Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Porsche Cayman S



  • getty1getty1 Posts: 1
    I am a new owner of a silver cayman S. I love it. It is such a fine machine.

    I was wondering if I can ask for some opinion about tire maintenance.
    I seem to have a tire pressure leak on one of my rear tires (19 inch). I say I'm losing about 5 pounds per day as I have observed if the car sat all day.

    I called the dealer and they suggested I replace the tire with a brand new one versus doing a patching due to the dynamics of the tires when travelling with higher speeds.
    My driving habits dont take me up passed 90mph. The tire replacement is anywhere from $400 to $500 a pop.

    Since this is my first Porsche I was wondering if that advise is justified to anyone. Thanks and I appreciate anyone's input.
  • habitat1habitat1 Posts: 4,282
    How "new" is the car / tire? If you just bought the car brand new, and you have noticed the leak immediately, I would think the dealer should take some responsiblity.

    On the other hand, did the leaking start after an "event" such as hitting a pot hole or running over something? If there isn't an obvious nail or other source of a leak in the tire tread, it may be caused by a bent rim. In which case you are looking at a lot more than $400 to $500.

    As far as fixing a hole, I don't think a small nail hole type patch would throuw the tire dynamics out of whack. But it sounds like you haven't identified the source of the leak.
  • chanderchander Posts: 21
    I am seeking advise on 2 issues-Can anyone chime in re the PASM feature pros and cons? Does the lower ground clearance pose a possibility of body damage from potholes?
    Often times the PASM comes with 19" tires,does this cause a significantly rough ride?,Thanx :)
  • kmanskmans Posts: 20
    There has been a lot of discussion about just this point on the Cayman Club forums, but in a nutshell PASM helps compensate for road conditions on the fly so you are apt to have a smoother, not rougher, ride with 19" wheels although it can certainly be very firm on smooth surfaces. Best advice is to test drive cars with and without and then decide.
  • habitat1habitat1 Posts: 4,282
    I assume you are aware that PASM has two settings you can toggle between via a push button. I have a 911S in which PASM and 19" wheels are standard. The "normal" setting is at least, if not more, comfortable than the standard suspension on a base 911 w/ 18" wheels. Yet, even on the normal setting, body roll is very minimal and the car handles very well. The "sport" setting is noticably stiffer and great for "enthusiastic" driving on smooth surfaces, but too harsh for daily driving on city streets, IMO. After 18 months and nearly 13k miles, I am a fan of PASM. But I must admit that I probably only use the "sport" PASM setting 10% of the time. On the other hand, I use the "sport" setting on my sport/chrono (faster throttle response and braking) closer to 50% of the time. The two can be toggled independently.

    I have had no negative issues with the lower ground clearance of PASM, although I have yet to hit a major pothole and do my best to avoid them. I think the difference in ground clearance is minimal and if you hit a big enough pothole, it would do damage wither way.
  • kyfdx%40Edmundskyfdx%40Edmunds Posts: 25,856
    .. that the bigger risk to 19" wheels is tire/rim damage from having 1/2" less sidewall..

    I've not heard too many stories of body damage from potholes... on any car. I doubt 19" vs. 18" would have much effect there... the axles are still the same distance from the ground.

    Moderator - Prices Paid, Lease Questions, SUVs

  • bgsntthbgsntth Posts: 76
    This is the reason I have 17" rims on my Cayman, as I drive through SF everyday and take advantage of the pot-hole ridden commute lane on Bay Street to cut time. The Cayman base suspension is very compliant and rarely bottoms-out, much less so even than my previous OBXT, ironcially enough.
  • topspin628topspin628 Posts: 373
    SF traffic is probably similar to NYC so I have to ask how you like it and if you use as a daily driver? I am very drawn to this car for the looks and performance but I'm concerned a bit on the noise factor and the comfort as a daily driver. Also, just curious why you chose over a boxster? I like the looks of the Cayman much more but how much fun are you giving up without the vert option?
    Did anyone cross shop the Cayman with the Vette?

    Thanks to all for input/opinions.
  • habitat1habitat1 Posts: 4,282
    "Did anyone cross shop the Cayman with the Vette?"

    I have a 911, not a Cayman, but was asked that question by a friend who is considering a Porsche now. My response is that the two couldn't be further apart on the subjective qualities. Porsche is all about precision, finesse and quality, the Corvette is all about brute power and quantity. In actual statistical performance, a 911S and Corvette (or Viper, for that matter) are not all that far apart. But how you feel in the drivers seat is night and day. Both when the car is moving and when it isn't.
  • bgsntthbgsntth Posts: 76
    The Cayman works very well as a daily driver, if you are an enthusiast who accepts it is a true sports car. The suspension is stiff, but compliant. The engine makes a lot of noise, but it is glorious. It also is very comfortable, and has a lot of space for gym bags and such.

