Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





Midsize Sedans 2.0

14814824844864871065

Comments

  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    But why would MT test a model (SE) that few people are likely to own?
  • elroy5elroy5 Posts: 3,741
    Passat
    Accord
    Camry
    Sonata
    Fusion
  • maxamillion1maxamillion1 Posts: 1,467
    Especially when said model isn't even avaialable to consumers...Hyundaiusa.com doesn't even list a Sonata I4 model with automatic or manual transmission.

    And did anyone notice the Passat was a stick shift?
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,682
    Few people are likely to own an Altima 2.5 with every possible option or an Optima EX I4 with every possible option, but those are the cars MT tested. If you look on the lots you see mainly 2.5Ses and Optima LXes, or EX V6es.

    As has been said, MT could have lined up the equipment in the cars better. For example, they tested a basic Camry LE and Passat but loaded-up Altima, Fusion, Optima, and Malibu (any others?--Galant?) and mid-trim Sonata, Accord, and Avenger. It throws the whole "value' equation off--if they use that as a key criterion. For example, an Optima LX with ESC/ABS package, AT, and Appearance package is very nicely equipped (with many of the features on the EX trim) and lists for under $20k (under $17k with current rebates). And the other loaded cars are at disadvantage if the loading doesn't improve the ride/handling, which it probably doesn't much. OTOH, the Camry would have probably done better had they tested the SE trim, due to its sharper handling.
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,682
    All the cars are supposed to be automatics (or CVTs). I wonder if they slipped up and used a stock photo of a Passat with a stick, or maybe the AT shifter just looks like a stick? (That's what I thought when I saw the photo.)
  • maxamillion1maxamillion1 Posts: 1,467
    The photos on Motortrend's website show a stickshift (VW uses a chrome surround for there tiptronic transmissions) and it went 0-60 in 6.7 seconds.

    It's gotta be a stick.

    But I agree 100 percent Backy...the comparison has no consistency whatsoever...especially they way they try to slant the VW Passat as a "Value" leader in the group.

    A Passat equipt anything like that Altima would be well over $32 grand.
  • karsickkarsick Posts: 312
    .... more Motor Trend comparos coming next month, too:

    They'll decide which is the most cost-effective commuter sedan from the Far East, a Kio Rio sedan or a Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution.

    Then they'll head to Moab to compare the off-road prowess of two SUV's, the Jeep Wrangler Rubicon vs the Porsche Cayenne GTS :P .
  • dgs4dgs4 Posts: 66
    "silly navigation"

    Excuse me? I have the V6 Limited Sonata with navigation and it's anything but "silly." It is a great system, voice activated and touch screen with a huge POI database, dead reckoning, multi-destination routing, and the ability to play CD's and DVD's (both movies and music) all for $1,250. That under cuts the competition by as much as $750 and is just as good as anything in a Honda. Maybe it's silly to you, but for those of us who need the assistance of a nav system, and enjoy the convenience of it, the system makes a wonderful addition. It was a huge factor in getting me to look at a Sonata in the first place, and I'm sure I won't be the only one. I guarantee you that option helps with sales of the 09 on top of all the other improvements.
  • moocow1moocow1 Posts: 230
    Whoa whoa, it was just a random comment regarding my non-need to upgrade to limited and also add nav. I'm sure the nav system is awesome and great for everyone who gets it. Don't worry about what I say there :) I'm sure you have every right to love your nav.
  • jerry08jerry08 Posts: 2
    I am new to this forum. I plan to purchase either an Accord LX-P (I4 Auto) or a Sonata Limited (I4 Auto) in the next two weeks, and to keep the car for 5 to 8 years. I am looking for your opinions on the following in order to firm up on the decision: pricing, maintenance/insurance costs, reliability, and resale value.

    I have test-driven both vehicles and feel either one will be a good choice for my family. Their drivability is between the two cars I previously owned: a 96 Maxima SE and a 02 RX 300. Both vehicles are closely priced: the Accord has a price quote that is $100 above invoice, whereas the Sonata is priced $405 above the Accord's. Accord has better reputation and resale value, and Sonata has better warranty and accompaniments. Can you provide some advices/opinions to help tipping the scale? Thanks.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    The Accord definitely has the resale value advantage (in 5 years, think of the price difference). Overall though, both are excellent vehicles. Do you have a gut feeling of one you prefer over the other? The sportier handling of the Accord or the smoother ride of the Sonata?
  • jlindhjlindh Posts: 282
    I think that if you'll compare the equipment on both cars, you'll find the Sonata gives you a LOT more for your money. Having said that, it comes down to which YOU prefer.
  • moocow1moocow1 Posts: 230
    If you're comparing a mid-model Accord vs Top of the Line Sonata Limited, I'd definitely pick the Sonata. At going for 5+ years of ownership, resale values aren't as important and I would figure the extra interior space and many extra features would be worth it. Of course this assumes you like the ride itself, that is key. I'm not sure where you get your pricing from as well, but a Sonata should be easily found at $1000 under invoice as well before any rebates even.
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,682
    Since you are comparing two cars with much different levels of equipment, I think a price comparison is difficult. Think of it as getting a car with a LOT more equipment for about the same price as a more basic car. You should check with your insurance rep re relative insurance costs, since they can vary widely. Maintenance-wise, there should be little difference, but consider that you have a much longer warranty on the Sonata to cover problems, so that could affect overall ownership cost. Reliability-wise, the Accord and Sonata I4 are very close. Resale value is not a major issue for a long-term ownership, but again it's hard to compare here because the cars are not of equivalent utlity. It would be different if you were comparing, say, the Sonata Limited to the Accord EX-L.

