Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Simple as that.
Keep in mind they recommend the 2001 Intrigue also.
Ah, yes, Oldsmobile. Introduced a whole bunch of pretty good vehicles that were totally unlike their past image. A few people who never would have previously considered an Oldsmobile actually bought them, and liked them. But unfortunately, they turned off a whole bunch of their former customers who, like it or not, were still walking around with money in their pockets looking for a traditional Oldsmobile they could buy. A bunch of those customers walked away from Oldsmobile forever and went to Buick to join the traditional Buick buyers that liked the kind of car Buick makes. As a result, Olds died. Now, Teo, you want Buick to do the same thing that killed Olds? Are you bucking for a Vice-Presidency at GM or something? This sounds like Zarella-thinking...
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
If I were in that position I would change many things around...but...given GM's archaic corporate culture I dunno.
The Bengal might be the wrong product for Buick but like you said it is designed to increase show room traffic pretty much like the Prowler did for Plymouth, the Viper did for Dodge and the NSX did for Acura.
Look at Lexus. Lexus does not enjoy a high performance image. It is consider to be the stodgiest of high end Japanese luxury cars. They brought over the RWD Toyota Altezza (Lexus IS300) sedan and the car has been criticized because it is too small, too expensive and too radical for the typical Lexus buyer. The car hasn't sold well (I personally like it minus the clear taillight lenses) due to the lack of a manual tranny and a more power 6 cyl engine. In the fall, Lexus will introduce a 5-speed manual and the IS300 Sportswagon in hopes to jump start interest for this vehicle.
Perhaps, the IS300 would have had more acceptance as a high end Toyota model, not a Lexus blvd cruiser. Lexus also introduced the akward looking, French designed Lexus SC430 coupe which is another non traditional product for the Lexus clientele. The Audi TT is better.
The Bengal is to fill a similar niche and it is mainly another Image builder product. This car is not aimed at the Regal/LeSabre buyer but it is preparing the way for the Buick Cielo and other Buick products. I think GM will get it right and better with Buick.
If Oldsmobile would have gotten the Bengal I think things would have gone a bit better.
The Prowler was marketed as a Plymouth, already a dying brand long before this hot rodder was introduced in the mid 1990's.
If GM had Carlos Ghosn at the top...things would be a lot different.
Just look at the tremendous come back of Nissan with the all new Altima and 260HP Maxima...
I suppose I could have bought a Saturn Intrigue, if my GM card points were accepted. Now with Olds gone, I wonder if GM will allow the GM card points to be used on Saturns? (They do in Canada. And I think even Saab allows GM card points there.)
The Mastercard/GM card US program is better when it comes to accrue more points quicker (The Canadian Visa card still has the old Blue US accounts rules).
Saturn from time to time has allowed to use the GM points on the L series sedan.
Don't care for Saturns or Isuzus either way.
A Saab would be tempting...
I hope you still find it 'amusing' when Nissan begins to put serious dents all over the place.
www.autonews.com
I see that GM's main problem is timing..
My dealer also said that many customers wanted a bench seat and olds no longer ofered it.
He was the king of bean counters..
reliability..
The SHO Taurus V-8 was an absolute dismal failure.. The V-6 SHO was a winner but something happened to the original acceptance of the car and it was killed by Ford and Yahama.. The V-8 was never a performance car and the Yahama valve train never was as planned..
The Impala is a price car, lets face it.. If you worked with the automotive people you might understand some of the decisions.
My impression of a car is how it stays away from the dealer and does the hi-speed bit without complaint or failure..The 98 Intrigue at 26k was in perfect running order because I made sure it was fixed..What happened at that time is still puzzling..Next thing I know is that I am in a new 99 GLS w/3.5..
Please read carefully:::::the 99 has had the rear rotors and pads replaced, rear rotors turned once and the front rotors turned twice..A ISS was replaced to shut up my mouth so to speak,,,and the front end rattle is less.. The car has 46k miles of big time high-speed cruising with the same balanced tires and alignment as it left the factory.. The tires up until 32k were rotated every 6k miles.. There are no telltale signs of strut weakness or or any suspension wear which is absolutely remarkable given the crappy roads in the region..having spent alot of time in Fla, your roads are glass smooth, no chuck holes or disappearing pavement..
The creaky body is almost AARP like in approach and if ones ears are that sensitive maybe some cotton inserts would make life more liveable..
GM does not give anything away so if you think somebody forgot to charge enough for the Impala and you got a bargain--don't stay up nights trying to see where you made out..You might as well have bought a GP SE w/3.8 and saved a ton..
Each GM division carries a status symbol in circle of life so where do you think Chev/Pontiac/Olds/Cad fit in the scheme of things..
A note to anyone buying a used GM car::: a copy of all repairs done under warranty is available through your dealer..I just had a check done on a 93 Allante starting with the first service in 10/93 through 3/98..
