Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
It was a great ride the 118 miles home, although I have toa dmit that I was paranoid about maintaining the same speed for too long of a time on Interstate 79. The best part was when I got off of the Interstate and followed Route 19 home from Grove City (about 55 miles).
Now a couple of questions for you veterans. Is it right for the Steptronic gear selector light (on the console) to stay on all the time? When I pulled into my garage last night and shut it down, the little square beside the "P" stayed lit. I thought maybe it would go off in 15 minutes like the interior lights are supposed to, but when I got in it this morning the light was still on! What gives? I would think this would be a constant (albeit, small) drain on the battery.
Secondly, on the way to work this morning, the dreaded "Service Engine Soon" light came on! I know this could be caused by the gas cap not being tightened properly, but although last night my salesman did remove the cap to show me how it should be tightened, the light wasn't on the whole 118 miles home! I have since taken it off and put it back on again to make sure that it is on right, but with no luck, as yet, in extinguishing this light. I understand that it can take several "driving cycles" for the light to go out, if in fact it was caused by the cap, but because it wasn't on the whole way back home last night makes me think it must be something else anyway. Any thoughts from any of you experts? Should I take another car on my trip (350 miles one way) tomorrow?
Does anyone know which 5 series have dual exhaust pipes? I was passed by one during a semi-stressful 200 mile drive. Those angel eyes are pretty damn cool.
I somehow sense that BMW will be carrying its new styling down to the 3 series in 2005 or so. Why such a dramatic shift in design for all the cars, i wonder??
Chris Bangle is the name you'd be cursing. He's the new lead designer for BMW. He wants to take us to places we don't want to go (can't remember the exact quote, but it's close enough).
I think Mr. Bangle is doing a good job of mangling the BMW look. It seems that the only things he keep intact are the twin kidney grill, dual headlights and the kink in the c-column. He probably would change those if he could. But BMW will not have a problem in sales because of people that will buy a BMW regardless of what it looks like. These are probably the same people that buy BMW because can not because of how well the car handles. The same logic is used to buy Japanese entry model luxury car. I get more bang for my buck plus more HP despite their car will not be able to carve up European roads the same way. What a compromise!!!
Back to the 5er, some purist might say that us Yankees messed up BMW by complaining to the company more than BMW owners in the rest of the world. We all know the complaint,"For my $40K, I expect to have....like my ." Some complainers will turn the BMW into a Japanese sedan when all is said and done.
congrats to wrjohnson, will stay posted for update on the service engine light story.
Yes.
brave1heart: why would I want to lose a M5?
Regarding the 7 and 5 design, hasn't Adrian Van Hooydonk been responsible, not Bangle? Bangle may be heading up design but I don't think he actually designed the 7. I read this in BMW Magazine. Am I wrong?
I'm debating between Yokohama, Sumitomo, and Kumho 245s. Any recommendations?
As for the 5 vs 7, my wife and I looked at the 7 and liked everything, except the tail. She kinda liked it, I hated it. With the pics of the 5 posted on that google site (anybody got the site for the translation?) it looks like the trunk lines are a little bit softer and less pronounced than on the 7. While I don't care for it on the 7, the 5 looks kind of nice. Maybe it is one of those designs that grows on you.
DL
Love the 330i or ix but the price tag is a little steep and love the loaded G35 for about 8k? less than a similarly equipped 330. Someone mentioned that leasing might make that price gap smaller and I was wondering if anyone had any info or hard #'s about that. It'd be a 36 mo, 12k per year in Jersey with $5,000 down
Thanks for the help
I know, I'm crazy, and way too much of a perfectionist, but maybe I'll mellow when my kid drags his bike handle bars down the side of my car one day!
I love these cars. For the money, you cannot find a car that handles and drives the way a 3-series does.
They can have the G35. I'd pay the $8k more and get the better car. It is a lot cheaper than a psychiatrist and for all of you that drive a Bimmer, you know what I mean--its like therapy everytime you take a corner.
Not as crazy about its tail. The dashboard also seemed a little obstructive.
I'm still wondering, though, if anyone out there can advise on whether or not replacing the rears only is a bad practice. I, like Kominsky, don't want to break the bank on tires. Gurumike?? Bueller?? Anyone??
TBL: Replace tires in pairs as they need to be replaced.
You should really try to replace all 4 tires at the same time. In most situations under most conditoins, I agree that you could get away w/ mixing different tire brands/ tire ages front to back, but when you really need your tires you might regret that decision:
Different tires will have slightly different adhesion qualities which will affect:
-braking performance
-can contribute to whether the car will oversteer or understeer
-handling in wet conditions-- different types of tires could hydroplane at different points causing a situation where the car suddently skids.
-Could reduce the effectiveness of the DSC
when it comes down to it, why reduce the safety of your car by doing this?
good luck
DL
Brought the car to the dealer, and they replaced a valve body, which seems to have cured the problem. I recommend you do the same, and get someone from the shop to drive and duplicate the conditions that made the light come on. That's what I did, which facilitated diagnosis.
I question whether these advertising fees should be passed on to the consumer. After all, there is a cost to do business, and above all the profit that the dealer makes, why should the consumer subsidize the business itself?
What are people's thoughts on that?
But having the dealer tack certain expenses on after a price is agreed to is where the problem sets in. And this problem is compounded further because the dealer is NOT up-front on the fee to begin with. You don't see it on a window sticker MSRP. You have trouble finding it clearly shown in open source pricing information. And they can vary from place to place and time to time.
Ever notice how the "Destination Charge" has little or no relationship to how much it actually costs to transport the vehicle? You don't pay less by living next door to the factory. Manufacturers and dealers treat this as a fixed, non-negotiable cost. Ended up being a way to increase profits. They are trying to do same with advertising fees. If they succeed, won't surprise me to see salesperson's salaries & commissions added on. That is just as much a cost of selling a car as are advertising fees and transportation charges.
Why is it that car manufacturers and dealers think they can price their goods differently than a department store? They can advertise a price or you can negotiate a price that you think is the final price, but when it comes time to close the deal, all of a sudden additional fees pop up. The dealer should only advertise or negotiate a price that covers all of their costs. They know what the car cost and they know their expenses, fees, & charges. Does Wal-Mart charge you an advertising fee when you go to the cashier to buy a TV or stereo system? No, because the price they post takes into account all their costs and their desired profit. (And at least when you pay sales tax, you know the fixed percentage ahead of time and it is equally applied to all items so taxed.)
The DSC is precisely one of the reasons that you can have a different set of tires on the front and back.
I agree with leenelsonmd, that replacing in pairs is preferable, but it seems financially irresponsible to replace all 4 tires when only a couple of tires are worn out.
If you have the money you can replace all 4 tires every 6 months just for fun.
Enjoy whatever tires you own.
there will be enough traction for every day driving with non-performance treads if you can find them.
The light went off after driving through deep water and rain. When it went off, the car did, in fact, go into safe mode (that is a scary term). I don't understand if the safe mode is set when the light goes off, or if the computer senses something wrong and sends it into 3rd gear. Therefore, wouldn't they be able to reset the computer, and get me out of safe mode, so I can drive again? If it was the water, it should have dried out by now. If it wasn't the water, they should be able to diagnose it by now.
WOW, do I miss that car.
Hope this helps.