Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Audi A5

dhamiltondhamilton Posts: 873
edited December 2013 in Audi
Autospies has "leaked" pictures of the new A5.

I think it looks great, although I'm a little disapointed it's not as aggresive as the concept from 03.

At any rate, there's much less weight past the front axles, so the dynamics should be improved a ton.


  • But the target is the 335i and that's going to be a tough one. Based on what I've read, the A5 will be between the A4 and A6 in size (well, it is the "A5"). I just wish it was an A4 coupe. I'm not really interested in a larger car. Also noted that the images show a three liter Diesel badge. I wonder if NA will see that configuration?

    In a month or two we will at least get to see what the reviewers think. I can't wait for Jeremy Clarkson to do a write up. He certainly dissed the 335i's styling.
  • Clarkson usually disses anything not

    1. Ferrari

    2. Lotus

    3. Mercedes

    But it will be hilarious as always.

    I'm not in the market for a coupe, I really just want to see what they say about the driving dynamics. A sedan for everyday, and the occasional autocross event [think S4] would be perfect, if a little less nose heavy.

    I've also heard that this will replace any A4 cabriolet's now.
  • and other forums, people are saying it resembles the 3 coupe series to much.

    I get that a little. The 3 series is a killer for me in the rear end. It looks to much like a GTO.
  • If I recall correctly, Clarkson was smitten by the Bugatti Veyron. Seems that all it takes is 16 cylinders, four turbos, and > 1000 hp in a car that looks like a UFO. But must say, the A5 better have its handling act together 'cause it ain't the most striking design out there.

  • I agree it's a pretty safe design.

    Like I said earlier, I wish it was more like the Nuvolari concept, ie more aggressive.

    I think it will handle better, how much so remains to be seen.

    One of my Audi buddies thinks this design is the signal that all Audi's will look like Italian cars now. Not such a good thing.
  • rjlaerorjlaero Posts: 659
    Neither BMW or Mercedes have any car that isn't a bit controversial in styling. Audi has the best looking cars on the road today from A3 to A8 of any highline company.

    I not totally sold on that swoopy styling and prefer the sharp crease of the other audis, but I'll have wait to see the a5 in person before i make a final styling judgement.

    Kinda interesting abou the italian comment..the A5 looks a little maserati to me. And that might not be a bad thing.
  • Its okay. I dont really like the square-ish headlamps but i think the rear end is really sweet. The interior looks a little downgraded but im sure the fit and finish is nice...wish it was more like the a6. It does look a little Italian...a lot different from the other Audis with sharper creases and lines like the A6 and R8... Here's another website with some more photos... link title the side profile is amazingly good looking imo. it almost looks like it might have the window built into the trunk hatch, like the Jaguar XKR or Aston Martin Rapide. That would be awesome... and here are some better pics of the S5...looks pretty much the same. link title
  • I definatly like the lines of the A5 more than the 3 coupe.

    The 3 is out of proportion front to back IMO.

    As far as the interior, I wish it was again more aggressive like the shooting brake concept. That interior was just so driver oriented. It called out to me at night to drive it :blush:
  • everyone is reporting that the 6 cylinder version will be the same 3.2 litre displacement.

    Anyone know why they aren't giving it the 3.6 from the Q7?

    I think it will fit won't it?
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Posts: 1,986
    Remarkable similarity.

    Unfortunately in this instance, Audi looks more Japanese than Italian to me. I would take it over the BMW based on styling, but not on drivetrain layout.

    I just don't know about these teuton coupes though. Frankly, I think the existing G35 coupe is a more coherent and compelling styling exercise than either...
  • This is the best part of the car. I just show pictures of the interior and I would like to say well done Audi. Its almost like the BMW 3 series setup in terms of the navigation display position BUT Audi A5 has more buttons so the center console does not look like a blunt piece (like the 3 series especially without navigation) but its nicely "decorated" with buttons. I bet its faster to use them than navigating with the idrive.
    The only reason I hate i drive is because it has stripped the BMW console from its buttons
  • conallconall West TexasPosts: 91
    Some of you may have already seen this from Autoweek:

    "U.S. sales of the 2008 A5 and S5 begin in November with the 3.2-liter, 265-hp V6 as the primary A5 engine offering.
    Both models launch with six-speed manual transmissions
    with six-speed automatics appearing three months later for the A5 and six months later in the S5.
    Although front drive is available in Europe, all U.S. models come equipped with quattro all-wheel-drive."
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Posts: 1,986
    "...Although front drive is available in Europe, all U.S. models come equipped with quattro all-wheel-drive..."

    I wish they'd figured that out with the A3. IMO, buying Audi means buying Quattro. FWD is for VW, says I. :blush:
  • conallconall West TexasPosts: 91
    ...and available first w/ 6 - speed manual tranny, too!

    I looked at an A3 2.0 Quattro w/ 6 speed in Ingolstadt (visiting in-laws), but I wasn't in the market at the time to order one, drive it around and then ship it as a gray-market vehicle.

    It's just a pity we couldn't get that model over here.
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Posts: 310
    C&D site has A5/S5 first drive article. S5 comes first, A5 next year. Kind of strange to start with the S.

    1st Drive
  • jpennjpenn Posts: 68
    Just saw the A5/S5 article and pics on Edmunds site. The car is attractive but seems to lack a real styling punch. No doubt it will be a fantastic driver w/quattro. The back seat is a real laugher. It looks more like a platform for small kids and/or packages. In any event it's really nice to see so many of the luxury auto makers coming back to the two door coupe segment, it's long overdue.
  • rockshocka1rockshocka1 Posts: 310
    Found it curious that Edmunds thought the rear seating was spacious. Every other first impression I read said it's tight. One other article, can't remember which, noted the rear headroom was better than you would believe.

    I'm inclined to believe there won't be much room back there, but wouldn't mind being surprised.
  • conallconall West TexasPosts: 91
    Makes me wonder. :confuse:
    I know that in the original incarnation of the Coupe Quattro, there was plenty of back seat space.
  • I had a 2nd generation (AKA B3) 1991 Audi Quattro Coupe. So cool. So rare. So practical. The back seat had headroom for 6 foot tall people, 60/40 rear folding seats and a hatch for serious cargo capacity.

    You will never see that again with todays demand for a low roofline, unless you look at economy cars.
Sign In or Register to comment.