My dealer ordered 2002 Olds models and expects his first Intrigue to be built 3rd week of August and arrive here by the end of August.
teo : Ya.. Saturn/Saab/Isuzu (SSI) dealers are accepting the GM card on everything they sell. May consider a Vue SUV next year. Can't afford a Saab unfortunately.
bz4 : Roger Smith was a screw up. Current management seem to finally be moving GM in the right direction.
I don't hold too much faith in some of these predictions; but why should they keep on the heavy discounting and add to their liability at the dealer level on the buyout which is based on total units sold over a certain time frame..
Hell, if you need a major repair done today, while the car is still in production, it is forever and a day before they even get the parts in. Imagine 4-5 years after production stops. Backed by GM--what a joke!
I am holding out for the 02. Black with chorme wheel and gold lettering.
Hell, if you need a major repair done today, while the car is still in production, it is forever and a day before they even get the parts in. Imagine 4-5 years after production stops. Backed by GM--what a joke!
The most unusual thing about the Intrigue is the 3.5. Keep it in good order and you're really no worse off than any car. Although, even that may not be such a big deal. Corvairs had a unique all-aluminum engine, and that was 30 years ago. People can still get them repaired.
Plus, by 2006 some Intrigues will be in the wrecking yard. If you need a piece of trim or a headlight lens, you can scavenge for it.
The cars were going to be built for 2002. That may have changed since less than 20,000 intrigues have been sold so far this year. Auroras are stacking up on the lots too.
We have been on edmunds top 10 most active for the last two days!
focus18 : Hummm.. I think Marvin Star might be another big one to try. I leased my Grand Prix from Addison. Great service there and they always wash your car after. Unfortunately they could not sell me an Intrigue (only lease),. so I didn't get another car there.
bz4 : Nice to see the forum come alive again. The group here is clearly interested in the Intrigue which says a lot about the character of the car. It's too bad more people didn't notice.
The funny side of the story is probably why the main GM engine series is still the antiquated 3.8 due to lack of funds to develop anything decent..The Northstar series V-8 is basically great but it has some real expensive burps.. The Shortstar in my 99 is also covered by an extended warranty due to the fact it is modeled after the V-8..When one drives cars covered by warranty action the abuse factor is somewhat greater and driving fun is increased twofold w/o worry; because if it scatters over the pavement; call an 800 number..
Now what could be easier???? Maybe its as good as Medicare..
Never abused the 3.8 because of its drony tone and rackety behavior.. one felt sorry for it; since it did complain..
Good forum--keep it stirred up..
One more thought before parting, I remember reading praise over Saab, Saturn, and Catera..My only choice would be Saturn if I was forced to buy in that group for GM has lost it's everloving buns in that venture; but the cars aren't too bad..The Catera is a real pipedream and a typical underpowered tank being sold as an autobahn cruiser propelled by a squirt 3.0 engine with a huge price tag.. The Saab is a strange animal, another good GM cash drainer..
For entertainment I am going over to the Mercedes C-class forum to catch up what is the latest complaint from the world of super fussy owners..The nearest Mercedes dealer to my house is 35 miles across town so based my criteria of having a good dealer selection available, I will have to pass on buying one..It's like marriage, no choice at times..
In my weekly oil level check of the 3.5; 1292 miles of rapid spinning has consumed approx a pint of Valvoline..when its down a qt. off to the dealer to change..
Anyway, I had forgotten how enjoyable the 3.8 is to drive when not on the highway! Goo-gobs of power. I had gotten used to the I-6 in the Envoy. Great on the highway, took a second to come to life from a slow roll. 3.5 w/o PCS felt quicker. Guess it should... it's a car. But if I had to trade one for the other, I'd take the 3.5 over the 3.8. Have to add that the 3.8 w/205 hp and 230lb-ft used in the Bonniville and friends moves better at highway speeds than the Intrigue's 3.8.
Some of the better looking wheels are not available in intrigue offsets. Don't know why.
18" tires are noticeably more expensive than 17's.
one2one :Congrats on the new car. Let us know the details.
dindak::: Thanks. If things go smoothly tonight, I'll give the details.
By the way. Holden makes Chevy's over there. Take a look at the Auto Show and click on "Lumina". If the Lumina looked like that, the current Impala could have been built like it was historically meant to be.
There is a market for these cars in the US but fuel economy and environment regulations discourage these type of high performance sedans.
On the other hand, why the heck SUVs dominate the American driving scene??? The worst EPA offenders???
Also look for 2005 when the all new GM global large car platform known as 'Mid-Lux' will debut as a RWD platform. Grand Prix and Impala are confirmed recepients of these platform in 2005.
The Holden/Opel/Vauxhall Commodore/Omega/Caprice/Senator and the South African market only Chevrolet Lumina SS are all the same exact spin offs of the current Opel Omega. We get the bland Cadillac Catera version which is a direct derivate of all the Holden/Opel cars. The Holden Caprice is just a long wheelbase cadillac Catera.
But what's GM's excuse with the designs? They are much more interesting overseas without being gaudy.
