Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
2000-2011 Chevrolet Malibu
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I could not agree with you more, the 04 Bu is an outstanding car, mine is a company car with over 3340 miles. The car is agile with a supple ride. The pushrod 3.5 engine, combined with GM's 4 speed automatic (still the best in the business),is superb, with useable torque occuring at low rpms, where drivers need it most. Combine this with the gas mileage (39 mpg at steady 60 mph) and GM has a winner on their hands!
P.S. I am also missing a cd that was in my cd player when I dropped off my car.
ohc has an advantage though in terms of customizing the engine and more actual horsepower (take for example, the Nissan Altima: 3.5L V6 DOHC VVT 240HP)...they can also be added with variable valve timing which significantly improves the overall gass mileage of the car
ohv, though proven, is usually used just so that the manufacturer can save money since it is cheaper to build..though it usually takes a bigger displacement to achieve higher horsepower ratings..
either choice of engine, you can't go wrong!
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
I commented on it to the salesman, and he said he's had several other people mention the same thing, so I don't think it's just a personal idiosyncracy.
malibu 200hp, 3.5 litres......57hp / litre
the verona is nicer looking, significantly cheaper and for those that like the more plush, better crafted interior.......
value for the dollar, isn't that always your argument? the verona starts a hair over 14 grand. 6 cyl. power and smoothness for the price of a 4.....sound familiar? i borrowed that point from the GM fans.
and the front end of the verona doesn't resemble a mutant killer guppy.
the verona / EPICA is a GM product...I would think you would be fine with it? A well built car, good price, stylish, good value. Sure its a little short on go juice....but many of you have said sedan buyers don't care or look at what's under the hood anyways......built in Korea, no issues there.......
You put out hp per litre as though that is a significant factor. Yet you ignore mpgs, and the size and weight of the engine. The 3.5 litre is actually a smaller, lighter engine, allowing a better front rear weight balance and a lighter car.
Bringing the old Daewoo design here is a good idea. But the design is definitely compromised and should be replaced soon with something on the epsilon platform.
"The 3.5 litre is actually a smaller, lighter engine, allowing a better front rear weight balance and a lighter car"
I'm not sure you actually have proof of this. The 6 cylinder verona is inline and doesn't hog space like a v engine. The v engine is more complex and may infact weigh more. Plus, I don't know if the Verona engine is aluminum, someone should check that.
some snippets from edmunds.....on the verona
"All trim levels come with a 155-horsepower inline six-cylinder engine. The all-aluminum, dual-overhead cam 24-valve power plant also generates 177 pound-feet of torque at 4,000 rpm for strong acceleration at low speeds"
"Passenger room is also in abundance as the Verona measures up to the Camry in nearly every interior measurement. The Verona isn't an eye-catching standout but it does offer a smooth power plant, a roomy interior and some premium features"
"What it does provide is a solid alternative for buyers who want a comfortable, feature-laden family sedan without spending the money necessary to get an Accord or Camry"
suzuki Verona - Curb Weight: 3307 lbs
"and with 177 lb-ft of torque, it accelerates quickly from a stop"
and isn't that what many of you have said is most important....in town accelration from stoplights....
edmunds does also say it won't challenge the established class leaders, but they don't say the Mali does either.
not reading anything negative here....my visual inspection of the verona confirms its got a very nice interior for the price.
now what does edmunds say about the malibu
"2004 Malibu delivers excellent value but it still lacks the performance and refinement of the class leaders."
"Down on power compared to its competitors, lackluster interior"
"The interior still doesn't have an upscale feel"
"but it proves to be more than adequate during typical driving. There's plenty of punch off the line and the power doesn't let up much from there on out. The power delivery is consistently smooth, but its rough sound keeps it a step below the Accord and Camry in the refinement department"
etc.
i would have posted the links here but there were far too many. edmunds has many spec and review pages for these two cars.
My point here is not to rag the bu, but to point out that the Verona is quite a good car, and as a competitor, internally within GM, it may actually be better suited for a lot of folks. I get that feeling some of you feel because its not a home grown car you have some bias against it. When you compare the cars as a whole, and not focus on where the car comes from, the Verona may be the better purchase choice.
Plus the Verona has a better warranty.
perhaps this is more suited to sedan comparisons....."Dueling Chevys-Epica/Verona vs.Malibu"
The Malibu 3.5L OHV smokes both those numbers and Edmunds compares it to the Camcord 6 cylinder motors. Now if only I could see the Malibu in a darker interior more often than the too light gray I see all the time.
Epica has a fake feel to it, much like it's Hyundia / Kia cousins. Yes, nice looking interior I suppose, but it's cluttered and seems to be trying too hard to be luxury. The cleaner interior of the Bu is much preferred as is the 45 hp. Sure Epica / Verona is a good value but so is the Malibu and I prefer it in every way even with a shorter warranty.
and yes, the Verona HAS an all-aluminum engine
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
i doubt the sebring stratus twins would be more desirable.....talk about a dud.
i'm just saying.....y'all are using the 'value' card in praising the merits of the malibu, and also saying things like ultimate performance isn't an issue and the performance of the malibu is good enough for the sedan buyers. You're saying its about it being a value choice.
And what I'm saying is that the Malibu is quite possibly not the winner in the value department.
So the Malibu is not the winning performer and it doesn't win the value challenge, especially within its own walls. Grand Prixs and Veronas are better value buys.
So then we fall to styling and comfort and the Malibu doesn't take the cake there either. Especially styling.
Just making some points. I just want to know the one segment of the mid size sedan market where the Malibu excels and is the leader in class.
I had stopped at 7-11 on my way to church. As I went back to the car, an attractive woman young enough to be my daughter asked me how I liked the Malibu. I told her I liked it fine and she said "it sure is a beautiful car". She was driving a Pontiac Vibe.
Personally, I know nothing about Daewoos. They were sold here for about a year or two before they went broke and you rarely see one on the road. The combination of flash, lack of power and the unknown don't strike me as a value. While Malibu may not be the best value on 4 wheels, I do think it's a better value than what the other 4 major car companies offer.
I can dig that answer. Fair enough.
I haven't tested the GP back seat so I don't know how useless it may be. I would assume the GP is a superior car from a dynamics standpoint as well as a powertrain standpoint.
clintonjohn : Suzuki itself does make very good quality cars BUT, the Verona is not really a Suzuki, it's a Daewoo. GM makes about the best auto transmissions in the business.
Thanks.
~alpha
Save the "I hate GM", "Beemers rule", and "You are an idiot for liking Brand X" for other forums!
Lissen up folks!
FYI, I have owned 2 Hondas in the past.
Sorry.......carry on with the Malibu discussion
If you don't have anything to contribute other than troll remarks, why bother posting?
Capiche? If not, feel free to email me, but off-topic posts need to stop.
:-(
the tv ads are good.