Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!

Mazda3

16465676970180

Comments

  • tomcat630tomcat630 Member Posts: 854
    Sorry it was so long ago, but I have to reply!

    3238: "True, they have downsized those boats a little, but a Roadmaster still looks close to the old ones. The styling is still very Buick. Some traditions should be done away with and move on to new adventures in styling. Lincolns are still boats and the Crown Vics still float down the Interstates. ..."

    OK, first, the Roadmaster was dropped in 1996, 7 years ago!!! The traditions were done away with then!

    Second, big Fords are miles away from the 30 years ago. Driven any lately? No, Im sure since they are not approved by the "automotive correct media", it's dismissed. BTW: they are a lot smaller then the huge SUV's all over.

    3rd, these so called big cars are only 5% of the line up, how does this count as "the entire Detroit line up"?

    Sorry to hijack the Mazda 3 forum, carry on!
  • pzevpzev Member Posts: 807
    I ask because it may be quite a long time before I get to test drive a 2.0 auto. Also I'll probably wait on purpose a little longer since I've found that most of the time when I test drive the car it has less than 10 miles on it. Unless they have a 2.0 auto specifically for test drives I'll wait awhile so the people who want a Mazda3 right away can do the test drives and buy the lower mileage cars.

    When I buy a less than 10 mile car I wouldn't want someone to beat on it in a test drive so I try to show the same courtesy to other buyers. When the initial demand has gone down and there's more 2.0 autos available I'll probably go for it. It'll probably be a couple of years before I buy so I can wait.
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    sorry, I'm little bite slow today, but why your post is directed specifically to me? Do you just want to say you can't observe my RPM request?

    Don't worry, if you couldn't, I'm sure many others will do.
  • pzevpzev Member Posts: 807
    "the car had auto wipers and auto lights (just about the only things Canada gets that US doesn't)"

    On the MazdaUSA page when you click "safety" the window that pops up on the screen while the section is loading has a few things listed as a preview for the section. The last one on the list says "auto light system". This is mentioned nowhere else on the site or specs so it may be a mistake. Maybe someone on the west coast can confirm if the US Mazda3 has this or not. Not that it's a big deal but would be nice to have.
  • pzevpzev Member Posts: 807
    Oh no reason. Just my original post used your quote, but it was kind of a general statement which is why I didn't mention your name. When you commented on it I wasn't sure if it was directed to me or not. I don't think many people are going to choose a 2.0 auto as the test drive vehicle anytime soon. ;)

    I was just trying to figure out from you or someone else if the 2.0 auto Mazda3 would end up significantly slower than the 2.0 auto Protege. It seems to me with the 2.0 Protege engine having more low-end torque and the new 2.0 having most of the power gain at high rpm's, that the extra weight and gear ratios may really hurt it. 0-60 isn't the best method to figure this out but having a 0-60 time of 11 seconds would tell me it isn't a very fast car, and may be too slow even by my standards.

    Toyota claims it's new Toyota Prius with CVT will get 0-60 in 10.5 seconds I think. The Mazda3 may be even slower than a hybrid!
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    - if you are concern about performance of the 2.0L, then you will figure out during your test drive.

    - In any case you shouldn't relly on our 0-60 discussion here to chose or reject the car. We just do it for fun. To be honnest, there is still many incertitude about the performance of the Mazda3 in a real life on the real road condition.

    Take an example: I have no idea how the activematic is programmed, what is the parameters that take as input in order to shift up/down. With the Mazda2 2.0L-AT, the electronic could decide to stay longer on the lower gear than with the Protegé's. In that case, you might get similar or better performance, even the finale drive of the Mazda3 is longer. I even heard that the auto tranny have a learning possibility, i.e., it means it will adapt with each person driving style after few days of learning (though I haven't yet found a reliable proof of this feature). I guess you get the picture...

    In addition - I know it's kind of stupid - but I still have a doubt about the spec given by Mazda, that's why I ask our friends to check the RPM.

