Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
John Hine Mazda in San Diego just got them.
Here is what I observed during my testdrive. Depending on the type of pavement, one can hear more or less a roar noise from the rear tires. You can't blame on the tires alone because: first the noise is transmitted through the chassis and come from the back floor pannel of the car. Otherwise, the car noise would be heard mostly through the windows. Second, the tires that are equipped my car is one of the quietest out there: the Turanza (and with the correct tire pressures during my testdrive). Driving back to back the Mazda3 and P5, I feel the Mazda3 is more noisy in this aspect (but the engine is definitively not buzzy as the P5's). Overall, I think the NVH-wise, The Mazda3 doesn't equal more refined/upper scale cars, but is perfectly livable and in part with other "economy" cars. You can always argue that I drove the Hatch and not the Sedan, but from Preston's report, Sedan is not much better.
Suspension: I think Mazda designs a perfect balance between firmness and ride comfort. It's less firm than the Protegé's, but it's firmer than the average cars, which shouldn't be taken as a benchmark. Personally I wouldn't mind having an even firmer suspension setup, but that is just me. Oh, and it's definitively a "controlled" firmness. That's the three things that I love about the Mazda3 rear suspension: controlled, accurate, and quick response. The damping of the rear should be even better than the Mazda6 because the later uses an angled short dampers instead of a vertical/longer dampers in the Mazda3. The 6 however has a better designed front suspension (double wish-bones).
Weight wise it's not brainer: give me the light and fun Mazda3 any day.
Bruno
PS: do you all forget my RPM reading request?
"Yes, Canadian-spec titanium is combined with blue/black cloth. But if you really want blue/black, why not just order the cloth and tell your dealer to swap it? I don't imagine the front seats would be that difficult to swap, though the rears may be difficult (but I don't know enough about this)."
I'm sure the rear won't be hard to swap either, as long as the dealer won't black mail me to do so. When I was drooling over a Cosmo Silver '81 Scirocco S, the dealer was unwilling to swap the red/blk w/ grey/blk from the Mars Red one! Anyway, our folks didn't buy one, no way! Not for us kids.
"Funny you compared to BMW, cause one of the cars I testdrove was a 325. The Mazda3 is just a little bit more firm than the 325."
The 4dr 325i still has the choice of regular or lowered sport suspension in N.A. Is the one you drove a 4-dr w/o the pull-out thigh cushion-length? That's the softer-riding car w/o the sport package. The 2-dr 325is has the sport suspension std, regardless whether it's 16" or 17".
If the 3 rides firmer than the 325 w/ the lowered sport suspension, then it's too firm!
Not sure about that. A rear wheel drive platform, an amazing inline 6 engine, a nicer interior, and probably the most important: an blue/white helix badge are something that Mazda don't have.
I completely agree with your assessment - the noise is mainly tire noise but there is some suspension noise too. Overall it's noisy, pure and simple. And I also agree that the rear suspension is better on the Mazda3 but the front is better on the Mazda6.
This morning I stopped by the dealer to see the cars in daylight. The colours and hatch vs sedan is subjective so I won't comment, but those 17's have seriously low sidewalls (sidewall looked thinner than the 195/50R16 from the Pro/Pro5).
I didn't forget your RPM request, but I never held any constant speed for a significant amount of time during my testdrive.
creakid:
Ok, I kinda lied about testing the BMW 325 - it was actually a 2003 320 (I said 325 cause they're similar and most US folks don't know what a 320 is). It was a pretty stripped model so I'm pretty sure it was the softer suspension.
But as Bruno says, BMW won't be going out of business because of Mazda (I won't comment on the Bangle issue though).
Owners who give their cars names, think of them as pets, like their cars to *talk to them* a little.
A car that is totally quiet would be too isolating, like riding in a sound chamber.
fowler3
The only thing I'm concerned about when considering the Mazda3 is that Mazda has chosen such a funky tire size; it may be difficult to impossible to swap out to a better tire after the OEMs wear out. I've even tried some plus-sizing and I still can't find any alternatives.
Before any of you say, "Well, the new car will create a market for this size tire and we'll see other tires show up soon," lemme tell ya -- everybody said this about the 195/55-15s on the Protege ES when it came out in '99. Almost five years later, pickin's are still slim -- in fact my BFG upgrade was only doable as a modified plus-zero (from 195/55-15 to 205/55-15) which results in a minor speedo error of about 1 mph at 60 mph.
Meade
Dinu
Compare this:
http://albums.photo.epson.com/j/ViewPhoto?u=4126411&a=3096109- 0&p=65740834&f=0
... to this:
http://galactic-voyage.com/images/Characters/Nute%20Gunray.jpg
Uncanny resemblance, ain't it???
Meade
Dinu
"Ok, I kinda lied about testing the BMW 325 - it was actually a 2003 320 (I said 325 cause they're similar and most US folks don't know what a 320 is). It was a pretty stripped model so I'm pretty sure it was the softer suspension."
Wait a minute, does the stripped 320i have 195/65-15 std just like the '99 323i? I rode one & it was cushier comfier than any Mercedes C-class prior to '02. Were you comparing a 205/55-16 Mazda3 to a 205/55-16 3-series' ride comfort?
Mazda3 17's were a bit firmer than the Mazda3 16's, and the Mazda3 16's was quite a bit firmer than the BMW 320 16's.
we have something in common, as I am deaf in my right ear. You would think that we would be looking for similar things in a car, but I guess not, because I would prefer more quietness in a car.
