Volvo's were sold in much lower numbers than Honda/Toyota of course, but they were reliable cars. Since Ford took over Volvo, I can't speak for the reliability of the newer models. My neighbor buys older Honda's and Toyota's all the time. For the most part, they are good solid cars, but he has spent a considerable amount of money on mechanical repairs and other issues.
"So basically what i'm trying to say is when they take the employee discount offer off, a lot of people will not buy their cars."
I agree.... not only that, but the cars will be worth even less at trade-in time and when the '06 models arrive over the next few months. GM and Ford are finding themselves in a situation that will be tough to overcome without major changes. Now with the union infighting going on, it will be interesting to see what happens over the next year or two at the big three US automakers.
"I agree.... not only that, but the cars will be worth even less at trade-in time and when the '06 models arrive over the next few months. GM and Ford are finding themselves in a situation that will be tough to overcome without major changes. Now with the union infighting going on, it will be interesting to see what happens over the next year or two at the big three US automakers."
I seriously dont know if they're going to get themselves out of this situation. Who knows maybe it will all turn out good, it will be real interesting to see how they will deal with this problem.
I doubt it. The employee discounts are only a temporary fix for a major problem. Buyers will now expect the huge discounts or they won't buy. GM has cut production, so that might help in the long run, but it also means fewer cars being sold and less profit. I have been a loyal GM customer, but I won't buy another GM product at any price. GM refuses to stand behind what they sell by ignoring design flaws and quality defects. I could go on, but this isn't a GM related forum.
It's something they had to do? No, its not something they had to do they should have found a better marketing ploy to generate more sales. They should've looked at what the consequences are of putting an employee discount. Now customers know exactly how much they could get off a car, and they will wait till they will get that amount they want off their car. I think employee discount is a reflection of the trouble GM is currently in and what GM is doing now is to boost sales while in the long run this might backfire.
Accord Coming out in early 2009? I highly doubt that. But i could be wrong, where did you say you read that?
Didn't ignore it as much as I overlooked it. Kind of hard to devote my full attention during times that I have a 15 month old getting into everything both in and out of sight .....
To answer your question I can think of 2 times that my ABS activated. One time was done intentionally and the other time was when I had to brake rather hard to avoid a car that turned out in front of me. Fairly low considering the length of time I have been driving and the total miles I have driven. The ABS wasn't as much of a necessity to me as the SCAB. My son's safety is a priority to me and if I thought ESC would help my chances of protecting him I wouldn't buy a car without it. I feel that a strong safety cage and SAB along with SCAB are more important than ESC and ABS. Granted, that is my personal opinion but if you take a poll outside of the carnut centered Edmunds circa then you will see a lot of people don't care about ESC.
It's about keeping the car from swerving out of control when you try to avoid something unforseen on the road suddenly, such as an animal, debris that fell out of another car, or another car. People overcompensate when this happens, and I've seen at least two instances where this has happened and the car spun out.
The vast majority of side curtain airbags don't deploy in a car's lifetime. But when they do, it can save someone's life or disfigurement.
Same thing with stability control. Chances are that you won't need it to come on (for the average driver), but when it does, it can save your life or other driver's lives.
Side curtains can protect you when you get into an accident. Stability control can protect you from getting into one.
"My son's safety is a priority to me and if I thought ESC would help my chances of protecting him I wouldn't buy a car without it."
I'm not sure why you think it won't. Research, testing, and real world evidence has clearly shown that it is a worthwhile safety feature. Of course, it doesn't work 100% of the time. But it definitely increases your chances of keeping a car straight during an emergency manuver.
I think it's only a matter of time that stability control becomes standard on all cars.
should have found a better marketing ploy to generate more sales."
Like what? There is nothing like cutting prices that can boost sales almost
instantly. It is a desperate measure (obviously) and demonstrates how GM
and other American automakers are out of any viable alternative measure.
GM really is not in a position to worry about long-term effects of price-cutting.
They need to keep the sales up or their plants will begin to shut down (not
that it's not already happening). Plus, they will run out of cash on hand (which
is quite different from profits) if the sales continue to dive. With their junk bond
status, they will run out of cash to pay for operating and marketing costs, let
alone R&D.
Given the situation, GM's priority is "staying afloat" until they can come up with
better vehicles and scrap that ridiculous retirement package deals with its former/
current employees.
So, yeah, I think it's EXACTLY what they had to do.
It will be another twin brother to a Hyundai model (as in Sonata) just like the
Sportage/Tucsan combo.
Obviously, nobody here dreams of owning a Kia, but if they can keep the
quality as high as the Sonata, I think it can be an economic alternative to
other mid-size sedans.
