Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Honda Odyssey vs Dodge/Chrysler minivans
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
How difficult is it to remove the two middle row seats on the Odyssey? How heavy are they?
As Reagan said may times on Iran contra. I don't recall, I don't recall, I don't recall!
You are right about the towing package for 3500lbs needing tranny cooler. I missed that one! DOH!!
funny, I went to:
NHTSA
I found dif results searching TBSs today (maybe more were added since you checked)
Honda TBS - 63 total
DCX TBS - 52 total
Hmmmm guess Clinton got what Reagan had!
Honda TBS - 63 total
DCX TBS - 52 total
I looked again same results!! Are you comparing DCX minivan to Honda Odyssey or are you comparing all the models. So compare the vehicles Dodge caravan or Chrysler T&C then select components, then retrieve TSB, Now you have to look thru the TSB's by TSB number. They will both come up with 20 results(Chrysler T&C has 33 but didn't want to wade through all of them) When you take out the repeats 2005 Honda Odyssey-11 2005Dodge Caravan-17. I can never tell what your criteria is!!!
Hmmmm guess Clinton got what Reagan had!
Nope it just matter what the meaning of the word 'is' is!
All data.com
2005 Dodge Grand Caravan
link title
2005 Honda Odyssey
link title
They are a little different total TSB honda-16 Dodge-28
Probably better to stick with NHTSA site.
I'll take your word for it, life is too short to wade thru any of these TBSs......there's repeats through out the files.
One could argue that the more generated bulletins equates to a more comprehensive support of field service personnel.
Dusty
One could argue that the more generated bulletins equates to a more comprehensive support of field service personnel.
Alot of this stuff is gray area. I really don't care how many TSB there are dosen't matter to me. I work field service and most PSB are to help other people with a problem someone else found. Like a noise problem that makes the generator output less power.
I don't claim that the Odyssey is perfect just better suited to my needs. Here are some places where the DCX vans make sense(I'm sure I'll get flamed for my opinion but I don't care)If you can only afford a sub $23,000 van and you want to buy a new car. If you think the honda's ride is too harsh. If stow and go is a must. If the fact some people say that the Honda has problems and get scared off easily. If you like the 7/70 limited powertrain warrenty which you have to act soon in 2006 it's gone(Honda's going to a 5/60K power train with no deductable for 2006) If you want to save a few grand on the price of a van. If VSC and standard sideairbags aren't that important. Then maybe the Dodge is right for you. There are many reasons to buy a DCX van. But the best thing to do is look at both van drive them a few miles. Maybe back to back there are places where both dealerships are in the same automall. Then if you simply love one, thought about it, can aford it, and still feel that way its probably the right choice. Now if it all comes down to price take your time. Deals change daily I thought 1000.00 off was the best I could do. But soon people were calling me left and right. Buying a car isn't something to be taken lightly. I've seen so many posts of people buying something and then getting rid of it 10 months later. I don't wanna be that guy!
I currently have MY05 Honda minivan: my first Japanese product since all my previous new purchases were GMs. In my job, I drove many different minivans on long distance trips.For vacation trips, we typically rented Chrysler/Dodge minvans since we always got good deal on them. Overall, my impression on Chrysler vs. Honda as followed:
1. Engine: the Honda 3.5L is way better than any US equivalent (DC included) in terms of power and refinement. Chrysler 3.3L is similar to GM 3.4L engine overall. Ford engine (3.9L) sounds like a tractor engine.
2. Transmission: Chrysler transmission is very slow to down shift. Many times, I had to remind myself to step hard on the accelerator 2-3 seconds prior to merge onto 70mph LA traffic. They have made improvement on the 05 MY, but the response is still very lazy. GM van, even with 4 gears, does the this job way better. Honda's is very similar to GM's in nature.
3. Head Light: after many years talking about improvement, Chrysler still have the worst head light intensity in all vans that I have driven. It is scary at night, driving at high way speed in a strange road. It is to me a safety issue
4. Brake: Honda wins hand down on this department. GM is the worst, Chrysler is somewhere in the middle
5. Handling: No comparison, the winner is new Honda. GM, surprisingly is very good even for a dated design. Chrysler has a tip-toe feeling. New Ford van is slightly better than GM
6. Body Integrity: Chrysler is the best. Little Squeak and rattle. New Honda seems to suffer more of this problem in the first model year. GM's old model was a joke: the van may fall a part in highway since they skimmed on chassis enforcement
7. Ride: Chrysler is best on smooth roads. But as soon as the road got bad, it gives me the uneasy feeling of losing control. Honda has firmer feel which makes it less smooth but instead well control.
