Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





GM News, New Models and Market Share

1155415551557155915601576

Comments

  • lemkolemko Posts: 15,075
    If not for our military presence on the Korean peninsula, Dear Leader would've overrun the south and what was once Hyundai-Kia would be producing "Dear Leader Cars" for the Stalinist elite. Wonder if they would look like old Packards?
  • tlongtlong CaliforniaPosts: 4,702
    tlong, your original post said only "I don't have the numbers" (implying 'right here with me'), but then go on to say "I suspect Honda/Hyundai numbers are less than Chevrolet". Not...really...so. Did you correct yourself when the numbers were posted? No, you said, "Chevy is up there in the mainstream numbers as well"...no mention that Hyundai had the identical age and Honda was only one year younger. I had to point that out to you here.

    That's why I said "I suspect". I also believe I said that I recall reading this but didn't remember from where. I do believe that I adequately qualified my statements. And you are also ignoring a bunch of other makes that ARE much younger buyers as we saw in the data. Even one year can be significant, as the numbers represent the aggregate of a large population of buyers. I was also talking about GM as a whole, and we did see that if you include Buick and Caddy the overall GM buyer age is much older than most other mainstream makes. So my overall point was accurate. We can nitpick Chevy against SOME other makes - Chevy is only a "bit" older. But as a general rule, GM *does* have quite a bit older buyers. I think we've established that, and therefore the point that this had been a ridiculous post was a bit.....inaccurate. ;)

    I agree with everybody here that the Eco Malibu debuting first was a mistake

    The entire "light hybrid" was a mistake - the Eco Malibu is just the rewarmed manifestation of that technology...
  • tlongtlong CaliforniaPosts: 4,702
    edited February 2013
    >I know that my impressions of GM were very negative well before the bailout.

    Was that because of the Nader era where GM was criticized for being one of the military industrial complex companies that were so evil during the 70s? 80? GM had a GNP 9th in the world among countries IIRC. So they were hated just for being big.


    For me, it started with my best friend's brand new '74 Vega GT which began to rust within 3 years of being new (in Southern California!). Then the engine destructed at about 70K miles.

    It continued with my SIL's Chevy Citation that was always in the shop.

    It endured through the '90's era of bland, big clone sedans of huge mediocrity.

    It was the lack of any competitive smaller premium sedans available (closest thing being the Catera, which was not very close), even though GM was the world's largest manufacturer, it couldn't even have a full line of vehicles that went into the segments that I was interested in.

    Then it was the dozen or so brands/divisions in the 00's that still didn't have a decent smaller car, yet had so many duplicative trucks, SUVs, convertible trucks, divisional trucks, blingmobiles, etc. that you could wipe the road with them.

    Overlay all of that with decades (literally) of poor reliability reports from CR and other publications. Overlay THAT with the general union atmosphere, including tons of workers doing nothing and getting paid for it. I knew that for the buyers of GM products, they were paying for a bunch of people to sit and be unproductive.

    Add on top of all of this the inane commercials that sang along telling me how if I bought a Chevrolet I was being patriotic and like hot dogs and apple pie. The stupidity of the company's marketing was SO obvious it was insulting.
  • tlongtlong CaliforniaPosts: 4,702
    A diesel domestic car? That can't be a good thing since Korea or Japan didn't do it

    D3 diesel cars haven't exactly had a good history, or the same track record that non-domestic diesels have had. It's an understandable concern.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    The entire "light hybrid" was a mistake - the Eco Malibu is just the rewarmed manifestation of that technology...

    On that, we agree. You heard it here! ;)
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    The Olds diesel debacle was the big one, although GM's later 4.3 diesel V6 I never heard/read anything bad about, nor all the truck diesels that have been utilized in the over-thirty-years since the Olds diesel V8 came out.

    Frankly, I hate the sound/smell of a diesel, myself.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Posts: 72,587
    Insight and CR-Z are failures. Look at the days' supply.

    The surprise is that GM still went that way even after seeing how the full hybrid Prius clobbered the Civic mild hybrid.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Posts: 72,587
    They've gotten better, and perhaps more importantly cars are better isolated.

    Some diesels are loud outside, but inside the cabins you barely hear them.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    Add on top of all of this the inane commercials that sang along telling me how if I bought a Chevrolet I was being patriotic and like hot dogs and apple pie. The stupidity of the company's marketing was SO obvious it was insulting.

    It's too bad you (probably) don't remember the decade-long "See the USA..." campaign. It was excellent. I gotta say, "Oh What a Feeling!", with people jumping in the air, never struck me as having been written by a marketing major from Mensa.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,597
    The Olds diesel debacle was the big one, although GM's later 4.3 diesel V6 I never heard/read anything bad about

    I've never heard anything bad about it either, and to be fair, supposedly the 1980 and later 5.7 Diesel V-8's were better (or not as bad, at least?) as the 1978-79 models.

