Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Midsize Sedans 2.0



  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    Personally, I'm not a fan of either one, but what I do like about it is that the speedometer is seperate from it, as in the Civic.
  • stephen987stephen987 Posts: 1,994
    That's what I like least, actually. I hate that upper rim with the digital speedo in it. I'd always be looking at the tach, dead center, and wondering why it wasn't giving me MPH.
  • baggs32baggs32 Posts: 3,209
    I'd always be looking at the tach, dead center, and wondering why it wasn't giving me MPH.

    Driving with a stick tranny would be a hassle too. Too many levels to look at. With an auto it wouldn't be as bad for me but I see where you're coming from. It's great if you love tech but could be annoying to those who don't. I'm guessing that's why the "youngster" Hondas have it and not the "old fart" Accord/Pilot/etc.

    My dad's '87 Taurus had an all digital dash and I loved it. But it did have the tach as a rising meter that ran up and around the speedo which was less confusing IMO.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Posts: 9,731
    Interestingly, my dad liked the Civic design better than I. He'll be 52 this year. I'm 21, and have the old fart Accord ('06 model). To be fair, it is an automatic, so RPM isn't something he's looking at often. I've driven the Civic for more than 5 hours at a time, and its really no big deal to adjust to; takes a few minutes, but everything becomes second nature pretty easily.

    Good news for Ford. They need to market this, or at least make it poster sized at dealerships. The 2010 Fusion is amazing in both safety and technology. Looks are subjective, safety is not. I personally love the new redesigned Fusion, it looks more sporty and aggressive. I currently own a 07 Fusion I4, and I'm pretty sure that the new Fusion will be my next vehicle.

    Before I got my Fusion I test drove a Camry. Hated it. The suspension was too floaty, the interior was not appealing, and the exterior looks are bland. Toyota salesman tried to steer me away from the Fusion based on reliability. Since it's launch, I don't believe the Fusion has had any recalls. Since I've owned mine, I haven't had any issues, just 25,000 happy satisfied miles. :)
  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,628
    The CR January issue has tests of the cars listed in the title of the post. Spoiler alert: do not read further if you don't want to find out how they scored!

    Of the cars tested for January, the Sonata GLS I4 and Limited V6 were the top-scoring mid-sizers in their respective groups (which are $20-25k and $25-30k). However, the top-scoring car that CR tested, as a sidebar to the other tests, was the Jetta TDI, which CR put just one point behind the top-scoring car in its $20-25k sedans class, the Altima 2.5S.

    The relatively poor showing of the all-new Mazda6 was surprising, since it is the newest mid-sized design. Also, the comments about the Mazda6 were pretty positive, with the only knocks being about road noise and the fuel economy of the V6 (20 mpg measured), and quibbles on some of the interior trim on the 6i Sport and head room in back. It could just be a reflection of the fact that the mid-sized sedan class is pretty darn good across the board; e.g. only four points separated the Sonata GLS from the Mazda6i, and only 2 points separated the Sonata Limited V6 from the 6s Grand Touring.

    Just kind of interesting though that CR would rank cars like the Prius and Optima (pre-2009 model) ahead of the Mazda6, refreshed Sonata, or even the Malibu. Probably shows that CR weights fuel economy pretty highly in its rankings (cf. Jetta TDI and Prius).

    Rankings of cars tested for January issue:

    Jetta TDI: 84
    Sonata Limited V6: 83
    6s Grand Touring: 81
    Sonata GLS I4: 77
    Malibu LT I4: 74
    6i Sport, Malibu Hybrid (tie): 73
    Aura XE I4: 67

    I guess we'll have to wait until sometime next year to see how the refreshed 2009 Optima and 2010 Fusion, Milan, and Legacy fare.
  • can you recall what it was they didn't like about the new Saturn Aura XE I4? Bad gas mileage, perhaps?

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,628
    They basically said it isn't as good as the Malibu--sound but unexceptional handling, rear seat not as good as the Malibu's (bottom is hard, flat, and low, and back is angled rather steeply), worse fuel economy (but just 1 mpg less) and noise isolation. They also mentioned a cheap-feeling, creaky center console that robs knee room and some complaints about the front seats and seat belts.

    Odd thing, though: CR did not recommend the Aura because it said the four-cylinder model is "new." But the Aura has been around awhile, and the powertrain is the same as in the Malibu LT that they also tested--and recommended. :confuse:
  • Hi Backy,
    As I remember,my 06.5 Optima score 87 at that time,so does that mean it's better than the new models?<img src="
  • your '06.5 Kia Optima is sound as a pound, man. You have a nice car, remind me what color you chose for your Optima. The refresh of the Optima that is your year has an interesting headlamp design, it gives the car sort of a Jetta [non-permissible content removed] Audi look to it. Definitely unique and refreshing IMO.

    And the '06.5 Kia Optima has been mostly treated fairly by the automotive press, too.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,628
    Well, I think you transposed the numbers in your mind. Not even the top-ranked car in the $20-25k grouping, the Altima 2.5S, got 87. The Optima EX I4's score is 78, with the V6 at 75. But that 78 is still better than all of the newer models tested for January, except the Jetta TDI, and the Sonata and Mazda6 V6s. Not too shabby for the old Optima.
  • Read backy's post above. You and csandste have scored very, very good automobiles that have caused the automotive press to stand up and deal wid it honestly, and the Optima actually came out smelling like a Washington state rose in glorious bloom. A good looking rose, too, I might add. ;)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • backybacky Twin CitiesPosts: 18,628
    The Accord and 2010 Fusion/Milan hybrids are represented on the latest Ward's 10 Best Engines list--the 3.5L V6 for the Accord and the 2.5L hybrid powertrain for the Fulan:

    It is encouraging that Ward's notes the Ford hybrid powertrain (tested in the Escape hybrid) managed to easily exceed its EPA ratings in their tests. That bodes well for the Fulan, which should be able to get better fuel economy numbers than the Escape.
  • Sorry I didn't reply sooner,but I never got notification of your post.There seem to be some issues with that on this site.
    My Optima EX is black.I did not choose that,but with the equipment I wanted it was the only one my dealer could get his hands on.I've got over 24K on it and so far so good.I have had three people comment on it's good looks.This has never happened to me with any of the many cars I have owned. :blush:
  • Ooops :blush:
  • A reporter from a national newspaper would like to speak with consumers who have been frustrated by some manufacturers&#146; tendency to place safety related vehicle options into expensive packages. Have you ever wanted to equip a vehicle with specific safety features that required the purchase of an entire package? If so, please respond to with your daytime contact information no later than Friday, December 12.

    Need help navigating? - or send a private message by clicking on my name.

  • no, Kia did a great job styling the 2006.5+ Kia Optima body. I first saw one on the road in Jackson Hole, WY, on vacation. It was a white one and it's driver was scooting right along downtown there. I had to look in my '01 Kia Sportage 4X4's side view, then rear view mirror. Very, very handsome vehicle, I might add.

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • Good thing too, as it's probably my last car.
  • man, your last rig? Are you for sure? Don't you wanna join me in getting a 2010 Pininfarina-Bollore B0 all-electric car with $7,500 taken off of the price because it's a new "green" car the Obama Administration will give us a credit for? Sounds like a cool rig, I'll provide a link and/or picture if you like, later. ;)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer GTS

  • akirbyakirby Posts: 7,622
    41 mpg city, 36 hwy. Beats Camry by 8 mpg city and 2 hwy. Wow.
Sign In or Register to comment.