Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
My question is, what, if any special tools might be needed? I don't want to take my entire shop. I plan to take:
A set of 3/8" drive metric sockets with all the typical extensions etc.
A set of metric combination wrenches.
A large C clamp.
A large screwdriver.
Piece of rope to support the caliper.
Anything else I need??
If you could email me an answer at pcalinski@iname.com in addition to posting, it would be a big help. I don't know if I can find this board again.
Thanks in advance.
Pete Calinski
I posted #816 with very little response .
I purchased (actually leased) a new 2001 CR-V EX 5-speed last weekend. Armed with knowledge from the Edmunds site I was targeting $19,400 as the 'fair price' as espoused by the True Market Value (TMV). During negotiations, the salesperson said that the invoice was $19,400, which I knew was too high for the vehicle. After back-and-forth dickering, explaining that I'm a return Honda customer, my '98 Passport LX coming off lease is in excellent condition and well-below mileage allowance, we settled on $298/month including local taxes (5%). I also had him waive the security deposit and first month's lease.
I paid for additional options (arm rest, cassette player, retractable cargo cover and Lojack alarm system) out of pocket leaving the montly lease payment alone - I realize there are pros and cons to doing this. There was no room for haggling on the options. Needless to say, Honda is still making money on the deal and accepted the final terms without much hesitation. THEY GET YOU NO MATTER WHAT!
As for the options, salespersons at the dealership (Honda Village, Newton, MA) don't even deal with these and leave these for the finance people. They simply move the vehicles and leave the options to others. This is different than I remember and I'm not sure if this is dealer-specific, Honda-specific, or an industry trend.
Any thoughts/comments on the above?
Overall, my wife and I were reasonably happy.
Delivery will be in mid-April. I guess - and I'm always guessing - if I could have gotten an even better deal?
Cheers.
Everyone should check out the April issue at http://www.hondasuv.com/
Some good reports this month. Mud, snow and sand.
you can probably sell the whole lot of them to someone with a lower model at a yard sale for a hundred bucks or so or just give them away if you know someone.
don't give them anything they are NOT entitled to.
LovemyCR-V - Beatfarmer is not spamming http://www.hondasuv.com because he gets paid for it. ;-) It's a great site which includes all kinds of articles about installing extras like the cargo cover and net. Check it out.
As long as I'm spamming.... Anyone interested in off-roading should check out the articles on the Withlacoochie Forest in FLA, the Allegheny Forest in Bradford, PA, and the sand dunes of Dubai (sp?) This month we also have some information (speculation) on what not to expect from the '02 CR-V and the official version of "The Life and Times of a CR-V Spy Journalist". Our Host Steve might enjoy that last one.
:-)
Steve
Host
Vans, SUVs and Aftermarket & Accessories Message Boards
It is my understanding that Honda plans to produce a Honda scale down version of the MDX sometime in the future, unfortunately I don't want to wait that long.
It's also quite amazing how Toyota has managed to release this year alone three new SUV's (RAV4, Highlander, Sequoia) with a redesigned 4Runner for next year. In the meantime Honda released the MDX and a redesigned CRV is forecasted for next year. Is it a lack of R&D money at Honda, just wondering?
Honda is known for some of (if not THE) best 4 cylinder engines made in the world.
I would rather a 2.2 Honda motor, or better yet, a 3 litre 4 cylinder over a v6 from Nissan or GM.
The Honda version of the MDX is due out in 2003. Personally, I hope that it is a wide as the MDX. Keep it stable, baby!
I recently bought a 2001 Honda CRV (SE). On the way home the day I picked it up, I noticed a hollow/grinding noise coming from the front of the vehicle. I've had it in the garage twice for this problem. They first replaced the front wheel bearings, and that didn't cure the problem. Next, they replaced the transmission, and that didn't cure the problem. At this writing, the CRV only has 900 miles on it. Has anyone encountered a similar problem?
My first thought was that it was a bad shock or some part of the front-end assembly, because going over a rough road produces a distinct hollow sound, as though something is loose or broken. At times, the noise is so loud that even turning the radio up doesn't drown out the noise.
Obviously, any help or comments will be appreciated. Thanks.
Bob
As for other Honda SUVs, the Honda version of the MDX is going to sell very well (duh). Passport leaving the ranks at that point?
-beanboy
I'm thinking that many of the people who have been complaining about the lack of a V-6 in the CR-V will be very happy with the Honda version of the MDX.
CRV EX CRV SE
90amp .vs. 95amp alternator
cloth .vs. leather seat/steering wheel
black .vs. colored bumper, side moldings
4.56 .vs. 4.36 axle ratio
what are the other differences b/n EX & SE?
btw, what does "axle ratio" mean?
thanks.
I paid invoice w/ free floormats (2WD LX). While I was waitting the delivery, Honda started offering the financing deal, so I got it also. The dealer just gave my deposit check back. So I paid nothing for my new CR-V, and I don't have to pay anything until the end of next month.
Since it will be my daily transportation, I do want the black bumper and black side moldings.
1) A chrome-colored grille surround on the SE.
2) AM/FM/CD stereo in the EX; AM/FM/CD/cassette stereo in the SE. Someone at CRV-IX claims that the SE headunit is also more powerful, but I haven't verified this.
3) If you want a stick shift, get the EX; the SE only comes with automatic transmission.
4) The SE's have tinted glass from the rear passenger windows to the back of the vehicle.
Also, what have some of you paid for a crv-ex manual, want to make sure I am negotiating ..
thanks in advance.
The most likely engine candidate for duty in the next gen CR-V (remember this is just speculation) is a SMALLER engine that puts out more horsepower, slightly more torque, gets better mpg, and has cleaner emmisions.
