Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I looked into specific lens polishing kits, but on a lark I tried a microfiber cloth with some Meguires Cleaner Wax. It's a decent wax with a light duty polishing compound thrown it. It's a great general purpose product perfect for those of us who are lucky to find the time to wax their old cars once a year or so! It beads for half a year or more, comes off the rubber just fine (way better than their upscale Gold Class), and takes off the embedded crap that I should be going after with a clay bar but never get around to do.
The mild abrasive cleans off the oxidized plastic haze, and the wax helps to seal the surface. I'm sure the purists will cry foul to what I'm doing, but for me it seems to work great. And it's cheap! 30 cents of the stuff (I think I paid $6 at Walmart for the last bottle) will keep the lenses clean for months.
I've had an issue with the height of my headlights being too low on my 2010 Forester from day one. The dealer said "they are all like that" when I brought it to him. But...I had a 2009 and had no issues with seeing street signs, stop signs, etc. that I do with this 2010. Does anyone know how to adjust the height of the lights?
Thanks!
Hard to say if it did a better job than the toothpaste. Probably my imagination, but it seems to have stayed "clearer" longer.
After my attempts at exterior auto care last summer, that poor car, which is only three years old, looks heavily aged compared to the summer before. :sick:
I don't have any problems with headlight housings right now, but I imagine that if you start caring for them early, you're less likely to have issues later on.
As for the life span of your bulbs, that sounds pretty darn reasonable. Some of the bulbs, such as the Silver Stars, I've heard tend to last six months to a year. I use my lights all the time. Do you, or are yours used only "when necessary?"
No tarter on the lens so it must be working!
Wouldn't want to root around trying to refill that cavity.
: ))
The bulb I just replaced has lasted since I bought the car in Aug 2001 - so no complaints with the base brand but maybe I will give those Sylvania Xtravision a shot unless you suggest trying the Wagner's.
I am one of those guys with cloudy lamps so I am going to use a 2000 grit sandpaper on them lightly before I clean (or maybe clean first, sand, clean again?)
We also have six months of snow, and the whiter light interacts really well with snow (in that it multiplies the lights' effect). After a fresh snowfall, I feel like I can see a mile ahead with those things.
Unless they don't last at least a year, I plan to stick with them. Oddly enough, my new Fiesta uses the same bulbs as the Forester, so that's a nice bonus.
Aside: I hate blue/purple headlights. They are the worse offenders for throwing glare at oncoming drivers. :mad:
There's no play in the wheels, and since its AWD, detecting roughness in a bearing is a problem. I changed the rear diff oil, everything looked clean and good there, but the noise has persisted. Being doing it for about 10k miles now.
Any ideas?
In the electronic T bodies, they are servo motor controlled. Different issues there as well.
As for everyone else.....the MO Subaru fleet seems to have caught a head gasket virius! One completed and returned to service. The other two have been caught failing in early stages at 250K miles or more of service. The best I have seen about this issue on web is the following web site. The most recent failure was on a replacement engine with an estimated mileage between 80-100 service. That estimate is based upon exam of cylinders and deposits found in the oil galley.
http://allwheeldriveauto.com/subaru-head-gasket-problems-explained/
Two very experienced mechanics, myself included, cheked this website out and found that this guy seems to be very much on target with the problem. He nailed the issue to a t on this 98 engine I serviced last!
What do you know? No corrosion at all the last year I owned it! In other words, it's a resistance game. Try adding (or replacing) a grounding strap on your car and see if it makes a difference.
Got the craigslist ad drafted but maybe I'll talk myself out of it. Just makes little sense to have two cars when neither gets driven that much.
Needless to say, conversation ensued about relocating the ground strap. I have added another one on an 89 Mazda a few year or two ago. Nice to hear the Escort experience. Might be worth trying it on the Subie as well. The left side has a bunch of timing electronics there. Cam shaft sensor on head. Ground on block. Think that thought out later to try. As for the article about running Subies and not storing. That does seem to be the case. 1st engine died a high speed head gasket failure. Lost it at 286K. The one I service as stated before, could not have had more than 100K is clearly a 98 engine. Clearly a acid build up from oil/blowby gases? The 94 I am getting ready to deal with is at 247K and the youngest '03 unit is at 271K. I am dreading the last one. It will be work on every end of that sucker including valves. Oil galley, clutch, rear main, head job, timing set and everything else up front. Been a very trouble free unit. Everything in house. Too many mechanics have overcharged and beep beeped up! My new curse word! FCC approved!