    B.
  • lavaorange3lavaorange3 Member Posts: 128
    Well, I was going to wait until March to buy a Mazda3 hatch out here in Hawaii...my 2002 P5 was going to be paid off in Feb. But this past Saturday, upon bringing the cat home from the vet, the cat carrier leaked out some...urine. Argh!! And despite my best efforts, we're left with a bit of odor...hmmmm. So, I think I'll make the payoff on the rest of the loan like now, and try for one of the first new 3's in the islands. I might have to change my name to titaniumgray3 cause the dealers are telling me Orange is going to be hard to find out here. So here's a tip: don't buy a used red 2002 P5 in Hawaii if you can at all avoid it!
  • creakid1creakid1 Member Posts: 2,032
    wongpres Nov 18, 2003 1:16pm
    “however, there is quite a bit of tire/suspension noise, so much so that I'm seriously questioning how bad the 17's must be. It was so bad that I'm now debating whether or not I'm going to get the GFX (which is the package that includes the 17's.”

    It should improve w/ the quiet Turanza LS-H tires, but, still, some of ya are gonna need the 15”s. ;-) Unless you drive at least as aggressive as I. Even then, you probably will only want to step up to the 16"s.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Your MPH numbers are correct. I grabbed the wrong constant in a hurry.
  • lavaorange3lavaorange3 Member Posts: 128
    A quote from my contact at McKenna Mazda in Kaneohe, Hawaii: "I am told that our Mazda3s will be hitting the docs Friday next week. We should receive some the following week. The minute I get one I will contact you to set up a test drive."

    I can't wait!
  • combustible1combustible1 Member Posts: 264
    sure that wasn't a Mazda publicity release, instead of an ordinary review, dev28etc.??

    That thing was positively gushing! not that it's a bad thing necessarily, but makes it harder to take very seriously. (although, I'm secretly hoping that this reviewers reaction will reflect my first hand impressions too!)
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    beside the second place in 04 European COTY, Mazda3 won Car of the Year in following countries: Croatian, Turkey, Czech, and Denmark.

    Bruno
  • creakid1creakid1 Member Posts: 2,032
    wongpres Nov 18, 2003 1:16pm
    "- interior was of BP5/BP6-type. The blue part of the cloth was quite nice, soft yet durable. The black cloth felt similar to the Mazda6, rougher but durable"

    A slight advantage over the BP7/8 fabric texture to cuddle you?
  • creakid1creakid1 Member Posts: 2,032
    http://www.autosupermart.com/auto/images/news/2004mazda3/hi_p_25.- - - jpg

    It's the notchback sedan's permanent rear shelf that was helping. In case you wonder why the 5-dr 323 hatch used to be cool sleek fastback shape & switched to wagon-shape after '98, it's to cut down the overall flexing. Just look at today's Nissan Z car. That fastback shape w/o the G35 coupe's notchback rigid rear shelf means the need to add a horribly bulky brace bar between the upper rear wheel wells.

    I've always thought that a fastback hatch should keep a rigid metal rear shelf covering a fraction of the trunk & can be removed temporarily when carrying large cargo. I wonder if the Saab 9000 hatch also had a rigid bar on the removable rear shelf.
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    sure that wasn't a Mazda publicity release, instead of an ordinary review, dev28etc.??

    Sure it is. It's taken straight from Mazda Mazda3 complete press kit, which has been posted here one time or another, including the graph of flexing and torsional rigidity.
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    The car looks VERY solidly built! I'm impressed by the many reinforcements and the litle details they put on it.

    However, the GX w/15" alloys looks tall, hence the NEED (not want, but NEED) for at least 16" alloys.

    Dinu
  • mdaffronmdaffron Member Posts: 4,421
    Please excuse me if I missed it, but were those oil filter and other engine pics of the 2.0 or the 2.3?

    Meade
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    It's the MZR 2.0L engine. But the 2.3L would have the same layout because the 2.0L uses the same engine block/cylinder head/oil pan. In designing the 2.0L Mazda just removes the S-VT, balancer shaft, and de-strokes the cylinders.
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    yes, this car seems to be "well born". I'm trully impressed how Mazda can achieve such careful design in such short period of time.