I like Juice and, in general, he knows a whole lot about cars, but his suggestion is based on what he thinks Honda should do. The engine I'm talking about has already been built and is used in the Honda Stream. (Sold in the Japanese and European markets only.) It's a smaller 2.0 liter four banger using i-VTEC technology. It's the same block used in the upcoming Acura RS-X and the Civic Si.
Honda has built a new production line in their Sayama plant where they are capable of producing eight variants of this engine. Engines will be built in sequence to lower costs associated with waste and lead times.
Honda has promised to revamp all of their domestic car engines by 2005 (the CR-V would be one of them). Therefore I doubt we'll see the aging Accord 2.3L in the CR-V.
Expect to see the new model hit sales floors in the Fall. I'd guess November, but it could be as soon as October. We should start seeing "spy" photos soon (not the stuff I did at "that site, which will remain nameless" for fun). We should also see either a concept or the real deal at auto shows this Summer.
If that's not enough information for you, search back about 40-50 posts here in the town hall for other posts where I've given more details. There's also a good one about the engine over in the Forester vs. CR-V topic approx. 20-30 posts back.
Ckoc - I paid about $19.5K for my EX manual, but that was back in Spring 1999.
That pic is the result of an airbrush meeting a current CR-V. It was first posted by a member at the CR-V IX. Anyway, there were two pictures. One is the blue CR-V in that link and the other is a green one. The green one is exactly the same except for the color. Even the reflections in the glass is the same. Chances are, if one was an airbrush job, so is the other.
There are other tidbits. Note the size of the front wheel arch vs the rear one. They're out of proportion.
I also haven't figured out why a Japanese magazine would be taking pictures of a home market car and use a license plate spelled in english.
As for the engine, I recently posted what my best guess would be...
varmit Apr 13, 2001 10:17am
It's quick and easy. The only other way to significantly protect the cover would be to have an alarm with shock sensor. I'd be pretty upset if someone took my cover too, since I took the time to paint mine Electron Blue to match the rest of the car.
Also, I'm concerned that the armrest on the door will be unconfortable during long drives. It seems like such an impractical shape for an armrest. It's not a flat surface! Since I rest my left elbow there when I drive, I have to think about such things. Am I crazy?
Thanks for any feedback.
I can't make claims about the accuracy of that Honda employee's claims. He may have been told all that by someone else just as a smoke screen. I do know that Honda/Acura has design studios in CA. I was unaware of one in PA (but hey, I don't know everything!).
Marlowe - Your test drives should answer that for you better than I can. In normal driving conditions, I find the amount of power in the CR-V to be adequate, but nothing to write home about. However, when you rev it up to 4,000 rpms or higher, it has enough for some fun. I have the manual, though.
I like the the fact that Honda included full length door handles on all four doors. They're great from a practical point of view. Comfort is another story. I've read only a few complaints about them, but I do know of two owners that have hand made pads for them. They used OEM cloth or door fabric (try a junk yard or auto interior dealer) and did a nice job of making a flat pad that inserts between the handle and door panel. Ask over at the CR-V IX for more information.
Interesting thoughts about the new Passport. Since the rumors say that it was be a tame version of the MDX, I was expecting it to compete with the Higlander. Honda would up the ante on the Highlander in the same manner that they did the RX300 (more power, more cargo, same car-like ride).
Good posts. Keep em coming.
Just checked out that site, Honda is offering a new special edition CRV in Australia with sunroof. Wonder if it will make its way here. The sport classic edition is said to start sale April 1, for 3 month.
Notice the front bumpers have 2 round holes for fog lights. I don't see it on US models.
Here's a picture on Japan Honda site, CRV with painted front bumper with fog lights. Chrome grill. Is that some kind of scoop on the hood?
http://www.honda.co.jp/auto-lineup/cr_v/
Oh yeah, there's definitly a sunroof on Japanese CRVs.... What about us here in the poor USA? Why didn't Honda make it available for us?
Yes, but the important part is at what rpm's does this "slightly more" torque come? That is important for off road capability, and around town.
I like the Sportage, but dislike some of the quality issues. A true 4x4 with a great warranty. All it needs is a few more cc's and some improved quality, and I'd buy.
I looked at those web pages. On the specs, I noticed the tire size: "195/70 R15 92S tyres." I would expect AT LEAST 225/75R15 on the entry level stocker if it is going to be taken somewhat seriously. Better would be 235/75R15, 245/75R15 or 245/70R15 or even a sport version with 31X10.50R15 tires.
I want ride height!!!
The little engine that could develops most of its torque between 2000 and 4000 rpms. The article does not give a specific percentage. Typically, they do not remark on this unless it's 85% or higher. The current CR-V also has a flat torque curve, but it doesn't get close to peak until almost 3000 rpms and hangs on through 4,500 rpms.
The current CR-V's block is a 2.0L, but has the external dimensions and weight of a 1.6L. This new block is supposed to be even smaller. With more torque, a lower torque curve, and less weight it should go pretty good.
The Stream (where the engine is used now) has been billed as a seven seater coupe. LOL! However, it's probably only slightly smaller than the LX non-AWD CR-V. All of the reviews describe it as having "sporty peformance". I'd guess that with the AWD CR-V's extra weight, this will translate to an improvement in pick-up, but nothing to challenge the V-6s in the line-up.
The design direction of the block was aimed at improvements in fuel economy and emissions. Those areas are where the impressive gains are.
I have a '98 JGC and I'm looking for a more car-like ride. My little one tends to get car sick from the bumpy ride.
Any suggestions?