Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Mercedes-Benz E-Class Sedans
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Jean
Grand High Poobah
The Fraternal Order of Procrastinators
You should be able to sell it easily between the numbers you posted. How close you get to the upper number will depend on its condition (as well as the low miles,) your location and your patience.
Wally
Only the Michelin pilot Sport All-Season offered ALL of the above. In particular, The Pirelli tires mentioned in a previous post have a wear rating of 240 compared to 400 for the Michelin Pilot Sport All-Season tires. The Pilot Sport All-Seasons represent a compromise between performance and value. For pure performance regardless of tire life there are better choices such as the Bridgestone S-03.
I find my Michelin Pilot Sport All-Season tires appropriate for my E430. This tire compliments my driving style (aggressive but not crazy) and the vehicle's handling characteristics without sacrificing tread life.
This is probably true as Nissan, Toyota, etc are all offering more powerful V-6 engines in their cars. While M-B may not be the leader in HP the company can not afford to stand still in an ever more competitive market like ours.
The '03 E Class has the current generation of engines and is underpowered (IMHO) for 2003.
Mark
What kind of tires do you have? I have 15K on my 2000 E430 and doubt that I could get another 10K out of them. I have Goodyear F1 Eagles and have been relatively easy on them.
Wally
M
I have Goodyear Eagles F1, 235/45ZP17, Tread=200 Traction=A Temperature=A
It looks as though I could get 30,000 miles on these tires from what tread I have left. But we'll see.
Mark
M-B decided to take the easy route for the '03 E Class and use the current generation of engines rather than update them with the new model.
I believe resale value will suffer when the new engines are released particularly the '03 V-6 E compared to the new V-6 in '04.
IMHO, a 5 liter engine should develop more than 300 HP in 2003. M-B is waiting for BMW to release its new engines before putting more HP in the E class. The all new GS model from Lexus will have more HP and so will the all new BMW 5 series so why is M-B waiting? My theory is M-B wants to use its current generation of reliable engines so at least the powertrain will not have any glitches in the first model year. Also, M-B does not seem to lead in HP but rather responds to BMW and Lexus as necessary to maintain market share.
The new V-8 from BMW in the 7 series is a 4.4 liter engine which develops 325HP. A 5 liter engine should develop 350-375 HP. Too bad M-B did not decide to place the current reliable AMG V-8 engine in the '03 E (E550?) and take the lead from BMW. This would not hurt sales of the '03 AMG E as it will have 470HP.
M
My point is a NEW model usually has an improved power train to go along with the car. Lexus and BMW are going to release better performance engines with their new GS and 5 series. So, why expect less from M-B? As for quality my '02 BMW 330CiC equals my '00E430 in terms of overall quality. BMW is making great strides in terms of overall reliability and quality. IMHO, it is M-B that needs to catch-up to Lexus and BMW.
That said, I am very happy with my E430 and will test drive the new 5 (380 HP six cylinder turbo, 330 HP V-8, and 500 HP V-10 in '05) and the new E before replacing my currrent '00 E430. A few years ago M-B had BMW beat in terms of quality and reliability- not anymore.
Consumer Reports, an independent unbiased organization, gave the 3 and 5 series excellent marks (equal or better than M-B) for their respective category.
If Lexus improves the exterior styling (which may happen in '03 or '04) I would consider buying the car. Lexus will, of course, copy the current or former 7 series as its "new" design. I am not "bashing" or praising Lexus just stating the obvious.
The main reasons I purchase German cars over Japanese ones are styling and performance not reliability. A copied E or 7 with 350 HP would be just fine with me.
But you may be right. Just thought I'd comment.
When comparing BMW to M-B I prefer to stick with the German made products. The X5 and M Class are made in the USA. Both had some "quality" issues for the first 1-2 years.
As for the 7 series the jury is still out as far as quality is concerned. I still think the first year run of the 7 will be better then the '00 S Class. I prefer to avoid the first year of any new model (with the exception of some Toyota/Lexus products.)
For those of us on this board the question remains whether M-B will regain the lead from BMW and Lexus in this category. After all, the E costs the most and it should be the best. Currently, the E is a good car but not necessarily the best in terms of reliability and quality. I hope M-B realizes this and asserts itself in this area.
And "made in America" bashing is ridiculous. The Accord is made in America, as are Camry's, both of which are very reliable, and cheap. The ML has quality problems because of parts quality for cost savings. One of my friends was stranded in Vermont when some plastic hose clamps cracked and broke on a cold night after skiing on a '00 ML430. The car was towed back and I gave him a ride home.
