Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

GM News, New Models and Market Share



  • bpizzutibpizzuti Posts: 2,743
    For balance... the Cobalt was way better than the Cavalier. But that's like saying Tebow is better than Sanchez.

    Given how little Tebow has played, you might be better off swapping in McElroy instead. Yeah, an improvement, but still no where near the level of "acceptable."

    Tebow's still a big question mark. ;)
  • berriberri Posts: 4,138
    Tebow's still a big question mark

    On your Knee!
  • greg128greg128 Posts: 336
    edited December 2012
    For balance... the Cobalt was way better than the Cavalier. But that's like saying Tebow is better than Sanchez.

    MY son had a 2000 Cavalier that we bought new for him in 2000 for $10.5K
    He got a solid 200K miles from it (albeit with about 30K without A/C.) He loved that car in spite of its lousy ride. He bought a 2007 Cobalt fully loaded including leather for $18K. He now has around 100K miles with no problems. I have driven that car for about 100 miles on a 400 mile trip and found it to be smooth, quiet, and fuel efficient. The ride is better than my BIL's 2006 Acura TL.

    I drive a Chevy truck daily and my wife has a Saturn sedan. Both have been well riding and running and completely reliable.

    My only experince recentlly with any Audi or VW products is my younger son's 2012 J etta which has terrible seats and a buzzy engine, and my Neice's Audi SUV which seemed overpriced and overweight.

    It might be hard to fathom with your mind-set, but there are many GM owners that have had and continue to have positive owner experience. I am not a GM stockholder, employee, or hired advocate. I agree many other manufacturers produce good cars and trucks. I think some of them are overated. And some other vehicles are under-rated
  • fintailfintail Posts: 33,496
    I had a rental Regal - of course, this was just last year, so it was a "W" VIN Regal. It was a nice car, if not a little laggy off the line. Not a 3er competitor, but I'd probably take one over a 4 banger Camcord.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    I've had rental Cavalier's, Cobalts, Aveo's, and Malibu Classics all from GM.

    Even a Buick LeSabre.

    None of these rental experiences gave me any confidence in the way the Big 3 is making cars.

    I'm assuming you don't rent cars very often by that list of old nameplates. Not one is still being built.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    edited December 2012
    Yes, posted several days ago, OW.

    Googling "December 2012 Auto Recalls" promptly brought this list up, although I believe the Colorado/Canyon recall you mentioned occurred that day as it's not on the list yet. But read through the list and tell me what comes home again and again on the list.
  • busirisbusiris Posts: 3,490
    This was the item I thought was the most entertaining from the list...
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    "Maiming a window frame" is a funny way to describe the damage!

    I always think, 'how could someone push the gas instead of the brake?', but I'll admit, in the '66 Studebaker I recently sold, it had a small, square gas pedal and since the left rear portion of the driver's bucket seat back was bent, I tended to sit far-right in the driver's seat, and once or twice when attempting to hit the brake, I hit the gas and the car leapt a bit. Scary sensation but I stopped it right away.
  • dieselonedieselone Posts: 5,641
    I always think, 'how could someone push the gas instead of the brake?'

    It happens a lot more than many realize. My wife has about 30 retail stores in her district and it seems like someone crashes into one of them every few months. The latest was only a few weeks ago.

    Sure makes you think twice about walking near a running car in a parking lot. You never know when someone will be in drive when they think they are in reverse or hit the gas instead of the brake.
  • andres3andres3 CAPosts: 5,325
    I'm assuming you don't rent cars very often by that list of old nameplates. Not one is still being built.

    First, that's a bad sign, the fact not one of those models survives to 2012. Second, your right, I don't rent a lot (usually limited to when someone rear-ends me or I'm getting warranty work done at a dealership that provides free rentals). Now with a new different job however, I may be chiming in on rentals a lot more often.

    However, I do occassionally find myself renting a vehicle, just lately it has been:

    Dodge Avenger
    Mazda 3
    Chevy 2500 HD Pickup (My mechanic's rolling VW/Audi shop advertisement; genius).
    Kia Optima (the previous generation unfortunately)
    Nissan Murano V6

    Out of all those, I'd take the Nissan even though I don't like the CVT transmission.

    The Mazda 3 is OK, but I'd pay more for a GTI/A3, especially in CA as until recently they suffered about 8 HP under OEM specs for the other 49 States.

    I got the Murano because I wasn't going to let the insurance company get away with providing a "Kia Rio" as an equivalent replacement to my A3 as a rental. I wanted a like-kind vehicle. Or at least in the same ballpark.

    When my Accord V6 Coupe got rear-ended, the LeSabre was their answer to "something with a V6 in order to be remotely equal."

    In more ancient times, I had only ONE time in my life a rental model:

    Toyota Corolla
    Honda Civic

    Both are still sold today for what it's worth.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    edited December 2012
    Even Toyota And Nissan discontinue and/or replace model names. Tercel, Echo, Solara, and Stanza come to mind with about five seconds of thought.

    Chevrolet is using the names Impala, Malibu, Camaro, Corvette, Suburban, and Silverado, names they were using 35 years ago. I know that Corona and Cressida and Supra and B-210 and 260Z also aren't being used now as model names.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,846
    I think one reason the domestics change their nameplates so often is to keep their marketing departments busy! It may also be an artifact from the old days of planned obsolescence, where they were constantly trying to get you to trade in for the latest and greatest, and go for the glamour and the fame.

    For instance, in 1955, Chevy's lineup was 150, 210, and Bel Air. In 1964 it was Biscayne, Bel Air, and Impala. But, in the overall scheme of things, was a '64 Impala really that different in status from a 1955 Bel Air?