The "Invented here, Made here" motto has been the force benhind GM's platform/model segregation for many, many years. There are marketplace considerations as tastes/budgets/needs and wants of customer vary greatly from Country to Country or Continent to Continent. Because of this thinking we have such crappy cars as the Cavalier, when GM (Opel) sells world class small cars everywhere else in the world.
Fortunately GM has realized that we are already part of a Global Ecomomic Community and the successful implemetation of Global car platforms and economies of scale is the key to survive in the future and whatever new 'waves' the future might have in store for us.
The 'Delta', 'Sigma', 'Epsilon' and 'Mid-Lux' are a clear example of the strategy that GM has laid out for the next few years on which cars sharing these platforms will be offered in Global Markets with minor tweaks here and there to cater to the immediate needs of said markets. If GM can implement solid economies of scale we'll see a decrease of overlapping models, phasing out of old platforms and powertrains and an increase in quality and manufacturing efficiency.
VW has been the perfect example on this minus the quality equation that they somehow haven't been able to grasp. Until right before the release of the VW New Beetle in 1998, VW was an operation well into the 'Red' almost ready to pull from the North American market. That little 'Concept I' vehicle signaled the complete turn around of VW in the market place that they enjoy today. Also just read a report that VW will increase their basic warranty from the skimpy 2/24 coverage to 4/48. The 10/100 powertrain warranty will be made transferable. See? This is something that Olds could have done and they went in the opposite direction. The 'Classic' Aurora (1995-99) had the 4/50 warranty and the 2001 was launched with a lousy by comparison 3/36. Now the coverage was increased to 5/60 just to get rid of excess inventory but too late nevertheless.
All these magnificent changes at GM will be possible only if the top corporate culture is willing to accept them. GM's corporate culture is another problem and case study in itself.
Also keep in mind that the W-body platform will be phased out in 2005. We are buying the very last W-bodies. The last re-design based on a W-body platform was the Impala/Montecarlo. After that the 'Epsilon' and 'Mid-Lux' platforms will replace the W-body cars. Also the 3800 V6 will be phased out along with the W-bodies after 2005.
http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=3853&n=156,178&sid=178
I am a Computer Systems Engineer..but if I had one day the chance to work in Motor City I would not disregard such opportunity....
By the way....
did you see the Edmunds article about the new Nissan Altima?...Hot, hot:
http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/firstlook/articles/46727/article.html
Carlos Ghosn is the best thing that could ever had happened to Nissan.
The Altima is high on the list for next year, when my wife will get her new car. Also looking forward to checking out the new Max, Accord, and Camry. The Aurora 4.0 isn't out of the question either, if they are still making them.
http://www.autonews.com/html/main/stories0709/mitsu709.htm
Should Oldsmobile have done this? Maybe. I like the new icon or logo or whatever you call it (you know the oval thing that points forward and upward). I like the Aurora icon even better. Maybe I'll see if a junkyard has an Aurora icon and put that on the front end of my Intrigue instead.
Boy those new spy photos sure look great. That Saab is so handsome. And so is the Opel. If I were running GM, I'd dump Saturn altogether and replace them with Opels. That way, they could go for the import buyers with an already popular brand. Plus, they look European and European is a highly desireable look from what I hear and see. Plus, it'd give GM a cheaper European alternative just like VW is.
I'd like to point out that people who've posted here and have had problems with the Intrigue shouldn't be discounted. If nothing else, I hope we can all agree than the Intrigue's build quality is INCONSISTENT. It's like those of you/us who love the Intrigue seem unwilling to welcome those of you/us that do have problems. I hope we can all be more welcoming.
I agree with those that have posted about the speed of the 3.5 I was accelerating up to the freeway last night and looked down at the speedometer and I was unnoticeably at 85MPH When I slowed to 70, she seemed to say "is that all? Can't we keep goin?" I do love my powerful engine. I've never had any problems with acceleration off the line either. I find her quite powerful all around. (I blew past an ugly Impala on the way up the ramp. Boy was that a good feeling. I'll take my squeaks and rattles anyday over that ugly monster. Have you seen the interior? It's interior is more Buick than a Buick's interior.)
I find the front end a little quirky. It was nice back in 1997, really. But I think an update would've been good beginning with the 2000 model year. Just a little update. Perhaps bring the headlights flush with the fascia like on the new Aurora. There's always a little tweaking that could be done to improve the look even more. I've mentioned several times that I think the icon should be on the front fascia for visibility. The hood ornaments don't do anything unless they stand up. Has anyone seen pictures of the Antares interior? Man, I wish they could've duplicated more of that interior in the Intrigue. It's so handsome still, even today, six years later.
Does anyone else detest the daytime running lamps? They're so close together on the Intrigue and they're yellow... they look like two big yellow nostrils. They're very distinctive though, I'll give em that. My buddy calls em "the evil yellow eyes." LOL
I think Oldsmobile would've failed even sooner had they not switched. I believe fewer cars would've sold had they continued with their outdated lineup. If I were choosing an AARP mobile, I'd have certainly gone with Buick (because of their quality ratings) over Oldsmobile.
Sorry couldn't resist ;-)