    You might also see if you can find an SE to drive. Its crisper handling might be closer to that of the Accord, if you like the way the Accord drives better than the Sonata. And the SE would cost less than the Limited.
  • maxamillion1maxamillion1 Posts: 1,467
    Simply put, I'd take the Sonata Limited I4, with it's leather upholstery, dual-zone climate control and power sunroof over the Accord LX-P which lacks these options.

    The LX-P is a better value than the LX IMO, but I could never own any Accord (or any car for that matter) without at least a sunroof. I prefer the styling of the Sonata Limited, with it's chrome trim bits and nicer 17 inch alloy wheels to the Accord LX-P's 16s as well.

    As other have mentioned you should be able to get the Sonata for well below invoice. For some of the pricing I've been seeing over at the "Prices Paid and Buying Experiences" forum for the 09 Sonata, you should be able to get at least $2000 below invoice at a minimum for an 09 Sonata. With that kind of pricing you could very well step up to a Limited V6 and it would still be comparable in price to the Accord LX-P.
  • joe97joe97 Posts: 2,248
    http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0806_four_cylinder_midsize_sedan_- comparison/index.html

    http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/sedans/112_0808_top_five_family_sedan_compar- ison/index.html

    1ST PLACE VOLKSWAGEN PASSAT
    Despite a high sticker and thirst for premium, wins by a nose due to driving fun.

    2ND PLACE HYUNDAI SONATA
    Only lacking the VW's verve; our #1 pick if family comes first.

    3RD PLACE TOYOTA CAMRY
    Efficient, well executed, it's the sound, yet charmless choice.

    4TH PLACE HONDA ACCORD
    Polarizing looks inside and out can't hide a great engine and chassis combination.

    5TH PLACE FORD FUSION
    Surprisingly athletic chassis hampered by wheezy engine and irritating transmission.

    6TH PLACE KIA OPTIMA
    Though due for a refresh, Kia finishes on top of the second tier. Room and economy are fine, it just needs the same refinements the Sonata received.

    7TH PLACE NISSAN ALTIMA
    Steepest sticker, yet not the best ride, performance, or value. CVT and light steering create an effortless drive, yet fully loaded, it still seems lacking.

    8TH PLACE CHEVROLET MALIBU
    Poor finish for arguably the best looker. Shame that sexy skin hides a weight problem the underpowered Ecotec can't handle.

    9TH PLACE MITSUBISHI GALANT
    Looks old, feels older, and saddled with many of this comparo's worsts, including power-to-weight and EPA and observed fuel economy.

    10TH PLACE DODGE AVENGER
    Drum brakes, four-speed trans, cheap plastics, and poor economy make this a frightful drive. Gaps between last and first don't get any wider than this.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    You might want to put a big "SPOILER ALERT" in the top of that post for people like me who subscribe to the magazine and may not have wanted the ending given away.
  • moocow1moocow1 Posts: 230
    I think for serious frugal family car buyers the real answer is the Sonata. We're looking at something that just outgunned the Camry and Accord.

    The Passat is more for family buyers with extra cash that want to have fun. Kinda reminds me of a Mazda3 And Rabbit in the compact class. If you wanna have your cake and eat it too, it'll cost you...and it'll push you closer to a lot of other vehicles in the 25-30k range. Personally I'll stick to the 15-20k range.

    The two biggest surprises to me were the Altima and Malibu being so low. I guess everyone has different likes and tastes, obviously the Motortrend people do too!

    One other interesting note: The Avenger uses an engine with similar base parts to the Sonata's 2.4L, I guess hyundai did a better job tuning their engine to be smooth and reasonably powerful. The Avenger's 9.3 0-60 is pretty pathetic and the handling numbers are just as bad. It goes to show that an engine does not make a car. Of course the same base type of engine in 2.0T is also the lancer evo ;)
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,682
    The basic block design of the Avenger and Sonata are similar, that's about it. Much different engines--obviously.
  • Hello Folks,
    Consider a Kia Amanti. I think you'll be very surprised at what you get for the money.
    Larry
Sign In or Register to comment.