Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Fears of buying a Mazda CX-7 in its first model year - still justified?

budhbudh Posts: 109
edited March 15 in Mazda
I've been very interested in the new Mazda CX-9 (and CX-7) and am seriously considering purchasing one of the other.

But I have always vowed never to buy a car in the first year of production. And the CX-9, in particular is not only in it's first model year, but in it's first few model MONTHS!

Are those fears still justified these days?

Bud H
«13

Comments

  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Posts: 498
    "Are those fears still justified these days?"

    Let your heart be your guide. If you REALLY think you'll love the car, then all of these nit-noid complaints we've made in the last few months, are really minor, in the over-all scheme of things. The CELs have been the dominant theme. Second place is the NAV system.

    Oh, don't forget the MPG...If you REALLY can't get past the lack lustre MPG, then consider alternatives.

    Everyone who visits these forum have their own peculiar gripes.

    Me? I've had a couple CELs, but beyond that, I STILL LOVE MY CX-7!

    Vince.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Posts: 458
    Yup, Bud H. Ditto to what Vince said.

    ...CX-7 owner since 08/06.

    -c92
  • wjbushsrwjbushsr Posts: 135
    Jumping into the fray, I do indeed love my CX-7!

    Owner since June '06 :shades:
  • astegmanastegman Posts: 171
    Just do your homework. Be informed. If you can get past the so-so MPG, then there's little to no reason NOT to buy one of these great cars. Good luck!
  • erhayeserhayes Posts: 10
    I'm waiting till the 2008 MY after reading owner reports in the MyCX7.com Forum.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Posts: 458
    Keep in mind that forums are not a perfect cross-section of owners. I think almost everyone here and on other forums either really loves their car, or has an axe to grind (possibly because they LOVE their car so much). The middle ground is probably not well-represented. If you buy into my theory, that means there are a vast number of people out there with no problems/complaints who are not speaking out here, either positively or negatively.

    So, it's your call - and the MY08s are right around the corner. But even with a few CELs and dealer flubs, I'd still do it all over again. I'd bet most of the other CX-7 fans, even with all their car issues, would do the same, too.
  • extech2extech2 Posts: 120
    When I worked for Honda every time a new model came out they had the service bulletins popping up, sometimes 3 or 4 a month,always the small niggling problems with wind noise,rattles, windows and latches, mostly body integrity. Then by the year's end the more serious problems arrived, but the real bad things like transmission or engine failures didn't show up until the model was at least 3 years old. By the fourth year usually all the problem areas were corrected, then they start a new model and the circle begins again. I know that's not what you want to hear. My biggest concern with a turbo engine is that if there will be common failures they won't show up until 50-60 thousand miles or later. Think of it this way, you have a man running as hard as he can, how long will he last? I'd rather take a larger engine spinning slowly and giving me the same power with the same or only slightly less gas mileage. However, in the case of the CX-7 or the RDX we don't have a choice if we really want the car as it is.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Posts: 458
    Well, the good news is, I guarantee you that you haven't seen any Honda turbo failures after 50-60K miles, because they haven't sold one in the US before.

    FWIW, carmakers these days have the turbo thing pretty much under control, and given proper maintenance, it's not on my hot list of things to fail. Case in point: my 90,000-mile chipped 1.8T Volkswagen which has been driven far beyond what the manufacturer intended, but has also had fresh Mobil 1 every 5,000 miles.

    Incindentally, turbo engines don't spin any faster than NA engines - actually usually slower, if there's any difference at all.

    But your point about makers not getting it perfect until the 4th year is well-taken. I figure that's pretty much the same for all makers, in all cases.
  • extech2extech2 Posts: 120
    "Well, the good news is, I guarantee you that you haven't seen any Honda turbo failures after 50-60K miles, because they haven't sold one in the US before."
    That is EXACTLY the reason I'm reluctant with these turbos.
  • nmknmk Posts: 111
    Well you have to decide what you want in a vehicle.
    Obviously you have some spirit and spunk to consider a smaller manufacturer of very special automobiles. :shades:

    Do you want to slog your car as basic transportation, or do you want something to enjoy while you navigate the daily drudge. :confuse:

    Ask yourself if your concerns are the jitters of anxiety or reading these forums convinced you that you are better off waiting?