Not to be too anti-MB, I like my E320, and my father is happy with his E300DT, but I looked at the ML before buying a Land Cruiser, and while the LC is more expensive, the difference in quality is profound.
like M-B and BMW I was pointing out the obvious:
The ML and X5 are not German cars. Similarly, the Accord like my Odyssey is made in the USA.
IMHO, these American made Honda products are not as good as autos made in Japan.
I do not wish to start a debate in this area.
We live in a free market economy where the buyer can decide what to purchase. I believe the Land Cruiser is better because it is made in Japan where quality control (including materials) is set at a higher standard. I have had both American made Japanese cars and the real ones from Japan. The ones manufactured in Japan are better.
This is why the best from Toyota and Honda still come from Japan. The upcoming RL (Legend) will be made in Japan. Similarly, the best from M-B and BMW come from Germany. A few years from now product sharing among DaimlerChrysler's lines will result in more American made Mercedes-Benz cars; but, they will go by the names of Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep.
I don't trade cars frequently, as you can see from the age of the Toyota, so I hope to have my next vehicle for many years to come.
I have always wanted a Mercedes. Not so much for the prestige, but for its reputation for fine engineering and saftey. So I am now at a time in life where owning a MB is a possibility rather than just fantasy.
I've visited the local MB dealership on a few occaisions and did a short test drive with 2 vehicles. I am considering one of 3 vehicles:
1. ML320 : Since I have a van now, I am accustomed to driving a "high" vehicle. I like the ability to look out over traffic. It is also easier to get in and out as compared to a sedan. I am also accustomed to plenty of storage and I like the room that an SUV provides. The Toyota gets about 25mpg (4 cylinder)so 15-19mpg will take a little getting used to...
I have test driven a 2001. I thought the ride was OK.
2. C-320 Wagon : It looks sharp! It offers easy storage. I would wait for the 4-Matic that I believe is due later this year. It is not a high profile and it is not a truck so I would expect a smoother ride. I have not test driven a C-Class. I have seen a few negative comments about the C over on the sedan board. I guess the bugs are still be worked out.
3. E-320 4Matic Sedan: I test drove this car. It was about the best driving car I've experienced.
Obviously this car is not meant for carrying a lot of cargo like an SUV. I'm afraid if I go with this choice, that I will regret not having the cargo room later on. The E-320 Wagon is out of my comfort range price wise to consider. The E320 sedan is about as high as I'd go.
I welcome any and all of your opinions and information that you can provide to help me in the decision process.
If you buy around August or September, dealers will be eager to get them off the lot. Although less so for the wagons because the 03 E class wagon is not due till actual calendar year 03.
As for wagons, Consumer Reports rated the E320 the BEST STATION WAGON. If you want a German Luxury wagon then purchase the E320. You can get a great deal on a '02 model. The decision is yours to make.
Two suggestions: First, go for the E320 wagon, but you may not want to wait until the fall. As noted, the new E-Class wagon will be delayed a year, and I doubt that you'd gain much bargaining power if you wait. In fact, the 2002 E320 wagons may actually become scarce by fall and therefore become MORE expensive! So do it now!
Second, if you're considering an E320 4Matic sedan, you'll be spending $50,000-plus. With that amount of money involved, and considering your plan to keep the vehicle for many years, why not spend a few dollars more and get the E320 wagon? If you finance, like most of us, the additional amount of your monthly payment for the wagon will be comparatively minimal.
Keep us posted about your final decision.
Did you notice anything peculiar about your front end alignment before replacing the ball joint?
Did your dealer charge you to rotate the tires?
Should other E owners watch out for this problem?
Thanks.
Thanks....
So let me raise a new question in the hopes that someone has the answers..
I've got a 96 E320. Does it have a timing belt or a timing chain? If a belt, what is the recommended replacement mileage?
Thanks..
Have you seen the Letter from the Town Hall Manager on the Town Hall Welcome page? If not, you might want to follow that link to have a look.
And hang on to your seats. Change is never easy - for any of us - but resolving the Search problems we've had will be worth the pain.
Pat
Sedans Host
I have not driven my E320 long enough, but I have been told by other Mercedes owners that these chains are fairly long-lived.
Do you think this is a good deal? My problem is I need an AWD car and I don't like SUV's. I had a 99 Audi A6 and was VERY disappointed with it. It had numerous problems even though I bought it new. The only reason I hesitate on the Mercedes is it is pre owned and I have only bought new cars in the past. Any suggestions? Or should I look elsewhere? If I buy new I really don't have many choices. Audi is out of the question. The BMW and Jaguar AWD's are too small for me. I don't care for Suburu or Volvo.
Any advice would be appreciated!
The Mercedes itself is not going to be unreliable if you make sure it has all its maintenance done - the problem is, the 4Matic system has not been one of M-B's strongest points. Are you set on having AWD?
Louis
Jean
Jean