Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
RE92 takeoffs from a WRX were the second set of tires. I believe they already had about 3k on them, I replaced them at 80k, (net of 43k on these tires).
Could have kept either set a bit longer, but winter was near.
'00 Legacy sedan.
Jim
That is very similar to my wifes drive taking the kids to school with our Chevy Tahoe (14-15 mpg). 2 miles at 25mph with 4 stop signs.
1 mile of 65mph. (interstate to cross river)
A stop light, then 3 miles of 50mph. 5 miles of 30mph with 4 stop signs.
Going shopping around town is even worse with top speed at 35 and more stop signs/lights.
These 4 banger engines should get better mpg.
I'm happy with the 27 I get but its mostly highway driving. Maybe the AWD just has too much drag? My parents big pig Buick gets better mpg than me. Granted its not nearly as fun to drive.
--jay
He'll see how it goes with highway driving this coming weekend. He's taking a nice leisurley drive up to Buffalo, so hopefully he should see improvement.
Mark
My wife's OBW is much more consistent - 18-20 around town (she has exactly the same commute as I do) and 25-26 highway.
I don't know whether to feel bummed out by jay's post or be happy his Tahoe's got such good around town mil age :<)
Larry
I'm contemplating buying another CD changer (lots of $$ but I like the factory look) or attempting to wire an IPod into the factory stereo. It should be possible to hook one up so it acts as the CD changer. I found some info on the internet, but was wondering if anybody here has experience doing this?
Thanks!
With some experimentation, you could probably use the CD changer jack on the stereo. You'd have to find the pinouts for the audio signal and figure out how to trigger than input. If we had a schematic of the jack, it would be cake!
Craig
We only have 27k or so right now on the ones on our Legacy L (2002).
-juice
I am very happy with the new tires in all kinds of driving, and was happy that I could sell the take-offs easily. My suggestion is to read the extensive road tests results and owners' reviews at Tirerack.com before you make any tire decisions.
Other than the oem tires, I've been happy with the new Legacy. As contrasted with the 2001 Legacy Outback I had, the new car seems to have a bit less acceleration, same mileage (22-26), and a slightly different ride, probably due to the smaller (and harder?)tires on the new one. It cruises up I-75 easily: I have to watch exceeding 80 or more.
Overall, the car is a great value, and I haven't any regrets in buying it. There were two glitches in the buying process, though: One, the salesman said we were getting a weatherband radio, and we didn't. Also, replacement weatherbands were not available for this car. Two, the air didn't work at all. When I took it in, the service manager opened the hood, flipped a switch, and sent me on my way in two minutes. Said that their delivery people neglected sometimes to change this switch from the shipping mode.
I hope this note helps David and others with tire decisions, and some others are interested in my 0 to 9000 miles Subaru experiences.
thanks for yor comments
mikek in south jersey
Very pleased with these tires.
Jim
Steve
It's got me beat why Subaru in the US don't fit a mud/snow tyre as they do out of Japan.
Australian spec Outbacks come with Yokohama Geolanders that run about 50,000km (30,000 miles) My latest set have now run 45,000km and have probably 15,000km left on them. Wet weather performance is still very good.
Cheers
Graham
I'm in Texas, so driving on snow will only be occasional. I am mostly interested in all-season tires with a good ride and low noise. I also thought about going to the largest tires possible (18"?). And, of course, I don't want to spend an arm and a leg.
Any good suggestions? Thanks so much in advance.
Bob
Brian
Krzys
Researching tires is fun! Everyone has a crazy story to tell about what tire did what!
Based upon many reports, I narrowed it down to Bridgestone RE950's and Toyo TPT's. My tire dealer could not get 4 matching Toyos, so I went with the RE950's.
No problems so far, they ride nice and firm. But only time will tell.
mudhen - CA
So far, so good on the tires. They are speed-rated for much faster than this 2004 Legacy Wagon would ever go, and I feel they handle quite well on a dry highway at high speeds. The wet traction seems very good; the snow traction is okay, but probably not up to some soft rubber Continentals I had at one time. The price of these new Continental Extreme Contacts was reasonable, and I'd buy them again.
There is one interesting development: They are directional tires, so rotating them according to the dealer's service schedule will be interesting--can't do them the regular way, and have to just move them same side/front to back.
I've noticed no flat spotting so far.
Good luck!
Craig
I've been too lazy to do an X rotation for years on any of my cars anyway, so I guess I'm covered on my Outback.
Steve, Host
Our owners manuals stipulate a lot of rules, most of which make sense and I follow, or at least consider closely. Tire pressures, tire 1/4" wear limits, lug torque, wheel size and offsets, spare use, etc. All seem to be based on good engineering judgement (me like good engineering...). But I have a real problem with the tire rotation statement. Yes, Craig is right (P44 in the last section in my manual). Same side only, front to back.
