Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Anyway....
I didn't have to jack the rear of the van, I was able to get to everything by sliding under the van. It was very easy to do. The 'hardest' thing was loosening the muffler strap and lowering the exhaust, ha. I did not get a wiring harness as I'm only using this hitch for a 5 person bike carrier. However, seems I read somewhere, sometime, about being carefull with the wiring harness because of electrical requirements, etc. That might have been on the Nissan Frontier, not sure.
Good luck and enjoy!
Also, are splash guards really required in certain states as the description for the 2007 says? And if so, why?
(I also posted this in "Prices Paid & Buying Experience" because I wasn't sure where it should go.)
I suggest you save your money.
I traded in my Quest today for another van. This was simply not the right vehicle for me, after struggling with it for 2 1/2 years.
It's been fun chatting with many of you folks. Enjoy your vans.
If the tailgate feels resistance it will stop, just depends on what it hits. A friend of mine covers the tailgate switch with masking tape when he puts the bike rack on.
any input is appreciated. thankyou.
The engine is the best reason to buy one! We turned 31,000 miles so I can't comment on long-term reliability. Do the 07's still have the 5 year 60,000 mile powertrain warranty?
I checked the log and the average for the last 5,000 miles was 22.3. For the previous 5,000 (20-25K) it was 23.1. the highest ever tank was 27.5. The lowest real tankful seems to be 16 or so.
This compares very favorably with the long term test here of the 05 Odyssey - 18.6. This is for the 5spd automatic 05 SL.
The reclining rear seat was very popular on this trip.
Averaged 22.3 mpg.
~800lbs of people and cargo.
75-95 F
Tires (according to TPMS) 34-36
91 Octane
Terrain Hilly for 4 hours then flat for 14 hrs
I think the high mph kill the mileage going 65mph we were averaging 24.8 mpg (first 6 hours or so of driving plus it was hilly), when the speed increased to 75-80mph the average mpg fell...stabilizing to 22.3 at the end of our 18 hour trip.
Minivans are tall and wide - and have large side mirrors - so you move a lot of air. Another factoid I've heard is that a car moves 6 tons of air driving one mile at 65mph.
Anway...
I went to the hardware store and purchase a piece of foam pipe insulation, cut off a piece about 12" long, and split it in half. This allows me to put it on the lip of the rear tailgate just in case someone opens it.
I purchase the rack that folds, which works well, unless you have it loaded with 5 bikes like myself and then it takes two people to lower and raise it, ha.
Mark
My biggest complaint is the long wheelbase, and the nearness to the ground. This lets it drag in too many places, and makes for difficult parking because of the turning radius. However, the ride is superb.
Thanks to all who suggested the Yokohama Avid TRZ tires.
A lot of research on tires convinced me that these are a great replacement as far as specs are concerned. These tires turn 763 turns per mile, and the Goodyear originals turn 761. They are about .2 inch less in diameter as I remember. Therefore, I correct my gas mileage readings by the percentage difference.
Before leaving on a long trip out west I decided to replace the tires. My tire shop said they believed the original tires would hold up fine for the trip. I had 31,000+ miles on them. Considering the every hot highways, and high speeds in the west I choose to get new tires.
The originals wore very good and caused no problems as far as I was concerned.
The Yokohamas did a great job. Many miles were put on at 75 miles per hour in Kansas, Nebraska, and Tennessee.
In Yellowstone park we ran through ice 2 to 4 inches deep from a hailstorm that had ice balls as large as marbles. The hail do did not damage the paint as far as I could tell, but it did clean all the bugs off!
The tires never once hydro planed or performed poorly in any way.
The trip was about 5,000 miles from beginning to end.
Many miles were in mountains, some long delays at construction sites, very high and some low temperatures.
The over all gas mileage corrected for the tire size was 22.24 mpg. A couple of legs showed 27 mpg running on fairly flat ground at 75 miles per hour.
The van was very comfortable and served us very well.
The seats are very adjustable for cargo or passengers. We had two people most of the time, and a heavy load of luggage. In Yellowstone the gas has oxygen added. The book says not to use this gas, but there you have no choice. The "check engine" light burned for awhile, but went out when I got to lower altitudes and burned a few tanks of 87 octane gas. I did use some E85. The book says you can uses 85 octane at altitudes above 4,000 feet. Many miles were put on at 4,000 to 8,000 feet.
This van does anything I could expect it to do, an does it very well.
Thanks again for all the great comments on this forum!
I hope this information will be helpful to someone.