8. Radio reception: Honda radio sucks since it has windshield antenna which limit its reception range and has directionality problem. On top of that, their audio tuning allows more noise to be amplified. Those whip antenna on the front fender is the best friend of your radio. They are becoming rarer everyday however
9. Fuel economy: about even between them
10. Price: Chrysler probably has better incentive and deals
11. Seat comfort: about the same for front seat passengers
12. Interior design: I am less impressed with Honda choice of hard plastic in the IP section. The upper glove box has big gap: engineering oversight for 30K vehicle. In fact, I think new GM has the best interior design this time
So after considering all options, I decided to go with the MY05 Honda. It has some initial first model year assembly problems. But overall, I liked the Honda because of its mechanical superior design. It has more latest safety and techical advantages that no current minivan (US or Import) can match.
JT
Agree, but if you want to feel good and not talk about recalls, then TBS comparisons are great!!!!
I currently have MY05 Honda minivan: my first Japanese product since all my previous new purchases were GMs. In my job, I drove many different minivans on long distance trips.For vacation trips, we typically rented Chrysler/Dodge minvans since we always got good deal on them. Overall, my impression on Chrysler vs. Honda as followed:
1. Engine: the Honda 3.5L is way better than any US equivalent (DC included) in terms of power and refinement. Chrysler 3.3L is similar to GM 3.4L engine overall. Ford engine (3.9L) sounds like a tractor engine.
2. Transmission: Chrysler transmission is very slow to down shift. Many times, I had to remind myself to step hard on the accelerator 2-3 seconds prior to merge onto 70mph LA traffic. They have made improvement on the 05 MY, but the response is still very lazy. GM van, even with 4 gears, does the this job way better. Honda's is very similar to GM's in nature.
3. Head Light: after many years talking about improvement, Chrysler still have the worst head light intensity in all vans that I have driven. It is scary at night, driving at high way speed in a strange road. It is to me a safety issue
4. Brake: Honda wins hand down on this department. GM is the worst, Chrysler is somewhere in the middle
5. Handling: No comparison, the winner is new Honda. GM, surprisingly is very good even for a dated design. Chrysler has a tip-toe feeling. New Ford van is slightly better than GM
6. Body Integrity: Chrysler is the best. Little Squeak and rattle. New Honda seems to suffer more of this problem in the first model year. GM's old model was a joke: the van may fall a part in highway since they skimmed on chassis enforcement
7. Ride: Chrysler is best on smooth roads. But as soon as the road got bad, it gives me the uneasy feeling of losing control. Honda has firmer feel which makes it less smooth but instead well control.
8. Radio reception: Honda radio sucks since it has windshield antenna which limit its reception range and has directionality problem. On top of that, their audio tuning allows more noise to be amplified. Those whip antenna on the front fender is the best friend of your radio. They are becoming rarer everyday however
9. Fuel economy: about even between them
10. Price: Chrysler probably has better incentive and deals
11. Seat comfort: about the same for front seat passengers
12. Interior design: I am less impressed with Honda choice of hard plastic in the IP section. The upper glove box has big gap: engineering oversight for 30K vehicle. In fact, I think new GM has the best interior design this time
So after considering all options, I decided to go with the MY05 Honda. It has some initial first model year assembly problems. But overall, I liked the Honda because of its mechanical superior design. It has more latest safety and techical advantages that no current minivan (US or Import) can match.
JT
Keyword being "Impression" here. JT is every bit as capable of doing a automotive review as any of those bozos at C&D, Motor Trend etc....!!!!!!! I know a few of these Einsteins, hung with them at Car Club events. I remember one bringing a brand new 96 Taurus to an event and raving about it and the STYLING!!!!! UGH!!!! Saw history of Mustang this weekend.....MotorTrends gave Mustang II COY award!! One thing I notice a lot of, when a car is new, cutting edge etc....it's the greatest, they're in love with it, few months later they drop like stones!!!
The guy who helped import the Catera (convert an Opel) from Germany raved about it, when he left GM....he traded his "Opel" for a Jetta!!!!
The AC in our T&C works great, which has been our experience with most Domestics/Semi Domestics (GM, Chrysler and Ford). We had a '98 Honda Accord and the AC was the achilles heal of that car!!!
I am just curious about your experiences.
If it takes under 10 seconds for you to install a carseat, you're not doing it properly. Maybe just one of the bases, but a properly installed convertible can be a lot of work even with Latch. I just switched the youngest out of her infant seat into a rear-facing Britax. Run the rear tether under the seat, install the extendable rear-facing support, plus deal with the carseat pads. Repeat for the other carseat, it's forward facing but still takes a bit to get all the attachments. It may only be a couple minute ordeal, but in 95ºF and 90% humidity it's a chore. Then you've gotta find somewhere to stick the seats. I'm sure stow-n-go is great for some folks, but I didn't even give it a second glance myself. The 2nd row sliding (didn't even notice that when I was shopping) has been very useful though. I can leave the full 3-passenger 2nd row in place and others can get to the 3rd row just by sliding the 2nd row forward.