    As for trucks, I dunno...I've heard people gripe about those old 6.2's that they used to put in GM trucks in the 80's...product of Detroit Diesel, or something like that? I've also heard griping about the later 6.5 turbodiesel, and remember my uncle's bried experience with one. He bought a '94 GMC used in late 1996, with that engine, and it seemed like it was going back to the dealer every other weekend because some sensor or something-or-other would fail on it. Never any problems with the engine or transmission itself, but just all that extraneous stuff that can go bad and make it act up.

    I've even heard people gripe about the latest Duramax, which I think comes from Isuzu?

    But, I don't know how well an occasional gripe heard or read here and there translates to real-world reliability.
  • tlongtlong CaliforniaPosts: 4,702
    It's too bad you (probably) don't remember the decade-long "See the USA..." campaign. It was excellent. I gotta say, "Oh What a Feeling!", with people jumping in the air, never struck me as having been written by a marketing major from Mensa.

    I do have a vague recollection of "See the USA" and that one seems pretty good to me - better than the recent slogans.

    Yes, Toyota has had some humdingers. Remember "Get your hands on a Toyota....and You'll Never Let Go?". I'm not sure I even know what their current slogan is.

    For GM, I like "We are Professional Grade" (although I'm not sure I believe that about the product in a lot of cases). What is Caddy's slogan, or Buick's?
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    I couldn't tell you what Buick's is now, but I always liked, "Wouldn't You Really Rather Have a Buick?". They also used to use "When Better Cars are Built, Buick Will Build Them". I like the first one better.
  • andre1969andre1969 Posts: 21,597
    Yes, Toyota has had some humdingers. Remember "Get your hands on a Toyota....and You'll Never Let Go?". I'm not sure I even know what their current slogan is.

    I remember awhile back, they used that song "Everyday People" by Sly and the Family Stone. Some people in one of my Mopar clubs picked up on it and started putting in their sig line "The last thing I want is a car for everyday people". And one used to put "I'd rather have a Real 'Ota than one of them toy ones."

    For some reason the one that sticks in my mind, but might have been local, was a jingle from the 80's that asked the question "What Will You Do with all the Money You Save?" And, in the summer they'd turn it into "Would You Believe It's Christmas I-in Jooo-ly?" to advertise their summer deals.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    edited February 2013
    When the tsunami hit one guy said they deserved it, the posts were so tasteless the hosts had to delete them.

    Yeah, there's no reason for saying something like that. But...I have seen a thing or two not a whole lot better than that, right here from one particular poster and even a descriptive word written by him that I haven't seen in print or heard in thirty years (not the one you're thinking of, though).
  • busirisbusiris Posts: 3,455
    It's too bad you (probably) don't remember the decade-long "See the USA..." campaign.

    Dinah Shore, belting out that tune....

    Man, I feel old...
  • busirisbusiris Posts: 3,455
    "A diesel domestic car? That can't be a good thing since Korea or Japan didn't do it "


    D3 diesel cars haven't exactly had a good history, or the same track record that non-domestic diesels have had. It's an understandable concern.


    Once again, showing my age, but anyone that lived through the OPEC oil embargo period and saw what Detroit did in its attempt to create suitable Diesel engines would think twice before buying a domestic-made diesel automobile equipped with a home-grown Diesel engine.

    I might still buy one, but I wouldn't want to be leading the pack...

    I'm sure that Uplanderguy would agree with that statement.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Posts: 72,587
    I wonder who developed that diesel engine, though, since it's basically from Europe.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Kent, OHPosts: 7,370
    edited February 2013
    I'm sure that Uplanderguy would agree with that statement.

    That engine was introduced 35 years ago this year, busiris.

    I've used this analogy before, but that'd be like not buying a new '65 Mustang because you had a bad new Model A, or not buying a new Accord because your '78 CVCC had big engine troubles and the tops of the front fenders rusted out a la Vegas. ;)
  • busirisbusiris Posts: 3,455
    edited February 2013
    Well, what I said was that I'd think twice before buying one, and I wouldn't want to be one of the first to buy one....Not that I would refuse to buy one.


    Big difference!

    To think that anyone would simply ignore a previous bad (and expensive) experience seems a bit irrational to me.

    Just like if I have a bad experience in a restaurant, I might go back sometime later, but I'm going to give it much more thought than dining at a restaurant where I've never had anything but a superior experience.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Posts: 72,587
    100k warranty. More details:

    http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/07/2014-chevrolet-cruze-td-diesel-chicago-2013/

    The price doesn't even include freight, ouch.

    Cruze TD will be the name.
Sign In or Register to comment.