    Carlitos92 is "righton" with his remarks about owners and there feelings. ;)

    My understanding is that Mazda is very particular about the complaints and suggestions mentioned by owners and have bent over backwards to remedy many if not all of the problems.

    Personally, I would buy it again and even pay for some of the improvements that I had suggested to Mazda to make it a more upscale vehicle. ;)

    Darth Vader GT AWD w/Nav.
  • carlitos92carlitos92 Posts: 458
    Still, I wouldn't be reluctant at all. Not that Honda has shyed away from being on the forefront of technology (CVCC, VTEC, ATTS, SH-AWD, etc.) - but in this case, I think the important point is that turbos in general have been figured out industry-wide, and Honda isn't starting from scratch when it comes to engineering a pressurized engine. Even if it is Honda's first American-market turbo, over the years, engineering secrets have been shared, staff have moved from maker to maker, and the common turbo knowledge is out there. If ANYBODY can do it right first try, it's Honda.
  • I concur, so I will render my opinion for the middle ground.I pride myself on being objective when giving an opinion on how good or bad anything is. Fact is, I have had my CX-7 since October 2006. In 6800 miles I have had a CEL twice so far. One has been due to a bad gas cap and one was due to a bad flapper valve. Both parts were replaced and no more issues. I have had the occasional thoughts of "I can't believe I bought this car with the price of gas these days", but the damn thing is so much fun to drive that those feelings don't last long. Not to mention the compliments I get from people. I also swore I would never buy a first model year car, but once I test drove it I fell in love. Just in case of issues later on, I plan on getting the extended warranty soon. This way I can have some peace of mind in case something goes awry. Hope this helps.
  • vbbuiltvbbuilt Posts: 498
    "I plan on getting the extended warranty soon."

    Curious... what is the eligibility period for buying Mazda's extended warranty? You've had the car for 5 months now and 6800 miles? Can you still buy the warranty? I've had mine since June 2006 and have 16000 miles on it. Am I still eligible?

    Vince.
  • I believe you can get it before the 3/36 runs out, but don't hold me to it. I would certainly double-check with your dealer. My target is to get it before 12,000 miles which according to my dealer will get me a better deal on the price.
  • sssfegysssfegy Posts: 132
    You can get an extended warranty from Mazda at less than 65K, the 12K is not correct, you can have up to 25K and still get the same price as brand new, after that it goes up significantly.
  • Thanks for the clarification, that does give me a bigger cushion. If you don't mind me asking, how do know these figures? Are you affiliated with a Mazda dealer? Found it on the web somewhere?
  • sssfegysssfegy Posts: 132
    I work for a Mazda dealer, an excellent car, we have not had 1 CEL light come on at our service dept.! What we heard is only the first 10% produced were afected. Enjoy.
  • fonefixerfonefixer Posts: 247
    Purchased on 25 October, CEL did come on once, dealer replaced gas cap,currently 7000 miles, no incidents.
  • papercutpapercut Posts: 5
    First 10% you say ? Cos the first batch of right-hand CX-7 arrived here in Singapore in Feb 07, thus my ride may be in the first 10% percentile ? :surprise: Ouch ! I can only hope that the boys at Mazda picked up on the problems of the CEL, gas cap, etc....before they put together in mass for the right-hand units...... picking my Aurora Blue on the 30th. Question .. my wife's 04 CRV has a chain driven timing belt that supposedly do not require any changes for almost the entirety of the vehicle's life. What about the CX-7 , any chance it is chain and not belt driven ? ;)
«13
This discussion has been closed.