Even in the close confines of a car, if there is too much wind, tire and engine noise in combination, it can make it difficult for me to hear my passengers. The quieter the environment, the less neck-craning and diminished concentration from driving as I struggle to hear what others are saying.
This is one reason I don't drive stick, as it would be one more distraction for me.
Maybe you are deaf in your left ear, just the opposite of me. This would explain our different preferences.
I guess I should have been born in Great Britain.. I would have no problems then and could buy any car without consideration of the noise factor (w/the driver on the right hand side and therefore perfect hearing for me!).
No, if you drive stick more often, it will become a second nature, no distraction what so ever.
I have an idea for Mazda, they should offer an pair of ear plugs as free accessory for the Mazda3. Sorry, just kidding.
You know when you're at that point, when after a stop you discover that you're in 4th gear and don't remember how you got there.
Umm, no this is more a beginner's mistake. Advanced drivers would have downshifted. I'd say you're at that point when you tell people that you drive a stick and they say "wow, I didn't even notice you shifting."
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Great car. I will be going back Saturday and have my wife drive it as it is for her. For those interested in performance it will turn the 1/4 mile in high 16s and 84mph. It was very quiet as far as I was concerned. Look out Civics and Corollas you have BIG time competition.
Don't ask me where they put it in the sedan.
Oh yeah, one more thing that N. American-spec Mazda3's don't get - we don't get the little parking light at the top of the high-beam (as can be seen from this picture on Bruno's site):
http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/brunoluong/vwp?.dir=/Album+02&am- p;.dnm=red_sedan_4.jpg&.src=ph&.view=t&.hires=t
P.S. Just noticed that was an auto, not a 5-speed. So the actual time should at least be sub-9.
80% Japan
0% Canada/US
The other 20% is unaccounted for.
Dinu
I have a 91 Maxima - in a straight line it's faster than my Protege 2.0, but it has no steering feel and in turns you really have to slow down. Not so in the PRO
Yes, I like the PRO better.
Dinu
You know when you're at that point, when after you stop and get back up to speed, you discover that you're in 4th gear and don't remember how you got there.
Welcome to the club!
"Even in the close confines of a car, if there is too much wind, tire and engine noise in combination, it can make it difficult for me to hear my passengers."
You could ask them to speak louder. Some may not know you can't hear.
"Maybe you are deaf in your left ear, just the opposite of me. This would explain our different preferences."
Yes, you are right about the left ear. The advantage, if there is one, I can't hear the wind noise the left outside mirror makes, unless I open the window.
Try this one -- I'm almost blind in my right eye. So I have to be extremely careful passing and pulling back into the right lane. Fortunately, signaling a pass well in advance, most other drivers are courtious and allow me to pull out. Talking about "blind spots" on the MZ3, LOL, you have no idea...
I agree with fdanna and Bruno about stick shifting. It becomes second nature quickly and with practice you can shift unnoticable to passengers. What you should pay attention to when carrying passengers is to not make hard stops throwing them forward.
Always drive with your passengers' comfort in mind. Hotdog it when you are alone. With a full load no small car is at its best performance.
fowler3
16.7 second, 84.9mph 1/4 mile, 8.8 second 0-60mph and 132 mph top speed. Cartest2000 is very very accurate if you load the correct data.
You'll like this:15.9 second, 89mph 1/4 mile times, 0-60mph in 7.5 seconds, top speed 134mph.
You're right, I like that.
" - the car drives like a Mazda6 but more nimble."
I like that, too!
Thanks, everyone, for the reports and sightings.
- However don't know how to input the shift point for the automatic tranny. Do you have any idea how Cartest200 do that?
- Do you have a dyno test for Mazda3? Or you just take the official torque curve and scale it down? What about wheel weights?
- Could you please run Cartest200 with the 2.0L?
Thanks
http://groups.msn.com/BrunoLuong/photos.msnw -> Video Page -> together_part1 & together_part2
BTW, Brampton is a suburb on Toronto. Some Mazda 3s have also been spotted at Pickering/Ajax Mazda.
Dinu
Please do us a favor, bring your camera there and don't forget a lot of memory/films. We especially need photos of:
- Sedan in Sand Mica
- Sedan in Indigo (dark) Blue
The dealer where I did my testdrive is also very large (the owner has 3 dealerships in Toronto), hence they got they got a good number of cars early as well. Dinu, it seems the Avante's are quite a bit behind (I went to Avante Toronto last night and they only had 3 Mazda3's, and Avante Richmond Hill still hasn't called me).
Anyways, the dealer where I did my testdrive had several indigo blues. But the most interesting colour/combo this dealer had was a Sand Mica sedan GT with GFX (sorry didn't have my camera).
They are on page 55 of this PDF.
I'll run a CARTEST2000 of the 2.0l shortly.
CARTEST2000 simulation shifts the auto at 6500rpms which is the red line and the peak hp.
Sedan.
I used 2750lb for the car weight.
I don't know how much more the auto weighs.
5sp performance:131mph top speed, 16.3 seconds, 86mph for 1/4 mile, 0-60mph in 8.1 seconds.
auto performance:128mph top speed, 17.1 seconds, 82mph for 1/4 mile, 0-60mph in 9.4 seconds.