    I agree, there is too much space between the fenders and the 15" tires. 16" would look better. The car seats hight, but also Mazda keeps the same wheel offset across the range of rim diameters/tire widths, that's why the smaller wheels doesn't fill well the space. On the Protegé, the offset inceases with respect to the tire size.
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    I can't get over those details. That's what I like in a car and this is what shows how much car you're getting rather than how many cupholders it has (the 3 has 2 and 4 bottle holders). It looks to be very well engineered. I'm really impressed. Wow!

    Dinu
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    I wonder if the dealer has removed the engine cover before taking the picture or rather the N/A engine doesn't have it? Because here is how the european 2.0L engine bay looks

    http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/brunoluong/vwp?.dir=/Powertrain&- amp;- amp;.dnm=Engine+bay+of+the+MZR+2.0L.jpg&.view=t
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    I looked carefully at the NA pic and I can't seem to find where the cover would bolt on. Unless it's held in place by clips not bolts, I think we're getting it w/out the cover then...

    Dinu
  • fdannafdanna Member Posts: 263
    That oil filler cap is a Ford part and so is the fact that the engine uses 5W-20 oil (a very Fordistic trait).

    Also, I don't like the fact that the rear bumper was not modified to hold a north american license plate better. It's going to hang incorrectly just like the current Volvo S40 (looks like crap with an american plate).
  • wongpreswongpres Member Posts: 422
    Dinu:

    Just got the call, Ontario Mazda just got their first shipment (yesterday was just the single car for each dealership). If I have time during lunch, I may drive by (but I'm quite busy today).

    fdanna:

    Good question about the bumpers, but this is why they didn't modify it to better hold N. American (and also JDM's) license plates:

    - sport bumpers are common world-wide, so the same bumper is used for Europe (long license) and N. America/JDM (short license)
    - regular bumpers are different for various regions so you would think they could shorten the license for N. America/JDM. However, all bumpers are two-pieces, the body coloured part, and a seperate black piece at the bottom, and the N. American-spec regular bumper has a common bottom black piece as the sport bumper (which has to be molded for the long license).

    It's really hard to describe without showing pictures (or beter yet seeing the real thing), but basically Mazda would have had to make a new mold (for the lower black piece) to make it work. And obviously they made a business decision that the benefit wasn't worth the cost.
  • combustible1combustible1 Member Posts: 264
    "Sure it is. It's taken straight from Mazda Mazda3 complete press kit, which has been posted here one time or another, including the graph of flexing and torsional rigidity."

    I recognized most of the info came from Mazda itself, but the first few paragraphs contained an actual review of the car. This is the part I was mostly referring to. It's as if the guy read all the glowing Mazda source info first, thus coloring his objectivity, and from that, tailored his review.
  • bluong1bluong1 Member Posts: 1,927
    image
  • neomonkeyneomonkey Member Posts: 32
    Darn, that picture is way too dark, can't see any part of the car except the front. Looking good though!!!
  • fowler3fowler3 Member Posts: 1,919
    "It's as if the guy read all the glowing Mazda source info first, thus coloring his objectivity, and from that, tailored his review."

    You would be surprised how many reviewers do that.

    fowler3
  • howkramerhowkramer Member Posts: 3
    An alert for all Mazda 3 fans in Vancouver: Wolfe Mazda (Boundary / 1st Avenue) has two models in their showroom, a titanium grey hatchback and a winning blue sedan. First time I ever saw the sedan in "real life." The back end's a little big (Nissan Altima Lite). Overall, the hatch looks more balanced.
  • odysseus3odysseus3 Member Posts: 19
    How does the Titanium Grey look on the hatch?
  • combustible1combustible1 Member Posts: 264
    well I suppose the most important gushing and glowing should be coming from me, when I get that first chance look for meself. ;-)
  • combustible1combustible1 Member Posts: 264
    hmm.. so the sedan lacks "balance", you say..

    is that opinion based on the sports package or non sports pkg.. or both?

    and is it solely the long bumper that causes this balance shortcoming of which you speak??
  • dinu01dinu01 Member Posts: 2,586
    Looks to be an exact copy of the Nissan copper. Not bad.