    The automakers were constantly bringing in new names to make you think they were offering you something new and exciting, but often it was simply a matter of putting a new name on the top model, and then dropping the others down a notch. I'd say things were a little different when the Caprice came out, because initially it was a VERY well-trimmed car, and a step above what was normally associated with the Chevy nameplate.

    But, it got cheapened a bit in the 1970's. For instance, when they moved the convertible from the Impala line to the Caprice for 1973, it still had the Impala level trim as I recall. Didn't they pretty much just peel off the little antelopes on the fake woodgrain of the door panel and replace them with the Caprice shield?

    When the downsized '77 models came out, the Caprice didn't seem quite as special anymore, but I think that's because car interiors in general were becoming more and more plush, and not any cheapening of the Caprice itself. Plus, the Caprice started outselling the Impala that year, so they were just much more common, which probably made them seem less "special".

    Another thing that the domestics tended to do was introduce a new model before they're through with the previous one. For instance, the Ford Maverick came out while the Falcon was still in production. The Aspen/Volare were introduced while the Dart/Valiant were still being sold. And Chevy sold the Malibu and its replacement Celebrity alongside each other for two years. So, because of them doing stuff like that, they HAVE to come up with new names!
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    edited December 2012
    The domestics used to frequently 'push down' a model name after a few years. The Bel Air was once top-of-the-line, and kept getting 'pushed down' 'til it was the bargain-basement model. Same with Delray and Caprice (just plain Caprice) at Chevrolet. At Ford it was the same with 'LTD' and 'Fairlane', and at Mopar, 'Polara' comes to mind quickly.

    Regarding the '77 big Chevys, I can remember going out back at Bob Mayberry Chevrolet in Sharon, PA where they had a handful of '77's stashed before introduction day. They had a two-tone silver Caprice Classic Coupe with the bright red velour optional 'Custom' interior, and a Caprice Estate wagon, brown of some sort. There was actually a throng of people around these two cars. I had never seen a Chevy with the interior of the luxury level of that Caprice coupe--with the chrome(d plastic) escutcheon around the interior door handles, the no-black-plastic anywhere visible, etc. I was way-impressed. As discussed previously, I still like those cars (and most all of the GM B-bodies that came out that year). I think they did their homework that year, and had to--to get people to not worry about 'road-hugging weight' like they were saying over at Ford!
  • dieselonedieselone Posts: 5,641
    edited December 2012 - reaky-steering-with-video.html

    Sounds like someone put a deck of cards in the spokes . That sound would drive me nuts.

    Edmunds claims the steering wheel has made that sound from day one. How can a $50k car leave the factory or the dealer like that?
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,494
    Sounds like a piece of plastic up just behind the wheel.

    Annoying as s***, for sure.

    Would it keep me from buying one? No. It's a new model, and probably one of the first ones out, with press lead times and such.
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Posts: 2,743
    That's probably how they used to do it, but these days (80s onward) a nameplate is retired because it has more negative equity than positive. It costs money to set up even a recycled nameplate, from a marketing perspective, so when you retire "Escort" for "Focus" or "Cobalt" for "Cruze" then it means the old name has such a negative connotation with it, that you need to dump it so it doesn't hurt sales. Generally, successful models keep names, like Impreza, Civic, Corolla, Fusion, and (so far) Malibu.

    When I see GM stop doing name swaps with every redesign of their cars then I'll know they're on the right track. But while they're keeping Malibu and Impala rright now, they recently dumped Aveo for Sonic and Cobalt for Cruze, so much remains to be seen.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Posts: 3,062
    GM workers can expect bonuses of between $5,500 and $7,000

    Does anyone know if GM has repaid the loan from we taxpayers to bail out that bankrupt company? If not, workers should not get any bonuses. They should be thankful they have jobs courtesy of we taxpayers and the thousands of bondholders that were treated badly in the bankruptcy.
  • dieselonedieselone Posts: 5,641
    edited December 2012
    Would it keep me from buying one? No

    If I liked the car enough, no it wouldn't keep me from buying it. But as obvious as that issue is, if indeed it was making that noise prior to Edmunds picking it up, you'd think someone would have noticed it.

    GM is not alone in that department. I've had similar issues with Ford where I'd swear if someone with more than a pulse worked there (dealer or factory) it would have been addressed prior to delivery.

    I had a similar type of issue when we picked up our new boat this past July. The delivering dealer gave me a check sheet with everything that was checked over at the factory, then again by the dealer prior to delivery.

    Well I didn't have the boat 15 minutes without finding several issues that should never have made it past the inspection process and flat out didn't work properly despite being listed as checked on the inspection sheet. Thankfully none kept me from using the boat through the summer, but the nearest dealer is 150 miles away and it's not a small ordeal to take the boat back. I was not a happy boater;)

    At the end of the season, the outdrive needed thousands of dollars worth of warranty work that wouldn't have been necessary if someone would actually check what they're suppose to or do their job right the first time.
  • xrunner2xrunner2 Posts: 3,062
    I have never once had my dealer tell me 'no' on a warranty issue. That's for real.

    Perhaps a popular consumer magazine's ratings over the last 10-20 years could have helped guide some folks away from certain car manufacturers with poor quality and reliability. Avoiding manufacturers with models with lots of full or half black circles will mean NOT having to go back to dealers for warranty problems. Look for a manufacturer with many models having an ongoing record of full red circles on ratings.

    The consumer magazine's annual issue in April gives those black circle, red circle ratings.
Sign In or Register to comment.