Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!





2009 Acura RL

12467

Comments

  • vavavavolvovavavavolvo Posts: 111
    Acura.com has removed the 09 RL from "Future Vehicles" . The RL section is now (mostly) updated to reflect the new vehicle.

    Check out the RL commercial and video on the website.
  • kurtkbeekurtkbee Posts: 22
    Good to hear, will check the website for the new ad.
    I wonder if anyone knows if they improved on the very low mileage that this sedan had or improved the styling for 09'. It looked so much like the accord (just longer).
  • nebraskaguynebraskaguy Posts: 341
    I wonder if anyone knows if they improved on the very low mileage that this sedan had or improved the styling for 09'. It looked so much like the accord (just longer).

    The listed mileage is slightly less than the 08 model. However, I've always gotten better highway mileage than the listed mileage. I recently took an 8,000 mile trip and got a low of 25 mpg and a high of 30 mpg.

    The styling hasn't been changed much except for the grill and a little in the trunk. For those of us who never thought it looked much like an Accord, it still doesn't. Those of you who thought it looked like an Accord will probably not change your mind.
  • billyperks2billyperks2 Posts: 378
    Why only five gears for this class?
    I like the refresh look but come on, in this day and age, five gears will not cut it for this segment.
    I will compare with the new TL pocket is leading towards the GS350.
  • docrwdocrw Posts: 94
    Unfortunately, despite the slight extra length, there is no more legroom in either the front or back seats. Sorry.

    That's very disappointing. All of the previews stated that that was an area that they were going to address. I read yesterday that they redesigned the seatbacks of the front seats to provide more leg room. Unless they went with carbon fiber seats, I don't see how that could make any significant difference.

    If the new TL is based on the Accord, then it seems like it would have more rearseat room than the RL. How will Acura reconcile that with customers?
  • kenb757kenb757 Posts: 149
    How much would an RL buyer be willing to spend beyond a top-line Accord? They're built on the same platform with an identical wheelbase, but the RL is AWD. Have you noticed the horrendous gas mileage figures for the Acura V-6 vs. Honda's V-6? Also the RL requires premium fuel.
  • kennyg8kennyg8 Posts: 225
    "Have you noticed the horrendous gas mileage figures for the Acura V-6 vs. Honda's V-6?"

    In the case of TL's V-6, the difference is not significant, particularly if you compare hwy mileage. I frequently get 29-32 mpg when cruising at 65-75 mph on the hwy when driving the TL. With respect to the RL, the mpg is around 25-27. Not too bad for a car weighing close to 4k pounds.
  • kenb757kenb757 Posts: 149
    The 2009 RL brochure lists 16 city and 22 hwy with premium fuel. My DTS lists 15 and 23 with a 4.6 V-8 on regular fuel and I get around 20 combined.
  • kennyg8kennyg8 Posts: 225
    You need to take into consideration how a car is driven. If you have a lead foot, your mpg will suffer. If you cruise btn 55-65, you have optimum mpg.

    For reference, see this link about real world RL mpg:kamdog, "Acura RL Real World Fuel Economy" #1, 28 Mar 2007 12:24 pm. The 09 RL has a bigger engine, and is supposedly tuned for quicker pick up and acceleration. Thus, mpg is likely worse than 05-08 models.
  • kurtkbeekurtkbee Posts: 22
    I agree, there are very similar styling lines in the RL and the Accord and for me the RL really does not stand out in its class (A6,BMW5,M45 and E-Class).

    Combined with the requirement to use premium fuel, its poor fuel efficiency and the styling, i doubt that anyone looking at other members of its class will get the RL (and you should even look at the Jaguar XF which is $49K and 18/26MPG).

    I always loved Acura but i think that i may skip this generation. But you do get more amenities/options for less that the other brands (but do you really need them)
  • nebraskaguynebraskaguy Posts: 341
    But you do get more amenities/options for less that the other brands (but do you really need them)

    What does "need" really have to do with any car in this category? Can any of us really say we need the things luxury cars offer?
  • nebraskaguynebraskaguy Posts: 341
    I received an e-mail yesterday morning from my salesman informing me they finally had a 2009. I called this morning to arrange a test drive and he informed me they sold their only one yesterday afternoon! So, someone must have really loved it!
  • ocimocim Posts: 45
    This is a major disappointment. Even though I swear I read somewhere that the 2009 RL would offer more room in the rear. Although, I must admit I was wondering how they would accomplish this since they were not changing the basic design. Basically, Acura does not make a sedan that is not tight in the rear. Oddly enough, the Honda Accord offers plenty of leg room. Why can't the TL offer the same amount of leg room since it is built on the same platform as the Accord? How is it that the TL ends up with less leg room in the rear and a smaller trunk. Why are luxury cars built under the Acura badge smaller than those built under the Honda badge? What is so luxurious about being cramped? I just don't get it. I would think that increasing passenger volume in sedans would be a selling point for manufacturers since I would think a lot of buyers will be switching from SUV to cars.
  • vavavavolvovavavavolvo Posts: 111
    I agree with all your points. I think Acura is making a mistake by not correcting this problem.
  • nebraskaguynebraskaguy Posts: 341
    This is a major disappointment. Even though I swear I read somewhere that the 2009 RL would offer more room in the rear.

    Just the other day, I received an e-mail from Acura and one of the improvements touted was increased rear leg room. This despite the brochure I received earlier which listed all specs, including rear leg room that was exactly the same as the 2008. So, someplace there's a disconnect.
  • genesis6genesis6 Posts: 8
    I read somewhere there is a totally new RL coming in 2010? Can anyone verify?
  • rv65rv65 Posts: 1,074
    Yes the 2011 RL will debut in 2010. Thats when it will likely get a v8 and a RWD based platform. The v8 will likely have VCM and other fuel saving technologies.
  • billyperks2billyperks2 Posts: 378
    Finally got a chance to check out the refreshed RL and I have say I like it a whole lot.When I drove up to the dealer there was a white one parked up front and I was immediately taken aback by the refreshed taillights and very nicely done pearl white exterior with the chrome trim by the footwell.My sales guy saw me pulled up and went in the back for a black one, I sat in the car for about 30 minutes playing around with the gizmos- I am totally sold, this upcoming TL better be a home run for me not to purchase the RL.
  • go_mdx1go_mdx1 Posts: 135
    Although I personally don't care for the 2009 RL, others appear to be in love with this car as it is selling very well at my 2 area Acura dealers. Nearly all of the 10 original shipment vehicles have been sold.

    Wonder what kind of price discount are being offerred on the 2009 RLs to make them so attractive.
This discussion has been closed.