Are the Avid TRZ "T" or "H" rated tires? I have not had any luck with finding that brand in "H" rated tire.
They are calling the Quest a niche vehicle, and say its keeping the factory from full production.
Interesting read, but, I'm wondering how many, if any, sales will be conquered from Ford/Mercury once they stop making the Freestar/Monterey here in the next few months.
I'm also wondering if they will make this decision based on how well the 2007 Quest sales now that it has been 'refreshed'. I would assume that if 2007 sales increase, the production would stay here in the US.
Also of note, Motor Trend has a good minivan article comparison out this month. But, this time they compared a Quest SE with every single option against lesser models then criticized the Quest for being expensive. Guess that is better than comparing a mid-range Quest with upper level competitors then slamming it for not having all the goodies like last time. Ha..
Same here cool design interior and exterior multi sunroof 2 dvd screens black exterior with running boards.
When the warranty period is over I told my wife I’m going to “pimp” our van lower the suspension 24” wheels and a super-charger :shades:
Traditionally, MT would score vehicles by advertising dollars, so that might be considered progress.....
I like MT but they are too subjective at times. They care too much about performance. It could be advertising dollars or a bias. But you know what i still read it each month.
Has anyone taken advantage of this type of promotion?
Oh my God, I hope you didn't run true E85 in your van. E85 is 85% corn ethanol, 15% gasoline. The Quest isn't designed for E85.
The gas mileage must be adjusted because of the different diameters of the Eagle LS2 vs. the Yoko Avid TRZ.
The Eagle is 27.5 inches in diameter, the Yoko is 27.2. The Eagle turns 761 turns per mile, the Yoko turns 763.
Therefore, the wheels turn more per mile and the speedometer thinks the car has gone further than it really traveled. To be accurate you have to account for the difference. An adjustment of 99.797% will give the correct distance traveled, and the correct gas mileage.
In 5000 miles this amounts to about 10.15 miles error.
If this is not correct reasoning, please help me out so I can understand the correct method of calculation.
The AVID is a "T" rated tire. I never intend to travel over 118 MPH, so I do not think I need a "H" rated tire that can go 130 MPH.
Hope this answers your questions.
If you really want to take this MPG thing to the extreme, get a small notebook and record the date, odometer reading, miles traveled and gallons of gas at each fill-up. this way to you can really see how different types of driving affect your gas mileage. Also you can see how differnt maintenance affects your mileage. Like when to change the air filter or replacing an oxygen sensor. What you are doing is not wrong, tracking it manually is easier and there is no debating the accuracy.
As far as T vs H, I've heard from different tire stores that the T rated tires will give you a softer ride. It may not be noticeable to the "average" driver (whatever that means).
Regarding the T/H rating, I remember someone commenting somewhere that one needs to consider effect of running over debris and road irregularities at high speed which could lower the real life speed rating.
I never heard that argument.
it seems all those who have the Avid TRZ are very happy. I doubt a tire shop would put tires on a vehicle if it would adversely affect handling adn ride of the vehicle. T vs. H is probably personal preference and not a safety issue.
http://www.edmunds.com/ownership/tires/articles/43860/article.html
I record every gallon of gas I buy with the date and speedometer mileage. I do this for my van and Honda Ridgeline. I enjoy keeping up with it.
I have done this for years and keep the records in a spread sheet.
Thanks,
Bob
MPG on the way out was 22.something. That's going 75mph on the Interstate, and usually against the prevailing wind. Then we drove around 100 miles around Niagara, in traffic etc.
On the way back it was very hot (95) so we ran the A/C the whole way pretty hard but in recirculate mode. Still went 75 or so with traffic and average 25.9 for the return trip!
The Quest V6 is just a terrific engine!
She doesn’t use the cruise but keeps pressing the gas then letting it go then pressing it again annoying but I’ve learned to keep my mouth shut and take the mileage hit
HondaKid
Thanks,
HONDAKID
Thanks.
There is another thread for Quest pricing, called, logically enough, "Nissan Quest: Prices Paid and Buying Experience."
We run the AC in recirculate mode almost all the time. Seems to help.
If they kept my payments the saem or less for reasonable period of time, I might be interested (and toss in an extended warranty).
The banging was our faults, not Nissan; we have had no significant issues with the Quests. Worst thing that comes to my mind is my sunroof has memory issues. I stopped using the slide-open because of that, but the tilt works fine.
I think they improved in every aspect, but one major design flaw: The rear folding seat remains a one-piece bench design - not 60/40 as most other offer. Why did they do that?
I think otherwise it competes very well with the leaders.