On the other hand, by having extra cars in the fleet and grouping together with other family members who can drive, we can take the time needed to do a job right and not cut corners.
But before you holler.....sure beats car notes! Some states also have provisions to keep your tags, remove your insurance and store the vehicle. If you do this like me, make sure you tag the steering wheel that unit is in storage so a family member does not take it out when it is grounded! This is also a good time to pull maintenance. I rotate them in and out of service so they all get some use. The older cars are great for winter if they have heat. We save the newer ones with good a/c for summer.
As for the "the inevitable head gasket failure" I always say, anything goes over 200K: things get interesting above 300K! I try to move those cars to winter use in LA. We have a lot of snow here you know! So Steve, I hope you reconsider keeping Subie around. Hard to beat that 4 wheel drive system in snow and the maintenance is not all that bad. Besides, several of us in forum have a lot of road we have already been on. Oh, highway unit....fuel pumps go around 250K+! We now consider pulling before it beeps somewhere in nowhereland. Another thing to add to that 03 list to do.
Second ground.....maybe attach somewhere on left head? Graphite head gaskets not the greatest conductor. Painted new head bolts not great either. Thoughts anyone? Attach to mounting bolt on front bearing housing near cam shaft sensor?
I dunno, the van is more comfortable to drive and we could borrow the in-law's Buick if it died and we needed to go buy something. After 13 years, we're at the point with the car fund where we can pay cash, but interest rates are so low, who knows. Just don't like owning stuff I don't use and would rather see someone else run it into the ground (and freeing up half the garage would be nice too).
Maybe one more winter (for the car and me. :shades: ).
I'm disappointed to see that CR readers are reporting HG failures in their Foresters. Subaru had led me to believe that it had solved the HG failure problem a few years back with a different gasket material and the required use of some sort of radiator stop-leak. Subaru has to have known that the HG leak problems were continuing and only changed engine design recently.
I suspect this means that anyone who owns a Forester of that vintage, or perhaps even an Outback or an Imprezza (similar engines) is going to find that their vehicle is going to be valued less at resale or trade-in because even a vehicle without a failure now is at greater risk for needing an expensive repair sooner than later.
I sure hope that Subaru redeems itself by extending the warranty on HG repairs to at least 125,000 miles. A modern engine that is properly maintained should not need an expensive HG repair even at 125,000 imo. The article doesn't tell us at what mileage HG failures are occurring.
We've owned five Subarus since 2000, and so far have been lucky. Or it may just be that three of those Subarus are H6's, which appear to be pretty much immune from the HG failure problem.
Like I tell people, if it can not make 200K historically without major maintenance, it is junk on the lot brand new. Needless to say Subaru is not on our replacement vehicle supplier list anymore unless it is needed for 4 wheel service applications! Shame for Subaru.
As for the H6 engine, it shares the same design flaws, but keep your oil changed and try to operate each car at least 10K or more miles per year. Check out the following website to read why these gaskets fail and use those preventive measures. You may be all right. Several of us agree these guys may have this figured out. http://allwheeldriveauto.com/subaru-head-gasket-problems-explained/ As you may have already noted we pull a lot of miles out of Subies as well. Oh, I failed to mention, the 03 is in failure mode at 280K currently.
Mine is at 92,000 miles after a ~16 hour RT cruise to Chicago and I've decided to try to get one more winter out of it.
That also means the gaskets have far fewer holes and seams, so certainly the odds of failure are much lower.
Don't worry, we still have front and rear main seals to worry about.
Just teasing, no car is perfect. I'm sure Dodge and Honda owners would be delighted to get 160k miles out of their transmissions. $1300 repair bill they wish!
Per Steve:
He pulled a recent ticket and the bill was around $1,300. He typically doesn't see them until 160,000 miles or so though.
Maybe we need to wait 20 years for Subaru! Then again, my new Toyotas are all plastic! I wonder if that plastic can be used to buy the next car! Charge it! Fake money for fake cars?
Cost cutting, big time.
Tricks of the trade?
I have exactly the same problem with my 2003 Forester. Would you mind to share the link where you were able to download the pdfs?
