Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
One would think there would be one or two though, maybe they were sold.
In my experience earlier in the summer, most dealers had one or two base models (probably "ad cars") with sticks. It was impossible to find LS's with sticks.
I went to visit a friend this weekend in D.C. At the airport, they tried to give me a Cavalier and I refused. I just couldn't stand two days in that wretched car. The alternate they gave me was a Cobalt.
After spending two days in the Cobalt, I'm quite impressed. I've read a lot of reviews of the Cobalt, but rarely did they give it many compliments. Usually they just said it's better than the Cavalier. The Cobalt is very responsive (I barked the tires starting off on several occasions), it handles great and GM has finally figured out how to build a nice looking and user friendly interior.
Kudos Chevrolet! You done good!
:::::::::::end quote::::::::::::::
And may I add, looked better than its replacement.
Loren
2) When can we expect to see a Convertible Cobalt? Not sure if it's easy to make one, but it sounds nice.
2FastDre.
2) When can we expect to see a Convertible Cobalt? Not sure if it's easy to make one, but it sounds nice. "
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~end quote~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1) No
2) That is called the Solstice. Base Solstice, plus air $21K plus or minus $1K depending on if you need it now, or later on. Dealers may pile on extra side sticker prices, so be prepared to smile, laugh and walk away. A convertible would be too close or the same as a Solstice in price and look nothing close to as good.
Loren
2FastDre.
The resale on an econo car convertible is not all that good.
It is usually a lose - lose situation to buy one.
The Mustang convertible may be a best option. Also there
are lots of used Sebrings. I personally would never own a
convertible without a roll bar. Another option is to win the
lottery, then buy a BMW or Mercedes convertible. :shades:
Loren
2FastDre.
The person wanted a back seat, so those two are a non-starter.
That is why I suggested a Mustang or Sebring. An a V6 is not too expensive.
Wonder why people would pay that much for an XLR, when a Vette
is a better car for less money. If I want chisel look, I would go CTS.
With extra cash on hand, the CTS-V. For a sports car, in the GM
line, the real deal Corvette.
Loren
Meade
Thanks! :mad:
The Cobalt is often cross-shopped with Mercedes-Benz and Cadillac products. :P
That does seem like a long time to get a part though.
Hey, don't think that's necessarily a joke! I needed a set of plug wires for my '92 Protege once, and my service writer, finding that the parts department was out of them, disappeared and came back with a set in his hands from a new Protege out on the lot. "We'll warranty that one," he said with a chuckle as he popped my hood and installed them himself.
Meade
2- If you can get the part off of the car that you need to replace you may be able to get the new part yourself. Find the part number on the damaged part - all GM parts have numbers on them somewhere. Go to GMpartsdirect.com and see if they have your part. They are usually cheap and ship quickly.
Do you need the whole mirror assembly? The inserts may be a piece that you could pop out and use on the new mirror?
Just some thoughts.
a)The gas mileage wasn't what I had hoped
b)The breaks/rotors seemed to wear out WAY too quickly.
So how are the brakes and rotors :confuse: on the Cobalts?
I don't own a Cobalt myself, but I read Edmunds' long term test on an LT sedan recently. They stated that they are only averaging 24.9 mpg with their test car. That's certainly not as good as I would expect from a compact sedan. This also rules the car out for me now.
Ron M.
My Focus ZX3 is getting a little long in the tooth in comparison. Once the top of its class in NVH (noise vibration harshness) it is now surpassed by the Mazda3 and, yes, even the Cobalt. I thought the Cobalt also handled better than the S trim level of Focus which I have (which is bereft of rear sway bar); so there is an ironic advantage to having a twist bear rear axle which sort of acts like an anti-sway bar, although reviewers view twist beams as a primitive set-up compared to the newer multilink designs on the ZX3, Mazda3 and new Honda Civic. Note that I am not comparing "at the limit" cornering, just typical on ramp grip and feel; and the Cobalt may benefit from a lower center of gravity, as well (you sit lower in it).
I am now thinking that if I can get a quiet enough small car (because small cars are generally better handling) I will be better off than moving up to a Malibu or Fusion or Five Hundred. We have a second vehicle which can be used for hauling and road trips, so I am re-thinking my goals on my commuter car.
Don't laugh, but I am seriously thinking about getting a decibel meter to eliminate the subjective factor from my search for quietness....
Honestly, it's sad that the dealer you took it in to for diagnosis couldn't find the problem. The lesson is a better dealer could and did. The GM rep has his hands tied somewhat by the servicing dealer - they can't actuallly do the work for that dealer, and they can't tell you to take it to another.
I hope they were nice with you on the buyback. GM tries hard, in my experience, but when they drop the ball, their customers tend to be VERY vocal. Consider Toyota and their many sludged engines and initial efforts to blame their customers - I have seen very little in the way of persistent venom from affected owners. I agree that Toyota and Honda are better, but in my experience, not by much, and I have had bad Toyota and Honda dealer service departments as well as good (and bad) domestic departments.