    Dinu
  • wongpreswongpres Member Posts: 422
    Having gotten two rides, I finally drove a Mazda3 today after the dealer got a shipment of 10. Given that I got to ride in the 16's yesterday I chose to testdrive a 17-inch shod vehicle today to compare with the 16's. So the car was a Mazda3 GT sedan with GFX package and auto in silver.

    My thoughts:

    - just to totally confirm for the Canadian-folks, the GT sedan with GFX has black taillights (so all Canadian-spec Mazda3 sedans have red taillights except for GT with GFX package)
    - the car drives like a Mazda6 but more nimble. However, in comparison to the Mazda6, the car has more suspension noise. I've only driven the Mazda6 2.3l with auto, and the Mazda3 2.3l with auto felt more powerful & torquey (so the reduced weight overcame the Mazda3 2.3l tuning disadvantage)
    - the 17's only have a little bit more suspension noise than the 16's, and the ride is also just a little bit harsher. Overall, there is a good amount of suspension & tire noise. But, just like my ride with the 16's, the car I drove today wasn't PDI'd, so the tire pressures may have been higher from the shipping. Bottom line, this is no Camcord, ride is firm and noiser than the Mazda6
    - you can't hear the engine at idle but when you rev the engine sounds are very sporty
    - my testdrive was after work so it was dark. The electroluminescent gauges are AWESOME, especially at night with a soft blue backlight.
    - the current gear number is displayed in both D and M modes of the automatic. Mazda6 auto owners can correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the gear number is only displayed in M mode on the Mazda6. I don't know which one I would prefer.
    - today was the first time I saw the Mazda3 hatch in real life. I'll reserve my comments on the looks until I see one in daylight, but I got an idea of its proportions. One of the hatch's was the orange colour. Again, I can't really comment on that colour until I see in daylight

    That's about all for now, I'm going to put down my own order next week or the week after. My car & packaging will be:
    1. Mazda3 GT sedan with GFX and auto in Titanium Gray (exactly what I drove today except for colour)
    or
    2. Mazda3 GT hatch with auto in Winning Blue. I'm moving to a new house next year and the garage for the second car is quite short. I actually have a rope measurement of the Mazda3 GFX sedan and will compare it to the house this weekend. While the sedan should just fit, if I find the tolerance to be too tight then I'll get the shorter hatch (yes the garage is so marginal that those 2 inches matter)
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Nice!

    Personally, I don't care if the MZ3 is a little noisier than the MZ6. Everything will be REAL quiet when I'm dead.
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Anybody know what tires are on the 17s? My choice would be the Michelin Pilot AS but I suspect I won't be that lucky.
  • lmp180psulmp180psu Member Posts: 399
    "That's about all for now, I'm going to put down my own order next week or the week after. My car & packaging will be:
    1. Mazda3 GT sedan with GFX and auto in Titanium Gray (exactly what I drove today except for colour)"

    That will be the same configuration I am looking at (except GFX=Sport package in US):) The titanium gray is both sporty and elegant at the same time, without the high maintenance of black.

    You said the ride is firm and there is suspension noise; is it a controlled firm ride, or a bouncy firm ride. What kind of suspension noise are you talking about?

    I am jealous!!:)
  • wongpreswongpres Member Posts: 422
    mazda6s:

    The 17's come with Goodyear Eagle RS-A.

    I agree with you on the Michelin Pilot A/S. Once the OEM tires wear out, I will probably go to that tire as well.

    lmp180psu:

    I still have not seen a real-life Mazda3 in titanium gray. However, I've seen seen the RX-8 titanium gray in real-life so I have a good idea how it'll look. This weekend I will be visiting a few dealer lots to see if I can find my colour & option combo for confirmation.