Thank you for your help,
Regards,
Pavol
I have learned over the years that any kind of air leak in the intake area can create some real thought provoking issues. Not to mention codes getting toss at you. Hoses must fit tight and snug. If it wiggles or has a crack, toss it. The above mention hose was replaced with heater hose. Cheap and readily available.
At my last service, which was for a recall campaign regarding the front catalytic converter, the service rep said that I had some cracks in the A/C Belt (I looked later when I got home and didn't see them, but I expected the belt would have to be replaced around my 60k anyway) and that my brakes were low. Funny, because I didn't hear the agitator at all on the brakes until my ride home, I think it's coincidence.
The last few major services I've done were over at the AZP Installs in Kenilworth, and they've done some good work for me. I'll most likely be bringing it back again for the brakes/rotors.
I've noticed over the last few days of driving that there's been a pronounced vibration when I'm stepping on the brakes. I'm thinking/hoping that this is a brake/rotor issue. We'll see what happens after I replace them this fall.
Should I be concerned about the belt if I couldn't see any of these cracks that were mentioned on the last write-up, and what typically is the lifespan of a belt?
Another quirky thing that's happening with the car is something going on with the rims. I like the way the alloy wheels look, the 5-spoke design is great, but because they're a low-profile tire, I've had a few instances of impact-damage like potholes as a result.
Apparently one or all of the rims were "bent" and "out of round," but I'm not feeling any vibration when I'm driving, only the above mentioned when I brake.
It's also important to note that I'm also not losing air. I had the tires (OEM Yokohama) replaced with Bridgestone Potenzas at my local Costco due to the promotion they had which included road hazard, free rotations for life, and free nitrogen fill. When I had my Yoko's I noticed that in the colder months, October through March, one or more of my tires would activate the TPMS warning light. I'd fill them up with compressed air and be good for another few days. I don't think anything was wrong with the tires because as I'd completed rotations, the tires in the FRONT of the car were always the problem with the slow leak.
I'm either attributing this to either a bad seat between the tire and the rim, or maybe not enough bead sealer, or maybe the nature of compressed air. Either way, since the new tires plus the nitrogen fill, I haven't seen the TPMS light - and I've had the tires for about 18 months now.
I've found some refurbished/repaired OEM rims on eBay/Craigslist for around $125-150 per rim, which Costco will charge me an additional $15 per rim for to mount, balance, and nitrogen fill.
But, I'm wondering if it's possible or even worth it to switch to a steel rim. I know they're not as pretty, but I've never had any problem like this before this car. I partially blame this on the low-profile tires, but I think part of it is the nature of the aluminum alloy being softer than steel.
My questions, I guess, would be:
1. Would a steel rim prevent the problems I've had with low-profile tires?
2. Would I need to buy four brand new tires again to use with steel rims?
3. Can I use a standard-sized tire with new steel rims if I did have to replace the tires at some point down the road?
And a recap of the above questions:
1. What could be causing the vibration when I brake (my brakes are low, rotors are original, never machined)
2. Have switched from conventional to synthetic to conventional again for oil mostly for price. Is it worth or even possible to switch back to synthetic? I've heard problems with the gaskets swelling larger because of the bigger, natural, random size of conventional oil and the synthetic oil is smaller and could leak.
Just curious as to how much of a hassle this whole thing would be to get done.
Thanks again,
Pilot
Okay, usually vibration during braking can be traced to a warped rotor. Take it for a slow test drive in a parking lot maybe. Let go of the wheel and brake. The direction it turns to is the side for the rotor to check most of the time. I doubt you have a dial gauge handy, but jack it up anyway. Turn the wheel where you can see the edge of the rotor and turn it slowly by hand. Watch the edge of the rotor in relationship to something fixed like the caliper holder. May need a tool to turn the rotor. Be careful not to damage lug threads. Look for the side to side movement. The worse the vibration, the easier to see the warpness. Get a repair manual from the parts store. Rotors are easier to change than most people realize.
I have covered synthetic oil before. So you should be able to find that in posts search under my profile. Bottom line, New car is cheaper to operate long term on synthetic oil. Oil leakage is more of a problem on older units.
Low profile tires/rims tend to have more damage from hitting bumps. I do not run them at all. All of the fleet units here have steel rims with a regular tire that provides more give between the rim and the pavement on impact. I recommend you watch what a lot of fleet operators do and why.
I've run synth. oil since new, changing every 5k-7500 miles, no leaks, no oil burning, etc.