Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
i just went over to the chevy dealer to look at some malibu's. the 2 tone interiior is over rated. the door panels are all plastic, unlike the fusion which has cloth inserts. the chrome in hte malibu interior looks like what it is, plactic plated chrome.
the buttons on the steering wheel of the malibu are rediculously small. impala is much better. fusion is better for functionality, although the buttons seem kind of cheap.
a nice 4cyl/4 speed auto malibu lists for over 24k. as mentioned previously, a fusion is about 3k less.
Obviously this 2010 Fusion is one equipped with the nav. I'm curious to see one without it.
I remember reading an article about the Ford Escape regarding the 2009 model. They state that not only is the truck getting the new 2.5 liter like the Fusion, but a revised version of the 3.0 24v v6. Does anyone know if the Fusion will also get this upgrade?
I hope they improve the fuel economy too, especially considering that the Sonata and Malibu get 32 now!
-Ed
to me, the 6 speed auto is the biggest improvement and is already available in the fusion.
i don't hang my hat on epa numbers. usually i can beat them, sometimes by a lot.
It gets the same 2.5L I4 including a hybrid and the PIP 3.0L making 240 hp with better FE than the current 221 hp 3.0L.
The 2.5L I4 models get 6 speed manual and autos to replace the current 5 speeds.
consider the malibu 'cause the lack of one single feature.
Here's the Fusion spy shot:
Here's a larger Fusion spy shot pic so you can see the detail better and compare it to the pic from the Flex. Note that the buttons and knobs are all identical in the nav equipped versions.
Link to pic.
Here's the nav equipped Flex.
Does anyone have any insight into this? I have read speculation that a 3.0L based on the 3.5L is in the works, but nothing concrete.
when i started there was about 3k miles on the car.
the trip was 4 people from central ct to western pa and back. lots of hills, highest point 2250 ft above sea level. we ran the a/c about 75% of the time and averaged 26 mpg. the explorer would have averaged about 18.
i sat in the back for a couple 3 hours stints. there was enough head room and plenty of leg room for me(over 6ft).
even when my wife was driving 80, there wasn't much wind or road noise and my mother seated next to me in the back, had no clue we were going that speed.
anyways, i think it worked out pretty well and will only get better.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/14/spy-shots-2010-mercury-milan-is-up-next/
- Robert -
The future plan for Mercury is to sell smaller premium vehicles while Lincoln focuses on larger premium vehicles.
The Mercury Sable is gone after next year along with the Mountaineer and there are no Mercury versions of the new Flex e.g.
Doesn't sound like Mercury will have very much to offer. Still wouldn't be surprised to see Ford discontinue the brand altogether. These are touch times and things are only going to get tougher for the next few years. Boz
With the shift towards fuel economy it will now be viable to offer premium versions of smaller cars (B and C size) that would not have worked before.
You should check out the 2010 Fusion I4 - best in class fuel economy for both the regular and hybrid version, according to Ford.
1- GM paid out $1B to shut down Olds. It ain't cheap to shut down a car line.
2- Who will sell Lincolns if Merc is out? Dealers won't put up with Lincolns only and Ford may not want to move the line to Ford dealers.
Paul
It will also help that Lincoln and Mercury will no longer be rebadged Fords.
At Fremont Ford I did not see that LM is separated from Ford. But Mazda has both separate showroom (in same building) and separate service adviser.
Noticed right away less road noise, car feels more confident in the turns. Took the Fusion into some mountains for some twisties and there was a definite difference. Sure wish I could get back into the sedan forums, after reading what some are posting, I don't deserve to be banished for life. Guess if your a Ford fan and question the Honda/Toyota fans, its a no, no.
BTW, what highway mileage are 4cyl auto Fusion/Milan owners averaging here?
I have a 2000 5cyl Volvo that can average 33 mpg on a long mostly flat highway trip.... so I laugh when I see small new cars rated at only about 30 mpg hwy.
I have a 2000 5cyl Volvo that can average 33 mpg on a long mostly flat highway trip.... so I laugh when I see small new cars rated at only about 30 mpg hwy.
Final EPA mileage has not been released for the 2010 Fusion yet but Ford is claiming at least 33 highway for the 2.5L I4 in that one. I think that's a 4 or 5 mpg improvement over the current 2.3L PLUS more power. Not as much as the I5 in your Volvo but still a big step in the right direction and it is class leading (or will be) or very close to it. You can also get the 2010 Hybrid Fusion which gets at least 38 mpg city. Highway is something like 33 or 34 IIRC. Plus you can run on batteries up to 47 or 48 mph which is definitely class leading as is the city mpg for a hybrid. The next closest is the Camry hybrid at 33 city.
My numbers may be off by a bit as I'm going off of memory and you can read most of it here.
FWIW, I had a 1991 Ford Thunderbird 5.0 V8 that got 32 mpg on a drive from OKC to Dallas...
Accordwhen they wear out (still have plenty of life left at 42k) with the Potenza G009 or G019. I have them on my old '96, and it actually handles better in the wet than my 2006!BTW Scape, I thought you'd be interested to know that my folks finally bought a new car in June to go along with their Civic. Just like the one below. They told me it was the best thing I've ever talked them into.
Pretty cool how Ford has improved the Fusion/Milan
I am sure everyone has heard how the Fusion/Milan are now rated very high in safety! Ford/Volvo have 16 vehicles with safety awards! Ford is listening to consumers.. :shades:
A question... has anyone seen the NON-Hybrid gauges?
The front-end design. Just my thoughts; I always rather liked the front-end of the Fusion and the Milan. Now they seem so over-styled, not as good looking as they once were.
:P
Actually, exterior style isn't typically high on my list. If it is conservative (as my cars are), then fine. If it draws attention to itself, let it be positive. I don't have a problem with the cars fundamentally, I just don't care for the more *ahem* easily-noticed front-end on either one.
Better than the Avenger and Sebring though, for sure!
You've seen the hybrid's gauges right? I think it was you whom I was conversing with about those on the midsize thread, no?