    It's most definitely a controlled firmness. The suspension on this car is very, very impressive. Knowing of my impending purchase, I've been test driving a bunch of cars lately, all of which are of a higher class than the Mazda3, and I can't begin to tell you how impressed I am with the Mazda3's mechanicals overall (plus add in the price factor and I confirmed today that the Mazda3 is my car).

    But this is a noisy car - I should correct myself and say that it's road noise as opposed to suspension noise. As such, I think it's the tires.
  • creakid1creakid1 Member Posts: 2,032
    "That will be the same configuration I am looking at (except GFX=Sport package in US):) The titanium gray is both sporty and elegant at the same time, without the high maintenance of black."

    Don't Canadian Titaniums get blue cloth instead? I would choose the titanium if it's like this. I swear, I'll rather have the PZEV 2.0's Starlight Green w/ light-beige cloth. That combo will look way cool if I add the black taillights, as if to out-handsome a new light-green 325i.

    Darn balance-shaft less! California should make the balance-shafted 2.3 PZEV engine not just mandatory for the base Focus, but the base Mazda3 as well!
  • creakid1creakid1 Member Posts: 2,032
    "(plus add in the price factor and I confirmed today that the Mazda3 is my car).

    But this is a noisy car"

    It has to be worse than the BMW in some way significantly, not just slightly. Otherwise, BMW will go out of business.
  • cambocambo Member Posts: 10
    Does anyone have any updates on the arrival of the 3 in California?
  • wongpreswongpres Member Posts: 422
    Yes, Canadian-spec titanium is combined with blue/black cloth. But if you really want blue/black, why not just order the cloth and tell your dealer to swap it? I don't imagine the front seats would be that difficult to swap, though the rears may be difficult (but I don't know enough about this).

    Funny you compared to BMW, cause one of the cars I testdrove was a 325. The Mazda3 is just a little bit more firm than the 325. However, where the 325 shines through is that it's much quieter and more refined while having performance. The Mazda3 also has performance (for a FWD anyways) and is very smooth, but not the refinement of the 325.

    Which brings to why I'm getting the Mazda3. The Mazda3 feels about $5,000 cheaper than the BMW whereas it's almost 50% off pricetag wise!
  • mazda6smazda6s Member Posts: 1,901
    Tires have a huge affect on road noise.
  • fowler3fowler3 Member Posts: 1,919
    "Tires have a huge affect on road noise."

    Yeah, if they didn't touch the ground it would be absolutely silent. ;)

    I wondered what the "noise" part meant, too.

    How does it compare to the outgoing Protegé in noise..more...or less?
    Is there a discernable hop or porpoising?

    fowler3
  • wongpreswongpres Member Posts: 422
    Sorry, I've never driven or ridden in a Protegé so I can't do that comparison.
  • lmp180psulmp180psu Member Posts: 399
    "Don't Canadian Titaniums get blue cloth instead? I would choose the titanium if it's like this. I swear, I'll rather have the PZEV 2.0's Starlight Green w/ light-beige cloth. That combo will look way cool if I add the black taillights, as if to out-handsome a new light-green 325i."

    At first I wished that the Titanium came with the black/blue interior, but after thinking about it, the black/red matches better with the red instrument panel lights. Now if the panel lights were blue, of course I would want black/blue cloth. But, the interior is so nice either way that it really doesn't matter :)
  • dev282938dev282938 Member Posts: 5
    i drove both models. i was driving about 60 or 70 in very curvy roads , up down hills, it was a great road. the car has no noise from the suspension, its amazing and quiet. i wish i could see it in leather. handling is great, you guys will love it once you try them both. the sedan 4 door is a lot better looking to me. the 5 door is more curvaceous, like lines of air going over it.

    compared to the bmw i have , this one has more room inside, it isnt as wide so i guess the bmw feels bigger when driving but the 3 is so much cheaper for what you get. 2 for 1 i guess.
    its truly amazing. not as well done inside as the rx8 but still great . with nav and stuff, amazing.
Sign In or Register to comment.