Yes, not something a large person could do, but kids/teens can quite easily. If you just had a booster seat in one of the 2nd row captains chairs, an adult could easily access the 3rd row because the captains chairs fold forward and slide individually allowing plenty of room to get to the 3rd row.
There is no latch anchors on the middle 2nd row seat. You could install a carseat, but I wouldn't recommend it. It's not a full-size captain seat, more of a modular seat that can be folded up, popped out, etc.
We have two child seats installed in both outboard 2nd row seats. One is rear-facing, the other is forward facing. My wife routinely switches from the front to the 2nd row and sits in the middle seat to care for our 6mo grandchild. Or she gets in before we leave, there's enough room to easily access the 2nd row middle seat even with a forward facing carseat installed.
The Ody setup was perfect for this which was one of the big reasons we liked it. We had a Tahoe before and while there was a bit more room in the 2nd row middle, it was nearly impossible to get to it with carseats installed on the outside seats.
It is very easy and quick to attach a car seat base for infant carrier. Two clips on the anchors, knee on the base and pull the belt. Detaching takes a couple extra seconds. There is no tether for the back of the base.
I have yet to use our Britax Marathon, but test fit it in our vehicles in rear facing position. I did not connect the rear tether, but the front LATCH connectors only take a couple seconds each to attach and tighten. The extra time over a car seat base is to walk around the vehicle to reach the inside belt. Admittedly, it took longer than a minute the first time, but after a little practice, the convertible seat was a snap to secure. I'm not sure what pads you speak of.
I only have one child so far, 3 months old. I probably won't have this minivan for the next child because we are leasing. Two rear-facing seats in the middle row on a DCX w/ StoNGo would not allow passage to the rear seats. I have not tried to mount the convertible seat forward facing yet, so I cannot comment on how to get to the rear. I don't believe one can get to the back seat without either folding/flipping a 2nd row seat or walking between the 2nd row seats. I keep the second row seats all the way back. Keep in mind that I need the front seats to be able to go all the way back as I am tall w/ long legs. That limits how much comfortable movement the second row can have. With my wife driving (9" shorter than me), I understand there could be more opportunity to move the 2nd row seats. I will try moving the 2nd row seat forward to see if there is enough clearance to get to the 3rd row w/o folding/flipping. My guess is there is not enough clearance between the back of the door opening and the back of the second row seat, but I can check tonight.
If I had another child with this van, I'd put the older child in the 3rd row. That leases either the other 2nd row seat or 3rd row for an adult to tend to the children with the other 2nd row seat stored. Personally, I find the PlusOne seat uncomfortable and could not imagine sitting between two large (Britax) child seats.
I'm tall as well and have my front seat all the way back and there's still plenty of room to go between 1st/2nd rows to get to the middle 2nd row seat. I can still slide the 2nd row seat all the way forward without touching the drivers seat. The only problem we've had is with the rear-facing seat. It's a rather compact design when forward facing, and I had bought it to haul my older grand-daughter in my ext. cab truck. We moved it to the Ody for the baby and it's huge when reclined back for rear-facing. My wife had to move her passenger seatback up a bit (she usually has it reclined pretty far) to fit this seat. It's a Britax Galaxy I believe. The forward facing seat is a Britax Marathon. So now the one captains chair can't slide forward because of that carseat.
Right now I have a Ford Freestyle, but it only has the 2 across in the 3rd row. It's fine for now, but I'm looking in the future. Last week my wife went with her friend and had 2 car seats and a booster in the 2nd row, my wife and her friend up front, and lots of stuff in the back with the 3rd row down. I know that in a minivan with the split 3rd row we could have put the stuff back there with one of the kids, but I like the extra options of three across car seats in row 2. We did it in the Freestyle which is not as wide as a full size minivan and we like that option.
The option of putting the additional seat between the 2 seats in row 1 would be nice though, so you could carry 9 if you had to. It would be nice to be able to replace the center tray with a removeable seat like in the Odyssey in row 1. Again, I like to have the option.
One thing I like about the minivans is you can use the 3rd row and still have a lot of cargo space. That was the mistake when I bought the Tahoe, I should have gone for the suburban. Most SUV's don't have much space behind the 3rd row.
I like how the lower portion of these covers extend down the seat. Keeps their feet off the leather.