The one arena in which I won't argue with you, is that Toyota and Honda REALLY hold their value...in part due to the "cone of silence" and aura of invincibility. Their problems (like failing automatic tranny's ) get buried, everything GM./Ford/Chrysler does wrong keeps reverberating in user groups.
I can't see how the GM rep's hands were tied. He looked the car over and couldn't find anything wrong with it. Although, I did not talk to him. They test drove the car a whole nine miles which is barely enough time for the AC to cool off the car here in Central Florida. The dealership told me that I just had to realize that I couldn't have my AC on high. Its 95 degrees w/99% humidity and I can't use my AC on high? Give me a break!
I do plan on filing a complaint agaist the dealership and GM to our State Attorney's office. How can anybody trust GM's final repair attempt? Obviously he isn't trying to find any problems. He works for GM. And it was like pulling teeth to get my money back. They even tried to keep my sales tax. I told the woman "when I buy my Toyota I'll have to pay them the sales tax". She said that GM was not prepared to offer me my sales tax back. I told her to call me when they were. I was prepared to go to arbitration. I knew I would win.
I'm starting to ramble. But the whole experience has been a horrible one. And I could rant on and on.
A good friend of mine bought one of the first '04 Ford F-150s to roll off the line. Over the first year of ownership, it was taken to three different dealers for a total of 16 repair attempts and an accumulated 48 days out of service. The biggest problems were a persistent vibration from the rear-end at highway speeds and an intermittent slipping in the transmission.
I started investigating the lemon law in our state and began the letter writing process. One of the service departments had indicated on a repair order that the rear-end problem had been seen in numerous '04 F-150s.
After four letters, one final repair attempt and about another 45 days, he finally received the letter from Ford to either request buy back or a suitable replacement vehicle.
Long story short, the '04 had 18k miles and he paid a penalty of $837 for that. In return, he got an '05 identically equipped with the addition of power passenger seat and power moonroof. Great deal in my opinion. They handled it very well.
I lost $1200.00 on my deal. They offered me a new car but I would have had to pay them an additional $1700.00. I refused to do that. I only had 4800 miles on my car and they charged me $550.00 for the use of my car. The additional money was a rebate that I got when I bought it. I felt that they should have given me a brand new car at no charge. What other product do you buy charges you a usage charge when the product is obviously defective? None comes to my mind.
Yes, we all need to support the Lemon Law but I think they need to be revised in favor of the consumer. Its kind of like the criminals have all the rights in our "justice" system. Manufacturers don't lose anything when they sell a defective product. They are just going to turn around and sell the lemon at a salvage auction and still make money on it!
I'll go because I feel another rant coming on.
Given GM did give you your money back, bad mouthing them and saying you will never buy again seems to make you look like the bad guy now. Just something to consider. You had a lemon, there is nothing wrong with the Cobalt in general.
The repurchase experience through GM was the worst customer service I've ever experienced as a consumer. For one thing, it took them nearly TWO MONTHS to complete the paperwork on my exchange - from November 17 until January 10th (dealer had the replacement car there in two days -and they were PO'd at GM because they had to carry it on their books all that time/past the end of the year). I was originally told "mid-December".
As time went by, and no news or apparent action by mid-December, I kept calling and calling my Executive Relations contact, and not getting callbacks. Finally heard from the individual responsible for my repurchase. He was completely incompetent (never called me, just faxed me a repurchase agreement - only got two of the three pages, and confidential personal info was left on our corporate fax machine for other employees to see). He needed copies of the title, registration, et. al., I faxed it to him, he called me two days later and asked me to re-fax the items. Told me a specific date (January 3rd), then the next time he called it was the 5th, then the 10th - and I jumped through all of the hoops and immediately got them everything they needed, but they could never give me an explanation of why these dates kept slipping.
Went to sign the paperwork on the car on January 10th, and they had forgotten the GMAC loan substitution paperwork - even if I had wanted to leave the dealership with the car that night (I didn't, it was going into storage), I couldn't. Finally got the paperwork and picked it up a couple of days later (flatbed into storage). In mid-February the dealership called me - could I and my wife come in and re-sign the paperwork? GM had lost it.
I don't wish my experience on anyone - buying a new car should be an exciting experience, not a frustrating 4 1/2 month battle royale like mine was. Fortunately my replacement car has been pretty solid, so that helps soothe the wounds. But frankly, I highly doubt I'm purchasing GM again - certainly not new (and I'm a GM Cardholder and get my mother-in-law's employee discount, too, so that says something).
--Robert
They think there is a manufacturing issue with the sun roof, I'm pressing the dealer to take this car back and I'll move on to something else, Oh yeah, I only have 1500 miles on the car!
Any thoughts?
As for the Corolla being a good car, my '98 was reliable, and inexpensive to own -- no real money paid out after warranty. It was like the Eveready Bunny. That is until I sold it and it was totalled out within a couple weeks of the next owner having it.
Don't have any idea how good or bad a Cobalt is build wise. It looks stats wise like plenty of HP for the money if bought somewhere in the $14-15K range, the price seems
OK.
Loren