Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Accord - Manual or Automatic?

stikitstikit Posts: 3
edited March 9 in Honda
«134

Comments

  • Just turned in my 2004 civic si. Decided I needed to grow up a little bit, having a family of 5. If the 2007 accord 6mt is growing up then I'm there. hoping there are more grown ups like me out there who still enjoy driving a stick with some power!
  • ezshift5ezshift5 Posts: 852
    .... hoping there are more grown ups like me out there who still enjoy driving a stick with some power!

    ...a few of us survive - -(not nearly enough to convince Toyota - for example - to offer more 5M/6M vee-hicles....).

    ..best, ez./././
  • patpat Posts: 10,421
    to make this discussion a little broader and more encompassing.
  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    I already don't like stop and go traffic. If I had a manual transmission I would hate it. Too me, an automatic is so much easier. Everyone has his or her own priorities though, so what I like, is not necessarily what you like. Only you can decide which is right for you. My truck is a manual, and it's just a hassle IMO.
  • tallman1tallman1 Posts: 1,874
    To offer the flip side (but not to disagree with elroy)... I drive in a lot of stop and go traffic and I love the manual. Lots of coasting, especially when going downhill. I find that my mileage doesn't suffer nearly as much as I thought it would.

    However, I'll bet I'm in the minority on this one. Of course, I'd be bored to death with an automatic. :)
  • kingrkingr Posts: 60
    I have a different reason for not buying the manual and that is resale value, Even though the MT and AT are the same price new(V6), I have to believe in 3 or 4 years the manual will be worth at least $1000 less than the AT. I know this is speculation however it's a demand issue, The demand for the AT is much greater. Just couldn't justify throwing money away on a manual.
  • For me it's ez, performance and fun. I looked at a few other cars in the price range ie: mazda speed6, although equally oufitted the mazda goes up to $32k+, the acura tsx and the subaru impreza. none of these dealers could come close to the lease deal I received on the honda. Even so, I love the combination of sportiness and luxury the Accord comes to the table with, and that's without any options.
  • tallman1tallman1 Posts: 1,874
    That hasn't been my experience... there is always someone who is looking for a manual. Of course, the auto costs more up front too.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    Actually, in the V6 Accord, the 6-speed manual is the exact same price as the 5-speed Automatic.
  • ray_h1ray_h1 Posts: 1,134
    ... of "shiftless" people who have better things to do than coordinate five or six perfect shifts and clutch actions while trying to avoid some ditzy, self-absorbed soccer mom with a cell phone growing out of her ear and repeatedly weaving her foam-rubber suspension Lincoln Terminator across three lanes of traffic on her way to a sweat session (?!) with her personal trainer.
  • tallman1tallman1 Posts: 1,874
    True... I was thinking of the I-4.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    True... i think the auto in the I-4 models cost $800 or so extra.
  • Then you have to consider the persons with health problems; like bad hips and knees who don't like coming home in pain after a long drive constantly having to clutch and shift in bumper to bumper traffic in Hotlanta. You just know that the AUTO is what you have to have so that you can tolerate living!!! :) ;)
  • dudleyrdudleyr Posts: 3,407
    Once you get used to it, you have to coordinate the clutch and gas about as much as you coordinate walking and breathing.

    For me the stick is a no brainer. Cheaper, faster, more efficient, better in the snow, more control (esp on hills), push starts are possible (if you drain your battery), better weight distribution (and slightly less weight) and most importantly - more fun.

    Thankfully Honda offers a choice.

    Anybody read the new CR test of small cars (not the Accord). Interesting that some of the cars were 3 seconds faster to 60 mph with the stick than with the automatic. That is a huge difference. It is probably only about 1.5 seconds with a more powerful vehicle like the Accord (4-cyl) and less still with the V-6. Also the befefits of ABS were quite pronounced.
  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    Once you get used to it, you have to coordinate the clutch and gas about as much as you coordinate walking and breathing.

    Getting used to it is not a problem ( I do it every day myself). But doing it ( shifting a manual ) is a hassle when I want to just relax, and drink my coffee on the way to work in the morning. A manual is only fun about 5% of the time, in my case.
  • exshomanexshoman Posts: 109
    I can't imagine wanting to drive my wife's 5 speed I4 Accord if it had an automatic. Then it would just be an appliance to get me from point A to point B.

    Life's too short. Enjoy it every chance you can. Even on those crappy drives to work.

    Especially on the lower powered cars, the stick makes such a big difference in make use of all available power. I might feel a bit different if the manual was notchy or balky, but Honda make such snick-snick smooth shifters & clutches it makes it a joy to drive.

    I agree on many cars, an automatic is the way to go, especially those that have no sporty pretentions at all (like trucks, which are immensly useful, but have the driving dynamics of, well, a truck).

    I'm so glad that Honda doesn't pull stupid crap like other manufacturers (Nissan is famous for this) and require an automatic if you get certain, often minor, options. Honda gives you a choice across the board - stick or auto.
  • tallman1tallman1 Posts: 1,874
    I agree. I could have made a great deal on an EX-L w/Navi that was on the dealer's lot. I drove it but found the automatic lacking. They don't make many fully loaded manuals but I found one and it was well worth it.... for me. :)

    I'm sure that if you drove just the automatic it would be fine for most. Then there are the people who can't drive a stick or don't want to learn. As others have stated, they find the auto more convenient. After driving both, I found a huge difference. Ain't choice grand??
  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    Especially on the lower powered cars, the stick makes such a big difference in make use of all available power.

    I have the V6, so I'm not exactly lacking power. I can do without the extra hp a manual would have. I see an automatic as a luxury, because it makes driving so much easier and relaxed. If I had an S2000 that would be a different story.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Posts: 3,407
    Of course if you have a stick you don't need the power of the V-6. ;) :)

    The 4-cyl with stick is also amazingly efficient. My brother has one (I don't - yet) and he averages nearly 38 mpg for his commute - mostly highway with some city, and can get over 40 mpg pure highway driving.

    I hope Honda keeps offering the stick on all trims with the new generation.
  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    The 4-cyl Accord with any transmission will not hang with my V6 :D . I get 33mpg on the highway doing 80mph, so that's good enough for me. :D
«134
This discussion has been closed.