    I chose it over a Boxster because I never really fit in the Boxster; albeit I have not sat in one in the last 3 years, I had a convertible previously and actually prefer a hardtop, and I will at some point start participating in trackdays.
  • rmddsrmdds Posts: 10
    Anyone out there who has driven both - the Cayman S and BMW's new 335i? Any perspectives or thoughts on the relative performance. I have yet to test drive the latter.

    I know both are entirely different cars. But, I have been hearing big raves about the 335i's twin turbo, never mind the new M3 which will be out next year.Just wanted to hear out some comments. Tks :confuse:
  • fedlawmanfedlawman Posts: 3,118
    That's easy - the Cayman is sportier and the 335 is roomier.
  • vodkavodka Posts: 2
    In every family there’s one person who thinks a little differently than everyone else. Someone who is very much in touch with his roots, but interprets them in a totally different way.

    Check the powerful expression of the energy:

    Performance, acceleration, speed. Terms subconsciously associated with the rear view(if you can only see the rear) of the new Cayman S. Central to the look: the dual tailpipe. Framed by two ribs that allow a glimpse of the twin-branch performance exhaust system. An effective synthesis of forms and function. In true Porsche fashion, the open design not only offers outstanding looks, but also provides additional cooling.
  • seamus6seamus6 Posts: 1
    I've driven both and now own an '07 Cayman S. They are two completely different cars. The 335i is an excellent sports coupe (I traded a Z4 for the Cayman) that offers typical BMW performance, handling, quality and comfort. For my money the 335i is a better choice than the new M3. But the Cayman S is a superior sports car, not a GT, not just another sports coupe. If Porsche would endow it with 50 more hp, it would outperform the Carrera and the Carrera S. As it is, it is a wonderful driving experience and stops, goes and corners better than anything one could buy for $25k more than its lofty price. And it works as a daily driver with excellent storage space for a true sports car. The gas mileage, while not in the econo car class is acceptable for a car with its performance. Its quality is first class, too, as it should be for the price. Check out the J. D. Power ratings. Porsche and the Cayman in particular, is tops. One personal quality is that is does not come with runflat tires as do all BMWs. In my opinion, they are awful tires and awfully expensive to boot. RFs cannot be repaired under any circumstances and the cost well over $200 each to replace even when you run over something as simple as a small nail that barely punctures the tire. In the final analysis, it's what you want.. do you need four seats? If so, get the BMW. If not, drive a Cayman, preferably an S with a 6 speed, and you'l be smitten. It is simply a superior automobile. :) :) :) :)
  • I have a 2006 Cayman S. I lowered my car 8 months ago with H&R springs. About two weeks ago, I heard a dragging noise from the rear of the car. I took the car to the dealership for inspection, they information the stroud had slip and ripped the cv boot. They didn't want to cover the repairs under my warranty because I lowered my car with after market accesories. A friend told that a lot of owers had the same problem without lowering the car. Has anybody had the same problem, or similar. I'm trying to get more information.

    Any feed back is appreciated.

    Thank you!!
  • uniklyunikly Posts: 3
    Im new to this forum. Planning to buy me a new car since I just relocated to the US. I got a limited budget but fancy me a small car rather than a huge truck. Options are Caymen S or SLK 55 AMG. Both have the same price range. Am using the car for a short drive to work. Anyone care to expose the comparisons between these 2 cars, lets hear it. Cheers. :blush:
  • habitat1habitat1 Posts: 4,282
    You seriously need to test drive these two cars. They have almost nothing in common from a driving perspective, IMO.

    The SLK55 isn't really a sports car, IMO. It's a nearly 3,500lb SL-lite, with lots of torque attached to a lousy slushbox automatic. If you like to drag race between stoplights, it's the bomb. But for any other kind of driving, I'd take another of my former $32k Honda S2000 over it any day.

    The Cayman S is a serious sports car. According to my Acura/Mercedes dealer, who owns one, it is the 911 of old. I happen to like my 997 version, but I know what he means. He may sell SLK55's and SL65's, but he drives a Speed Yellow Cayman S. Six speed manual, of course.

    You aren't going to get much help in this forum. I think the answer resides with you. Do you want a real sports car, or something else? And I hope that you are going to use whatever you get for more than just a short drive to work. Otherwise, you might as well get a Prius.
  • kmanskmans Posts: 20
    As habitat1 said, these cars have almost nothing in common. The Mercedes is a luxury barge (albeit a smaller one) trying to be disquised as a performance car. The Cayman is a true sports car down to its last bolt. They serve different purposes and usually appeal to different drivers / styles. You owe it to yourself to do your research and this site along with Cayman Club both have a ton of information on the Cayman.

    Then get out there and test drive each of them and report back and let us know what you think!
  • Im new to this but I have been thinking about getting a cayman s for my self.
    Need some feed back.
  • kmanskmans Posts: 20
    What sort of feedback are you looking for? There is a Cayman Sales and Leasing forum at the CaymanClub.Net website if it is a sales or leasing question check there. If you are just wondering whether or not the car is a good one, simply YES it is an outstanding car. :)
Sign In or Register to comment.