I don't think they are **horrible** but they don't begin to compare with the super comfortable Odyssey seats!
We don't complain about the seats because we tried them out before buying them and found them to be alright. Plus we are sitting in the front seats 100% of the time. But I have had adults sit on them and they never complained they were uncomfortable and I have asked. The only ones that say they are uncomfortable are Honda owners that have never ridden in them. Now I will grant you they are not as comfortable as the Honda seats, but being able to fold into the floor makes that expected. They are not as thickly padded because of that feature. That would be like me saying the Honda seats aren't any good because they don't fold into the floor. Well they do fold down, it's just that they don't fold flat and have that bar across the back. You can lay some stuff on them but not as much or as heavy a stuff as you can put in the Dodge. All depends on what your going to use your van for.
Another great feature of stow-n-go seats that no one else has, is it you only carry six people or less, you can fold just one middle seat and have greater excess to the third row than with any other van. Or it gives you room to put in a stroller already set up.
There is no hassle stowing the Dodge seats at all. I can do it in less than a minute. Those seats also move forwards and back.
So now the Dodge seats can be stowed with a child seat installed? AMAZING STUFF!
I live in Phoenix so I know what that 100 degree plus, is like all summer. My 2005 DGC easily keeps it cool inside. Couldn't say as much for my 2001 Dodge Dakota I use to have. It had no recirculating switch on it and it never got cool enough.
Try stowing one of those middle row seats and see how easy it is to get in and out of that third seat. I have three grandkids I pick up after school and two set in the third seats and one likes to set in the second seat. They can run in and out of that third row with one seat stowed. Unless your the one that has the babies in the car seats. You still have room for seating six and plenty of room moving around inside. I keep one seat stowed all the time. A lot of stuff I carry, I find it's easier to put in the side door than the rear hatch.
My solution as I've posted would be to always have an adult in the back with the kid(s), so keep one 2nd row seat open for the adult or stowed for easy access for the 3rd row. There is zero need for an adult in the front passenger seat when there is an open seat in the rear with kids. More time entertaining the kids (or is it they who entertain us?).
Regardless, I only have one child who rides in an infant carrier so far. She is long (25" at 3mo) and has almost outgrown the carrier. We'll be switching that out for the Marathon in another month, I think.
I find the back storage more useful than the side w/ one 2nd row seat down. I switch back and forth between 3rd row down and up, to utilize the bins or to carry a large stroller and other baby gear. I'm tall, so the rear loading height is no problem for me.
You would still have ALL the extra space under the floor between the 2nd row and front seats which is MUCH more than the miniscule space of the donut gimmick in the Odyssey. :P
However, for people with 2 small children, the 2nd row bench seat of the 2005 GC SE with 2 built in child seats is JUST RIGHT and also provides the 2 large storage compartments under the floor where the 2nd row "Stow-N-Go" seats of other 2005 DC minivan seats would go when folded.
They're so easy to move I do both. Apart for long trips(anti touching mode)together during the week when my wife drops off my boy. :P
However, for people with 2 small children, the 2nd row bench seat of the 2005 GC SE with 2 built in child seats is JUST RIGHT and also provides the 2 large storage compartments under the floor where the 2nd row "Stow-N-Go" seats of other 2005 DC minivan seats would go when folded.
While nice the built ins have considerable short comings. First they are only for 22lbs to 50lbs. So for the first 2 years it's a no go. Then after 50 lbs or 47inches you have to get them out. For seat belts to work properly the children have to be tall enough approx 57 inches. This is the time when the seat belt doesn't go across the neck and their legs are long enough to bend at the seat edge. This keeps them from slouching and the belt being across the belly. This area is very weak in most toddlers/small children. So you still end up buying 3 seats baby/convertable/booster just that you only use the convertable in the rear facing mode. That said, it's almost impossible to engineer a seat good from 0-8 years old. I wouldn't waste my money!!!
DC is not using their buyers to test a new, questionable tire. The tire testing should be completed before putting them on new vehicles and equipment to repair the new tires should be readily available. :shades:
So your saying the SXT hit the EPA numbers. Please also put the Odyssey hit the 28 MPG on the highway. Let's be fair once in a whil. BTW if CR is the king what was the overall MPG SXT VS Ody??
CR does not show the Dodge, only the Odyssey. It also does not show highway miles. Only city driving. It's on page 20 of the Oct. 05 issue
But then again this is one of those areas that is highly subjective. Body porportions, size, and weight of an individual make all the difference in how one judges seat comfort. And if your an overzealous salesperson, then whatever your selling will be the "best."
Dusty
What is so amazing about it, is it get's that bad with all that hi tech on it.