For 20 years, tire mfgrs were concerned about radial plies taking a set and delaminating if reversed. Witness the Firestone 500.... Nobody preaches that any more. Michelin never did. They even launched a major campagne some years back telling dealers to ignore the statement found in most owners manuals and do cross-rotation, unless the tread design dictated a directional rotation.
I have directional snows (Dunlop Wintersport), and do of course follow those instructions. But the Brig RE92 carry no such warning. Can anybody offer up an informed reason as to why Subaru states otherwise? I am certainly open to listening to a good argument, but in the meantime, I will continue doing front to rears on same side, then X when moving rears to front.
Steve
Seriously, Subaru's been doing AWD for so long I'd like to think they understand the relationship between the tires wearing coupled with the drivetrain effects.
Larry
Craig
Steve
I just do same side rotations because it's more convenient since I usually do it myself.
Steve, Host
(Someone I know) was not too particular about mix-n-matching tires on their Bravada and the transfer case failed.
I also use the Dunlop WinterSports. Very happy with them as well.
The clutch plate friction material was problematic, and it was worse in damp or humid weather, even worse in the cold. The problem was known as judder. Over time, the judder problem would eventually damage the flywheel as well (created hotspots).
I believe this affected several Japanese manufacturers who used the same clutch supplier.
Revised clutch parts were released along with the TSB in January 03, if I remember right. It seems to have fixed the problem.
My parents 2000 Outback had the same problem, and they were able to get it taken care of under the TSB without any hassles. The car has been fine since.
I am guessing that you are out of luck since you went through a 3rd party for the service, but you never know. Wouldn't hurt to call the Subaru 1-800 number and ask them about it. They are ususally very nice to deal with, and will bend over backwards to help you if it's at all possible. I do suspect you may be out of luck though.
Craig
Some Miatas had the same issue.
The number you want is 800-SUBARU3, but it would have been better to call before you changed it.
-juice
Is mike around, paisan I mean? He has a 2.2l and knows much more about those than I do.
-juice
I'd get one of the same year and same transmission. I'm swapping my dad's 97 2.2L Legacy L engine with the same year motor etc. Makes life easier.
-mike
I can only get the sunshade to retrack when the moonroof is opened. Doesn't make sense to me.
Any ideas would be appreciated. Thanks!
Craig
I ask because some do, some don't. I test drove a Saturn Vue Redline and the shade did not move independently from the glass.
These guys sell "recycled" Subaru parts:
http://www.fsautoparts.com/
-juice
Thanks in advance
Chris
CRaig
Mark
Thanks again
Mike k In South jersey
Keith
On the manual trannies, it's on the other side, i.e. passenger side on the top of the transmission tunnel.
It's a long reach but you can reach it. It's also where you add gear oil.
-juice
It needs a guide rope to find ;-)
-Dave
Actually, after changing my gear oil I cleaned mine. Misted on some Simple Green and then hosed it off with a gentle spray. It's impossible not to spill at least some gear oil, given the reach.
-juice
I just took a road trip with my '03 OBW A/T (33k miles) and got from 27 to 31 mpg. A/C on. No cruise - tried to use it but found out it didn't work
27.5 from home to Vince Lombardi service plaza in North Jersey via PA TP from Valley Forge and NJ TP.
29+ mpg from Vince Lombardi service plaza to Maine (via NH) - drove the NJ TP to 18W; over the GW bridge; Major Deegan, Hutchinson, Merrit, and Wilbur Cross parkways; I-91; I-84; Mass TP; I-495; I-93; then local 2 lane roads to Mt. Washington area, then into Maine the next day. My speed on the interstates and parkways was probably 65 to 75. Three people with luggage.
31 mpg - local roads between NH and Maine. Three to four people with some heavy luggage.
26.5 mpg - RT Mt. Washington area to Woodstock, VT via local roads. Four people; no luggage. Heavy rain on return trip.
29.5 mpg - From Mt. Washington area to Newburgh, NY via local roads across NH; I-91 in VT, MA, CT; I-84 across CT, NY. Four people and loaded with luggage to the top of the rear headrests.
28 mpg - From Newburgh, NY to SE PA via I-84 across NY, PA; local roads thru the Poconos to home. Four people and loaded with luggage to the top of the rear headrests.
DaveM
Craig
I think I need a smaller diameter tube.
-juice
I agree it should be better, but at least it was an improvement for him. Prior to this trip he had just hit 5000 miles; he put another 1000 on jsut from this trip. I think if he uses the car for more than the streets of Brooklyn, that the mileage would improve. Heck, take a drive on the Belt Parkway (at around 8 am on a cloudy Sunday morning that is).
Mark
DaveM