Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Visibility Charts - Something we never see anymore

bumpybumpy Posts: 4,435
viewing angles for cars.

image
Tagged:
«1

Comments

  • Wow that is something we never see anymore.
  • fintailfintail Posts: 32,907
    Does that exist for other than 92-96 Preludes?
  • nippononlynippononly SF Bay AreaPosts: 12,669

    2013 Civic SI, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (stick)

  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,589
    that's pretty cool. Good way to estimate how bad the blind spots are on a car. Of course, it's going to vary depending on the driver's height, how far they had the seat back, etc, but I guess it would still be a good guideline.
  • john_324john_324 Posts: 974
    ...this info provided? In manufacturer brochures?

    If so, pretty cool that once upon a time car brochures provided useful information instead of lame prose about the "responsiveness" of base engines and ridiculous photos of happy people leaving swank nightclubs to drive their immaculate econony sedans... ;)
  • bumpybumpy Posts: 4,435
    I don't know; haven't plowed through enough of the Honda Fact Book to say. I would hope someone would sit down and figure this out when designing cars, but given the abominable rear visibility in most new designs I suspect they don't.
  • 210delray210delray Posts: 4,722
    Given today's fashion with the gun-slit windows and ever-thickening pillars, I think manufacturers would be embarrassed to put out something like this drawing now.

    NHTSA had many years back considered regulating "field of view," but supposedly couldn't find any evidence that blind spots caused collisions. :confuse: Of course, it didn't help that the automakers were in their usual for the time "it can't be done" mode.
  • fintailfintail Posts: 32,907
    I guess I would expect the Honda of back in the day to look at that detail. Pretty cool. I remember the 90-93 Accord had fantastic visibility.
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Posts: 1,986
    Yeah, looking from the inside out it was a pretty decent view...
    }-]
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,589
    I remember the 90-93 Accord had fantastic visibility.

    Even today, I think Honda might still pay some attention to visiblity. At least, I've noticed that the Accord, despite getting bigger and taller, and having a higher beltline, still seems pretty airy inside.

    Last month I participated in a local test drive event that pitted the Accord, Fusion, and Camry against each other, and I thought the Accord definitely had the best visibility. The Fusion definitely felt more enclosed. And the Camry, heck, you'd have to go back 30 years to find a car with visibility that bad! No, I take that back...even cars 30 years ago had better visiblity out the front than this Camry!
  • so that more folks can find it. Bask in the glow of my pun.

    Need help navigating? kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.

  • john_324john_324 Posts: 974
    ...for "what were they thinking" rear visibility:

    The 1971-73 Mustang fastback!

    image

    :shades:
  • fintailfintail Posts: 32,907
    I suspect many 50s and 60s domestic cars also have decent visibility, do to all the glass and thin pillars. My fintail has excellent visibility, with its wraparound front and rear windshields, and thin C pillar.

    The 07 Lexus ES I drove a few weeks back had fairly poor visbility...the windows were just too short, and the pillars very thick.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,589
    I suspect many 50s and 60s domestic cars also have decent visibility, do to all the glass and thin pillars. My fintail has excellent visibility, with its wraparound front and rear windshields, and thin C pillar.

    I'd say about the worst blind spot on my '57 DeSoto occurs whenever I get a center passenger. Totally blocks out the dash-mounted rearview mirror! The left tailfin shows up in the rearview mirror though, and that's not a car part I'm used to seeing in the mirror. So at a quick glance, it'll make me think that a car is cruising off my left rear quarter.

    I think the worst car I ever had for visibility has got to be my Intrepid, although my '88 LeBaron coupe would have been a close runner up.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Posts: 3,062
    viewing angles for cars.

    That diagram is a great idea. Maybe Consumer Reports could set up a standardized way of measuring and start including in their reports. This is a safety issue, and CR more so than any other magazine, stresses safety. Would think with some kind of laser pickup device and data fed to a computer program would make this easy to do once developed. Heck, CR could even give 3 diagrams for each vehicle for different height/torso persons: 5-3, 5-9, 6-1 as example. Then, at end of each year, some how they could rank order vehicles for best-to-worst visibility.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Posts: 3,062
    I guess I would expect the Honda of back in the day to look at that detail. Pretty cool. I remember the 90-93 Accord had fantastic visibility.

    And it had a great, maybe classic design. Still looks nice today and its style has withstood the test of time. We had an 86 Accord LXI 4-door that I recall had great visibility - tall windows, low beltline, and sloping hood. Got 247K mi out of that car.
  • texasestexases Posts: 5,424
    That's my problem with the new CR-V (well, besides the eye-watering front end) - the 'fashionable' curved side window opening (sorry Honda, one curved window does not an FX-35 make). We end up with poorer visibility and reduced rear seat access. Hope they don't botch the new Pilot in a similar way, but the last spy shot I saw looked like it...
  • fintailfintail Posts: 32,907
    I remember the Accords and Civics of those days also had that kind of drop down dash design, that gave the car an even more airy feel inside. I agree, that 1990 Accord design is timeless.
  • fintailfintail Posts: 32,907
    I never understood that dash mounted mirror. Seems to be against any logical idea of visibility.

    I think they were common on Citroens, and probably other French cars too.
  • w9cww9cw Posts: 888
    I rented a 2007 Camry SE for a week trip last summer, and the visibility was very poor, especially out the side windows. I know the high beltline design is the rage now - look at the Saturn Aura - and that it's perhaps dictated by side impact crash testing requirements, but I really dislike it. Give me a car with a large greenhouse any day, like my old 1970 Volvo 144S has, or even my 1985 SAAB 900.
«1
This discussion has been closed.