I'm pretty sure that its power-train will be identical to Sonata's.
Enough features in inexpensive packages to make even Hyundai blush?
I'm expecting another Amanti-like design :P
I hear that its Korean name will be Lotze. yuk.
truethat said: Given the situation, GM's priority is "staying afloat" until they can come up with better vehicles
You're both right.
However, they implemented this to help clear out old inventory and make room for the 2006 models. As for the quality and reliability of GM products I can't speak on the products because I never care for there integrated systems. If I buy a car I want to be able to work on my on car and do my own customizing. I feel this way about Honda's also.
Here is one thing that I did note about auto manufactures. The quality of there cars seems to be lower in the country or origin than in other countries. Is that because the cars are released in there home area first and than release in other countries months later. Thus given the manufacture time to realize mass production errors.
But I am not downing any of GM products because Honda also has problems.
Honda Recall
This covers a long range of cars 2000 - 2003 and some 2004 models. This is longer than there warranty.">link title
~alpha
Let's move on.
~alpha
Sonata vs Accord vs Camry comparison test by Edmunds
Accord and Camry? Think about it. I know you have a good argument and thats good. But sometimes you need to use common sense. This goes to Alpha guy too (if your reading it alpha)! :P
It seems to me like you are trying to mock anti-hyundai people by making some seriously dumb comments on their side.
If so, well it's kind of fun, but I bet it'll get old real soon.
Also, Hyundai was given a bad rep. in the early years because of its' partners Mitsubishi and Chrysler. Now Hyundai is producing more on their own and with more pride than before.
Also, with the technological advances that Hyundai has made who would want to buy an over price Accord or Camry.
The Accord and Camry are still going to sell better. Toyota and Honda have been rulers of the mid-size segment for many years and have earned the trust of many customers. The Sonata is relatively new to this segment, and still needs to time establish itself as a classleader. A lot of people look past the price of the Accord and Camry because they want to buy quality car. Honda and Toyota have been making quality cars for years, and its paying off (in sales and repeated buyers)
I'm not saying Hyundai doesn't make quality cars, they do, but it might take a while before they are up where Honda and Toyota are.
Yeah, I agree things tend to not change. Which is why it's generally safe to be in a position that "common sense" holds everytime. You'll get more right than wrong that way. Duh.
But sometimes, some things actually do change. I mean, otherwise where's the fun in life? And while it's hard to predict when that's gonna happen, I believe that there has been enough evidences to make a strong case that indeed this Korean company is changing drastically for better.
I know many would disagree. If everyone agreed it would also be a "common sense." And there'll be no fun in buying or supporting Hyundai at this moment. It'll just be another safe boring choice. But it's not. And that's why some people on this board are so excited about this former manufacturer of Excel. :P
Hyundai really did changed for the better, its amazing to see how it went from the Excel to the Sonata.
When will hell truely freeze over?
5 years? 10 years?
(I think this will better sum up how we assess the Korean company's progress
and prospects individually)
Only time will tell which automakers survive and which ones don't. The back and forth debate in this forum has become kind of ridiculous and of little value except for the sake of argument. :confuse:
That was my first ever drive in an Accord and I was not impressed.....road noise was deafening and when I closed the door it sounded cheap....and this was the EX-V6 I drove.....I test drove the Sonata about a month ago (real early in my car shopping process) and was expecting the Accord to blow the Sonata away.....
I have a strong feeling that I will be leaving the Hyundai dealer with an '06 Sonata tomorrow!!!
To me this is all kind of funny, because Hyundai has put Honda and Toyota in very very uncomforble spot. The new hyundai which aimed pretty high and benchmarked cars they didn't have to but was necessary to them in the audi a6 and lexus es 300 have it made difficult for honda and toyota because now they would have to make their cars a inch closer to their own luxury division car, which could cause a inner war within the company.
If honda aims to make their cars like acura, then that could hurt acura sales and same with the toyota. Also if done so, then acura cars have to take a step up as well, costing more money.
The next couple of years should be interesting in the asian car industry
http://www.moduta.com/bemarket/goods/5389_imgl6
(PS) Hyundai will never be up with the big two. I know many of you are going to say Hyundai is improving. But dont forgot Honda and Toyota are. Another thing hyundai lacks is honda's and toyota's bullet proof reputation. :lemon:
Lets sum it up like what Truehat said: Will Hell ever freeze up?
"We could sit here and debate "who's better" until the cows come home, but no one has a crystal ball. It all boils down to personal choice and people must make their own decisions.
Only time will tell which automakers survive and which ones don't. The back and forth debate in this forum has become kind of ridiculous and of little value except for the sake of argument."
Also nice pictures fezzy.